BYRON D. FRUEHLING AND ROBERT H. SMITH
Subterranean Hideaways of the
Underground Railroad
in Ohio: An
Architectural,
Archaeological and
Historical Critique
of Local Traditions
During the decade that preceded the
Civil War the underground railroad be-
came increasingly active in Ohio and
elsewhere in the north.1 Although
"underground" originally may
have had much the same figurative connotation
that it has today in expressions such as
"underground newspaper," it was al-
most inevitable that the term come to
suggest in popular imagination not so
much anti-establishment concepts and
practices as activity that took place in
tunnels and subterranean places of
concealment. Oral traditions about the un-
derground railroad frequently allude to
places of concealment allegedly con-
structed by abolitionists for the use of
fleeing slaves who were making their
way toward Canada. From the time of
Wilbur H. Siebert, whose pioneering
research involved heavy reliance upon
such information,2 to the present time,
popularizers and no few historians of
the underground railroad have tended to
accept personal reminiscences about
specially-constructed secret chambers and
escape tunnels largely at face value.
Examples of this reliance on anecdotes
recorded years later, some supplied
by participants and others by persons
who relied on hearsay, are abundant.
Among Siebert's extensive compilations
one finds the statement that Joseph
Morris of Marion County installed
partitions in both the attic and the cellar
of his home in order to provide
"secret chambers for his swarthy guests."
Siebert goes on to say, largely on the
basis of statements he found in a local
newspaper article, that
Byron D. Fruehling is a graduate student
at the University of Akron. Robert H. Smith is Fox
Professor and Chair of the Program in
Archaeology at The College of Wooster. The authors
wish to thank Larry Gara for reading an
early draft of this paper and making helpful
suggestions, as well as Dennis
Monbarren, Denise Monbarren, and Ethel M. Parker of Wooster
for their assistance in tracking down
certain items of information.
1. For general orientation and a recent,
concise bibliography, see Charles L. Blockson, The
Underground Railroad (New York, 1987).
2. Siebert's most important, and still
influential, work is The Underground Railroad from
Slavery to Freedom (New York, 1898).
Subterranean Hideaways
99
the garret was a carefully constructed
labyrinth and . . . the cellar had two secret
rooms, each capable of serving as a
secure hiding-place for a dozen refugees.
These rooms were hidden by large
cupboards fastened to their doors. From the cel-
lar two tunnels led out, one to the barn
and the other to the corn-crib. These pas-
sages were concealed in the same manner
as the secret chambers and afforded safe
egress from the house when it was
surrounded by slave-hunters. It is said that in
several instances Negroes made good
their escape while their owners were on guard
outside the house.3
Half a century later historian Ralph
Watts cited, apparently on the basis of
the recollections of an elderly Mrs.
Kent around the turn of the century, inci-
dents in the life of Udney Hyde of Brown
County, who was reputed to have
gone to great effort to construct
concealed places for fugitive slaves. Having
built a new home, he dug a basement
under the cabin that he had previously
occupied, throwing the soil into an old
well to escape suspicion; he then cov-
ered the trapdoor entrance with wheat,
"so that when anyone approached
whose mission was unwonted, some of the
family would be busily engaged
in flailing grain."4 In
addition, we are told, Hyde concealed fugitives in a
well near his livery barn. "He had
a platform placed in the well, which was
an excavation some six or seven feet in
diameter, on which the negroes could
stand during the day, waiting to be sent
farther on their trip to Canada when
darkness came."5 Watts
narrates other stories about the deceptions carried out
by this determined abolitionist, through
whose underground railroad station
eventually passed, by Hyde's count, an
astounding five hundred seventeen
fugitives.6 More recently
Burke and Bensch have passed on the tradition--as
they label it-that in Hocking County
"there was a tunnel under [Hanes']
mill through which many slaves passed to
freedom. Among residences in
Mount Pleasant which were known to have
hiding places for runaway slaves
was Quaker Hill."7 Blockson
cites traditions about the resourceful abolition-
3. Wilbur H. Siebert, "A Quaker
Section of the Underground Railroad in Northern Ohio,"
Ohio Archaeological and Historical
Publications, 39 (1930), 486-87.
4. Ralph M. Watts, "History of the
Underground Railroad in Mechanicsburg," Ohio
Archaeological and Historical
Quarterly, 43 (July, 1934), 216.
Details about concealed
entrances were, understandably, a
stock-in-trade of traditions about hiding places under floors.
An account of the method employed by
John Harvey in his home near Savannah in Ashland
County relates that Harvey, having
hidden slaves beneath the floor, replaced the floor boards
and had his wife sit atop them in a
rocking chair while slave hunters searched in vain for the
fugitives (News Journal [Mansfield,
Ohio], Sunday, May 19, 1988). Blockson in The
Underground Railroad, 249, relates an almost identical tale about
abolitionist William
Smallwood in upstate New York. Siebert
records that an abolitionist near Delaware, Ohio, hid
a female slave and her three children
under the floor of his barn, then spread harvested wheat
stalks on the floor and set his horses
to tramping out the grain to muffle any noise that the
children might make (The Underground
Railroad, 499); a similar story about an episode in
southern Indiana is narrated in William
Monroe Cockrum, History of the Underground Railroad
(Oakland City, Indiana, 1915), 71.
5. Watts, op. cit., 220.
6. Ibid., 219.
7. James L. Burke and Donald E. Bensch,
"Mount Pleasant and the Early Quakers of
100 OHIO
HISTORY
ists in Ashtabula County, one of whom
was Col. William Hubbard, who
built a tunnel for escaping slaves that
allegedly led from his barn to the shore
of Lake Erie.8
The primary emphasis in these and many
other traditions that have been
transmitted is on the clever deception
of opponents and the large numbers of
fugitives that had been assisted.
Persons who had no direct knowledge were
often eager to attribute to abolitionists'
houses a specialized function in this
romanticized picture of the underground
railroad. Indeed, with the passage of
time almost any venerable house, even if
constructed after the Civil War or
owned by a person with no known
abolitionist associations, could be included
in the mystique of the underground
railroad.
The folkloristic elements in many of the
stories are patent. Larry Gara,
who is among the few historians who have
evaluated critically the data per-
taining to the underground railroad, has
pointed in The Liberty Line to the
tendentious features that exist in some
of the oral traditions, as well as to the
inconsistencies between anecdotal
material and available statistics pertaining
to the migration of slaves. He is aware
of the tendency for anecdotes to be at-
tached to the homes of well-known
abolitionists, and argues convincingly
that far fewer abolitionists actually
gave refuge to fleeing slaves than they
later claimed. "Each local
story," he insists, "should be investigated, the ba-
sis for the tradition [be] examined, and
the sources [be] evaluated,"9 though
he gives little indication as to how
such investigation should be carried out.
Gara's own judgment, based chiefly on a
rational critique of the data rather
than field investigations, is that many
of the places that local tradition de-
clares to have been constructed for the
concealment of fugitive slaves were
simply storage places, cisterns, air
shafts or other commonplace features of
American life in the mid-19th century.10
Clearly one of the methods of evaluating
traditions about secret compart-
ments or tunnels constructed
specifically to assist fugitive slaves is on-site
Ohio," Ohio History, 83
(Autumn, 1974), 245-46.
8. Charles L. Blockson, The
Underground Railroad, 211. Blockson does not stress the
question of the historical accuracy of the accounts of
concealed chambers which he cites. In
his "Escape from Slavery: The
Underground Railroad," National Geographic Magazine, 166
(July-December, 1984), 25, a photograph
shows a sliding shelf beside the stairway in the home
of the Alexander Dobbin (now a
restaurant) in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, which slides back to
reveal a crawl-space which the caption
says is "large enough to hide several adults"--wording
that implies that the space was, in
fact, designed for that purpose and presumably was so used.
Other photographs in the article show
Joseph Goodrich's inn in Milton, Wisconsin, constructed
ca. 1835-1845, which has a tunnel in its basement that
leads to the cellar of a log cabin forty
feet distant (ibid., 22-23); the caption
states that "if any customers were slave catchers, the
fugitives resting and eating in his
basement could exit to the cabin and follow creek beds and
lakes north to Canada."
9. Larry Gara, The Liberty Line: The
Legend of the Underground Railroad (Lexington,
1961), 192.
10. Ibid., 11. See also his "The
Underground Railroad: A Re-evaluation," Ohio Historical
Quarterly, 69 (July, 1960), 218.
102 OHIO
HISTORY
investigation. At the time Gara wrote,
scarcely any houses had been sub-
jected to architectural, much less
archaeological, investigation. In the subse-
quent decades the few investigations
that have been carried out, mostly outside
Ohio, have produced generally negative
results. A case in point is the
William Tallman House in Rock County,
Wisconsin, constructed in 1855-
1857. Although Blockson describes this
house as probably the most impor-
tant underground railroad station in
Wisconsin, "specifically built to accom-
modate the movement of fugitive
slaves,"11 Iva Herzfeldt, site manager of
the Tallman Restorations, points out
that no evidence exists that would sup-
port such an assertion, or that would
demonstrate that the house was a station
of the underground railroad.12 A
stairway ascending from a second-story
closet to the roof, claimed to have been
designed as a secret passageway for
use by fugitive slaves, appears to have
served the more prosaic function of
providing access to the gutters for
purposes of cleaning; large containers in
which the water from the roof was
collected are, in fact, still extant in the at-
tic. A tradition about an escape tunnel
from the cellar may have originated
with a drainage pipe, too small for a
person to crawl through, that runs from
the house to the Rock River.13
However desirable the examination of
actual sites may be, one cannot in-
vestigate all of the hundreds of such
claims; selectivity is required. True, ran-
dom sampling would be impractical, but
the investigation of a group of such
houses situated within a coherent,
limited geographical region is feasible.
The determination of a suitable part of
the state for investigation was carried
out primarily with the aid of Siebert's
map14 and Galbreath's list of under-
ground railroad stations.15 The
area selected comprised Ashland, Wayne and
Holmes Counties in northeastern Ohio,
through which ran two of the under-
ground railroad routes from the Ohio
River to Lake Erie (Fig. 1). One route
11. Blockson, The Underground
Railroad, 194, who describes the Tallman House as having
"hiding places in both the basement
and the attic and a special lookout on the roof.... When
fugitives approached the house, a bell
was rung to alert the servants and then a signal was
given to the fugitives from a large
stained-glass window. When the slaves saw the dim light,
they proceeded to enter the cellar door
that was always left open. The ingenious Tallman led
his charges through a secret stairway in
the maid's closet and finally through an underground
tunnel, which led to the Rock River,
where an Underground Railroad agent took them by
riverboat to Milton."
12. Telephone interview with Iva
Herzfeldt, April, 1991; see Debra Jensen-De Hart,
"Uncovering the Secret of
Slaves," Janesville Gazette, March 31, 1991. The structure of the
Tallman House was investigated when a
restoration was carried out some years ago.
13. Allegations of concealed chambers
and tunnels of the underground railroad are abun-
dant throughout the Northern states.
Sometimes undocumented claims are given credence by
leading periodicals, such as the United
Press release in the Christian Science Monitor on May
23, 1979, asserting that a city work
crew in Erie, Pennsylvania, had uncovered a brick-lined
tunnel four feet in diameter lying
twelve feet below the surface that had been used by runaway
slaves. Ken Pfirman, Archivist of the
Erie Historical Museum, notes that the tunnel proved to
be an early storm sewer (telephone
interview, August 8, 1991).
14. Siebert, The Underground
Railroad, map facing p. 113.
15. Charles B. Galbreath, History of
Ohio, vol. II (Chicago and New York, 1925), 215.
Subterranean Hideaways
103
passed through Coshocton, Millersburg,
Holmes (Holmesville), Wooster,
Seville and Oberlin, before bifurcating
to Sandusky or Cleveland. Another
ran about twenty miles farther west,
passing through Mount Vernon,
Loudonville, McKay, Hayesville, Ashland
and Savannah, then on to
Oberlin.16 Numerous houses
along these routes in the three counties have
traditions of subterranean chambers or
tunnels. Regrettably, some of the
houses have been so extensively altered
that relevant original features are not
visible, and occasionally the owner's
permission for on-site inspection could
not be secured. Even with these
limitations more than a dozen houses were
investigated, yielding significant
information.17
1. The Keifer Croco House
The Croco House constitutes a prime
instance of underground railroad leg-
end intertwined with history. Keifer
Croco was the descendant of an aristo-
cratic Polish family who took their
patronym after Krakow, the city from
which they migrated to the New World.18
Keifer's grandfather, Peter, came
to America as a Hessian with the British
army during the Revolutionary War,
but defected to the colonists' side. His
son, Peter Jr., settled in Holmes
County in 1813, and later served as a
district judge in Ohio.19 The house is
located on a bluff above Salt Creek,
approximately one mile northwest of
Holmesville on State Route 83.
Constructed of red brick with a sandstone
foundation, it is a nearly square
structure in Italianate style, and retains its
original widow's walk and cupola.
Investigation by the current owners places
the construction ca. 1851,20 well
within the most active period of the under-
ground railroad. The only major
alteration to the house was the addition of a
first-story kitchen in 1873.
16. The route from Loudonville to
Savannah is inferred from locations on a map in the Ruth
Satterfield Underground Railroad
Collection in The Ashland Historical Society.
The
Satterfield Collection also includes a
tabular sheet of the sites that appear on the map, as well
as color slides of those structures that
were extant in the late 1950s. See also Betty Plank,
Historical Ashland County (Ashland: The Endowment Committee of the Ashland
Historical
Society, 1987), 287.
17. Because of the very nature of oral
tradition, a complete and authoritative list of houses
having alleged places of concealment
related to the underground railroad cannot be compiled,
but the authors believe that they have
considered the major alleged sites in the tri-county area.
18. The family name is pronounced as if
it were spelled Crocko, and in fact appears with
that orthography in some old documents
and in Siebert's publications. The first name appears
in the more orthographically correct
form Kieffer in some early records.
19. Roy Stallman, "Croco
History," in Holmes County to 1985 (Salem, W. Va.: Holmes
County History Book Committee, 1985),
31; Rosanna Painter, "Old Buildings, Croco Home," in
ibid., 251.
20. Interview with owner Rod Stefano,
January, 1991.
104 OHIO HISTORY |
|
Siebert includes Peter's sons, Keifer and John, in his list of those who op- erated an underground railroad station.21 Other sources provide a few anecdo- tal details. Keifer, the leader of the station, is alleged to have taken escaping slaves across the road to his brother's farmstead when he could accommodate no more persons, and the Croco brothers were said to have been involved in a skirmish with slave hunters outside Keifer's house.22 Charles Crawford, a Croco descendant, is quoted in a newspaper account as stating that the house was equipped to accommodate slaves in the attic, reached through a trapdoor in the ceiling of a second-story room, the entrance being concealed by the use of matched boards.23 That statement is, however, erroneous, for the second story proved upon examination to contain an ordinary staircase giving access to the attic, from which a ladder leads to the cupola and widow's walk. The attic was never floored. The second floor itself contains no concealed spaces, and there is no evidence of significant alterations to the second story and attic of the house since their construction. One newspaper account alludes to rumors about tunnels constructed beneath the house to facilitate the escape of slaves from bounty hunters. The pas- sages allegedly led from the basement to "caves on the estate," but subse-
21. Siebert, The Underground Railroad, 423. 22. Ed McGraw, "Runaway Slaves Found Haven," New Philadelphia-Dover Times- Reporter, Holmes County edition, ca. 1980-85; Francy Howland, "Writer Traces Slave Underground Railway in Holmes, Wayne Counties," The Daily Record (Wooster, Ohio), ca. 1950-55. 23. Howland, op. cit. |
Subterranean Hideaways 105
quently "the basement was sealed
off and the passages have now been filled
in, as have any tunnels to the
caves."24 Just how, if at all, "passages" dif-
fered from "tunnels" is not
explained. Local residents interviewed for this in-
vestigation offered a number of versions
of this tradition, variously claiming
that a tunnel led some 200 yards
northeast from Keifer Croco's house to that
of his brother, or ran a short distance
southward from the house to Salt Creek
where slaves could follow the stream
into a swamp, or even extended as far
north as another reputed underground
railroad station situated some two miles
away. One local informant stated that
when he was a boy of ten or eleven he
had entered a tunnel from the basement
of the house, but that the entrance had
subsequently been sealed up. Upon
examination, however, the stone founda-
tion of the house which forms the
basement walls proved to be both original
and solid, with no possibility that an
entryway to a tunnel ever existed.
It is clear from this evidence that even
though the Croco House may have
been a station of the underground
railroad, no architectural constructions in-
tended specifically to conceal slaves or
assist their flight were incorporated
into any part of the structure, either
at the time of its construction or subse-
quently.
2. The James Lawson House
This house is located on Townline Road
(formerly Noble Road), three
miles west of Savanah in Clearcreek
Township, which had been settled by
Scotch Presbyterians and was a center of
abolitionist sentiment. Although
James Lawson's brother John is listed by
Siebert among the abolitionists in
Ashland County, little is known about
James himself; nevertheless, an oral
tradition arose regarding the use of his
house in connection with the under-
ground railroad. Ruth Satterfield, who
in the late 1950s gathered traditions
about abolitionists and underground
railroad stations in Ashland County,
states that "a trapdoor from the
kitchen led to a dungeon in basement."25 A
chamber does exist, located, as
Satterfield notes, in the northeast corner of the
house beneath the kitchen, two of its
stone walls being those of the founda-
tion of the house.
The structure is clearly a cistern, an
installation that is by no means rare in
19th--and even early 20th-century houses
in Ohio. The interior is lined with
eight-inch-thick brick that has coats of
plaster totalling an inch in thickness.
24. Cathy Wogan, "Underground
Railroad House," The Holmes County Farmer-Hub, Oct-
ober 22, 1981, 1-2.
25. Tabular sheet in the Satterfield
Collection, which identifies each building (whether
extant or not) by the abolitionist
owner's name, the location of the building, any place of
concealment or "peculiarity"
in the structure, the ancestry of the owner, and the names of
subsequent owners, including the owner
as of February, 1960. "Dungeon" is Satterfield's
idiosyncratic term for a chamber without
doors or windows.
106 OHIO HISTORY
A hole near the top of one of the
outside walls presumably once accommo-
dated a pipe that brought rain water
from the roof. The floor has three dis-
cernable layers of plaster above a stone
or mortar base, and was found covered
with an inch or two of fine sediment,
above which lay scattered pieces of
wood and plaster debris; the outlet
drain, if any, was not evident. This cistern
retains its original trapdoor, an
opening 18 3/4 by 16 1/4 inches which had
been sealed from above when the kitchen
was later renovated but which oth-
erwise appears to be intact. Attached to
the frame is a rectangular wooden
chute 20 1/2 inches deep that may have
prevented ascending buckets from
bumping the trapdoor frame and spilling
their contents. Any inference that
this commonplace domestic installation
was constructed with the concealment
of fugitive slaves in mind is out of the
question, and there is no reason to
suppose that it was secondarily used for
such a purpose.
3. The Jane Forbes House
This house fronts Ashland County Road
686 (also known as Old County
Road 10A) some two miles northeast of
the James Lawson House. The
large, two-story white frame structure
stands on a slight rise in the fields,
one-half mile west of the Vermillion
River. The architectural style suggests
a date in the mid-19th century.
Satterfield states that the house had "a dun-
geon with a trapdoor from the
kitchen."26 Interviews with several longtime
residents in the area also brought to
light not only the familiar rumor that
there was a tunnel that led from the
house to the river, but also the tradition
that a cup tied to a string could be
sent down through the tunnel to the river
and be pulled back containing fresh
water.27
Upon investigation the house did prove
to have a doorless, windowless
chamber with exterior dimensions of
approximately 12 by 8 feet, projecting
from the north wall of the rectangular
one-room basement. The walls of the
chamber vary somewhat in thickness and,
like those of the foundation walls
of the basement, in composition. An
opening crudely cut into one of the
walls to accommodate a heating duct to
the present kitchen facilitated inspec-
tion of the interior. White plaster is
visible on all of the walls and the floor,
making the masonry smooth and
watertight. It thus immediately becomes
apparent that the chamber is nothing
more than a disused cistern analogous to
that in the Lawson House. An eight-inch
circular opening near the top of the
west wall contains the remnant of a
metal pipe, presumably one that chan-
neled water from the roof. Embedded in
the floor is a one-inch drain pipe,
toward which the floor gently slopes.
The bottom of the cistern was found
26. Tabular sheet, Satterfield
Collection.
27. Interviews with Jed Troxel, Stanley
Hissong, Dale Ramsey and Larry Bittinger in
February and March, 1991.
Subterranean Hideaways 107
covered with four inches of fine
sediment that had accumulated during the fi-
nal years of its use, on top of which
was debris from the duct installation and
a rebuilding of the floor of the chamber
above. Although the latter is now a
bathroom, it originally may have been
the kitchen, since the present kitchen
is an addition to the house. The
tradition that a cup lowered on a string could
be brought up filled with water is thus
readily explained. No evidence of a
trapdoor has survived, for the floor of
the room above the cistern has framing
that was put into place when the modern
bathroom was installed.
The tunnel that local informants
recalled as running from the basement of
the Forbes house to the Vermillion River
did not exist. Although the founda-
tion of the house is not entirely
uniform, there are neither openings nor sealed
entrances anywhere in the walls. The
house therefore has no physical features
that can be associated with the
underground railroad.
4. The Ezra Garrett House
The Garrett farmhouse is at the north
edge of Savannah, seventy-five yards
west of State Route 250. A one and
one-half story frame structure, the house
is small by comparison with the other
buildings discussed here. Despite its
modest appearance, it has been featured
frequently in histories and popular ac-
counts about the underground railroad in
northern Ohio. Siebert identifies
Garrett, who was a farmer of modest
means, as an abolitionist,28 and the
house is at the head of Satterfield's
list of Ashland County underground rail-
road stations. Garrett is credited with
transporting four to five hundred slaves
during a thirteen-year period prior to
the commencement of the Civil War.29
Published accounts30 and
local informants refer to Garrett's use of places of
concealment and escape tunnels for
fugitives. Satterfield comments about the
house with her formulaic phrase
"dungeon in basement with entrance from
room above by trapdoor," but also
adds, "tunnels to the spring in ravine and
to wagon shed." Dale Ramsey, a
local man who grew up near the Garrett
House, alleges that when he was a boy he
went down a trapdoor in the house
which gave access to a tunnel that he
followed for 200 feet in a westerly direc-
tion, and Connie Huff, a woman who was a
resident in the house in the
1940s, reports that as a youngster she
and her brother opened a trapdoor in the
floor, three feet from the northwest
corner of the main floor of the house, and
28. Siebert, The Underground
Railroad, 416.
29. Article in the News Journal (Mansfield,
Ohio), May 29, 1988. Both Emma and Martha
Garrett, Ezra's daughters, are said to
have vouched for the information given in the article
concerning their father's abolitionist
activities (William A. Duff, History of North Central Ohio
[Topeka, 1931], vol I, 180). That
Garrett assisted as many as four or five hundred slaves may,
however, be questioned.
30. Plank, Historic Ashland County, 287.
108 OHIO HISTORY
peered into a void.31 Perhaps
significantly, however, Emma Garrett's recol-
lections of the activities of her father
and other abolitionists make no mention
of either tunnels or concealed chambers.32
No trapdoor is presently visible
anywhere in the first story of the house,
where all of the flooring appears to be
original. The basement is a rectangu-
lar room with walls constructed of
large, well-trimmed stones laid with a
minimum of mortar. The ceiling is
somewhat more than six-feet high and
has large, handsawn joists, some of
which still partially retain bark. There is
only one modern and no original openings
in the walls, nor is there evidence
that any ever existed. There is,
however, a doorless, windowless space in the
basement which may have served as the
basis for Satterfield's notation about
a dungeon. Measuring 8 1/2 by 18 feet in
length, it extends along the entire
north end of the house.33 It
is separated from the rest of the basement by a
double brick wall, reported by Huff to
be intact at the time that she lived there
in the late 1940s, partly removed by the
time Satterfield made a photograph a
decade later,34 and now
largely dismantled. There is no evidence of a trapdoor
anywhere in the basement ceiling.
The compartment was filled with soil to
about half its height, with only a
crawl space left below the joists.
Because the soil might contain useful in-
formation, or even conceal the entrance
to a tunnel, two archaeological test
pits were excavated on the west side of
the enclosure, where informant
Ramsey had allegedly entered a tunnel.
No opening of any kind was encoun-
tered. Significantly, however, these
pits revealed that inside this chamber the
foundation walls become much shallower
toward the north end of the house,
and that the virgin soil had never been
excavated to the floor level of the
basement. Some occupational debris was
present in the soil above the foun-
dation level. The sounding in the
northwest corner yielded pieces of wood
which appeared to be construction
detritus, along with chunks of charred wood
(some of it wet from dampness coming
into the basement), compacted grav-
elly, grayish-brown soil containing
flecks of charcoal, and a shard of blown
glass. The other pit, dug at the
southwest corner of the chamber, produced
fragments of cattle and fowl bones,
shards from several different kinds of
household dishes, and a corroded 1845
Liberty penny.
Although it is initially tempting to see
these artifacts as evidences of hu-
man occupation, and to hypothesize that
the occupants were, as tradition
would have it, fugitive slaves, the
evidence actually points in quite a different
direction. Since this portion of the
basement was left partly unexcavated by
31. Interviews with Dale Ramsey and
Connie Huff in March, 1991.
32. See note 29.
33. If Ramsey's recollection has any
basis in fact, it may be that what he did was to traverse
the length of this narrow enclosure. To
a small boy, an eighteen-foot length of crawl space
might well later be recalled as a long
tunnel.
34. The photograph is in the Satterfield
Collection.
Subterranean Hideaways 109
the builders, it is clear that there
never was a habitable chamber here at all.
Evidently workmen had tossed both soil
and refuse, some of it from work-
men's cooking fires and meals and some
from the construction of the flooring
of the house, into this space. The brick
crosswall forming the south side of
the enclosure presumably was installed
during the construction of the house
to prevent slippage of the unexcavated
soil, as well as to block off the unex-
cavated area from the rest of the
basement. It is clear, then, that this con-
struction was not carried out for the
purpose of providing a place for conceal-
ing slaves; if such had been the case,
the space would have been made more
tolerable for occupants.
5. The Dienes House
This house, so identified by virtue of
its present ownership, is located di-
rectly between the Forbes and Garrett
Houses in Ashland County. A local
teenager alleged in interview that the
basement gives access to a tunnel
through which she had walked as a child
of about six, ca. 1978-80. The in-
formant stated that she traversed the
tunnel for about two miles until it came
to a dead end at a concrete wall.35
Upon inspection the house proved to have
a basement divided into two sections,
one of which, at the bottom of the
basement stairs, is a roughly square
room with foundation walls of field
stones; the other, linked with the first
by a doorway, is L-shaped, ending in a
modern cinderblock wall-presumably the
wall that the child saw. Because
the house stands on a small rise, no
tunnel could have extended from the
basement in any direction.
6. The Augustus A. Taylor House
Loudonville, in southern Ashland County,
is the location of the Taylor res-
idence, which at present is a restaurant
called Mohican Manor. The fine brick
structure, which perches on a hillside
at 105 North Mount Vernon Avenue,
was constructed in Italianate style in
1851,36 and is architecturally similar to
the Croco House. It was built for the
prosperous founder of several regional
mills that produced Taylor's Best Flour.37
Underground railroad documenta-
tion of this house is scarce, yet
Loudonville residents have heard about a con-
cealed basement chamber or tunnels on
the premises. One tradition avers that
a tunnel from this chamber led eastward
under the road and emerged in the
basement of a house several blocks away,
while another claims that a passage
35. Interview with the daughter of
Clarence Mosely, February, 1991.
36. Interview with owner Bonnie Bright,
March, 1991.
37. One of the mills still exists in
Loudonville under the name of the Conagra Mill.
110 OHIO HISTORY
linked the residence with its large
carriage house (still extant at the rear of the
property, though not of the same age as
the house).38
The basement of the residence contains a
walled-off space 41 feet 2 inches
long by 4 feet 8 inches wide (interior
measurements) extending across the en-
tire north end. The wall that sets this
"chamber" apart from the rest of the
basement is a massive 21 inches thick,
and was constructed in the same style
of masonry as the foundation walls; it
bonds with the east and west walls, and
thus it is unquestionably a part of the
house as originally built. Although all
of the interior faces of the walls of
the basement room are dressed and plas-
tered, those of the walls that enclose
the narrow compartment consist of un-
hewn field and river stones laid with
minimal mortar and unplastered. A 23
by 14 inch decorative iron ventilation
grill is located near the center of the
separation wall just below the joists,
and affords access from the basement
room. The north foundation wall of the
house has two blocked-up decorative
iron grills just below the joists, which
at one time provided outside ventila-
tion. Two heating ducts, additions that
probably were made when the house
was renovated in the last quarter of the
nineteenth century,39 begin at the fur-
nace in the basement room, cross the
compartment just below the joists, and
turn upward through the floor into the
parlors above.
As in the Garrett House, the soil level
in this space is high, leaving a fairly
uniform crawl space of about three feet.
The uppermost soil layer proved
upon examination to be extremely rubbly,
containing many stones resem-
bling those in the walls, though
generally smaller. On the surface, directly
below the ducts, were remnants of sawn
and hacked wood, representing con-
struction debris from the cutting of the
flooring during installation of the
ducts. Several objects lay near the
midpoint of the long enclosure, not far
from the access grill: a tobacco pouch,
a button of porcelain and metal, a pair
of trousers with a burlap rope belt
lying beside them, and a deteriorated leather
shoe sole. A foot away from this
assortment, but six inches below the sur-
face, a well-preserved 1857 Flying Eagle
penny was reportedly discovered by
one of the owners using a metal
detector.
The trousers proved to be the most
informative of these artifacts. They
were of sturdy cotton cloth,
machine-made but handsewn, much worn and of-
ten repaired. The original stitching
around the buttonholes of the fly was neat
and fine, the repairs much more
haphazard. Both knees had unrepaired tears.
Small clumps of mortar or plaster clung
to the pants in two places. The pos-
sibility that the trousers might have
been deposited relatively recently by an
Amish workman, of whom there are many in
the vicinity, could be excluded
38. Not surprisingly, the legend of
treasure has also been linked with the house. A former
owner's family, it is said, hacked holes
in the walls in their search for hidden gold.
39. The ornate iron floor grill in the
parlor above the duct is in a style contemporary with
the renovations made to the house prior
to 1900, which included the installation of new door
surrounds and stone mantles in the two
front parlors.
Subterranean Hideaways 111 |
|
at the outset by the presence of buttons and a metal clasp at the back of the waist, both of which are proscribed by Amish custom. Ellice Ronsheim, cu- rator of textiles at the Ohio Historical Society, examined the trousers and reported that they are work pants dating from 1850-1890.40 There is nothing about the other objects that would prevent them from being regarded as contemporary with the trousers. Although these artifacts might suggest some kind of temporary occupation of this space, and the worn state of the clothing further brings to mind indi- gent fugitive slaves, a less romantic explanation is more plausible. While the nature of the artifacts does not preclude a pre-Civil War date, any escaping slave who occupied the space for more than a very brief time would surely have removed some of the sharp stones and reshaped the soil of the crawl space into a more comfortable configuration for sitting and sleeping. The simplest explanation is that the trousers were discarded by a workman at the time of the installation of the furnace ducts. The other objects also probably were left either by the same workman or by others working on the project, who found the crawl space a convenient place for discards. The evidence, however, does not categorically exclude the possibility of a date of deposition contemporary with the construction of the house. A controlled excavation made at the southwestern corner of this area of the basement revealed that the foundation becomes much shallower at the west
40. Letter and telephone conversation with Ellice Ronsheim, March, 1991. |
112 OHIO HISTORY
end of the building, and that beneath a
layer of construction debris and rocky
earth lies virgin soil, much higher than
the floor level of the basement. The
foundation construction thus proved to
be virtually identical with that found
at the north end of the Garrett House.41
It can be seen that this crawl space
was never a habitable chamber at all,
much less one specifically designed to
accommodate slaves being transported via
the underground railroad. The
builder intended from the outset that a
portion of the space beneath the house,
where the foundation was built more
shallowly, remain unexcavated, and this
he isolated from the rest of the
basement at the time of construction.
Backfilling of above the virgin soil
during construction of the house probably
accounts for the presence of the Flying
Eagle penny-if indeed the house was
not constructed prior to 1857.
Once again, the examination of the
actual premises has not supported the
tradition that fugitive slaves were
given refuge in a specially-constructed
basement chamber. The lack of convincing
evidence tends to be corroborated
by the fact that Augustus Taylor does
not appear in Siebert's list of abolition-
ists,42 nor apparently in any
other early source.
7. The John Bebout House
This house, on Crum Road three miles
west of Savannah in Ashland
County, is alleged by Satterfield to
have had a "dungeon" measuring 15 x 18
feet, complete with a trap door.43 The
house burned about 1970. A former
resident who was interviewed stated that
the space was located beneath the
floor of the kitchen and back room and
was approximately three to five feet
high.44 The descriptions
collectively suggest that the chamber was either a
disused cistern like those in the Forbes
and Lawson Houses or a narrow foun-
dational compartment similar to the ones
in Garrett and Taylor Houses.
8. The Andrew Paxton House
This house, still standing a half-mile
southeast of Savannah on County
Road 191 in Ashland County, is said by
Satterfield to have had "a dungeon
room and tunnels leading to a ravine
west of [the] house."45 The current
41. Manifestly inaccurate, therefore, is
a drawing depicting this space in the Taylor House
as a floored chamber outfitted with
benches for the comfort of fugitive slaves, which historian-
artist Jim Baker presented in his
syndicated feature "As You Were" in Ohio newspapers on
February 2, 1979.
42. Siebert, The Underground
Railroad, 416.
43. Tabular sheet, Satterfield
Collection.
44. Interview with Robert Eby, February,
1991.
45. Tabular sheet, Satterfield
Collection.
Subterranean Hideaways 113
owner reported that the basement has a
separate area that is a crawl space,
which was closed off during remodelling.46
His description suggests that this
basement construction also was similar
to that of the Garrett and Taylor
Houses.
9. The Isaac Buchanan House
This early log house on State Route 545
at the first crossing southwest of
Savannah in Ashland County no longer
exists, but the current owner of the
property reaffirmed the story that the
cabin had served as an underground rail-
road station, as had a later house that
still stands to the east. Tradition places
a tunnel under the latter building.47
Visual inspection in a crawl space under
a modern addition to the latter building
revealed some small, unremarkable
construction anomalies, but nothing
suggesting a tunnel; an archaeological
excavation, impractical under present
circumstances, would be required in or-
der for the claim of a tunnel to be
investigated, but the prospects are not
promising.
10. The "Mayor's House"
This structure, named for its best-known
resident, William L. Long, Mayor
of Wooster during 1934-1939, is located
at 658 Pittsburgh Avenue in
Wooster (Wayne County). It is one
of several houses clustered in an old
area of the city where underground
railroad traditions have long existed.
Folklore attaches several claims to this
house, one of which is that a tunnel
led from the basement to the track of
the Pennsylvania Railroad, located only
75 feet to the north, so that fugitive
slaves could stow away on passing
trains. A more extravagant claim is that
a tunnel led from the house to the
Ohio Agricultural Research and
Development Center, situated three miles
away with an intervening valley, stream
and hills. Examination of county
maps revealed that this house was
constructed near the end of the 19th cen-
tury, as for that matter was the first
building of OARDC.
11. The Pittsburgh Avenue School
This old school in Wooster has been
razed, but a long-time employee
claims to have entered a basement tunnel
while the building yet stood, where
46. Interview with Warren Jordan,
February, 1991.
47. Interview with Clarence Mosley,
February, 1991. The log cabin is listed on the
Satterfield tabular sheet.
114 OHIO HISTORY
she saw what appeared to be makeshift
benches or beds dug into the walls of
the passageway. Although she did not
claim to have walked the length of
the tunnel, the informant stated that
the passage continued in a westerly direc-
tion toward the Jeffries House (no. 12).
One of two persons whom the in-
formant alleged could verify her
statement had, however, no recollection of
any tunnel, much less of having entered
one. If there was a tunnel of any
sort, it was not connected with the
underground railroad, since the building
was constructed in 1902.
12. The Jeffries and Pardee Houses
The Jeffries House, at 745 Pittsburgh
Avenue in Wooster, was built in
1843 by Judge John P. Jeffries, and has
long been rumored to have been an
underground railroad station with a
tunnel leading to another house, but Lola
Jeffries, daughter of Judge Jeffries,
emphatically stated in 1952 that her father
had nothing to do with the underground
railroad and that there was no tunnel
in the house.48 Interwoven in
local tradition with the Jeffries House was the
nearby Eugene Pardee House, a large
structure no longer extant that was situ-
ated about 100 feet north of Pittsburgh
Avenue, which was the home of a
19th-century Wooster attorney and strong
abolitionist.49 A red-brick barn or
carriage house associated with the
Pardee mansion still stands at 124 Massaro
Street, converted into a two-story
single-family dwelling. Local rumor al-
leges not only that the basement of this
structure was an underground railroad
station but also that Harriet Tubman
found refuge there. Some persons
whose property adjoins the converted
barn mention the existence of unex-
plained depressions in their lawns, as
if caused by a collapsed tunnel, and one
inhabitant reported that a clothesline
pole once abruptly sank into the ground.
Such cavities are not, however, unusual
in old urban areas and may represent
any number of phenomena having nothing
to do with escape tunnels.
Inspection of the basement revealed no
evidence of a tunnel or any sealed
openings in the walls.
13. The Watters House
This house, situated at 714 Pittsburgh
Avenue in Wooster, was alleged to
have contained two tunnels, one linking
the basement with that in another
48. E. H. Hauenstein, "Underground
Depots in Wayne Help Free Slaves," The Wooster
Daily Record, February 9, 1952.
49. Ibid. Pardee is perhaps identical
with the "Perdu" (no first name given) who appears in
Siebert's list of underground railroad
operators in Wayne County (The Underground Railroad,
430).
Subterranean Hideaways 115
house of the same street, and the other
extending toward the Pennsylvania
Railroad tracks. Listed among the
"Pioneer Homes" of the city and perhaps
constructed prior to 1860, the structure
no longer exists.
14. The "Ohio House"
This house, a former stagecoach tavern
located at Madison Avenue and
Spruce Street in Wooster, was alleged at
an early date as an underground rail-
road station. There is no documented
evidence of any tunnels or hidden
chambers in the building, which was
razed in the 1940s.
15. The John H. Kauke House
This now-razed residential building,
which stood on the northeast corner of
the intersection of Bowman Street and
Beall Avenue in Wooster, is rumored
to have had shackles in the basement to
keep slaves from wandering around
the town during daylight while waiting
to move to the next underground rail-
road station. The absurdity of the idea
that operators of stations would
shackle those whom they were helping to
liberate is patent. No secret rooms
or tunnels are documented. Historical
research has shown that the building
was, in fact, constructed after the
Civil War.
16. The Creston Antique House
This residence on State Route 3 at the
south edge Creston, Wayne County,
which has been used in recent years as
an antiques shop, is an alleged under-
ground railroad station. A former owner
of the shop stated in an interview
that there was a small tunnel leading
off from the basement in the direction of
a house located directly across the
street, and that his wife had fallen into a
hole in the yard that presumably was a
collapsed portion of the tunnel.50
Although the building may predate the
Civil War, the basement has been re-
modelled and the house across the street
no longer exists.
17. The Deer Lick Farmhouse
This house, located approximately two
miles southwest of Burbank at the
northern edge of Wayne County, is a
local favorite for rumors of secret con-
struction related to the underground
railroad. Built by a wealthy railroader fol-
50. Interview with William Firebaugh,
January, 1991.
116 OHIO HISTORY
lowing the California Gold Rush of 1849,
the farmhouse is alleged by a long-
time local resident to have had a tunnel
leading from a fruit cellar to an out-
building; the entrance was said to have
been concealed by a movable wooden
shelf.51 Visual inspection
showed no tunnel, sealed entrance or evident re-
modeling of the basement.
Although the evidence provided by these
investigations does not, and can-
not, prove that participants in the
underground railroad in these Ohio counties
never constructed special places of
concealment for fugitive slaves, it suggests
that if such constructions existed at
all they must have been extremely rare.
The accounts left by both agents and
fugitives involved with the underground
railroad show that while discretion
needed to be practiced, especially after the
Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, which gave
increased sanction to the searching of
premises, there was seldom excessive preoccupation
with secrecy on the part
of the abolitionists who were involved,
and little or no concern to construct
special hideaways for the fugitives.
If the agents of the underground
railroad rarely constructed secret chambers
or escape tunnels, how were transient
fugitives accommodated? Mordecai J.
Benedict recalled in later life that
during his boyhood in an active anti-slavery
Quaker settlement at Alum Creek, in
Morrow Co., prior to the Civil War, he
had "seen the floors of the
sitting- and dining-rooms [of his parents' house]
covered with the forms of sleeping
Negroes when he came downstairs of a
morning."52 The
homestead of Aaron Benedict, built at Alum Creek in 1857,
was a station where, in situations of
potential danger, Benedict simply moved
the fugitives to a barn or to
outbuildings across the creek.53 Benedict's
relative Griffin Levering sometimes
temporarily housed fugitives in his
cellar, but without any reported
attempts at special concealment. Even in
situations where concealment was
essential, fugitives who were given
overnight accommodations were generally
quartered in common places such as
an upstairs bedroom, a cellar, an attic,
a hayloft, an outbuilding, or even in a
nearby field or woods. Levi Coffin,
whose autobiography describes authentic
activities of the underground railroad
in Indiana and Ohio, says nothing about
constructing escape tunnels or secret
chambers, but speaks characteristically
of the use of existing household
facilities:
Our house was large and well adapted for
secreting fugitives. Very often slaves
would lie concealed in upper chambers
for weeks without the boarders or frequent
visitors at the house knowing anything
about it. My wife had a quiet unconcerned
way of going about her work as if
nothing unusual was on hand, which was calcu-
51. Interview with Gary Gallion, March,
1991.
52. Siebert, "A Quaker Section of
the Underground Railroad in Northern Ohio," 481.
53. Ibid., 482.
Subterranean Hideaways
117
lated to lull every suspicion of those
who might be watching, and who would have
been at once aroused by any sign of
secrecy of mystery. Even the intimate friends
of the family did not know when there
were slaves hidden in the house, unless they
were directly informed. When my wife
took food to the fugitives she generally
concealed it in a basket, and put some
freshly ironed garment on the top to make it
look a basketful of clean clothes.
Fugitives were not often allowed to eat in the
kitchen, from fear of detection.54
The abolitionist John Finney, who
maintained an underground railroad station
at his farm in Richland County, on at
least one occasion provided accommo-
dations for women fugitives in the loft
of his house and men in his barn.55
Examples of such common sense activities
could be multiplied.
Further evidence comes from the
fugitives themselves, some of whom later
recounted their long and arduous treks
toward Canada across fields, forests and
rivers, as well as through unfamiliar
and often hostile regions. The numerous
accounts of their experiences amassed in
Drew's The Refuge and Still's The
Underground Railroad, as well as ones found in many scattered publications,
incontestably reveal not only how
comparatively few slaves were assisted by
the underground railroad but also how
insignificant a role-if indeed any at
all-secret chambers and tunnels played
in their journeys to freedom.56 The
fugitives needed, to be sure, to draw as
little attention to themselves as possi-
ble, but most often seem to have found
impromptu accommodations on their
own initiative.
Knowledgeable examination of buildings
alleged to have features con-
structed for the concealment of fugitive
slaves constitutes a useful check on
the claims of oral tradition.
Investigation of this kind is particularly impor-
tant at the present, when an increasing
number of putative stations on the un-
derground railroad are being registered,
remodelled and opened to a paying pub-
lic, sometimes replete with guided tours
that feature secret compartments or
passages. The risk of creating places
and events not as they were but as they
exist in faded memories and romantic
imagination is a continuing danger in
the reconstruction of the history of
the underground railroad.
54. Levi Coffin, Reminiscences of
Levi Coffin (Cincinnati, 1898), 301. In one early instance
Coffin and his wife hid a negro man
"in a feather bed" (ibid., 151).
55. A. J. Baughman, "The
Underground Railway," Ohio Archaeological and Historical
Publications, 15 (1906), 190.
56. Benjamin Drew, The Refugee; or,
the Narratives of Fugitive Slaves in Canada, Related
by Themselves (Boston, 1856); William Still, The Underground
Railroad, a Record....
(Philadelphia, 1872). Still was
concerned, among other things, to emphasize the initiative of the
fugitives and their relative
independence from the patronage of white sympathizers along their
journey, and thus serves as a corrective to the
exaggerated claims that some abolitionists had
made about the numbers of slaves that
they had assisted in maintaining underground railroad
stations.
BYRON D. FRUEHLING AND ROBERT H. SMITH
Subterranean Hideaways of the
Underground Railroad
in Ohio: An
Architectural,
Archaeological and
Historical Critique
of Local Traditions
During the decade that preceded the
Civil War the underground railroad be-
came increasingly active in Ohio and
elsewhere in the north.1 Although
"underground" originally may
have had much the same figurative connotation
that it has today in expressions such as
"underground newspaper," it was al-
most inevitable that the term come to
suggest in popular imagination not so
much anti-establishment concepts and
practices as activity that took place in
tunnels and subterranean places of
concealment. Oral traditions about the un-
derground railroad frequently allude to
places of concealment allegedly con-
structed by abolitionists for the use of
fleeing slaves who were making their
way toward Canada. From the time of
Wilbur H. Siebert, whose pioneering
research involved heavy reliance upon
such information,2 to the present time,
popularizers and no few historians of
the underground railroad have tended to
accept personal reminiscences about
specially-constructed secret chambers and
escape tunnels largely at face value.
Examples of this reliance on anecdotes
recorded years later, some supplied
by participants and others by persons
who relied on hearsay, are abundant.
Among Siebert's extensive compilations
one finds the statement that Joseph
Morris of Marion County installed
partitions in both the attic and the cellar
of his home in order to provide
"secret chambers for his swarthy guests."
Siebert goes on to say, largely on the
basis of statements he found in a local
newspaper article, that
Byron D. Fruehling is a graduate student
at the University of Akron. Robert H. Smith is Fox
Professor and Chair of the Program in
Archaeology at The College of Wooster. The authors
wish to thank Larry Gara for reading an
early draft of this paper and making helpful
suggestions, as well as Dennis
Monbarren, Denise Monbarren, and Ethel M. Parker of Wooster
for their assistance in tracking down
certain items of information.
1. For general orientation and a recent,
concise bibliography, see Charles L. Blockson, The
Underground Railroad (New York, 1987).
2. Siebert's most important, and still
influential, work is The Underground Railroad from
Slavery to Freedom (New York, 1898).