Ohio History Journal

  • 1
  •  
  • 2
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  • 4
  •  
  • 5
  •  
  • 6
  •  
  • 7
  •  
  • 8
  •  
  • 9
  •  
  • 10
  •  
  • 11
  •  
  • 12
  •  
  • 13
  •  
  • 14
  •  
  • 15
  •  
  • 16
  •  
  • 17
  •  
  • 18
  •  
  • 19
  •  
  • 20
  •  
  • 21
  •  
  • 22
  •  
  • 23
  •  
  • 24
  •  
  • 25
  •  
  • 26
  •  
  • 27
  •  
  • 28
  •  
  • 29
  •  
  • 30
  •  
  • 31
  •  
  • 32
  •  
  • 33
  •  
  • 34
  •  
  • 35
  •  
  • 36
  •  
  • 37
  •  
  • 38
  •  
  • 39
  •  
  • 40
  •  
  • 41
  •  
  • 42
  •  
  • 43
  •  
  • 44
  •  
  • 45
  •  
  • 46
  •  
  • 47
  •  
  • 48
  •  
  • 49
  •  
  • 50
  •  
  • 51
  •  
  • 52
  •  
  • 53
  •  
  • 54
  •  
  • 55
  •  
  • 56
  •  
  • 57
  •  
  • 58
  •  
  • 59
  •  
  • 60
  •  
  • 61
  •  
  • 62
  •  
  • 63
  •  
  • 64
  •  
  • 65
  •  
  • 66
  •  
  • 67
  •  
  • 68
  •  
  • 69
  •  
  • 70
  •  
  • 71
  •  
  • 72
  •  
  • 73
  •  
  • 74
  •  
  • 75
  •  
  • 76
  •  
  • 77
  •  
  • 78
  •  
  • 79
  •  
  • 80
  •  
  • 81
  •  
  • 82
  •  
  • 83
  •  
  • 84
  •  
  • 85
  •  
  • 86
  •  
  • 87
  •  
  • 88
  •  
  • 89
  •  
  • 90
  •  
  • 91
  •  
  • 92
  •  
  • 93
  •  
  • 94
  •  

110 Ohio Arch

110      Ohio Arch. and His. Society Publications.

 

 

 

 

REPORT OF FIELD WORK IN VARIOUS PORTIONS

OF OHIO.

 

BY WARREN KING MOOREHEAD, CURATOR AND IN

CHARGE OF EXPLORATIONS.

 

 

PREFACE.

 

April 4, 1897, I left Columbus for Farmington, New Mex-

ico. Mr. Clarence Loveberry, who had been associated with

me for nearly three years in the museum as well as in the field,

was appointed to act as Assistant Curator in my absence. Dur-

ing my stay in the West he carried on field work and attended

to the museum routine duties. August 27, when I resigned the

Curatorship, Mr. Loveberry was appointed in my stead.

The field work had been projected and routes laid out for

Mr. Loveberry before I left for New Mexico. These he fol-

lowed. I am greatly indebted to him for his faithfulness in observ-

ing the lines of investigation indicated.

In mapping out certain localities for explorations I had in

mind not so much the securing of mound specimens for the

museum as the investigation of certain peculiar mounds. These

struck me (especially those in Pickaway county) as being dif-

ferent from the average lowland or "high culture groups" of

the Scioto Valley. Explorations tended to confirm my opinion.

In addition, it was thought best to follow the Scioto to its

source and from thence down the Sandusky to the Lake. By

such means we could ascertain if mounds or other works followed

the streams from the Ohio to the Lake. Trips through sections

of the state heretofore not well represented upon the archaeologic

map were also made.

There is not sufficient space to present the names of several

hundred persons who kindly aided the survey in many ways,

who donated specimens, assisted in placing monuments upon

the map. Suffice it to say that the Society is under great obliga-

tions to each and every one of them.