Ohio History Journal

  • 1
  •  
  • 2
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  • 4
  •  
  • 5
  •  
  • 6
  •  
  • 7
  •  
  • 8
  •  
  • 9
  •  
  • 10
  •  
  • 11
  •  
  • 12
  •  
  • 13
  •  
  • 14
  •  
  • 15
  •  
  • 16
  •  
  • 17
  •  
  • 18
  •  
  • 19
  •  
  • 20
  •  
  • 21
  •  
  • 22
  •  
  • 23
  •  
  • 24
  •  
  • 25
  •  
  • 26
  •  
  • 27
  •  
  • 28
  •  
  • 29
  •  
  • 30
  •  
  • 31
  •  
  • 32
  •  
  • 33
  •  
  • 34
  •  
  • 35
  •  
  • 36
  •  

REPORT OF FIELD WORK

REPORT OF FIELD WORK.

 

BY W. C. MILLS, CURATOR.

 

PREFACE.

It is the purpose of the Ohio State Archaeological and His-

torical Society to visit different sections of the State each year

for explorations upon the mounds and village sites.

It is apparent to all that the mounds and earthworks are fast

being leveled by the encroachment of agriculture and the relic

hunter, who, under the stimulus of commercial enterprise, tears

the mounds down and forever blots out evidence which would

materially aid in the solution of many of the problems which

confront the archaeologist of today. Consequently opportunities

for securing a more definite insight into the character and meth-

ods of mound building are rapidly being destroyed. We com-

menced the field work in Logan County, but were unfortunate

in getting permission to explore but two (2) mounds; these were

situated along the Miami River, in Washington Township. Al-

though we added thirty (30) mounds, one (1) earthwork and

twenty-seven (27) gravel burials to the archaeological map. In

the eastern half of the county, especially in the Mad River Val-

ley, are to be found a great many gravel kames. In some places

they were formed into beautiful rounded mounds which are

very often mistaken for works of the Mound Builders. After

leaving Logan County we examined the mounds found along

the north fork of the Licking River, which runs near the boundary

line of Knox and Licking Counties. The most important of the

mounds examined were the large Butcher mound, situated in

Burlington Township, Licking County, and the Larimore group

in Milford Township, southwestern Knox County. The peculiar

features of the mounds of this group were the burials at the

center, which were usually beneath the original surface at a

depth varying from six inches, to five and one half feet.

I wish to acknowledge the many favors shown us, while in

the field. Although in a few instances permission to explore

(309)