Ohio History Journal




POLITICAL INFLUENCE OF OHIO PIONEERS

POLITICAL INFLUENCE OF OHIO PIONEERS.

 

 

GEORGE M. GADSBY.

In present day politics we find the principle of "like father,

like son" a very potent one. Or, as a ward chairman of this city

recently remarked when speaking of the politics of a candidate,

"an apple never falls very far from the tree." If now this system

of "paternal" or "traditional" politics is noticeable in recent

generations it is fair to presume that a trace may be found run-

ning back to the time of the founding of the territory or county

and there may possibly be a relation between the politics of a

section today and the politics of its original settlers.

In the case of the state of Ohio there is enough variation in

the nature and origin of the first settlers to lend considerable in-

terest to a study of the "wherefor" of the present county "political

complexion."

Students of history will remember that while the first legal

settlement was made by New Englanders, the proximity of the

virgin territory to the boundaries of Virginia and Kentucky had

induced many squatters to cross the line before the Ohio Com-

pany was even formed. Later when the land was opened for

settlement men came in great numbers from the Southern states

as well as from Pennsylvania, New York, and New England. In

the case of settlement by Southerners we expect to find democracy

and when the Northerners first occupied the land the principles

of Republicanism prevailed.

In taking up the study of the counties as they are now found

it must be born in mind that many have been formed from

adjacent counties and again that large sections have been settled

by men from other older counties. In these cases it is more

difficult to trace the political trend as the accounts of the origin

of the first settlers is not definite. In determining the politics

of the various counties the returns from ten elections were taken,

the first election being that of 1836, and the last that of 1904. In

Vol. XVII. 13.        (193)



194 Ohio Arch

194      Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.

some few cases the number of Democratic victories and those of

the Republicans is about equal and the politics of these counties

has been indicated as indefinite.

As some order must be observed in taking up the counties

and that of date of settlement is not necessary, we have chosen

an arbitrary geographical method, and will commence at the

eastern edge of the state and follow the example of the early

settlers themselves by "going West."

Commencing then with Ashtabula it is found to have been

formed from Trumbull and Geauga counties and to have been

settled by New Englanders; with a single exception all of the

ten elections resulted in Republican victories. Trumbull and

Mahoning, the latter formed for the most part from territory

originally in the former, were both settled by New Englanders,

mostly from Connecticut, and again we find the Republicans in

the majority. Columbiana was formed from Jefferson and Wash-

ington counties and so the original settlers were from Pennsyl-

vania and New England, and in result is a Republican county.

Jefferson, as has just been stated, was settled by Pennsylvanians

and is a Republican county. Belmont was settled by men from

the North-west territory, which in turn was settled by men from

New England and in consequence is a Republican county.

Monroe was settled by both Northerners and Virginians, the

Virginia element prevailed and Monroe county is unquestionably

Democratic. Washington, Noble, Morgan, Muskingum, Athens

and Meigs counties were settled by New Englanders and again

the effect is Republican prevalence in almost all elections. Gallia

was settled by French immigrants and altho Republican it can

hardly be said to have acquired its political instincts from its

settlers. Lawrence was settled by Pennsylvanians and Virginians

but is a Republican county. Lake was formed from Geauga and

Cuyahoga, settled by men from Connecticut and is a Republican

county. The territory of Geauga, Cuyahoga, Portage, Summit,

Medina, Lorain, Huron and Erie comprising a strip of land north

of the 41st degree parallel of latitude and between the 81st and

83rd degrees of longitude were settled by New Englanders in

most part from Connecticut and all the counties are still Re-

publican. Stark was settled by Pennsylvania Germans and varies



Political Influence of Ohio Pioneers

Political Influence of Ohio Pioneers.    195

 

in its elections. Wayne was settled largely by Virginia and Mary-

land people with some few from New Jersey, Pennsylvania and

New England but it is a Democratic county as is to be expected

from the excess of Southerners among the first settlers. Ashland

was formed from Wayne and shares its original settlers and

Democratic policies. Carroll, Tuscarawas and Holmes counties

were settled by Pennsylvanians and Virginians in about equal

numbers, in politics we find Carroll Republican, Tuscarawas un-

decided and Holmes Democratic. Harrison was settled by a

mixture of Scotch-Irish, Germans, Quakers from Pennsylvania

and Virginians. Out of this conglomeration the Northerns pre-

vailed and the county is Republican. Guernsey was settled by

emigrants from Guernsey, some Northerns and a few Virginians,

the county is Republican. Coshocton was settled by Virginians

and Pennsylvanians and is Democratic. Richland and Crawford

were settled by Pennsylvanians and Virginians and are both

Democratic. Knox was settled by a mixture from Virginia,

Maryland, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and New England and

shows it in its politics. No record was found of the settlement of

Morrow, but it is a Republican county. Licking, Perry and

Fairfield were settled by men from Virginia, Maryland and

Pennsylvania and is Democratic.  Hocking and Vinton were

settled by Ohioans from the older counties and are both Demo-

cratic. Jackson was settled by Welsh and Pennsylvania farmers

and is Republican. The origin of the settlers of Scioto county

was not found but it is a Republican county. Wyandot and

Marion are Democratic, but no record of the source of the first

settlers was found. Delaware, Union, Logan and Madison, altho

settled largely by Kentuckians, are Republican, being, perhaps,

the "exceptions to prove the rule." Franklin's early settlers came

from Connecticut and Kentucky and they have shared political

honors very evenly. Pickaway settlers came from Pennsylvania

and Virginia, and the county is Democratic. Ross, altho settled

by the same classes, is Republican. Pike and Adams were settled

by Virginians and are Democratic.   Ottawa, Sandusky and

Seneca were founded by men from the center of the state who

came mostly from Pennsylvania and Virginia and are Demo-

cratic. Lucas and Wood were settled by New Englanders and



196 Ohio Arch

196     Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.

have remained strong Republican counties. Hancock is uncertain

and Hardin is Republican, altho partially settled by Virginians.

Champaign, Clark, Greene and Clinton were settled by Pennsyl-

vanians and New Englanders and are Republican. Fayette is

another exception, being Republican, altho founded by men from

Virginia and Kentucky. Highland is like Fayette, being a

Southern settled Republican county. Brown, Adams and Cler-

mont are Democratic and were settled by emigrants from Mary-

land and Virginia. Fulton is Republican, Henry uncertain and

Putnam Democratic, all having been settled and influenced by

adjoining counties. Allen, Auglaize and Shelby are of uncertain

origin and are Democratic. Miami, Montgomery and Warren

were settled by men from Hamilton county, which was settled

by men from New Jersey and all are Republican counties. Wil-

liams and Defiance were settled by men from adjoining counties

and are Democratic. Paulding is uncertain as is also Van Wert,

both being settled by other Ohioans. Mercer and Darke were

settled by Virginians and are Democratic. Preble was formed

from Montgomery and Butler, and is Republican while Butler was

formed from Hamilton and is Democratic.

From this brief review it will be seen that with comparatively

few exceptions the politics of a county date back to the men who

first occupied the land and thus left a permanent imprint of their

political minds. The same traits in religion, language to a certain

extent, and the very mode of living would be noticed if a similar

study were made along these lines. It will furthermore be noticed

that the counties along the Ohio River and in the eastern portion

are much clearer both in regard to early settlers and political

trend than the north-western counties which were settled by older

Ohioans who had become mixed with and influenced by the con-

victions of settlers from both North and South.

Marietta College, Marietta, Ohio.