CALEB ATWATER.
CLEMENT L. MARTZOLFF.
It is as Ohio's first historian that
Caleb Atwater is best
known. But had he never written his
History of Ohio, his
efforts to provide an educational system
for the state and the
record he made in Archaeology might in
themselves be sufficient
reason for placing his name in
"Ohio's Hall of Fame."
Caleb Atwater was a versatile, peculiar,
eccentric and vis-
ionary individual. From
the world's material point of view
his life might not be reckoned a
success. He never accumu-
lated any property. He lacked that power of concentration
which alone gives success in a pursuit.
But he was not lazy.
He worked hard on things that were
congenial to him. He
was a close observer of nature. He had
his ideas and theories
and it seems he spent much time in
formulating them.
His versatility expressed itself in his
being a minister,
lawyer, educator, legislator, author and
antiquarian. He was a
pioneer in more senses than one. And
since a pioneer is ever
a brave man we can forgive Mr. Atwater
his inclination to be a
"Jack-of-all-trades."
It was on Christmas day in 1778 at North
Adams, Massa-
chusetts, that Caleb Atwater was born to
Ebenezer and Rachel
(Parks) Atwater. He was a direct
descendant of David Atwater
one of the original settlers of New
Haven. On the maternal side
he inherited Welsh blood. His mother
died when he was five
years old. The child was placed in the
home of a Mr. Jones in
North Adams, where he remained until his
eighteenth year.
About this time Williams College was
founded and young At-
water was sent by his guardian to this
school. He completed
his studies here and received the degree
of Master of Arts.
I wish to express my thanks to Miss May
Lowe, Librarian at Cir-
cleville; Miss Wilder, Assistant Librarian; Mrs. L. G. Hoffman, of
Circleville, and Rev. Dr. Brown, of
Indianapolis, for courtesies extended
in the preparation of this article. C. L. M.
(247)
248 Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
Upon his graduation he went to New York
City and opened
a school for young ladies. While thus
engaged he studied
theology and in due time entered the
Presbyterian ministry. He
now married a Miss Diana who lived only
about a year. On
account of his health he gave up the
ministry and began the
study of law. His preceptor was Judge
Smiley of Marcellus,
New York. After a few months reading he
was admitted to the
bar. He married a second time. His wife
was Belinda, a daugh-
ter of Judge Butler.
It seems that now he entered into some
business arrange-
ments that proved disastrous. What this
business was is un-
known but it left him impoverished.
He had determined to go West. It could
hardly be said that
he wished to "grow up with the
country" for he was now thirty-
seven years old. He came to Circleville,
Ohio, in 1815, and
there made his home until his death
fifty-two years afterward.
The first six years of his residence in
Circleville was de-
voted to the practice of law. In 1821 he
was elected to repre-
sent the Pickaway-Hocking District in
the Ohio Legislature. One
of the great issues before the American
people at that time was
the question of "internal
improvements." Governor De Witt Clin-
ton of New York had begun his Erie
Canal. Roads were de-
manded. Better facilities to get the
produce of the land to
market were asked for. As usual the
people were divided.
Mr. Atwater upon his entrance into the
General Assembly
aligned himself with the friends of
"improvement." He had
not been a member long until he had an
opportunity to defend
his position. A bill had been introduced
to abandon for a year
the usual road tax. Mr. Atwater opposed
the measure in the
following speech.
"The people of Ohio are an
enterprising people and they are
as patriotic as they are enterprising
and will not thank you
for giving up the road tax. Does the
public voice call for the
abandonment of the road tax? Sir, the
spirit of the age remon-
strates against this bill in the
strongest language and he must
be deaf indeed who does not hear its
voice and perverse indeed
who disobeys it. There is not a single
state over the mountains
that is not up and doing. In New York
besides a vast number of
Caleb Atwater. 249
turnpikes running in all directions
through the state the patri-
otic Clinton and his friends are cutting
a canal, three hundred
and fifty-eight miles in length
connecting the Great Lakes with
the ocean. Virginia and North Carolina
have each their Boards
or Public Works busily and successfully
engaged in these improve-
ments. Shall this young State lose all
the benefit of example so
praiseworthy? 'But the pressure of the
times.' Great minds
rise under every pressure. The sages who
on the Fourth of July,
1776, declared us an independent nation
did not sit down to
inquire where our armies were, where was
our navy, where our
money was to be obtained, to carry on a
war with the most
powerful civilized nation in the world.
Had they done so we
had not been as now, here legislating
for a respectable state.
"Shall we throw dollars and cents
into one scale, against a
great system of internal policy in the
other? From such legisla-
tion I devoutly pray to be delivered on
this and all other occa-
sions."
Mr. Atwater was a friend to the Canal
System. He was a
great admirer of Governor Clinton of New
York. That fact is
evidenced when it is noted that he named
a son after the great
New York champion of canals. Many
Ohioans, including Mr.
Atwater, had kept in close touch with
Governor Clinton during
the years the Erie Canal was building.
His advice to the Ohio
people was valuable. Accordingly when
the friends of "in-
ternal improvements" were ready to
strike they were not entirely
ignorant of the best methods to be
followed. It is significant
that the friends of roads and canals
were also friends of public
education.
On the 6th of December, 1821, the
initial canal bill was
introduced in the Ohio House of
Representatives. Mr. Atwater
supported the bill as a member of the
Legislature but he
did more than that. There was a popular
opposition to overcome.
The people had to be educated. During
these years of debate
and agitation the pen of Caleb Atwater
was busy in writing for
the press. The files of the Circleville
newspaper of the time show
many articles that are evidently his.
While they are signed, usu-
ally, as was the custom of the time by a
high sounding Latin
pseudonym, yet to a person who is but
meagerly acquainted with
250 Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
Mr. Atwater's style, but little
difficulty is found in recognizing the
author.
These articles are vigorous and the
arguments are telling.
There is no doubt that they had
considerable influence in molding
the public opinion of the section.
But it is in the cause of popular
education that Mr. Atwater
deserves to be held in fond memory by
the people of Ohio.
Coming from the halls of an eastern
college as he did he soon
saw the need of an educated proletariat.
In expressing his views
of the stability of our Republic he
said, "To effect this object
universal education is the only
remedy." He had full confidence
in the function of the school master. He
did not doubt the po-
tency of an efficient system of education.
On the same day that the Ohio Canal Bill
was introduced
in the General Assembly, Mr. Atwater set
the educational wheels
revolving by presenting a resolution
asking for a committee on
"schools and school lands."
The part taken by Mr. Atwater is best
told in his own words
which are taken from his History of
Ohio.
"The congress of the United States,
by several acts, usually
denominated 'the compact,' gave the
people, of all the territory
northwest of the Ohio river, one
thirty-sixth part of the land,
for the support of common schools. No
small portion of these
lands were occupied, at an early day, by
persons who settled
on them, without any title to them, than
what mere occupancy
gave them. These occupants, made no very
valuable improve-
ments, on these lands, but they
contrived in time, to obtain various
acts of our general assembly, in favor
of such squatters. Such
acts increased in number every year,
until they not only had cost
the state large sums of money for
legislating about them, but
some entire sessions were mostly spent,
in such unprofitable legis-
lation.
"In the meantime, scarcely a dollar
was ever paid over to the
people, for whose benefit these lands
had been given, by congress.
"Members of the legislature, not
frequently, got acts passed
and leases granted, either to
themselves, to their relations, or,
to warm partisans. One senator contrived
to get, by such acts,
Caleb Atwater. 251
seven entire sections of land into,
either his own, or his chil-
dren's possession!
"From 1803-1820, our general assembly spent its sessions
mostly, in passing acts relating to
these lands; in amending our
militia laws; and in revising those
relating to justice's courts.
Every four or five years, all the laws
were amended, or as one
member of the assembly well remarked in
his place, 'were made
worse.' At a low estimate, this perverse
legislation, cost the
people, one million dollars. The laws
were changed so frequently,
that none but the passers of them, for
whose benefit they were
generally made, knew what laws were
really in force. New laws
were often made as soon as the old ones
took effect.
"During these seventeen years,
there were a few persons, in
different parts of the state, who
opposed this course of legis-
lation. And here we introduce to the
reader, Ephraim Cutler,
of Washington county, near Marietta, who
was one of the
framers of our state constitution. He had succeeded in his
motion, so to amend the original draft
of that instrument, as to
make it the imperative duty of the
general assembly, to support
religion, morality and knowledge, as
essentially necessary to
good government.' And the constitution
goes on to declare
'that schools and the means of
instruction, shall forever be en-
couraged by legislative provision.' This provision remained
a dead letter until in December 1819,
Judge Cutler, its author,
being then a member of the general
assembly, introduced a
resolution for that purpose, and was
appointed chairman of a
committee on schools. He introduced a
bill into the house of
representatives, for regulating and
supporting common schools.
This bill after being much injured by
amendments, passed the
lower branch of the legislature, but,
was either not passed in
the senate, or so modified as to render
it useless. This state of
things continued, until, in December, 1821, the house of
repre-
sentatives appointed five of its
members, to wit: Caleb Atwater,
Lloyd Talbot, James Shields, Roswell
Mills, and Josiah Barber,
a committee on school lands. To that
committee was referred
a great number of petitions from
occupants of school lands,
in almost every part of the state. This
committee devoted nearly
252 Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
all its time to the subjects submitted
to its charge. All the acts
of the legislature, relative to the
school land were carefully
examined, and this committee came to the
conclusion, that,
inasmuch as the legislature were the
mere trustees of the fund
set apart by congress, for the support
of common schools, not
a few of these acts were void, because
they were destructive
to the interests of the people whose
children were to be educated
by this grant. The trustee, the
committee believed, had the power
to so manage this fund as to increase
its value; but, the trustee
had no power to destroy the fund. The
committee saw all the
difficulties which surrounded the object
of their charge; as well
as the delicacy of their own situation,
sitting as members with
those who had possession of more or less
of the school lands.
They weighed in their minds all these
things and finally adopted
a plan and the only one which to them
seemed feasible, which
was, to recommend the adoption of a
joint resolution, authoriz-
ing the governor, to appoint seven
commissioners of schools and
school lands, whose duty it should be,
to devise a system of law,
for the support and regulation of common
schools. Their chair-
man who writes these lines, immediately
after this decision,
drew up, and presented to the house of
representatives, the
following report.
'The committee to whom was referred so
much of the gover-
nor's message, as relates to schools and
school lands, have had
these subjects under their
consideration, and now beg leave to
Report,
"That in the opinion of the
committee, the education of our
youth, is the first care and highest
duty of every parent, patriot
and statesman. It is education which
polishes the manners,
invigorates the mind and improves the
heart. If it has been
encouraged even by despotic governments,
how much stronger
are the motives held out to induce the
Republican statesman to
promote this object of prime importance?
Shall Louis XVIII
of France, support from the national
treasury, learned professors,
in every branch of science and learning,
in all the celebrated
schools in his kingdom; and will the
legislature of this young,
rising and respectable state, neglect to
provide for the education
of her youth? The committee presume not.
Caleb Atwater. 253
"It will be recollected by the
house, that many of the best
scholars, warriors, philosophers, and
statesmen, whom this nation
has produced-men who have shone as
lights in the world;
who have been blessings to their own
country and the world at
large; who have been applauded by the
whole civilized world,
for their learning, their genius, their
patriotism and their virtues
in public and private life, were many of
them when young, poor
and destitute as to property, and yet
through their own exer-
tions, under the genial influence of the
Republican institutions of
our elder sister states, were enabled to
raise themselves from the
lowest circumstances, to the heights of
fame and usefulness.
"The name of the illustrious
Franklin will occur to every
mind. Are there no Franklins, no
Monroes, no Wirts in the log
cabins of Ohio, who possess not even a
cent of property, who
have no knowledge of the rudiments of a
common education.
and are deprived of a father's advice
and protection, and even
without the benefit of a mother's
prayers? Is it not the duty
of the legislature, to lay, in season, a
foundation on which to
build up the cause of education? Ought
not a system of edu-
cation to be founded, which would
embrace with equal affection
the children of the poor and the rich?
"It has been said that 'a little
learning is a dangerous thing.'
This may be true in monarchical
governments, where the extremes
of wealth and poverty, power and
weakness, exist, but never
can be true in a republic like ours.
Where universal suffrage
is the birthright of every citizen,
learning enough to enable the
elector to become acquainted with his
own rights and his ruler's
duty is necessary for him to possess. In
a moral point of view,
learning enough to enable every rational
being to fully under-
stand his duty to himself, his neighbor
and his Creator, is abso-
lutely necessary. Without education and
morality, can a republic
exist for any length of time? The
committe presume not.
"A great philosopher has said that
'knowledge is power.'
It is that power which transforms the
savage into civilized man,
surrounds him with a thousand comforts,
unattainable through
any other medium, and exhibits man as he
ought to be, at the
head of this lower creation, and the
image of his Maker. It is
an acquaintance with letters
which enables man to hold a corre-
254 Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
spondence and become acquainted with his
fellow man, however
distant they may be from each other.
Through this medium
all the ideas of the warrior, the
statesmen, the poet, the philoso-
pher and the patriot are conveyed from
age to age and from
country to country. Through this medium the treasures of
learning and science are brought down to
us, from the remotest
ages past. Through this same medium,
these treasures are accu-
mulating, as they are borne along down
the stream of time, will
be conveyed to the remotest ages yet to
come.
"Gratitude to those who have gone
before us, for their labors
in the field of learning and science,
duty to ourselves and to those
who are to come after us, call on us for
a system of education
for common schools, so framed that
genius, to whomsoever given,
by the all-wise and beneficent Author of
our existence may be
drawn forth from its abode however
exalted or however humble
it may be to enlighten mankind by a
divine radiance.
"Full many a gem of purest ray
serene,
The dark, unfathomed caves of ocean
bear,
Full many a flower is born to blush
unseen,
And waste its sweetness on the desert
air."
"Is it not the duty of the legislature
to explore the recesses
of the ocean of distress and poverty and
to draw forth the gems
of genius and place them before the
public eye? Ought not the
field of learning to be so far extended
as to enclose within its
limits, those beautiful wild flowers of
genius which are now
wasting their sweetness on the desert
air?
"But it may be asked, how shall we
effect this desirable ob-
ject? Where are our means of doing it?
The committee answer,
that nearly one-thirty-sixth part of our
territory has been granted
by congress, (for a fair equivalent it
is true) to the state in trust
for the support of common schools. Had
this fund been prop-
erly managed, the committee are of the
opinion, that a great
permanent one would have been created,
the interest of which
would have done much toward the support
of common schools.
The committee deeply regret that the
school lands have been
in many instances, leased out for
different periods of time, to
persons who in numerous instances seem
to have forgotten that
Caleb Atwater. 255
these lands were granted to the state
(for a fair equivalent by
congress), for the support of education
and for the benefit of
the rising generation.
"From all the committee have been
able to learn it would
seem that more money had been expended
by the state in legis-
lation concerning these lands, than they
have yet or ever will
produce, unless some other method of
management be devised
than any hitherto pursued. The committee
refer the house to
acts concerning these lands on the
statute books and to the fact
in numerous instances, the lessees are
destroying all the valuable
timber growing in these lands. The
committee are impressed
with the belief that unless these lands
are soon sold and the
proceeds thence to be derived invested
in the stock of the United
States, or in some other permanent and
productive stock, no
good and much evil will accrue to the
state from the grant
of these lands by congress. Shall we
proceed on, legislating
session after session, for the sole
benefit of lessees of school lands,
at the expense of the state? Or shall we
apply to the general
government for authority to sell out
these lands as fast as the
leases expire or are forfeited by the
lessees? Or shall we en-
tirely surrender these lands to present
occupants, with a view
to avoid in future the perpetual
importunity of these trouble-
some petitioners? The committee are of
opinion that in order
to collect information on subjects
committed to their considera-
tion, commissioners ought to be
appointed to report to the next
general assembly, a bill to establish
and regulate common schools,
accompanied by such information on the
subject, as they may
be able to collect. Should the general
assembly authorize the
governor to appoint such commissioners,
a judicious selection
would doubtless be made, with a
reference to the local interests
of the state, as well as to the cause of
learning among us.
"Such commissioners ought to take
into their consideration
the propriety or impropriety of
obtaining leave of the general
government, of making such a disposition
of the school lands
of the state, by sale or otherwise as
may best comport with the
original intention of the grantors.
"It is our sincere wish to incite
into activity the learning,
the talents and patriotism of the state,
so that the attention of
256 Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
our constituents may be immediately
turned toward the subjects
committed to us.
"The following resolution is
respectfully submitted to the
consideration of the house:
"Resolved by the General
Assembly of the State of Ohio:
That the governor shall be authorized to
appoint seven com-
missioners whose duty it shall be to
collect, digest and report
to the next general assembly, a system
of education for com-
mon schools, and also, to take into
consideration, the state of the
fund set apart by congress for the
support of common schools,
and to report thereon to the next
general assembly.
"This report and this resolution
being read, at the clerk's
table, were ordered to be printed and on
the 30th day of Jan-
uary, 1822, they passed the house without
a dissenting vote.
The joint resolution for the appointment
of commissioners passed
the senate, January 31st, 1822, without opposition.
"In the month of May following,
Allen Trimble, Esquire, the
then governor of the state, appointed
seven commissioners of
schools and school lands, to-wit: Caleb
Atwater, the Rev. John
Collins, Rev. James Hoge, D. D., N.
Guilford, the Honorable
Ephraim Cutler, Honorable Josiah Barber,
and James M. Bell,
Esquire. The reason why seven persons
were appointed, was be-
cause there were seven different kinds
of school lands in the
state, viz: section number sixteen in
every township of con-
gress lands; the Virginia military land;
United States mili-
tary lands; Symmes' purchase, in the
Miami country; the Ohio
company's purchase, on the Ohio river;
the refugee lands, ex-
tending from Columbus to Zanesville; and
the Connecticut West-
ern Reserve land.
"Caleb Atwater was appointed for
congress lands; John Col-
lins, for the Virginia military lands;
James Hoge, for the
refugee lands; James M. Bell, for the
United States military
district; Ephraim Cutler for the Ohio
company's lands, N. Guil-
ford, for Symmes' purchase, and Josiah
Barber for Connecticut
Western Reserve school lands.
"All the persons appointed
commissioners, accepted of their
offices, as it appears, by referring to
Governor Trimble's mes-
sage to the legislature, in December, 1822. Five of
these com-
Caleb Atwater. 257
missioners, to-wit: Caleb Atwater, John
Collins, James Hoge,
Ephraim Cutler and Josiah Barber,
entered on the duties of their
appointment and assembled at Columbus
the seat of govern-
ment, in June 1822. They organized their
board, appointed
Caleb Atwater chairman, and inasmuch as
N. Guilford and
James M. Bell did not appear nor act,
the five who were present
and acting informally appointed Caleb
Atwater, to perform the
duty assigned to N. Guilford; and James
Hoge was appointed
to supply the place of James M. Bell.
"This board, thus organized,
ordered their chairman, to ad-
dress a circular letter, to all such
persons as had the charge
of the school lands in the state
soliciting information as to those
lands; what was their value, how they
were managed, how,
and by whom occupied, and finally, all
the information necessary
to be possessed by the commissioners.
"Each commissioner agreed to exert
himself in obtaining all
the information in his power relating to
these lands. After an
active session of seven days, the board
adjourned to meet again
in August the next.
"Five hundred letters were
addressed to persons in various
parts of the state and fearing that
unless the postage were paid,
these letters would not be attended to,
by those to whom they
were addressed, the author of them paid the postage. His
time was devoted almost wholly to this
business, until in August
following, the board met again at
Columbus. At this meeting,
which lasted seven days, the chairman
was directed to prepare
three pamphlets for the press: first, a
pamphlet showing the
actual condition of the school lands;
second, a bill proposing
a system of law, regulating common
schools; and thirdly, an
explanatory one, of the school system to
be proposed.
"The chairman was directed to
collect all the school systems
in use in all the states; and to consult
by letter or otherwise,
all our most distinguished statesmen,
scholars, teachers and
jurists on this matter. In pursuance of
this order, he opened
a correspondence with not a few such
men, in all the old, and
many of the new states. This
correspondence occupied nearly
all his time, during the three following
months of September,
October and November, and until early in
December 1822, the
Vol. XIV.- 17.
258 Ohio Arch. and Hist.
Society Publications.
board again assembled at Columbus.
During all this time not
a dollar had been advanced by the state
to this board, nor was
there a dollar in the state treasury to
spare for any object.
"Two of the commissioners had been
elected members of
the general assembly, to-wit; Ephraim
Cutler and Josiah Bar-
ber. The other three, Messrs Atwater,
Collins and Hoge de-
voted up their whole time to this
service. Occupying a room in
a public house, it became a center of
attraction for all the lovers
of learning who visited the seat of
government, during that ses-
sion of the state legislature. In this
legislature were many in-
fluential men who were opposed to a
school system; to a sale
of the school lands; and to internal
improvements. Calling
occasionally at the commissioners' room,
these enemies of all
improvement, discovered the
commissioners discussing the merits
of the different school systems which
they had collected. These
opposers as it now appears, with the
intention of swindling the
commissioners out of what would be
justly due them for their
expenditures of time and money,
requested the chairman to
let them see what the postage on his
official correspondence
amounted to, and they would pay it. This
being acceded to,
and that being found to be seventy
dollars, these legislators
framed a report in the senate that it
would appear that all the
services had been finished and paid for,
nine weeks before the
commissioners concluded their session.
"The board proceeded in their
labors, day after day, and
week after week, and prepared for the
press and printed the three
pamphlets aforesaid, at the expense of
printing and paper -paid
for by the chairman, and never fully
remunerated to this day by
the state! Fifteen hundred copies of
each, or four thousand
five hundred copies, after an absence
from home on that business,
of eighty-two days, were printed and
done. up in handsome
covers. They were circulated over the
whole state in the spring,
summer and autumn of 1823.
"On the assembling of the
legislature in December, as soon
as that body were properly organized the
report of the com-
missioners was presented to the general
assembly which they
accepted, thanking, but not
paying anything for their labors and
expenditures. This session had a
majority in both houses, op-
Caleb Atwater. 259
posed to the school system and the sale
of the school lands,
and all that was done by them, was to
quarrel about these sub-
jects. They finally broke up in a row
and went home. During
the next summer and autumn, the contest
about the sale of the
school lands, the school system, the
canal, and an equitable mode
of taxation, was warm and animated, but
the friends of these
measures, triumphed over all opposition
at the polls in the Octo-
ber election of 1824. Large majorities
were elected in both
houses, friendly to these highly
beneficial measures. These meas-
ures were carried through the general
assembly and the greatest
revolution, politically, was effected
that our history offers to
the reader. That legislature was the
ablest in point of talents
and moral worth that we ever had in the
state.
"They gave us a system of education
for common schools;
changed the mode of taxation; created a
board of fund com-
missioners who were authorized to issue
stock and borrow
money on it, wherewith to make canals.
They passed many other
wise, morally, healthful and useful
acts. These measures effected
more for us than all others, ever
originating with the people,
and carried out into execution by the
legislature.
"Our domestic policy thus
established, has never varied
since that time, and this new state has
as fixed a policy as any
other state in the Union."
In Mr. Atwater's term as a legislator a
bill for the education
of the deaf and dumb was introduced. Mr.
Atwater opposed the
measure in no uncertain terms. He said:
"When we have established a system
of schools throughout
the state; when we have respectable
academies in every county
and one college at least, well endowed
and supplied with the
necessary qualified instructors, then
our means could not per-
haps be better applied. But until provision is made for the
proper education of those not deaf and
dumb it would be divid-
ing our attention and diminishing the
means necessary for this
object by applying them to other objects
of much less import-
ance."
In 1822 Mr. Atwater was a candidate for
Congress. He was
defeated by Duncan McArthur for whom he
had a warm friend-
ship. It was this friendship that
prompted him to dedicate one
260 Ohio Arch. and Hist.
Society Publications.
of his books to McArthur, who had in the
meantime been elected
governor.
Mr. Atwater's ideas of education were
not theories alone
but he aimed to put them into practice.
Naturally he began in
his own town, Circleville. In 1823 he presided at
a meeting of
the citizens who had met to elect school
trustees. He himself was
elected to the board and it is to be
expected that he was the most
active member. The duties devolving upon
these trustees were
multiform. They included the examination
and employment
of teachers, erection of buildings and
the supervision of the
schools.
It was about this time that Mr. Atwater
conceived the idea
of editing a paper of his own. It was to
be published in Chilli-
cothe under the name of "The Friend
to Freedom." In a notice
published in a Circleville paper the
editor advanced his platform.
The paper was to promote the best
interests of the country, in-
ternal improvements and a good system of
education for common
schools. It would contain nothing
"unfriendly to religion or
morality, and modesty will find in it
nothing to condemn." There
were to be essays both literary and
scientific. For the benefit of
the people living beyond the
mountains," the editor himself who
has for several years been collecting a
mass of information on
the antiquities and natural history of
the Western states will
present his essays on these topics. But
three numbers of "The
Friend to Freedom" were ever
published. It failed for lack of
support. For this failure Mr. Atwater
was, to use his own
words, "maligned by evil disposed
persons." His financial con-
dition was certainly not the best, for
in a short time the sheriff
levied upon his personal property to
satisfy a creditor.
The presence of many prehistoric
earthworks at Circleville
was partly, at least, responsible for
Mr. Atwater's interest in that
class of Antiquities which he is pleased
to call them. Already
in 1820 he contributed to the American
Antiquarian Society his
observations. In 1833 he produced a
volume on "Western An-
tiquities." This book contained all he had previously
written
with much additional matter. There is no
doubt that he knew
more on this subject than any other man
of his time. His per-
sonal knowledge extended over many years
of investigation from
Caleb Atwater. 261
New York to the Tennessee valley. Many
of the places he per-
sonally visited, others he knew only by
what he could glean
secondhand. Of course his methods would
not bear the criticism
of modern scientific investigation. Yet
his theories of the use
for which the various earthworks were
designed tallies very well
with those of our "up-to-date"
archaeologists. In comparing the
generalized, superficial statements of
Atwater with what has
more recently been produced we find that
many who followed
him in point of time have also trod in
the "beaten paths." Be-
sides the descriptions of the principal
earthworks at Newark,
Glenford, Marietta, Circleville, Paint
Creek, Portsmouth, Fort
Ancient, etc., maps of the inclosures
are also presented. They
were evidently not surveyed yet they
show a decided degree of
accuracy. Throughout Mr. Atwater's descriptions he draws
his conclusions from his knowledge of
Roman customs. For
instance the parallel walls at Fort
Ancient suggest the probability
of their use for foot races. One thing
Mr. Atwater did do for
archaeologists and that is he furnished
descriptions of many
mounds that were destroyed before a more
systematic study
of them began. It is singular that the
Serpent Mound in Adams
county is not mentioned. Certainly Mr.
Atwater had never
heard of it or he would have included it
in his descriptions.
Yet before he published the last edition
of his work it is definitely
known that he passed within a few miles
of the famous "Snake."
This was on the occasion of his journey
to Prairie Du Chien
which was the next important event in
his life.
It was in May, 1829, that President
Jackson commissioned
Caleb Atwater as one of three
commssioners to treat with the
Winnebago Indians concerning some land
near the junction of
the Wisconsin and the Mississippi
rivers. The start for Prairie
Du Chien was made at once. Mr. Atwater
in a book published
in 1831 gives a minute account of this
trip. His decriptions of
the mode of travel and the towns and
country through which
he passed makes intensely interesting
reading. His first descrip-
tion is of Maysville, Kentucky. After
dilating upon the progress
of the town and the hospitality and
general intelligence of the
people, he concludes by wondering why
map makers had never
placed upon their maps such an important
place.
262 Ohio Arch. and Hist.
Society Publications.
Cincinnati with 30,000 people receives
encouragement to the
effect that it will easily reach 50,000;
that it will continue to be
the largest town in the state unless
surpassed by Zanesville or
Cleveland. A four days' stay in
Louisville awaiting a boat
gave Mr. Atwater ample time for a
lengthy "write up" of the
town. He went into details. After giving
some of the history,
he proceeded to tell the plan of the
streets, the nature of the
buildings, churches, schools, theater,
market houses, and then
at some length, the facilities for
manufacturing. He appended
a list of the various steamboats and
tonnage of each. He recog-
nized Kentucky chivalry and hospitality
and believed the state
to have been unjustly slandered.
The trip down the Ohio and up the
Mississippi opened a
new world to our traveler. For the first
time he realized the great
possibilities of the West. He
anticipated the building of rail-
roads and with words that are almost
prophetic says:
"When locomotive engines are
brought to the perfection,
experience and ingenuity will soon bring
them, goods and pas-
sengers can pass between the two seas in
ten days. That this
will be the route to China within fifty
years scarcely admits a
doubt. From sea to sea a dense
population would dwell along
the whole, enliven the prospect with
their industry and animate
the scene. The mind of the patriot is
lost in wonder and admira-
tion when he looks through the vista of
futurity at the wealth,
the grandeur and glory that certainly
await our posterity."
"As he looks upon the map of this
country where is the
man whose mind is not expanded with the
extent of this vast
national domain? How is the heart of the
patriot, the statesman,
the philanthropist, the lover of liberty
filled with joy unutterable,
when he looks with prophetic eye over
this vast field of future
happiness, grandeur and glory, yet in
reserve for the human race?
Here one language will prevail over a
great extent of country
and be used by over three hundred
millions of people."
A part of Caleb Atwater's prophecy has
been fulfilled. It
was one of his characteristics that
wherever he went his mind
penetrated into the potentialities of
the region. He saw the
possibilities of commerce, agriculture
and manufacturing and in
his judgment he was scarcely ever
mistaken.
Caleb Atwater, 263
He remained in St. Louis for three
weeks. During this
time he was acquainting himself with his
duties as Indian Com-
missioner. He also succeeded in getting
well acquainted with
St. Louis. One thing in particular
attracted his attention; it
was the democratic spirit of its people.
This was so noticeable
that he alluded to it in these words,
"There was but one tinner
in the city and he was noticed- taken
into the best society in the
place and was making a fortune by his
business."
Of his trip up the Mississippi he has
much to say of the
country on both sides of the stream. His
description is minute.
He expatiates upon the beauty and
fertility of the country. The
trip was a long tedious one and he had
plenty of time at his
command for observation.
Arriving at Prairie Du Chien the work of
treating with the
Indians began. Several weeks were taken
to reach a satisfac-
tory agreement. On the 1st of August,
1829, the final treaty was
concluded. The tribes interested were
the Chippewas, Ottawas,
Pottawotamies and Winnebagoes. The land
ceded to the national
government contained about eight million
acres, and extended
from the upper end of Rock Island to the
mouth of the Wis-
consin-from latitude 41° 30' to latitude
43° 15'.
Mr. Atwater in his book then proceeded
to give his impres-
sions of the Indians. He discusses the
red man from every point
of view. He inquires into his origin; he
notices his language,
customs and government; he looks at his
social status and makes
some interesting remarks upon family
life. The character and
influence of Indian women receives a
fair share of attention.
He discovers a propensity for gambling
among the braves but he
admires the eloquence and the poetic
instincts of the forest chil-
dren. He recognizes that there is an
Indian problem and goes
into a full discussion of the subject.
The final extinction of the
red man he suggests can be prevented
only by making him a
civilized man. The Indian must be taught
to build houses,
to give up the chase and cultivate the
earth. The Indian youth
should be taught the mechanical arts and
schools for that purpose
should be established.
264 Ohio Arch. and Hist.
Society Publications.
Mr. Atwater was a deep sympathizer with
the Indian and
he already saw in the treatment accorded
him that "Century of
Dishonor."
"As the tide of emigration rolls
westward our red brethren
will be driven from river to river, from
mountain to mountain,
until they finally perish. My heart is
sick of the idea. My poor
veto against the wasteful and villainous
expenditure of millions
of dollars under the hypocritical
pretensions of benevolence and
piety and even charity is of no avail
against the united efforts
of a corrupt set of men who contrive to
plunder the treasury
every winter under the solemn sanctions
of law. I feel ashamed
of my country and I conclude by
reminding our rulers and our
people that the red man is on our
borders -that he is wholly
in our power, either to save or destroy
him - that the whole
civilized world of this day and all
posterity, will judge us im-
partially."
A Dictionary of the Sioux language
occupies some space in
the book. Whether this was the result of
original investigation
on the part of the writer, can not be
determined. Certainly it
forms an interesting chapter on the
Indian language.
Mr. Atwater's return trip to Ohio is
described with the
same degree of care as his outward
journey. From Prairie Du
Chien to Louisville he traveled
overland. Sickness overtook him
and he was obliged to halt for several
days. His conveyance
was by light wagon and by stage. Nothing
along his route re-
mained unnoticed. The Wisconsin
snow-birds, the prairie hen,
the Dodgeville lead mines, the pure
atmosphere, the falls in the
streams where mills might be erected,
the soil, the species of fish,
the flowers, the trees,- all are jotted
into the omnipresent note-
book.
Of the future of the country Mr. Atwater
was optimistic.
In speaking of the Northwest he says:
"This vast region in its
present state is of little value, but
the time will certainly arrive
when it will be covered with farms and
animated by countless
millions of domestic animals. There
golden harvests will wave
before every breath of air that moves
ever its surface; there
great and splendid cities will rear
their tall and glittering spires
and millions of human beings will live
and move and display
Caleb Atwater. 265
talents that will ennoble man and
virtues that will adorn and
render him happy."
"The longest, the most durable and
the best rivers in the
world intersect and pass through this
country, standing on
whose banks there will yet be some of
the largest cities in the
world. Comparatively speaking but few
persons in the world
have ever beheld this country. No tongue
and no author have
described it, but it is there."
From Louisville to Cincinnati the trip
was quickly made
by boat and according to his own
statement he was glad once
again to set foot on Ohio soil. Anxious
to get to Circleville,
he started at once and completed the
journey in three days. His
route lay by way of Lebanon, Wilmington
and Washington. The
fertility of the soil and hospitality of
the people of the Miami
valley are not forgotten. Interested
ever in education, he informs
us that there is a University at Oxford,
rising in reputation and
usefulness but sadly in need of funds.
Then he pauses long
enough to say, "There is an
unreasonable prejudice against our
colleges. They are considered by
ignorant people as nurseries
of aristocracy; whereas they are exactly
the reverse. These
colleges furnish competent teachers to
our common schools, lo-
cated near every poor man's door in
which his children can be
well educated. The college is the poor
man's best friend and I
regret that they are not looked upon as
such by every man in
Ohio."
After visiting a few days with his
family at Circleville, Mr.
Atwater started for Washington to
deliver his treaty to the
President. The first day he traveled to
Zanesville by way of
Lancaster and Somerset, a distance of
fifty-eight miles. He
stopped long enough to discuss the
geology of the country and
then hastened on to Wheeling toward
Washington. At a tav-
ern he was compelled to remain some
time. This gave him an
opportunity to present his views on the
Allegheny mountains
which he proceeded to do at some length
and since he had
ample time and for fear he might forget
it he even discoursed
on the Rocky mountains also.
Upon his arrival in Washington he waits
upon General Jack-
son and breakfasts with the President
and his family. For several
266 Ohio Arch. and Hist.
Society Publications.
weeks he is in frequent consultation
with the President and the
Secretary of War. The details of the
treaty were gone over
apparently to the satisfaction of both
officials. This was in
October. The treaty could not be
ratified until after the con-
vening of the Senate in December. During
this interim a visit
was made to Philadelphia. Here many
prominent citizens were
met. They impressed themselves most
favorably upon the visitor
for he can hardly find words sufficient
and adjectives strong
enough to express his ideas in the
superlative degree.
By the opening of Congress Mr. Atwater
had returned to
Washington and was present at the first
session of the Senate.
A committee was elected to consider his
treaty and he met
with it twice a week. A most favorable
report was made. Then
the Senate confirmed, the President
approved and Mr. Atwater's
official life was closed. Before
returning to Ohio he attended
the first levee of President Jackson.
With much Naivete he
tells how the Mrs. Donelson and Miss
Easton of the President's
family and Mrs. Eaton, wife of the
Secretary of War were
dressed "in American calico and
wore no ruffles and no orna-
ments of any sort."
It appears that this dress was donned
out of deference to
the western idea of simplicity, for Mr.
Atwater continues, "As
a western man, I confess, I could not
help feeling proud that
they were born and wholly educated in
the west. The simplicity
of their dress, their unaffected
manners, their neatness, their ease,
grace and dignity, carried all before
them. The diamonds
sparkled in vain at that levee and
western unadorned neatness,
modesty and beauty bore off the palm
with ease."
"Our western ladies had felt some
uneasiness before the levee,
about the result, but their friends of
the other sex, assured them,
correctly enough, that republican
simplicity would triumph over
all the crosses and diamonds that the
east would bring into the
field. No time and no circumstance can
ever efface that night
from my memory. It was a splendid
triumph for the Mississippi
Valley."
It was in 1838 that Mr. Atwater
published his History of
Ohio. He had planned the work twenty
years before and much
of the material was gathered when first
originated. It was his
Caleb Atwater. 267
intention to publish the work in two
volumes but the author
evidently changed his mind. The book was
well received and
hearty encouragement was given it by the
best people of the
day. Among the original subscribers are
to be found state
and county officials, ex-governors and
men of all professions.
It is gratifying to see how well the
geological formations are
treated, when it is remembered how
limited was the accurate
information obtainable. The first
Geological Survey of Ohio was
published in 1837, but since much of Mr.
Atwater's manuscript
had been written years before
publication it is quite probable
that what he has to say of Ohio Geology
are his own deductions
from his own observations. In the
treatment of this part of his
work he is almost wholly utilitarian. It
is Economical Geol-
ogy that he discusses. What practical
use can be made of a
stratum of sand rock or clay or
limestone is the important ques-
tion. He saw the possibilities of Ohio
River Freestone and
Scioto Valley Limestone for building
purposes; the iron ores
of southern Ohio, the clays of
Zanesville and the coal fields of
the Hocking Valley.
The rivers of Ohio are described from an
agricultural and
a commercial viewpoint. He utters a
faint prophecy of the
Monroe county oil fields by observing
that on Duck Creek in
boring for salt water, petroleum was
found; that many such
springs were reported to be in existence
and that the oil was
being burned in lamps and used for
lubricating purposes in
manufactories. The chief utilization of
the product, however
was the bottling of "Seneca
Oil" or "American Oil" and selling
it for medicinal uses. Mr. Atwater
thinks that if some "water
doctor" would take hold of it a
large fortune would be made
as a result. Subsequent history in many
ways is a fulfillment of
Mr. Atwater's prophecy.
The fauna and flora of the state are not
neglected. Especi-
ally is the botanical feature well
discussed. Not only are the
native trees and their habitat pointed
out but their preservation
is urged for economical purposes. It is
interesting to note in
these days when the cry of "Save
the forests" is heard on every
hand, that our author raised a warning
voice almost seventy
years ago. Mr. Atwater's position on the
question is undoubtedly
268 Ohio
Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
the correct one and had his words been
heeded, there would
not now be that periodical, sentimental
wail of "Save the forests"
when there are no forests to save.
"Most of our timber trees will soon
be gone and no means
are yet resorted to, to restore the
forests which we are destroying.
In many places even now woodlands are
more valuable than
cleared fields. It is true that in the
northwest part of the state
we have vast forests yet, but it is
equally true, that their majesty
is bowing before the woodchopper's axe,
and will soon be gone.
We do not regret the disappearance of
the native forests, because
by that means more human beings can be
supported in the state
but in the older parts of Ohio means
should even now begin to
restore trees enough for fences, fuel
and timber, for the house-
builder and joiner."
Unlike Irving who begins his History of
New York with
the creation of the world, Atwater
begins his with La Salle's
discovery of the Ohio River. The
treatment accorded to the vari-
ous events down to the close of the War
of 1812 is full and vivid.
His conclusions on the Dunmore War do
not vary greatly from
what more recent writers have concluded.
The land claims, the
first settlements, the organization and
admission of the state, the
various treaties with the Indians, come
in for their share of atten-
tion. Ohio's attitude and share in the
second war with England
is especially well handled. Mr. Atwater
was a genuine Ohioan.
He was not a Jingo by any means but he
loved his state and
believed in its citizens. He knew what
every other fair minded
student of history knows, that the War
of 1812 meant more to
the people of Ohio than to the people of
the east. That while
the locked doors protected the
participants in the Hartford Con-
vention, there was little protection to
the frontiersmen, from the
tomahawk and firebrand in the hands of a
ruthless savage,
urged and abetted by English influence.
It is for this reason no
doubt, that Ohio's part in that war is
described with such minute-
ness by Mr. Atwater.
The period subsequent to the War of 1812
is passed over
hastily except those times when the
schools and "internal im-
provement" agitations were at their
height. The opening of the
Ohio Canal was certainly a great event
in the opinion of our
Caleb Atwater. 269
author. Governor Clinton of New York had
been invited to
Ohio and his journey through the state
was a continual ovation.
Mr. Atwater has, most probably, given us
the best and most
authentic account of the ceremonies.
Interested as he was, and
also active in urging the digging of the
canal, there surely was
no one better qualified to leave the
people of Ohio its history.
The book closes with a brief account of
the condition of Ohio
at that time. Schools and colleges with
their respective faculties,
churches, with the growth of religious
denominations, trade and
commerce, banks and banking, newspapers,
societies and cities
and towns are described in the most
optimistic manner.
On the question of slavery Mr. Atwater's
attitude was some-
thing of a compromise. He thought it
impracticable and impo-
litic to interfere with the institution.
He believed that slavery
ought to exist at least, a hundred
years. Yet slavery had passed
away before he himself died.
It were fitting after Mr. Atwater's long
career as agitator for
a public school system or the
establishment of one, that his last
literary work should be done along the
line of his favorite theme.
It was an appropriate climax. At the
time of its writing, 1841,
our common schools had been established.
Yet there was much
to be done for their betterment. In
"An Essay on Education,"
a plea is made for efficiency; better
school buildings, better
teachers and broader curricula are demanded.
His ideal of what
a school ought to be was years in
advance of his time. His
essay makes good pedagogical reading
even at this time.
The subject of music he places as one of
the requirements of
a complete education. He argues for its
place in the course of
study both as a cultural and utilitarian
branch. He believes in
the education of women on the same
equality as men; that the
future wives and mothers should be
conversant not only with the
elementary studies but with the higher
education as well. He
is a champion of co-education. He
believes that women should
be trained for their duties as well as
men and that this training
should be the same in kind.
He pleads for better teachers. He
emphasizes the import-
ance of a teacher in a country and asks
for a higher degree of
professionalism. He has little sympathy
for the teacher who
270 Ohio Arch. and Hist.
Society Publications.
makes his work a stepping stone to
something else. He places a
high moral responsibility upon the
teacher. He wants him to be
an example for good in a community.
He goes into the subject of text-books.
The histories in
vogue he unmercifully criticises. He
asks for a better arranged
text and then goes into detail on the
value of history as a school
study. His reasons breathe the highest
degree of patriotism.
He wants the rising youth to know how
our nation has been built
and the fundamental principles
underlying our government.
He thinks that the books ought to be
written by an American and
that American should be Washington
Irving. He deplores the
lack of authenticity in our
geographies. They contain such
meagre information concerning the New
West. Their descrip-
tions and maps are so indefinite. They
are made by eastern book
makers who evidently do not know their
subjects, for they speak
of "Missouri Territory" and
"other districts" in a vague uncer-
tain way.
Another argument Mr. Atwater cites for
popular education
is adduced from the fact of the foreign
immigration to our
shores. The people should become
acquainted with American
institutions. He speaks in a
commendatory way of the many
Germans and Irish who were then settling
up the middle west.
They were the kind of people wanted and
it only needed the
school house to make of them ideal
citizens because of their in-
dustry and thrift.
Mr. Atwater's essay occupied high
ground. It was in every
way worthy of the man. It shows him to
be of broad sympathies
and a noble nature. While it was not the
most popular it was
certainly the best thing he ever wrote.
Mr. Atwater was an admirer of the
classics. His writings
show a thorough acquaintance with both
the Latin and the Greek
authors. He was fond of quoting from
them and his allusions
to the writers of antiquity are
numerous.
The career of Caleb Atwater was an
uneventful one. He
worked hard for others and he deserves
to be remembered for it.
He was the father of six sons and three
daughters, all of
whom are dead, except his youngest
daughter, Lucy Brown, who
lives in Indianapolis, with her son, an
Episcopalian minister.
Caleb Atwater. 271 He died at the home of a daughter in Circleville on the thir- teenth day of March, 1867. He had been a familiar character in the village for years, yet when he died the local paper barely men- tioned the event. It added, however, that at one time he had been a prominent citizen. It might also have said, and said it truly, that he helped to give their city its first school and their state its first system of education. In Ohio's "Hall of Fame," let us place the name of Caleb Atwater. New Lexington, Ohio, April 25, 1905. |
|
CALEB ATWATER.
CLEMENT L. MARTZOLFF.
It is as Ohio's first historian that
Caleb Atwater is best
known. But had he never written his
History of Ohio, his
efforts to provide an educational system
for the state and the
record he made in Archaeology might in
themselves be sufficient
reason for placing his name in
"Ohio's Hall of Fame."
Caleb Atwater was a versatile, peculiar,
eccentric and vis-
ionary individual. From
the world's material point of view
his life might not be reckoned a
success. He never accumu-
lated any property. He lacked that power of concentration
which alone gives success in a pursuit.
But he was not lazy.
He worked hard on things that were
congenial to him. He
was a close observer of nature. He had
his ideas and theories
and it seems he spent much time in
formulating them.
His versatility expressed itself in his
being a minister,
lawyer, educator, legislator, author and
antiquarian. He was a
pioneer in more senses than one. And
since a pioneer is ever
a brave man we can forgive Mr. Atwater
his inclination to be a
"Jack-of-all-trades."
It was on Christmas day in 1778 at North
Adams, Massa-
chusetts, that Caleb Atwater was born to
Ebenezer and Rachel
(Parks) Atwater. He was a direct
descendant of David Atwater
one of the original settlers of New
Haven. On the maternal side
he inherited Welsh blood. His mother
died when he was five
years old. The child was placed in the
home of a Mr. Jones in
North Adams, where he remained until his
eighteenth year.
About this time Williams College was
founded and young At-
water was sent by his guardian to this
school. He completed
his studies here and received the degree
of Master of Arts.
I wish to express my thanks to Miss May
Lowe, Librarian at Cir-
cleville; Miss Wilder, Assistant Librarian; Mrs. L. G. Hoffman, of
Circleville, and Rev. Dr. Brown, of
Indianapolis, for courtesies extended
in the preparation of this article. C. L. M.
(247)