Ohio History Journal

  • 1
  •  
  • 2
  •  

ARCHAEOLOGICAL MAP OF OHIO

ARCHAEOLOGICAL MAP OF OHIO.

 

The accompanying map of Ohio, showing the distribution of

prehistoric Mounds and Enclosures in the state, is reproduced

on a reduced scale from the Archaeological Atlas of Ohio. This

map will be of special interest to the public, as it shows at a

glance the centers of occupation and the relative distribution of

prehistoric man in the territory included.

The valleys of the larger rivers-the Miamis, the Scioto, the

Muskingum, the Hocking, and their various tributaries, were the

principal localities of a more or less permanent and numerous

population. The relative sparseness of earthworks in the north-

western and eastern portions of the state, is due to topographical

conditions-the former being too swampy and the latter too rough

and broken to invite extensive primitive settlement.

The great center of population in the Miami Valley was

Butler County, with 221 mounds and 24 enclosures recorded. In

the Scioto valley, the central portion, including the counties of

Ross, Pickaway and Franklin, was most favored by the aboriginal

Ohio peoples, this section containing more earthworks than any

other similar area in the state. Ross county has 370 mounds and

49 enclosures recorded; Pickaway has 173 mounds and 33 en-

closures, and Franklin has 132 mounds and 28 enclosures, mak-

ing a total of 785 earthworks for the three counties.

Ross county has the distinction of containing the most highly

specialized types of earthworks, and as exploration shows, the

territory within that county was the seat of the highest develop-

ment of aboriginal man in Ohio.

The territory comprised in Licking county appears to have

been the great center of population of the Muskingum river and

its tributaries. This perhaps is due in great measure to the de-

velopment of the important flint quarries in south-eastern Lick-

ing county.

(409)