ANTI-SLAYERY
MOVEMENT IN COLUMBIANA
COUNTY.
BY C. B. GALBREATH
A study of the early anti-slavery
movement in Ohio
at this late day occasions many
surprises. It seems that
the first participants came from the
South, a number
arriving before the state was admitted
into the Union.
The famous Ordinance of 1787 prohibited
slavery in
the Northwest Territory. The states
carved out of it
were thus from the beginning dedicated
to freedom.
While the Ordinance contained a
provision for the re-
turn of slaves to their masters in
other states, this did
not prevent the free soil north of the
Ohio River from
becoming a haven and a refuge for
slaves seeking free-
dom from bondage or masters convicted
by conscience.
As early as 1796, William Dunlop left
Fayette
County, Kentucky, and settled in Brown
County, Ohio
(then in the Northwest Territory). He
brought a large
number of slaves with him, set them
free and "estab-
lished them on land about Ripley."
Many others did
likewise. Among the number was Dr.
Alexander
Campbell, who came from Kentucky in
1803, liberated
his slaves, advocated immediate
abolition, served in the
Legislature of Ohio, represented the
state in the United
State Senate and in 1835 stood at the
head of the list
of vice-presidents of the Ohio
Anti-Slavery Society.
Thomas Morris, member of the
Legislature, Judge and
United States Senator, came from
Virginia to what is
(355)
356
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
now Ohio in 1795 and resided in
Clermont County from
1800 till his death in 1857. Though not
a slaveholder,
like many other men from the southern
states, he came
to free territory in order that he
might entertain and
freely express his opposition to
slavery. Thomas
Kirker, member of the Legislature and
afterward acting
governor of Ohio, came to the state
from Kentucky
because of his opposition to slavery. A
comparatively
large number of ministers of the
gospel, chiefly of the
Presbyterian and Baptist faith, came
early from the
slave states to counties on the
southern border of Ohio
in order that they might freely bear
testimony against
the "peculiar system" of the South.
Pre-eminent among the anti-slavery
advocates from
the South was James G. Birney, born in
Kentucky,
February 4, 1792, a graduate of
Princeton, a scholar
and an eminent lawyer, who manumitted
his slaves,
became a candidate of the Liberty Party
for President
in 1840 and again in 1844. His son,
General William
Birney, in his biography of his father,
James G. Birney
and His Times, dwells upon the contribution of the
South to anti-slavery leadership and
gives illuminating
information upon the early movement in
Ohio. His
purpose, as he freely admits, is to
show that undue
credit has been given to William Lloyd
Garrison for
the overthrow of the slave power in the
United States.
This lays his book open to the charge
of ex parte testi-
mony, but for all that it reveals the
fact that much of
the early opposition to slavery on Ohio
soil was of south-
ern origin, transported across the Ohio
River from the
land of bondage.
The Quaker testimony against the
institution of
slavery is too well known to call for
extended notice
Anti-Slavery Movement in Columbiana
County 357
here. The "Society of
Friends" were among the earliest
settlers of Ohio and wherever they made
their homes
their anti-slavery views found
expression. They came
in large numbers to eastern Ohio early
in the last cen-
tury and settled in the counties of
Belmont, Jefferson
and Columbiana. On September 12, 1817,
Charles
Osborn, a Quaker preacher from
Tennessee, published
the first issue of the Philanthropist
at Mt. Pleasant,
Ohio, the first anti-slavery paper
published in America.
The second issue of this paper, bearing
date, "ninth
month 19th 1817" has recently come
into the possession
of the Ohio State Archaeological and
Historical Society.
This is the earliest issue now known to
be in existence.
In 1815, Benjamin Lundy, a pioneer
Quaker anti-
slavery advocate, organized at St.
Clairsville, Belmont
County, "The Union Humane
Society," which soon
acquired a membership of "nearly
five hundred." On
the establishment of the Philanthropist,
Lundy became
a local agent and active supporter.
Later he left Ohio
and was for some time in St. Louis,
Missouri. In 1821,
he returned to Mt. Pleasant and
established the Genius
of Universal Emancipation. This was afterward pub-
lished at Jonesboro, Tennessee and
Baltimore, Mary-
land. At this time mob violence and the
suppression of
free speech had not made their advent
in the South.
The seeds sown in eastern Ohio
continued to bear
fruit. Lundy's paper was generally read
among the
Quakers and the anti-slavery societies
that they inaugu-
* Some confusion has resulted from the
claim by Oliver P. Temple,
in his East Tennessee and the Civil
War, that the first "out-and-out"
emancipation paper was published at
Jonesborough in East Tennessee in
the year 1819. The name of this paper was Manumission
Intelligence. It
may be true that the paper published
there was more radical than the
early issues of the Philanthropist, but
it in no way disproves the claim that
the latter was the first anti-slavery
newspaper published in America.
358 Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications. |
|
The above is a facsimile of the head of the editorial column of the second issue (Vol. I, No. 2, September 19, 1817). The original is in the library of the Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Society. Benjamin Lundy was the pioneer anti-slavery leader in America; Benjamin Hanna was the grandfather of Senator Marcus A. Hanna. |
Anti-Slavery Movement in Columbiana
County 359
rated continued to grow in numbers and
membership.
On December 12, 1826, New Lisbon, now
Lisbon, held
the first recorded meeting in the
interest of the anti-
slavery cause in Columbiana County. The
Columbiana
Abolition Society was organized January
6, 1827, at
New Lisbon. It announced as its guiding
principle,
"abolition, without condition or
qualification." In a
short time it had a membership of more
than five hun-
dred. Colonization was then put forward
as the most
practical way of abolishing the evils
of the slave system.
A committee of five was appointed to
prepare an address
to the people. This was later published
in the Ohio
Patriot and contained the announcement that "the two
millions then held as slaves would
become ten millions
in the succeeding half century."
In the following year
Benjamin Lundy delivered an address at
the court house
in New Lisbon. He had great influence,
especially with
the membership of the Society of
Friends, with whom
he was a frequent visitor and in whose
homes his paper
circulated freely.
On March 15, 1832, John Frost published
the first
issue of the Aurora in New
Lisbon. In his salulatory*
he announced that the paper would be
non-partisan and
opposed to Masonry. He said nothing
about slavery or
temperance. It was a four-page,
twenty-column sheet,
of which about nineteen columns were
made up of clip-
pings from other papers. One of these
extracts dwelt
upon the evils resulting from the use
of intoxicating
liquors. Later this paper became a
temperance organ
and a vigorous opponent of slavery. It
published pro-
ceedings of anti-slavery meetings,
addresses and com-
* In order that this salutatory may be
preserved it is published in
full on page 393. Only one copy of this
issue is known to exist.
360
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
munications that otherwise would not
have reached the
people and become matters of permanent
record. The
descendents of Mr. Frost still have
volumes of the files
of his paper, but only a few of the
earlier issues are
known to exist.
The Aurora, as indicated in the
files from 1838 to
the suspension of publication, was
eminently a news-
paper on the three reforms advocated
and its columns
were more and more devoted to the
anti-slavery cause.
It gives a view of the progress of that
cause in different
parts of the country in extracts from
numerous papers
and records in extended detail for that
early day the
proceedings of local meetings,
communications from
correspondents and whatever might be
sought by those
interested in the movement. It must
have been, when
published, a distinct influence for the
promotion of the
chief reform that it advocated. As a
record of the
progress of the anti-slavery movement
in Columbiana
County and eastern Ohio the remaining
files of the
paper have historic value and it is a
source of regret
that nearly all of the issues of the
earlier years have
disappeared.
The year 1835 is an important one in
the anti-slavery
calendar of Ohio. Early in the year
previous occurred
the anti-slavery upheaval in Lane
Theological Semi-
nary at Cincinnati. A colonization
society had been
organized there with the sanction of
the faculty and the
evident approval of the patrons of the
seminary. The
organization of the American
Anti-Slavery Society and
the progress of sentiment favorable to
immediate eman-
cipation influenced the young
candidates for the min-
istry to form an abolition society. All
were drawn into
the movement including sons of slaveholders
and others
362
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
from the South who had been reared
under pro-slavery
influences. Dr. Lyman Beecher, the
eminent divine,
father of Henry Ward Beecher and
Harriet Beecher
Stowe, was at that time president of
the institution. In
his absence the trustees passed
resolutions suppressing
the colonization society and the
abolition society in the
seminary. The young divinity students
refused to sub-
mit. They were soon afterward presented
the alterna-
tive of giving up the society or
leaving the institution.
About seventy of the one hundred and
ten students
withdrew. They pursued their studies
for a time in
another building under different
professors and later
were admitted to the newly organized
department of
theology in Oberlin College.*
Among the students who left Lane
Theological Sem-
inary was Marius R. Robinson, destined
to become a
leader in the anti-slavery movement of
Columbiana
County.
In April, 1835, the first state
anti-slavery convention
in Ohio was held at Putnam, a suburb of
Zanesville. Its
sessions began at 2 o'clock in the
afternoon of Wednes-
day, April 22, and continued till noon
the following
Friday. The printed official proceedings
are now rare.
The copy owned by one of the most
active members,
Theodore D. Weld, with his autograph
and a few mar-
ginal corrections, is still preserved.
It bears the names
of many of the leaders in the cause.
Among them were
James G. Birney of Dansville, Kentucky,
and James A.
Thome of Augusta, Kentucky, who by vote
of the con-
vention were made "corresponding
members" and ac-
corded the privilege of participation
in the proceedings.
* See "Oberlin's Part in the
Anti-slavery Conflict," Quarterly, V. 22,
pp. 270-275.
Anti-Slavery Movement in Columbiana
County 363
Colonel Robert Stewart, of Ross County,
was chosen
president of the convention; Elizur
Wright, of Portage
County, was first vice-president. At
the head of the list
of vice-presidents of the newly formed
society was
Alexander Campbell, of Brown County,
although he does
not appear to have been in attendance.
Theodore D.
Weld, the great orator of the movement
at that time,
was a very active member from Hamilton
County, as
were also the eminent divine, Horace
Bushnell, Au-
gustus Wattles* and Henry B. Stanton,
afterward the
husband of Elizabeth Cady Stanton. One
of the two
members from Brown County was Rev. John
Rankin+
who figured in the rescue of Eliza, the
heroine of Uncle
Tom's Cabin.
The members from Columbiana County were
Joseph
Bailey, Nathan Galbreath and James
Hambleton. Gal-
breath was made a vice-president of the
Ohio Anti-
slavery Society and Hambleton one of
its managers.
The name of Marius R. Robinson is
attached to a report
on the "condition of the colored
people of Cincinnati,"
but he was not present at the
convention.
*Augustus Wattles was born in Goshen,
Connecticut, August 25,
1807. He moved to Ohio in 1833, locating
in Cincinnati where he at
once became active in the anti-slavery
cause. In the spring of 1855 he
went to Kansas, settled near Lawrence
and for a time was editor of the
Herald of Freedom. In 1857 he moved to a farm in Linn County, Kan-
sas, on which he lived until his death,
December 19, 1876. He was an
intimate friend of John Brown in Kansas
and became so obnoxious to
the pro-slavery party that a reward of
$1,000 is said to have been offered
for his head. In company with Thomas
Wentworth Higginson and
Colonel Montgomery he was active in
planning for the liberation of John
Brown from the jail at Charlestown. For
particulars of this plan see
Kansas Historical Collections, Vol. 8, p. 213.
+Rev. John Rankin was born in Jefferson
County, Tennessee, Feb-
ruary 4, 1793. As early as 1814 he was
actively engaged in organizing
against slavery. About the year 1821 he
came to Ripley, Ohio. Through
the succeeding years of his long and
eventful life he was a consistent
opponent of slavery. Eight of his sons
and one grandson fought for the
North in the Civil War. He died in
Ironton, Ohio, March 18, 1886.
364
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
Mr. Robinson was ordained to the
ministry at James-
town, New York, in the spring of 1836.
Soon after-
ward he returned to Cincinnati where he
addressed con-
gregations and public meetings on the
subject of slavery.
In August of that year he was appointed
lecturer of the
American Anti-slavery Society for
middle and northern
Ohio. This took him into Columbiana
County where an
active interest in the cause he was advocating
had
already developed. On June 1, 1837, he
went to Berlin
Center, Mahoning County (then Trumbull
County) to
deliver an address. Churches and the
school buildings
were closed to him. His statement of
his effort to be
heard and the indignities that he
suffered at the hands
of a mob indicates the spirit of the
times in northeastern
Ohio. His account was published in the Aurora
of
June 15, 1837, and it is here
reproduced as found in
A Souvenir History of Ye Old Town of
Salem, 1806-
1906. His
communication, written at the Quaker vil-
lage of Gillford, Columbiana County,
was addressed to
the editor of the Aurora as
follows:
"MR. FROST: At the request
of a number of my fellow-
citizens, I send you some of the
particulars of a recent gross
violation of my rights, in common with
those of my fellow-
citizens. * * * I shall give a simple
narrative of facts, for
some of the indignities offered me were
of too gross and brutal
a character to be thus publicly
detailed. In giving this nar-
rative I am actuated by no spirit of
resentment, but of un-
feigned sorrow for the deep-rooted and
widely extended in-
fluence of the spirit of slavery among
my countrymen, and a
strong desire that all may see their
danger, and, rising in the
vigor of Christian manhood, may remove
the cause, by the
unceasing proclamation of the great
doctrines of universal love.
"On Thursday, the 1st of the
present month, I visited Berlin,
in Trumbull county (now a part of
Mahoning county), for
the purpose of discussing the subject
of American slavery.
Notice was circulated that on the
following day there would
be a lecture. Application was made to
Joseph Holt, Esq., a
trustee of the school district, and one
of the oldest and most
Anti-Slavery Movement in Columbiana
County 365
influential citizens of the place, for
the use of the schoolhouse.
This was refused. Jesse Garretson, a
highly respectable mer-
chant of Berlin, at whose house I was
welcomed with the warm-
est of cordiality, opened his dwelling for the lecture.
Esq.
Holt informed him that if the meeting
was held the inevitable
result would be a mob. The meeting,
however, passed off
without a verification of the
prediction, and another meeting
was appointed to be held on the
following day of the week,
when I purposed to vindicate the Bible
from the charge of
supporting slavery. On Saturday there
were some buzzings of
disapprobation, because we had presumed
to have a meeting
in opposition to the well-known wishes
of the nobility of Berlin.
But they were not such as to create in
my mind any appre-
hension of violence. But the result
showed that Esq. Holt could
penetrate the future with more certainty
than myself. About
10 o'clock at night Mordecai B. Hughes
entered the store of
Garretson & Hoover, where I was
sitting in conversation with
J. F. Powers, Jesse Garretson and his
wife, and having seized
me by the arm proceeded to drag me
toward the door, at the
same time saying, 'You have got to leave
town tonight. You
have disturbed the peace of our citizens
long enough.' Mrs.
Garretson interfered, saying: 'If you
take him, you must take
me too'; and about the same time a
second ruffian, who entered
just after Hughes, seized me by the
other arm for the purpose
of dragging me out, while Mrs. Garretson
made an effort to
close the door and shut out the
remainder of the gang. But
this was prevented by those without, who
now joined in the
effort for my abduction; but for several
minutes these were
rendered unavailing, by the vigor and
firmness of my friends,
Mr. and Mrs. Garretson. During the struggle Hughes de-
manded of Mr. Garretson that he should
dismiss me from his
house. This was refused. They then
pressed on with new
vigor. They were requested to stop and
reason the matter.
'No reason here' was the reply; and so,
indeed, we found it.
Brute force was the order of the day,
and it was exercised
without respect of persons upon all who
opposed, as was strik-
ingly manifested in the treatment these
chivalrous advocates of
slavery were pleased to deal out to Mrs.
Garretson in their zeal
for the peace of the neighborhood.
Hughes, who seemed to
be dictator for the occasion, ordered
her to desist; assured her
that she was 'acting very imprudently';
that he 'would remem-
ber her for this; and once pushed her
with some violence. Mrs.
Garretson also received two blows, one
on her arm, which
sprained her wrist, and another on her
breast which has since
occasioned considerable pain and
soreness. But notwithstand-
ing their commands, threats and blows,
she continued unremit-
366
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
tingly her efforts, until they had
secured their prey by dragging
me into the street. The spirit with
which the attack was made
may be learned by the following fact: A
citizen from Berlin,
in conversation with two of the rioters,
asked them how they
would have felt had there been a corpse
found in the store the
next morning. One of them, William
Ripley, Jr., a merchant
of the place, replied, 'We went prepared
to take him, let the
consequences be what they would.'
"After getting me into the street,
they hurried me along
with violence and rapidity, a mile or
perhaps more--cursing,
taunting, threatening as they went. I
was dragged along by
three men, one holding me by each wrist,
another holding me
by the collar. This last, who seemed to
be more of a savage
than the rest, frequently jerked me with
violence towards him,
and would then thrust his fist violently
against my breast; and
once he struck me on the head. Hughes
remonstrated against
their hurting me, and they desisted from
this species of violence.
One started for a rail, but this measure
was decided against.
But in the infliction of tar and
feathers they seemed to coincide.
After the delay of some half hour or
more for the purpose of
procuring the means, they carried their
measure into execution.
After this outrage, one of their number
went for a wagon, for
the purpose of transporting me far from
Berlin, that I should
not be able to return in time for the
meeting next day. During
this interval, while being held fast by
two men, I was made
the subject of multiplied jeers and
insults. I made several
efforts to enter into conversation, and
in one or two instances
met with partial success. But Hughes,
who was most surpris-
ingly afraid of 'reason,' uniformly
interfered and thwarted my
purpose.
"When the wagon arrived, I was
placed in it with three
men, one to drive and two to prevent my
escape. After ascer-
taining by search of my pockets that I
had neither dirk nor
pistols, they concluded to relinquish
their hold on my person
and permit me to ride in the most
comfortable method I could.
I was carried by them about ten miles,
and left about an hour
before day, near the center of Canfield.
I was here an entire
stranger, not knowing even the name of a
single inhabitant of
the township, and in a situation as may
well be imagined any-
thing but agreeable. But that God, whose
I am and whom I
humbly endeavor to serve, guided my
steps to the house of Mr.
Wetmore, where all my wants were most
amply supplied. From
his son, Mr. William Wetmore, I received
the most marked
sympathy and kindness. Of him I borrowed
a suit of clothes,
my own having been entirely spoiled,
attended meeting through
the day, and although laboring under considerable pain
and
Anti-Slavery Movement in Columbiana
County 367
fever from the abuse of the previous
night, I was permitted
at 5 o'clock p. m. to open my mouth once
more, for the dumb,
and to search out the cause of those
who, by the avarice and
prejudice of the Nation, are appointed unto death.
"I will only add that I have since
visited Berlin for the
purpose of addressing a number of respectable citizens
who
were desirous of learning what this strange doctrine
(abolition)
was.
But tar and feathers having proven ineffectual, other
means were resorted to. I was now,
together with my audience,
subjected to other outrages, under the
professed authority and
sanction of law. The particulars of this
transaction are worthy
of record, and I will endeavor to
furnish them next week.
Yours,
MARIUS R. ROBINSON.
"GILLFORD, June 13, 1837."
From a manuscript sketch of the life of
Marius R.
Robinson, written by his niece, Mrs.
Homer C. Boyle,
who knew him well and got from him
direct the account
of his experience at Berlin Center we
quote the fol-
lowing:
"He went by invitation to Berlin
Center, a village a few
miles north of Salem to speak. He was
the guest of Jesse
Garretson, a Quaker merchant. * * * He
spoke in Mr.
Garretson's dwelling on Friday, June 2.
Another meeting was
arranged for the following Sunday when
he proposed to vin-
dicate the Bible from the charge of
supporting slavery. This
was more than the piety and patriotism
of Berlin Center could
endure. At eleven o'clock on Saturday
evening Mr. Robinson
was sitting in the store of his Quaker
friend, Jesse Garretson,
engaged in conversation with one or two friends. The
leader
of the already formed mob, Dr. Hughes,
burst into the room
saying, 'You have got to leave town
tonight; you have disturbed
the peace of our citizens long enough.'
Mr. Robinson in spite
of the vigorous efforts of his friends
to protect him, was dragged
into the street. * * * The hot tar
burned his flesh. From
one of his arms a piece of flesh an inch
square was torn. In
dragging him over a rack of scythes in
the store another place
was cut in his hip quite deep * * *. He
was placed in a
rough wagon, driven a distance of ten
miles and thrown into
a field near the village of Canfield,
where he was an entire
stranger, not knowing so much as the
name of a single inhabi-
368
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
tant. The household to which he first
presented himself was
frightened by his appearance, and
declined helping him, but
he found a Good Samaritan in a Mr.
Wetmore, by whom all
his wants were supplied. He attended
public worship twice
on that Sunday and at five o'clock in
the afternoon delivered
an anti-slavery address, but he never recovered from
the injuries
then received. * * * He never manifested
any other feeling
toward his persecutors than that
expressed by Jesus when in
his agony upon the cross, he exclaimed,
'Father forgive them;
they know not what they do.'"
Those who perpetrated this outrage were
all well
known. There was no attempt to conceal
their identity;
neither was there any effort to bring
them to justice for
this lawless act. On the other hand,
Mr. Robinson was
himself arrested on the charge of
"inciting a mob." He
was successfully defended in court by
R. W. Tayler,
later auditor of state and father of R.
W. Tayler, con-
gressman and U. S. district judge.
There was plenty
of law, but it was seldom invoked at
this time in behalf
of abolitionists.
In 1839, Mr. Robinson was delivering
anti-slavery
lectures in Licking County. At
Granville he was con-
fined to his room for some time by a
severe illness.
Taking advantage of this his opponents
resorted to a
novel device to rid the community of
his presence. The
overseers of the poor were influenced
to use their au-
thority in behalf of the local
pro-slavery sympathizers.
They sent by a constable the following
order which was
served on Mr. Robinson when he was unable to
leave
his bed:
"LICKING COUNTY, GRANVILLE TOWNSHIP,
SS.
"To H. C. MEAD, Constable of Said Township, Greeting:
"WHEREAS, We, the undersigned,
overseers of the poor
of Granville township, have received
information that there has
lately come into said township, a
certain poor man, named
Robinson, who is not a legal resident
thereof, and will likely
Anti-Slavery Movement in Columbiana
County 369
become a township charge, you are
therefore hereby commanded
to warn the said Robinson, with his family, to depart
out of
said township. And of this warrant make
service and return.
Given under our hands this first day of
March, 1839.
"CHARLES GILMAN,
"S. BANCROFT,
"Overseers of the Poor."
Although he was ill, Robinson was not
fright-
ened at this order and stood his ground
until he was able
and ready to leave.
In 1840 and 1844 James G. Birney was
the candi-
date of the Liberal Party for president
of the United
States. He ran on a platform pledged to
the abolition
of slavery and abolitionists of all
shades of opinion
supported him. The radical wing of the
party, the fol-
lowers of William Lloyd Garrison, grew
restive under
the leadership of those who sought to
liberate the slave
and at the same time to preserve the
union. The aboli-
tion of slavery in the District of
Columbia and in the
territory of the United States they considered
good so
far as it went but not sufficient to
justify continued
union with the South where slavery
existed under the
sanction of the Constitution of the
United States.
Rather than live under such a
government, they would
rend the union asunder. They adopted as
their battle
cry "No Union with
Slaveholders." In other words,
they were disunion abolitionists.
Naturally there were many who opposed
slavery but
were not prepared to go to this
extreme. The division
in the anti-slavery ranks, which had
been growing for
some time, reached a crisis in the
annual meeting of the
Western Anti-slavery Society which
assembled in the
Disciple Church at New Lisbon, Ohio,
June 5, 1845.
Abby Kelley, the aggressive and
eloquent Quakeress and
Vol. XXX-24
370
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
radical abolitionist, assailed the
citadel of conservatism
in this convention and ultimately
carried everything by
storm. She declared that
"Washington and Jefferson
were slave holding thieves, living by
the unpaid labor of
robbed women and children." At
this outburst a dele-
gate stepped on the platform and
declared, "This is a
slander upon Jefferson who said in his
warning against
slavery 'I tremble for my country when
I remember that
God is just, and that his justice
cannot sleep forever'."
Almost pushing the speaker from the
stand Abby
Kelley shouted:
"Ah, devils fear and tremble when
the Almighty is thunder-
ing out his wrath upon them,-but are
they the less devils?"
In the midst of the excitement a
prominent citizen
arose and said, "She is proving it
all, but it will lead to
war and bloodshed." At this point,
oil was poured on
the troubled waters by someone who led
the great audi-
ence in singing these lines from
Whittier:
"We have a weapon firmer set
And better than the bayonet;
A weapon that comes down as still
As snow-flakes fall upon the sod,
But executes a freeman's will
As lightning does the will of God."
The abolitionists of the Garrisonian
school, now
having complete control in this
stronghold of anti-
slavery sentiment in the West, took
prompt steps to es-
tablish a newspaper for the
promulgation of their views.
This was to be to this section in a
measure what the
Liberator was to the East and the entire country. It
was not to supersede but to supplement
Garrison's great
organ, and to give due prominence to
the anti-slavery
movement in Ohio and the northwest.
Anti-Slavery Movement in Columbiana
County 371
On June 29, 1845, the Anti-Slavery
Bugle was
launched. The first issue was published
at New Lisbon,
Ohio, and bore at its masthead,
"No Union with Slave
Holders." After the sixth issue it
was moved to Salem,
Ohio, where it was published until
Abraham Lincoln
issued his emancipation proclamation.
At first the Bugle carried the
name of no editor, but
it did not lack bold and vigorous
editorial expression.*
Some of the ablest writers of the
abolition school in
the United States were on the ground
ready and eager
to pen their fervidthoughts for
publication. The sev-
enth issue was published in Salem,
September 5, 1845.
In this appear the names of the
following publishing
committee: Samuel Brook, George
Garretson, James
Barnaby, Jr., David L. Galbreath and
Lot Holmes.
Barnaby was also general agent for the
paper and the
names of the editors were Benjamin S.
Jones and J.
Elizabeth Hitchcock. The editors were
later married.
In the issue of October 23, 1846, the
name of George
Garretson appears for the last time on
the publishing
committee. The names of the other
members of this
committee appear without change until
the issue of
October 8, 1847. At this time the
members of the
publishing committee were transferred
to the executive
committee of the Western Anti-slavery
Society. In the
issue of June 15, 1849, appears the
valedictory of Ben-
jamin S. Jones and J. Elizabeth Jones,
the joint editors.
Two weeks later "Words of
Introduction," present
Oliver Johnson, the famous anti-slavery
advocate, as
the new editor. He came expecting to
remain only one
year until a permanent editor could be
found, but the
* The earliest editorials are said to
have been written by Milo
Townsend.
372
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
work was so congenial to him that he
consented to re-
main almost two years. His "Parting Words" are
found in the issue of April 26, 1851.
Marius R. Rob-
inson was then persuaded to undertake
the editorial
work. His salutatory in the issue of
May 24, 1851,
shows that he did this reluctantly and
with misgivings
as to his qualifications for the new
position. He re-
mained editor, however, until the cause
for which the
Bugle was established had been accomplished and pub-
lication ceased.
The Bugle was a four page, six
column paper, that
increased its size by increasing the
width of its columns.
Its space was given up almost entirely
to the anti-slavery
cause. There were few advertisements.
The speeches
of friends of the cause in Congress and
on the platform
were frequently reproduced in their
entirety or extended
quotations. There were letters of
generous length from
speakers in the field. Anti-slavery
meetings and con-
ventions were ably reported and local
clashes with pro-
slavery sympathizers were given
considerable promi-
nence. In short, this was an organ of
agitation and
propaganda. An editorial in the first
issue sets forth
pretty clearly the purpose of the
publication. It reads
as follows:
OUR PAPER
In extending to our readers our first
greeting, we by no
means intend to disparage ourselves that
they may exalt us.
Though you may consider our garb rather
home-spun, and
our style somewhat homely, yet we come before you with
no
humble pretensions. Our mission is a great and glorious
one.
It is to "Preach deliverance to the
captive, and the opening of
the prison door to them that are
bound," to hasten in the day
when "Liberty shall be proclaimed
throughout all the land, unto
all the inhabitants thereof."
Though in view of the magnitude
of this enterprise, we feel that the
intellect and power of an
Anti-Slavery Movement in Columbiana
County 373
angel would be but as a drop in the
ocean of Truth, by which
the vilest system of oppression the sun
ever shone upon is to
be swept away, yet knowing as we do that our influence
is cast
with justice and Humanity, with Truth and the God of
Truth,
our pretensions are far from humble, though our talents
may
be justly so considered.
He who professes to plead for man
degraded and imbruted,
and to strive for the elevation of the crushed millions
of his
race; he who professes to labor for the
restoration of manhood
to man, and for the recognition of his divine nature,
makes no
humble pretensions.
It is true our Bugle blast may not fall
upon your ears with
all the sweetness and softness which so
well becomes the orchestra
of an Italian or French opera company,
but we intend that it
shall give no uncertain sound, and God
aiding us, we will blow
a blast that shall be clear and
startling as a hunting horn or
battle charge, and we trust that its
peals shall play around the
hill-tops, and shall roll over the
plains and down the valleys of
our State, until from the waters of the
Ohio to those of the
mighty lakes, from Pennsylvania on the
East to Indiana on the
West, the land shall echo and re-echo to
the soul-stirring cry of
"NO UNION WITH SLAVEHOLDERS."
The Bugle was not devoted
entirely to the anti-
slavery cause. Incidentally it favored
temperance, the
abolition of capital punishment and
woman suffrage.
The first call for an Ohio woman
suffrage convention
appeared in this paper, April 13, 1850.
This convention
was held in Salem on the 19th day of
April of that year.
It may therefore be truthfully said
that the Bugle was
potent in starting this reform which
only recently has
been fully accomplished not only in
this state but in the
United States.
The promoters of the Bugle seemed
to have been
inspired with a high degree of state
patriotism. They
make the appeal for the paper not only
in the name of
its cause but in the name of Ohio. In
the second issue
appears a lengthy editorial from which
we quote as
follows:
374
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
"Unpopular then as may be the
doctrine of 'No union with
Slaveholders,' yet believing it to be
true, the Committee have
inscribed it upon their sheet. No other
paper west of the moun-
tains bears that motto. The
Abolitionists of Eastern Pennsyl-
vania, of New York, and of New England
have unfurled their
banners and written it upon the folds.
Yonder, upon the soil
of Bunker's Height, beneath the very
shadow of time-honored
and venerated Faneuil Hall, the
"Liberator" has long since been
given to the breeze; and towering above
the crowded metro-
polis of New York, where the hurry of
commerce, the din of
business, and the conflict of selfish
interests have almost drowned
the voice of truth, floats the National
'Standard' of American
Abolitionists. In the Quaker city of
Pennsylvania, whose name
once synonomous with Brotherly Love, has
lost its beautiful
signification, there are enough to
sustain that banner which is
the glory of the true 'Freeman'; and
from the hills of New
England--from the White mountains of New
Hampshire is
heard the voice of a 'Herald of Freedom'
cheering the handful
who have rallied around the mountain
standard, and success-
fully defended it from the attacks of open
foes and professed
friends.
"'Westward the star of Empire takes
its way!' Ohio has
heard the call and responded to it. Her
flag has been unfurled -
the echo of Freedom's song has fallen
upon her ear, she has
caught up the notes and her Bugle is
even now sounding through-
out the land. Shall it be said that the
Buckeye State is content
to remain behind her older sisters in
this glorious enterprise?
God forbid! Let those of us who profess
to love the cause of
freedom, show at this time that our love
for it is not an empty
name."
The non-resistant attitude of Garrison
was pleasing
to the anti-slavery forces in
Columbiana County, which
for the most part were reared under
Quaker influences.
Their agitation often provoked blows
and mob violence
of which they were the victims. In
remarkably few in-
stances did they defend themselves
against insult and
personal violence. Their meekness and
persistence, as
one of their foes once expressed it,
"were infernally ex-
asperating." They serenely refused
to get angry or
excited. Their only weapon was
argument, and it is
Anti-Slavery Movement in Columbiana
County 375
not recorded that they ever ran out of
ammunition in
the war of words. The industry with
which they spread
their propaganda and devoted themselves
to the over-
throw of the slave power was truly
wonderful. At
night they traveled far to help
fugitive slaves along the
Underground Railroad toward the goal of
freedom; in
daytime they went long distances to
hear their speakers,
and they gave freely of their time and
meager means to
a cause that could bring them neither
wealth nor fame,
- a cause that was to them an educating
influence, an
inspiration to unselfish endeavor and,
in some instances,
the master passion of their lives. They
found a genuine
enjoyment in this work and were ever
cheered by an
unwavering faith that it would
ultimately triumph. By
the standards of their time they were
narrow-minded
and fanatical, but they saw in straight
and prophetic
lines and the "visionary" and
"impractical" reforms that
they advocated in their day became the triumphant
realities of a succeeding generation.
The anti-slavery speakers whose
itineraries radiated
from Salem, very frequently had
difficulty in finding
rooms in which to conduct their
meetings. Public build-
ings and churches were usually closed
against them.
Even the Quakers who freely bore
testimony against
slavery sometimes hesitated to open
their meeting
houses to the anti-slavery agents.
Oliver Johnson, then
editor of the Anti-Slavery Bugle, in
the issue of that
paper June 22, 1850, gives an account
of a meeting that
he addressed in Columbiana on the
Sunday preceding,
which is here reproduced in part:
"The afternoon meeting was
appointed at our request, made
at the close of the regular meeting
held in the morning--no one
objecting. On going to the meeting at three P. M., however,
Anti-Slavery Movement in Columbiana
County 377
Friends found the gate secured by strong
padlocks, and the
doors and windows made fast. We have
reason to believe that
this outrage against many respectable
members of the Society
was committed with the full knowledge
and approbation of the
two preachers who usually attend that
meeting.
"Friends feeling that their right
to the use of the house
under the circumstances was
unquestioned, did not hesitate to
scale the fences and enter it by the
readiest means in their
power. To accomplish the object nothing
more was necessary
than to remove a protruding nail from a
sash by pressing against
it another nail, and then to open a
window, through which a
boy found ready ingress. The bar that held
one of the doors
being removed, the audience found
shelter from the rain, and
enjoyed the opportunity they had sought
for the promotion of
the cause of Christian Reform.
"Whatever of responsibility is
involved in the removal of
the nail, we cheerfully take upon
ourselves for the act was
performed by our hands; and we must also
plead guilty to a
subsequent effort to drive a fresh
nail in the coffin of pro-
slavery Quakerism."
There were, however, some halls and
churches that
were always open to anti-slavery
speakers. Among the
latter was the church* near Cool
Spring, or Unionville,
as the village was later called. This
was a favorite
meeting place not only because the use
of the church
was freely granted but because it was
located midway
between a number of villages and
conveniently acces-
sible to many people in northern
Columbiana County.
On Sunday, July 14, 1850, a meeting of
unusual interest
was held there. Following is the full
account as it
appeared in the Bugle of July 20, 1850:
* The trustees of this church, which was
located about one-fourth of a
mile east of Cool Spring, were Samuel
Nye, David Galbreath and Samuel
Heaton, in whom and their successors the
title of the property was vested
"to be free to all the sons and
daughters of Adam" for public worship.
The father and two uncles of David
Galbreath, all Quakers, had estab-
lished a similar church near the village
of New Garden, Columbiana
County, in 1806. Three of his children
he named after anti-slavery
leaders--Charles C. Burleigh, Abby Kelley and Parker
Pillsbury. All
three of the trustees were in sympathy
with the anti-slavery movement.
The church was torn down some time ago
and the village of Cool Spring,
or Unionville as it is still called, has
for years been slowly declining, due
to the growth of Leetonia, a railway
town less than two miles distant.
378
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
"As we anticipated, the meeting at
Cool Spring on Sunday
last was attended by a large concourse of people from
the sur-
rounding country, most of them doubtless
attracted by the pros-
pect of listening to the fervid eloquence of Abby
Kelley Foster.
The meeting house being too small to
accommodate even one-
half the throng, the windows on the
north side were removed,
and the speaker taking her place at one
of the apertures was
heard with great ease as well by those
on the outside as by those
within the walls.
"Mrs. Foster's subject in the
forenoon was the popular
religion of the land - the
spuriousness of its worship and forms,
contrasted with the pure and undefiled
Christianity of the New
Testament. She spoke with great power,
and with an unction
proceeding from the heart and from a
deep sympathy with
struggling humanity. The large audience
listened as if spell-
bound for upwards of two hours, and we
are confident that a
deep and abiding impression was made on
many minds. At
the conclusion of her address, several
questions were put by Dr.
Evans and De Lorma Brooks, Esq. of New
Lisbon, which, for
want of time before adjournment, were
not fully answered.
After a few remarks by Henry C. Wright,
the meeting adjourned
until 2 o'clock P. M.
"The friends of the cause having
reason to believe that a
concerted effort would be made to throw
the meeting into con-
fusion, determined to organize at the
commencement of the
afternoon session by the appointment of
a chairman to keep
order. Five or ten minutes, however,
before the hour appointed
for the opening of the meeting, a
vagrant buffoon and rowdy,
calling himself Dr. O. C. Evans, took
his place near the stand
and commenced a characteristic speech.
When the hour of 2
o'clock had arrived, Samuel Myers mildly
requested him to
desist, but he refused to do so in the
most insulting manner,
and proceeded with his harangue, being
encouraged in that out-
rageous course by a few rowdies as vulgar
as himself. Of course
he had no more right to speak at that
time, in defiance of all
order and of the wishes of those who had
called the meeting,
than he had to pick the pockets of those
assembled; but all
appeals to his sense of justice and his
regard for decency were
alike vain; he had come to the meeting
resolved that his voice
should be heard, not in a peaceable and
orderly manner, but in
such a way to produce all possible
confusion. He was told that,
if he would suffer the meeting to become
organized, he should
have the floor at once; but it was of no
use.
"Seing that remonstrance was vain,
the anti-slavery friends
appointed their chairman, quietly
removed their speakers' stand
to the south side of the house, and left
the brawler and his
Anti-Slavery Movement in Columbiana
County 379
congenial spirits to themselves. The
creature then played the
buffoon for an hour or more for the
amusement of his cronies,
who enveloped in the smoke of burning
tobacco doubtless thought
they had achieved a victory over the Abolitionists and
saved the
Union and the Church from
destruction! That the noise of
the rowdy doctor - for he roared like a
'bull of Bashan' - and
the loud jeers of his boon companions,
did not annoy the friends
of order, it would be too much to say;
but the disturbance was
not such as to interrupt the progress of the meeting.
Able ad-
dresses were made by H. C. Wright and A.
K. Foster. William
D. Ewing of New Lisbon, a sort of
amateur Free-soiler, came
forward in a manly way to vindicate the
Constitution and the
Union, but we cannot honestly say that
he helped the cause he
sought to defend. De Lorma Brooks, an out-and-out Whig,
who believes that the 'self-evident
truths' of the Declaration of
Independence are a transparent lie -
whose highest rule of
morality is that 'Power gives Right,'
and wouldn't mind holding
slaves and raising them for market if
the law only allowed it
- controverted alike the views of the
Abolitionists and of Mr.
Ewing. He admitted, however, that the
former were consistent
in opposing the Union and Constitution
believing as they did
that slavery was a sin and that it was a
crime to aid in upholding
it. They were both pretty effectually
'used up' by A. K. F.
"The meeting on the whole was a
grand one, and we believe
that the good seed so freely sown will
produce an abundant har-
vest.
"We have understood, and see many
reasons for believing,
that Dr. Evans was hired by certain
persons in Salem and taken
to Cool Spring for the very purpose of
creating a disturbance.
Among those who were guilty of this
meanness we have heard
mentioned the names of some persons who
would like to be
thought respectable, and who in fact
have hitherto borne such
a reputation. Perhaps they contemplated no more than an
amusing conflict between their rowdy
champion and the anti-
slavery speakers, but even this was
wholly unjustifiable. They
knew well enough that he was a mere
brawler, as incapable of
discussing the question raised by
Abolitionists as he was of
comprehending what belonged to a
gentlemanly propriety and
decency. To encourage such a person to
make his appearance
on the platform, and, under the guise of
free discussion to create
disturbance, was an insult to the
meeting and disgraceful to all
concerned in it. Our opponents very well know that we are
ever ready to meet them in fair
argument-that our platform
is not more free to ourselves than to
them. Is it generous, or
manly in them, in return for this
liberality, to seek to make
our meeting scenes of confusion and
vulgar rowdyism?"
380
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
The New Lisbon Palladium, the
Whig organ of the
county, handled these meetings in the
following sum-
mary fashion:
"Abby Kelley Foster is again upon
the stump ministering to
the depraved appetites of her fanatical followers. She
spoke
in this place Saturday last and at Cool
Spring, about seven miles
north of here, on Sunday. The people of
New Lisbon showed
their good sense by staying from the
meeting, letting her rave
her blasphemies in the ears of those
who have just wit enough
to believe in the doctrine that 'the
bible's a farce and Jesus
Christ's an impostor.' We sincerely
trust that even to those
poor witless fools who are blinded by
her eloquence to the dan-
gerous tendencies of her doctrines the
poison may be of so
malignant a nature as to carry with it
its own antidote."
The town of Salem was well chosen as
the western
citadel of the anti-slavery
forces. It was settled by
Quakers, and traditions of hostility to
the slave power
extended back to the earliest
settlement there in 1806.
The Bugle was safe in this
stronghold. James G. Bir-
ney's Philanthropist might be
mobbed and his press and
type thrown into the river at Cincinnati,
but there was
no time when it would have been safe
for a party of
lawless and desperate men to make an
attack on the
office of the Bugle in
Salem. There had grown up in
the town a sturdy generation of young
men who, in such
a contingency, would have forgotten
their "non-
resistant" creed. Their long war
of words was prepar-
atory to action, as we shall presently
see.
On Monday, August 28, 1854, occurred
the rescue of
a slave girl in Salem, Ohio, under
circumstances that
entitle it to a place in this record. The story of this
episode has been briefly related in
print with varied and
conflicting details. Fortunately it is now possible to
tell it from the testimony of eye
witnesses, written at
the time and worthy of all
confidence. The newspapers
Anti-Slavery Movement in Columbiana
County 381
are at last at hand which give in very
satisfactory form
the contemporaneous accounts.
On the above mentioned date the Western
Anti-
slavery Society was holding in Salem
the concluding
session of its annual convention. This
was the after-
noon of the third day. The previous
sessions were held
in a large tent not far from the
railroad station. The
final session, it seems, was held in
the Hicksite Quaker
Church, still standing on Ellsworth
Street. Such is the
testimony of a few persons still living
who were present
at this memorable session. A
contributor to the Liber-
ator, who was present and sent an account to that paper,
states that the meeting was in progress
"about a quarter
of a mile from the railroad
station," and that accords
with the location of the church.
At about 3 o'clock in the afternoon a
telegram was
received in Salem stating that a train
bearing a slave-
holder, his wife and a girl slave, had
left Pittsburgh for
the west and would pass through the
town at 6 o'clock
that afternoon. This telegram was taken
to the con-
vention, the speaker on the floor was
interrupted and
the message was read. This stirred the
audience. The
speaker asked if they believed their
professed principles
and were ready to march to the station
to rescue the
slave. With one impulse the assembly
rose to their feet
and were soon on their way to meet the
incoming train.
In the meantime the news had spread
through the
town and many citizens joined the
convention delegates.
They reached the station before the
train was due, im-
provised a speaker's stand and were
addressed by
Charles C. Burleigh of Massachusetts,
Reverend Griffing
of Connecticut and others.
Anti-Slavery Movement in Columbiana
County 383
A committee was appointed to board the
train when
it arrived. On this committee were
Henry B. Blackwell,
of Cincinnati, and a colored man of
Salem. The latter
was chosen because it was assumed that
the slave girl
would be frightened and that she would
have confidence
in one of her own color.
The crowd at the depot had been growing
and ex-
citement had reached a high pitch when
the 6 o'clock
train pulled in. Some of the citizens
engaged the con-
ductor in conversation while the
committee entered the
coach and soon located the slave. She
was a child, evi-
dently about twelve years of age. In
answer to a direct
question from a member of the
committee, "Do you
desire to be free?" the child
answered, "Yes."
The girl's master and mistress objected
to any inter-
ference with their property, insisting
that she belonged
to them and was on her way to
Tennessee. Thereupon
Mr. Blackwell informed them that the
child was legally
free, lifted her bodily from the seat,
carried her out of
the car and joined the crowd which sent
up a great
cheer. The girl was soon taken to a
place of safety.
She was much frightened at the large
crowd and strange
surroundings. As they were taking her
from the train
she said:
"Oh, don't put me to jail."
"No, no," said one
of the rescuers, "we will not put
you to jail, we have no jails
here."
"What, have you no jails?"
she said.
"No," was the answer,
"but why do you ask?"
"Because," said she,
"they take us to the jail when
we are sold. And have you no
watch-house either?"
"Oh, no, why should we have a
watch-house ?"
384
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
"Why, they take us to the
watch-house to be
whipped."
The westbound train that brought the
slave girl was
delayed at Salem half an hour to pass
the eastbound
train which was late. The crowd did not
leave the depot
but used a large store box as a
speaker's platform from
which Charles C. Burleigh regaled them
with one of his
most eloquent addresses. When finally
the train bear-
ing the slaveholder and his wife started
westward, a
great meeting in the town hall for that
evening was
announced and with another triumphant
cheer the res-
cuers left the railroad station. That
evening there was
a great ringing of bells, calling the
people to the meeting
in town hall, "Liberty Hall,"
"the Faneuil Hall of the
West" as it has been called, and
the people came in
numbers that exceeded the capacity of
the hall.
The slave girl was brought to the
rostrum. An eye
witness stated to the writer that she
was led forth by
a white girl about her own age. There
was cheering
and someone in the audience called out,
"Which is the
slave?" and then there was more
applause and an appro-
priate song. The meeting was addressed
by Henry B.
Blackwell of Cincinnati, Reverend
Griffing of Connec-
ticut, Charles C. Burleigh of
Massachusetts and Marius
Robinson and Henry Ambler of Salem.
Burleigh, as
usual, spoke in his scholarly, serious
and eloquent vein.
Ambler swayed the audience with
alternate sallies of
humor and stirring appeals. The meeting
reached its
appropriate climax when the little girl
was again
brought forward and named "Abby
Kelley Salem," after
the famous Quaker woman whose oratory
had done so
much to advance the anti-slavery cause
in the West
Anti-Slavery Movement in Columbiana
County 385
and the town which organized and
successfully carried
out the rescue.
The following resolution was
unanimously adopted:
"RESOLVED, That in tendering our thanks to those our friends
who were actively engaged in this
day's rescue of a living soul
from the fate of a chattel, Salem sends greeting to her
elder
cities, Cincinnati, Pittsburgh and
Boston, inviting them 'to go
and do likewise.' "
The meeting then "adjourned to
meet again at the
depot or elsewhere when a similar
occasion might call
them together."
This incident illustrates the spirit of
Salem in the
interesting decade before the Civil
War. The citizens
there and in many communities in
northeastern Ohio
found genuine enjoyment in the advocacy
of their fa-
vorite reform. The anti-slavery
meetings and conven-
tions were fountains of enthusiasm from
which they
freely drank. The anathemas and showers
of eggs with
which they were assailed in earlier
years no longer
marred their gatherings. The tide of
popular favor
was at last turning strongly in their
direction. They
rejoiced in the controversy and the
prospect of the
fruition of their labors.
The rescue of the slave girl had its
aftermath. The
Cleveland Herald, the Cleveland Plain
Dealer and the
Cincinnati Enquirer denounced it
as the work of
"fanatics, fools and knaves,"
and announced that the
slave girl had been taken against her
will. On the other
hand the Cleveland Leader stoutly
defended the action
of the people of Salem on the following
grounds:
"1. The child was free by
the laws of Ohio the moment
the train of cars crossed the Columbiana County line.
Vol. XXX-25
386
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
"2. The 'master and
mistress' were kidnappers every
minute they held her as a chattel in
their custody while on the
soil of Ohio.
"3. Any man had a legal right to rescue the little girl
from
the grasp of these kidnappers.
"4. The child, when acked whether
she desired to be free,
distinctly replies, 'Yes'.
"5. It is said by the dough-faces
that it was wrong and
cruel to prevent the little girl from
returning to her mother.
Bah! The girl says that her mother was
taken from her long
ago, that she has not seen or heard from
her for years-just
as tens of thousands of slave mothers
before her have been
forcibly torn from their children. The
child has been placed
in the hands of a wealthy, humane Quaker
family that will
educate her and raise her rightly, and
when she is of age she
can return 'to her mother' and resume
her chains if she chooses."
Henry B. Blackwell, of Cincinnati,
published a
defense in the papers of his city, of
his connection with
the rescue. It concludes as follows:
"The only assault committed was
that of Mr. Samuel B.
Keyes upon myself, an offense which I
cheerfully forgive, be-
cause he appeared to labor under unusual
and unnecessary ex-
citement.
"After the child was placed in safety,
I returned to the
cars, not to apologize for any rudeness
to the lady, for I had
been guilty of none, but to explain to
her our motives for re-
moving the child. No one who knows me
will for a moment
believe me capable of insulting or
offering disrespect to a woman.
"Is there any southern city where
abolitionists caught in
the act of removing a slave child into
freedom, would enjoy as
much forbearance as did these
slaveholders who were taking a
free child into slavery?
"In conclusion, I will merely say
that the deed was done in
open daylight, before many witnesses, by
men of character and
responsibility. If any injustice has been done to Mr.
Robinson
or to his lady I hold myself amenable to
the laws of my state
and to public opinion. I invite the
fullest investigation. In
strict accordance with justice and the
laws I have assisted to
prevent a free child in Ohio from being
kidnapped. To have
done otherwise would have forfeited my
self respect and proved
myself unworthy the position of an American citizen.
"Nobody is hurt. The little chattel
of Tennessee will now
grow up into a free and intelligent woman of Ohio. She
is in
Anti-Slavery Movement in Columbiana
County 387
the hands of kind and conscientious
friends who will provide for
her interests."
The Anti-Slavery Bugle approved the rescue in a
strong editorial, concluding as follows
on the legal
aspect of the case:
"The Supreme Court of Ohio has
decided that the course
pursued by the Salem rescuers was
entirely legal. Some years
since, a similar rescue was happily
effected by our friends,
Abram and Edward Brooke and others.
Then, as now, a hue
and cry was raised against those
engaged in the heroic under-
taking, for it required more heroism to
do it then than now.
They were hunted by the mob and
persecuted by appeals to law,
at the instance of pro-slavery Ohioans.
The Court of Common
Pleas decided against the rescuers as
guilty of offense against
law. The case was appealed to the
Supreme Court, and Judge
Lane decided the act to be lawful and
constitutional and that
the rescuers had the right to use so
much force as was needful
to effect the deliverance of the
slaves."
The rescued slave girl lived many years
in Salem, at
first in the family of Joel McMillan.
She attended the
public schools and grew up with many of
the advantages
of white children. In disposition,
however, she did not
exhibit the traits that some enthusiastic
anti-slavery
workers were wont to ascribe rather
indiscriminately to
the colored people. Mrs. McMillan late
in life said that
some of the characteristics of Mrs.
Stowe's Topsy were
manifest in Abby Kelley Salem.
Very early in the history of Columbiana
County aid
was freely given the slaves escaping
from their masters.
The Underground Railroad had a number
of active
agents in New Lisbon, Salem and the
surrounding
country. The list of their names is a
long one and
incomplete. The secrecy that this work
enjoined pre-
vented for the most part written or
printed records,
and its history is necessarily somewhat
traditional.
388
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
In the late fifties the anti-slavery
cause drew to it
rapidly increasing numbers of
supporters. While the
"disunion abolitionists", as
the followers of Garrison
were called, still adhered to their
slogan, "No union with
slave-holders," there was a
gradual "getting together"
of all the anti-slavery forces, and a
mighty undercurrent
was bearing the people toward "the
constitutionalizing
of the Declaration of Independence."
NOTES.
MARIUS R. ROBINSON.
Marius R. Robinson, son of Benjamin and
Naamah Robin-
son, was born in Dalton, Berkshire
County, Massachusetts, July
29, 1806.
He died in Salem, Ohio, December 8, 1878. He was
the eldest of a large family of boys and
girls. Limited means
and the Puritan code enforced economy,
temperate habits and
moral rigidity. When he was ten years
old he moved with his
parents to Dansville, New York. Soon
afterward he went to
Utica in that state where he learned the
trade of printer. In
1827 he went south and taught school in
the Creekpath mission
of the Cherokee Nation. While teaching
in this Indian school
he studied theology, reciting to private
teachers. In 1830 he
entered the Nashville University in the
third or junior year of
the four years course and two years
later was graduated from
this institution with high honors. His
diploma, which is still
in the possession of a relative, bears
the name of President
Andrew Jackson. After graduation he
entered Lane Seminary
in Cincinnati under the administration
of Rev. Lyman Beecher,
father of Henry Ward Beecher and Harriet
Beecher Stowe.
Here he remained two years until the
controversy between the
trustees, faculty and students of that
institution over the ques-
tion of slavery. For some time a
colonization society had been
conducted by the students with the
approval of the trustees,
but finally the students organized an
abolition society. To this
the trustees and patrons from the South
at once objected and
both societies were forbidden. The
students, however, from the
North and many from the South insisted
upon continuing the
abolition society and severed their
connection with the seminary
rather than submit to the regulation of
the trustees and faculty.
They continued their studies through the
winter in a room that
they hired and under privately employed
teachers.
In the spring of 1836 Mr. Robinson was
employed on the
Anti-Slavery Movement in Columbiana
County 389
Philanthropist published by James G. Birney. While engaged
in this work the printing office was
mobbed but the presses and
type were saved. In June of this year he
was ordained to the
ministry in Jamestown, New York. In August he was
appointed
by the American Anti-Slavery Society as lecturer for
middle
and northern Ohio. His work brought him
to Salem which
later became his permanent home.
While in Cincinnati he became acquainted
with Miss Emily
Rakestraw, of New Garden, Ohio, who had
gone to that city
to teach in the colored schools. For
this she was practically
ostracized by the white people of
Cincinnati and by not a few
of her friends in her home village. She
afterwards became the
wife of Mr. Robinson and as the village
of New Garden was
near Salem the two had family ties that
made their new field of
labor doubly attractive. In 1851 Mr.
Robinson became editor
of the Anti-Slavery Bugle and continued in that
position until
1863. Promptly on the conclusion of his
editorial labors he
became president of the Ohio Mutual Fire
Insurance Company
with offices at Salem and continued in
this position up to the
date of his death.
Oliver Johnson, whom he succeeded as
editor of the Bugle.
gives this summary of his estimate of
his friend and co-worker:
"Mr. Robinson was a man of great
sweetness and purity
of life, and an earnest and eloquent
champion of every prin-
ciple and measure which he thought
beneficial to his fellow-men.
He combined great courage with great
discretion, winning the
respect and confidence even of those
whose views differed most
widely from his own. Of pure and
undefiled religion, as de-
fined by the apostle James, he was at
once a defender and an
exemplar. As a speaker he was full of
what is usually called
magnetic power, by which he was able to
command the attention
and sway the sympathies of his hearers.
For many years he
was editor of the Ohio Anti-Slavery
Bugle, the files of which
are a memorial of his power as a writer
as well as of his un-
swerving devotion to the cause of
freedom."
CHARLES C. BURLEIGH.
Charles Calistus Burleigh was born in
Plainfield, Connec-
ticut, November 10, 181O. He died in
Florence, Massachusetts,
June 14, 1878. He was the son of Rinaldo
Burleigh, a graduate
of Yale, and of Lydia Bradford, a lineal
descendent of Governor
Bradford who came to America in the Mayflower.
He studied
law and was admitted to the bar of
Windham County, Con-
necticut, but he early became interested
in the anti-slavery cause
and soon devoted his entire time to it.
He was editor of The
390 Ohio Arch. and Hist.
Society Publications.
Unionist, an abolition paper published in his state. In 1835
he assisted in protecting William Lloyd
Garrison from the mob
in Boston. He was a speaker in
Pennsylvania Hall, Philadel-
phia, in 1838 when the building was
attacked and burned by a
mob. For several years he preached for the Free
Congrega-
tional Society of Florence,
Massachusetts, and at one time served
in a similar capacity in Bloomington,
Illinois. He is described
as a remarkably eloquent speaker. He had
vowed that he would
not cut his hair until the slaves were
emancipated. His long,
abundant hair and his heavy beard marked
him as an eccentric
personality and the impression that he
made on first appearance
was for this reason against him. Mrs.
Fanny Garrison Villard,
the daughter of William Lloyd Garrison,
recalls a meeting at
which her father and Burleigh were the
principal speakers. Her
father was bald from the age of
twenty-one. The contrast be-
tween the appearance of the two speakers
led some lusty lunged
fellow in the audience to bawl out,
"Someone shave that black
Christ and make a wig of his beard for
Garrison."
Mr. Burleigh's eloquence, however, soon
led his audience
to forget his beard and long flowing
locks. The following quota-
tion from a letter dated May 10, 1852,
from a person not in
sympathy with his views who heard him
speak in Cincinnati,
gives some idea of the impression that
he made as a lecturer:
"A few evenings ago I went to hear
a lecture at the Me-
chanics' Institute, from C. C. Burleigh,
the celebrated abolition
orator from New England. * * * The
orator presently made
his appearance and a most unfavorable
one it was--the first
characteristic being an intense amount
of beard, covering his
face and breast, so that you could see
little more than his nose
and eyes above the top vest-button. I
must do him the justice
to say, however, that his language was
beautifully chaste, his
imagery superb, and the whole manner of
his oratory fascinating
to a very high degree. His reasoning was
of that kind which
to the superficial seems absolutely
conclusive and unanswer-
able; and I could easily perceive how an
ardent and unreflecting
temperament might be led by it into the
belief that the institution
of slavery was 'the sum of all
villainies,' and the obligation to
suppress it the highest of Christian
duties. It is no vanity, in
me, however, to say that I saw in the
whole argument, a trans-
parent sophistry, founded upon utter
ignorance or wilful mis-
representation of the real condition of
the slave in every south-
ern state. * * * With a few such
impressive speakers as
this man Burleigh speaking in populous communities,
with the
countenance of such auditors as have been flocking to hear
him in this place, there will be
thousands of the unwary, the
inexperienced and the ardent of
temperament led into uniting
Anti-Slavery Movement in Columbiana
County 391
their forces with the unscrupulous and
treacherous to the effect-
ing of most injurious, not to say
disastrous results."
Burleigh was an advocate of woman's
rights, temperance
and the abolition of capital
punishment. In 1845 he wrote
"Thoughts on the Death Penalty" which is
still sometimes quoted
by the opponents of capital punishment. One in sympathy
with
his work has described him as
"tall, with a noble countenance,
with long sandy beard and hair and
dressed unconventionally."
He spoke frequently in eastern Ohio
where he became a
great favorite among friends of the
anti-slavery movement.
ABBY KELLEY.
Abby Kelley was born in Pelham,
Massachusetts, January
15, 1811 and died in Worcester,
Massachusetts, January 14,
1887. Her ancestors were Irish Quakers.
She was educated
at the Friends School, Providence, Rhode
Island, taught school
for a number of years and resigned her
position in the Friends
School at Lynn, Massachusetts, in 1835
to enter the anti-slavery
lecture field. She lectured in
Connecticut, Pennsylvania and
Ohio and it is to her influence largely
that the Anti-Slavery Bugle
was founded. She also had much to do
with the swaying of
the Ohio Anti-slavery Society to the
support of the Garrisonian
abolitionists whose motto was "no
union with slave holders."
They were frequently called dis-union
abolitionists. In 1839
the name of this society was changed to
Western Anti-Slavery
Society and it became an auxiliary of
the national society. In
1845 she married Steven S. Foster and
accompanied by her
husband she continued in the lecture
field. The poet Lowell
thus describes her:
"A Judith there, turned Quakeress,
Sits Abby in her modest dress.
No nobler gift of heart or brain,
No life more white from spot or stain,
Was e'er on freedom's altar laid,
Than her's - the simple Quaker
maid."
After the triumph of the anti-slavery
cause she and her
husband settled on a farm in
Massachusetts. They were both
ardent advocates of woman suffrage. She aided in the
campaign
for the adoption of the fifteenth
amendment in doubtful states.
This appears to have been her last
service in the lecture field.
She is said to have been an amiable and
pleasing personality
but the severity of her arraignments on
the platform at times
led her hearers, especially those who
did not agree with her, to
reach a different conclusion. When she
came to Salem, Ohio,
392 Ohio Arch. and Hist.
Society Publications.
it is said that she went to the home of
Jacob Heaton, a prominent
anti-slavery advocate of that town, who
was also a firm supporter
of the Liberty Party. When she came to
his home, before
entering she said to him: "I do not
know that thee will wish me
to enter thy home. I have come to kill
the Liberty Party." To
this Mr. Heaton answered with a smile,
"Come in, Abby, and
we will kill thee with kindness."
OLIVER JOHNSON.
Oliver Johnson was born at Peacham,
Vermont, December
27, 1809. He died December 8, 1889. He was an apprentice
printer in the office of the Watchman
published at Montpelier,
Vermont. He was afterwards engaged in a
number of news-
paper enterprises and interested himself
in benevolent movements
and the anti-slavery cause. He aided in
organizing the New
England Anti-slavery Society in 1832,
assisted William Lloyd
Garrison in the publication of the Liberator,
went to Ohio and
there lectured for the Western
Anti-Slavery Society and edited
the Anti-Slavery Bugle for almost
two years. He afterward
returned to the east and in 1865 became
managing editor of the
Independent. In 1870 he became editor of the New York Weekly
Tribune and two weeks later accepted the editorship of the
Christian Union. He
wrote a book entitled William Lloyd
Garrison and his Times; or sketches
of the anti-slavery move-
ment in America.
JOHN FROST.
John Frost was born in Fayette County,
Pennsylvania, July
18, 1806 and died January 1, 1885. He
came with his parents
to Hanover Township, Columbiana County,
in 1811.
He re-
ceived his education in the pioneer
public schools and the print-
ing office. He was a born reformer and
early became identified
with the anti-slavery
movement-"itself a great educator."
In 1827 he entered the office of
the American, published in New
Lisbon, Ohio, where he learned the
printer's trade. In 1832
he established the Aurora, the
first issue of which bears the
date of March 15 of that year. This
paper he continued to
publish until 1856. Its character is set
forth on preceding pages
and in the excerpt following this
sketch. It was published at
first in an office "over the store
of Potter and Quinby two
doors west of Mr. Daily's hotel,"
and later from an office on
Walnut Street, constructed in circular
form, so built as the
editor expressed it, that "the devil could not
corner him."
After the Aurora ceased
publication, Mr. Frost went to
Ravenna, Ohio, where for a time he was one of the
editors of
the Reformer, a radical anti-slavery paper.
From 1859-1862
Anti-Slavery Movement in Columbiana
County 393
he followed the printer's trade in
eastern cities principally Phila-
delphia. In 1863 he returned to Ohio and
with Peter Walker
of Massillon commenced in that city the
publication of the In-
dependent, which he continued successfully for ten years. In
1873 he returned to New Lisbon, where he
was employed until
within a few weeks of his death in
general newspaper work, much
of his time in his later years being
spent in the office of the
Buckeye State. He
was a reformer and actively interested in
promoting the moral and educational
welfare of the communities
in which he lived. Firmly grounded in
his faith, he was tolerant
of those sincerely holding opposite
views and, through the stormy
controversial times in which he lived,
he ever preserved a genial
and gentle personality.
THE AURORA.
Volume 1, Number 1, March 15, 1832
The introductory note at the head of the
first column is
brief and is here quoted in full:
"THE AURORA
will be published weekly, at two dollars
per annum if paid within the
year, or two dollars and fifty cents if
payment be extended beyond that
period. No discontinuance until all
arrearages are paid--Office over
the store of Potter & Quinby two doors west of Mr.
Daily's hotel.
"Advertisements not exceeding a
square, one dollar for the three
first insertions, anw twenty-five cents
for each subsequent insertion.
Longer ones in proportion."
The editor's salutatory, which appears
at the head of the
third page, is as follows:
"In the early part of November, we
issued a prospectus, for pub-
lishing, in the town of New Lisbon, a
newspaper called 'The Aurora.'
At that time, we intended to commence
its publication on the first of
January last, and with a view thereto we sent to
Cincinnati for the press
and materials, which, in consequence of
the obstruction of the navigation
of the Ohio River by ice, we have not
been able to obtain until a few
weeks past.
"In presenting to the public the
first number of our paper, some
apology for the matter it contains we
deem necessary: Unfavored with
the advantages of an exchange, we were
obliged to gather the best we
could from the few papers in our
possession. Hereafter, we are in
hopes that these disadvantages will be
removed; and that we shall be
able, by a judicious selection, from the
best periodicals and newspapers
printed in the United States, to make
our future numbers more interesting
than the present.
"Since the issuing of our
prospectus for this publication, much
speculation has been afloat as to the
course that would be taken in its
direction. Many things have been in
circulation, calculated to prejudice
and forestall public opinion; and to
produce a withholding of that sup-
port, which we otherwise might have
expected. To correct the public
394 Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
upon this subject, we have thought it
advisable to notice two of the most
prominent objections that have been
urged against the establishment of
this press. It is stated that this
county cannot support three presses;
and that in case ours succeeds, it must
be at the expense of others. This
statement, in our opinion, is
incorrect-we cannot as yet, believe that
the rich county of Columbiana, with a population
of thirty-six thousand,
is incapable of supporting three
presses. It must be borne in mind that
improvement is on the march-that general
information is becoming
every day more widely infused, and the
advantages of newspapers more
properly appreciated. We deem the time
not far distant when almost
every family in our county will consider
a newspaper an indispensable
requisite to its interests and
amusement.
"It has also been stated, and
pretty generally circulated, that this
press has been established for the
express purpose of rearing up a polit-
ical antimasonic party-to proscribe
those who belong to the masonic
institution; and to lift into office a
few political aspirants, who have no
other way of getting in. We
unequivocally pronounce this to be incor-
rect. We are opposed to political
antimasonry unless it should be needed
to counteract the effects of political
masonry; we are opposed to pro-
scribing any man, because he belongs to
this society, or that; and, we
are also opposed to that class of men
that espouse any party for the
purpose of office.
"In principle, we are antimasonic.
We look upon the masonic insti-
tution as entirely useless, and
calculated, if for nothing more, to create
suspicion and mistrust. And in the
direction of this paper, we shall
occasionally endeavor to show why, &
wherein, it is useless, & the reasons
why it ought to be abolished. In doing
which, we shall not travel out
of the path of truth, or o'erstep the bounds
of candor and propriety.
Our columns also will be open for a fair
discussion of its principles.
And if they are, as its friends
represent them to be, correct and useful,
they have nothing to fear from
investigation, if not, the public ought to
be made acquainted with them.
"By some, it is contended that the
press has nothing to do with the
subject of masonry; that it steps aside
from its duty when it meddles
with it. We think differently-we
consider no society privileged, how-
ever ancient it may be, or whatever may
be its tenets or principles. If
they be useful, the world ought to be
made acquainted with it, if not,
justice requires an exposure; and the
press, in our opinion, is the proper
vehicle to make that exposure. Whatever
concerns the public, the press
ought not to withhold. Like a faithful
sentinel, its duty is to watch
over the welfare of the country; and to
sound the alarm when danger
either stalks abroad at noonday, or
skulks about under the cover of the
night. Such are our views of masonry,
and such are our views of the
duties of the public press.
"In politics this press will be
governed by principles rather than
men-only adhering to such men as are
governed by correct motives,
and whose abilities and integrity
entitle them to public confidence. Be-
lieving that the American system
embraces the true policy of our country
-a policy calculated to make us
independent in time of war, and happy
in time of peace, we shall give it our
undivided support.
"As to the two political parties
that now agitate this country, we
shall not espouse either; but endeavor
to pursue an independent course,
and to publish such matter on both sides
as may be interesting to the
public. Experience has fully shown that,
in the rage of political excite-
ment, truth is frequently sacrificed to party purposes,
and the public most
egregiously imposed upon-such things ought not to
be-truth ought
Anti-Slavery Movement in Columbiana
County 395
to be published, whether the same makes
against this party or that;
that the people may be correctly
informed, and be prepared to act in the
exercise of their elective franchise.
"Believing that the greatest
portion of our readers will be among
those, who belong to the agricultural and manufacturing
occupations,
we shall take great pains to make this
paper valuable to them; for that
purpose, we shall, as soon as possible,
devote a part of this paper ex-
clusively to such subjects as more
particularly interest them.-In short
it will be our aim to make our columns
interesting to all classes of
community."
ILLUSTRATIONS.
The portraits of Abby Kelley, Oliver
Johnson and Charles
C. Burleigh are reproduced from William
Lloyd Garrison, 1805-
1879, The Story of His Life Told by
His Children. These were
made from daguerreotypes taken prior to
1860. The portrait of
John Frost is from a photograph loaned
by his niece, Mrs. T. B.
Marquis. The picture of his office is
from a photograph loaned
by his grand-daughter, Mrs. C. C.
Helman.
RESCUE OF "ABBY KELLEY SALEM."
The facts upon which the account of this
rescue is based
were gleaned chiefly from the files of
the Village Register pub-
lished in Salem, Ohio. Confirmatory and
supplemental informa-
tion was gathered from files of the Liberator.
ANTI-SLAYERY
MOVEMENT IN COLUMBIANA
COUNTY.
BY C. B. GALBREATH
A study of the early anti-slavery
movement in Ohio
at this late day occasions many
surprises. It seems that
the first participants came from the
South, a number
arriving before the state was admitted
into the Union.
The famous Ordinance of 1787 prohibited
slavery in
the Northwest Territory. The states
carved out of it
were thus from the beginning dedicated
to freedom.
While the Ordinance contained a
provision for the re-
turn of slaves to their masters in
other states, this did
not prevent the free soil north of the
Ohio River from
becoming a haven and a refuge for
slaves seeking free-
dom from bondage or masters convicted
by conscience.
As early as 1796, William Dunlop left
Fayette
County, Kentucky, and settled in Brown
County, Ohio
(then in the Northwest Territory). He
brought a large
number of slaves with him, set them
free and "estab-
lished them on land about Ripley."
Many others did
likewise. Among the number was Dr.
Alexander
Campbell, who came from Kentucky in
1803, liberated
his slaves, advocated immediate
abolition, served in the
Legislature of Ohio, represented the
state in the United
State Senate and in 1835 stood at the
head of the list
of vice-presidents of the Ohio
Anti-Slavery Society.
Thomas Morris, member of the
Legislature, Judge and
United States Senator, came from
Virginia to what is
(355)