|
(396) |
EDWIN COPPOC.
BY C. B. GALBREATH.
Among many villages of our state that
pursue the
even tenor of their way so peacefully
and quietly that
they earn their way to honorable
obscurity, is Winona,
Columbiana County. This name was chosen
from
Longfellow's Hiawatha, for the citizens
of this place
find time to read, enjoy what we
dignify as "literature"
and are in a very useful and
unpretentious way "cul-
tured." The church and the school
are liberally patron-
ized. The moral standard of the community
is high.
Through the bellum and ante-bellum days
this village
was simply a crossroads, unnamed as
yet, with little to
distinguish it from the surrounding
country, which is
rolling, well watered and fertile. It
was not christened
Winona until the year 1868.
Hither in pioneer days at the opening
of the last cen-
tury came the Quakers, chiefly from
North Carolina.
The admission of Ohio as a free state
in 1803 made it
attractive to these people. They were
uncompromis-
ingly opposed to slavery. They did not
seek contro-
versies with slaveholding neighbors in
the South, but
preferred to make their homes in a land
dedicated to
universal liberty.
As a people they were frugal,
industrious, honest, a
little inconsistent, strangers say, in
their plain clothes
and plain language, but opposed with
uncompromising
firmness to all forms of organized
injustice, intolerance
and oppression. In the new state they
found congenial
(397)
398
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
environment, the opportunity to
practice unmolested the
tenets of their simple faith and a form
of government
that disturbed them little in the
course of their unevent-
ful and peaceful lives.
The settlement about what afterward
became Winona
was typically Quaker. Year in and year
out these
people tilled the earth, sowed the seed
and gathered the
harvests in. On First Day of each week
they met for
silent worship. They bowed in silence
before partaking
of their daily bread. They were a law
unto themselves
and very seldom needed either the
restraining or direct-
ing hand of government. This is about
the last place
that we should expect to give birth to
any one who
should startle the community or aid in
startling the
world.
And yet on some subjects these people
thought seri-
ously and profoundly. The slavery
question was to them
one of absorbing interest. On it they
read and medi-
tated. To many of them it was a source
of education.
They became familiar with all the
anti-slavery argu-
ments. To "remember those in bonds
as bound with
them," was for them invested with
all the force a direct
command from Mt. Sinai. Opposition to
slavery grew
with the passing years and the appeals
of Lundy and
Garrison found a fervid response in
this farming com-
munity.
We have heard much of the
"isolation of the rural
districts." This did not apply to
the region of which
we write in the three decades before
the Civil War, for
it was located in Columbiana County and
only six miles
distant was the town of Salem, a center
of anti-slavery
agitation, from which radiated the
itineraries of the
agents of the Western Anti-Slavery
Society.
400
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
In this community, when the movement
was in full
swing, the Coppoc brothers, Edwin and
Barclay, were
born. Their grandfather John Coppock
and his wife
moved to Mount Pleasant, then in the
Northwestern
Territory, but one year later in the
state of Ohio. In
the year following, 1803, he moved to
what in 1806 be-
came Butler Township, Columbiana
County, Ohio.
John Coppock was descended from Aaron
Coppock,
of Cheshire, England, who was born
August 19, 1662
and came to America in 1683. He was a
minister of
the gospel forty-two years. His son
John, born July 1,
1709, married Margaret Coulston. To
them were born
five children. The youngest son,
Samuel, born Novem-
ber 3, 1748, married Anne Stillwell.
Their oldest son,
John, born November 4, 1776, married
Catherine Kirk.
Their son, Samuel, married Anne Lynch.
Of this union
six children were born, Levi, Maria,
Edwin, Barclay,
Lydia and Joseph L. Levi and the two
daughters died
before they reached the age of
twenty-five years. Joseph
L. Coppoc saw very active service in
the Civil War and
rose to the rank of major. He was for
many years a
minister in the Baptist church. A
number of children
survive him.1
The sons of Samuel Coppock spelled
their family
name Coppoc, omitting the final k. A
cousin explains
the change in spelling as follows:
Levi, the oldest son
of the family, who died in his
twenty-fourth year, was
an expert speller and inclined to favor
simplified spell-
ing, which even at that early day had a
few advocates.
He and his brothers and sisters omitted
the k in spelling
the family name, but their father
always retained it.
While there seems to have been no
authority for chang-
ing the name from "Coppock"
to "Coppoc," this latter
Edwin Coppoc 401
spelling will be used in the names of
those who had
adopted it. In other words, each person
will be accepted
as authority on the spelling of his own
name.
It will be seen that the Coppocks were
of colonial
ancestry. They came from Pennsylvania
to that part
of the Northwest Territory which
afterward became
Ohio.
Edwin Coppoc, the third child of Samuel
and
Anne (Lynch) Coppock, was born in
Butler Township,
Columbiana County, Ohio, June 30, 1835.
His brother
Barclay was born at the same place
January 4, 1839.
Their father died when the boys were
young. They
grew up under the influence of a devout
mother, grand-
parents and other relatives. The father
died early in
1842, leaving a wife and six children,
ranging in ages
from one to ten years. In the spring of
1842, a few
months after the death of his father,
Edwin was placed
with John Butler, a farmer of sterling
character with
whom he remained for eight years.
During this time
he attended school in the winter and
performed the work
that usually fell to the lot of farmer
boys in the neigh-
borhood.
The years from 1842 to 1850 were
eventful. They
covered not only the brief period of
the Mexican war
but the anti-slavery agitation which
had been intensi-
fied by the results of that war,
including a substantial
extension of slave territory, and the
exciting debates in
Congress leading up to the enactment of
the Fugitive
Slave Law. It is needless to say that
discussion of the
burning question of the hour was
carried on almost
without interruption in the Quaker
communities of Ohio
and much that was said sank deep in the
receptive minds
of the young. The talk in front of the
ample fireplace,
Vol. XXX-26
402
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
at the table, in the church and on the
rostrum turned
upon the wrongs of those in bonds and
the aggressions
of the slave power. To all this Edwin
Coppoc was an
attentive and serious listener. His
impressions were
lasting; what he heard had much to do
with what he
became when he reached young manhood's
estate.
At the age of fifteen years, somewhat
to the regret
of Mr. Butler, young Coppoc went to
Springdale, Iowa,
in what was then known as the far West,
to join his
mother who had married a man by the
name of Raley
and was re-establishing a home for her
children. She
was a woman of native intelligence and
strong convic-
tions. Already she had known the trials
and vicissitudes
of life. She had lost the sight of one
eye when she was
a child and the other was beginning to
fail. Two daugh-
ters and a son were soon to follow
their father to the
grave. As Edwin grew into sturdy young
manhood she
looked to him as a source of comfort
and support. He
was industrious, frugal and bade fair
to become a suc-
cessful farmer in the new western home. In 1859,
Thomas Winn of Springdale, Iowa, wrote
of him:
"He came to Iowa with his widowed
mother some seven
or eight years ago and settled here. I
have been well and in-
timately acquainted with him and the whole family
during the
greater part of the time mentioned. For
more than a year Edwin
was an inmate of my family, [I] having
employed him as a hired
hand on a farm, in which capacity he
discharged his duties most
faithfully, and I can truly say that by
his uniform industry, cor-
rect habits and amiable deportment he
gained the confidence and
esteem of every member of my family. His
reputation has
always been good as an honest,
truth-speaking, straightforward,
industrious person."2
In a similar vein, Charles Adams, of
Philadelphia,
in December of the same year wrote of
Edwin and his
mother in part as follows:
The numeral referances are to notes on pages
450-451.
Edwin Coppoc 403
"About three years since, I
visited Iowa and was at his
mother's house in Springdale
settlement: her sons were then at
home; Edwin was a farmer, owned a team
of oxen and followed
breaking prairie. He was industrious and much
respected, and
had the reputation of being thrifty and attending
closely to his
business. He broke some prairie for me
also, and from his man-
ner and appearance and his mother's
representation of him as
a dutiful and attentive son, I took
quite an interest in him. In
December last, I had business
again in Iowa, and dined at his
mother's house. Edwin had been on a
visit to some of his rela-
tives in Kansas and returned the day
before -so that I dined
with him also: He then talked of
renting a farm in the spring,
and I inferred that it was his
intention to marry.
"The mother is a member of the
Society of Friends,
[orthodox] and is largely and
respectably connected in New
Jersey and Pennsylvania. She is an exemplary
woman and has
been visited with many and grievous
affictions, lost one eye in
her childhood and is now nearly blind.
Of six children three
have died of consumption."2
Late in December, 1857, an event of
unusual im-
portance occurred in the village of
Springdale. It was
the arrival of John Brown and his party
on their way
from Kansas to Canada preparatory to
the attack on
Harper's Ferry. It had not been the
intention of John
Brown to stop long at Springdale. He
had expected to
press on to Ashtabula County, Ohio, as
soon as he could
sell his teams and wagons and thus
realize sufficient
money to proceed on the journey by
rail. Times were
very hard, however, and he could not
raise sufficient
money to proceed. While cash was
scarce, food in this
Iowa village was abundant and he found
that it would
be much cheaper to winter there than to
continue east-
ward.
Besides he found the people of this
community in
hearty accord with his anti-slavery
views. Springdale
was settled by the Quakers, a number of
them from
Ohio. An Iowa writer thus describes the
early settlers:
404
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications
"Among the first residents were
John H. Painter, a Quaker,
who came in 1849; and Anne Coppoc, a
Quakeress, and Dr. H.
C. Gill who came in 1850. During the
next few years many
came, almost all of them Quakers; so
that when visited by Brown
and his band in 1857, it was a thriving
Quaker settlement. Its
one street, which in fact is but a part
of the public highway, is
bordered on either hand by modest frame
houses surrounded
by spacious yards and shaded by
overhanging branches of trees.
On all sides of the village the green
and undulating fields stretch
away to the horizon. Within its homes
the pleasant 'thee' and
'thy' of the Quaker are constantly
heard; and there prevails an
air of peace and serenity which is
inexpressibly soothing and
comforting."
It was not, of course, the natural
beauty of the
place and surrounding country that
especially appealed
to Brown and his followers but the
friendly attitude of
the people who threw open their homes
and bade the
storm beaten little expedition of
anti-slavery warriors
a cordial welcome.
John Brown himself lived, while in
Springdale, with
John H. Painter, a Quaker who became
his staunch
friend. His men, however, were
quartered in the home
of William Maxson about three miles
distant from the
village. Here they found a haven of rest and social
enjoyment that contrasted sharply with
the excitement
and turmoil of the border warfare in
Kansas. Maxson
was not a Quaker but an ardent
abolitionist.
They had regular camp duties to perform
under the
direction of Aaron D. Stevens, one of
their number
who had served in the United States
army and was an
ideal instructor in military
tactics. The men began
their daily work at five o'clock in the
morning. Imme-
diately following breakfast they took
up their studies
and continued until about ten
o'clock. Books were
then laid aside and the remainder of
the forenoon was
devoted to drill in the school of the
soldier. A portion
Edwin Coppoc 405
of each afternoon was spent in
gymnastics, sword drill
and company movements. This training
was conducted
in an open space close to the Maxson
home. There was
perhaps a double purpose in this. It
was conveniently
located with reference to "winter
quarters" and the
exhibition of arms, "carnal
weapons", was not obtruded
upon the peace-loving Quakers of the
village.
Of course these "conscientious
objectors" to the use
of arms knew what was in progress at
the drill grounds.
They also understood in a general way
that Brown and
his followers believed that slavery
must be overthrown
by force of arms, but their religious
objections to war
were very materially modified by the
thought that the
projected warfare was to be launched
against the insti-
tution of slavery, which they
considered the supreme
iniquity of the age. They were in full
sympathy with
Brown in the object to be attained and
while they did
not approve they were disposed to
excuse the means
by which he sought to achieve the end.
Had he and
his followers come on a mission to
return fugitive
slaves to their masters, they would
have found Spring-
dale at this time a most inhospitable
abiding place.
With a community of views on the slavery
question as
a basis, there were other
considerations that aroused
in the people of this pioneer village
additional interest
in their guests. Had not these young
men and their
chieftain already achieved fame on the
plains of
Kansas? These were the heroes of Black
Jack and
Ossawatomie, who had opposed the border
ruffians
from Missouri. Free State papers and
the New York
Tribune had brought the news to the community. Be-
sides, the new comers by their social
deportment and
their manifest interest in literary
attainment most
406
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
favorably impressed their Quaker
friends, especially
those of about their own age. Kagi was
a ready writer,
a skillful debater and an able speaker.
Cook was of a
poetic temperament, fluent and
impressive on the ros-
trum.
Richard Raelf had already written poetry of
genuine merit, was a born orator and a
lecturer who
was heard with genuine pleasure. He had
come from
England, had travelled much, was
reputed to have been
the protege of Lady Byron and it was
even hinted that
he was related to her husband, the
famous poet. That
he was a youth with claim to native
genius is attested by
the substantial volume of his poetry
that was collected
and published after his death by his
friend, Colonel
Richard J. Hinton. All the members of
the little band
had had thrilling experiences on the
border which fur-
nished interesting narratives for the
long winter eve-
nings around the hospitable
firesides. In addition to
this all of the men, except John Brown
himself, were
young and of attractive personality.
Brown's men found a pleasing diversion
in organ-
izing and successfully conducting a
literary or debating
society. Tuesday and Friday evenings of
each week
were set aside for this purpose. A mock
legislature was
organized which included not only their
own number
but interested young men in the
community who wished
to take part. Irving B. Richman thus
describes the
work of this moot body:
"The sessions were held either in
the large sitting room of
the Maxsons, or in the larger room of
the district school building,
a mile and a half away. There were a
speaker, a clerk of the
House, and regular standing committees.
Bills were introduced,
referred, reported back. debated with
intense earnestness and
no little ability, and finally brought
to a vote. Kagi was the
keenest debater and Raelf and Cook
orators of very considerable
powers."3
Edwin Coppoc 407
It is scarcely necessary to state that
from the day
of the arrival of these guests, Edwin
and Barclay
Coppoc were sympathetic observers and
listeners.
"They both took much interest in
Brown, his men and
his cause, and at length enlisted under
his leadership."
If these two boys and the good people
of Springdale
were favorably impressed with John
Brown and his men
in the winter of 1857-58 and shed tears
when they took
their departure on April 27 of the latter
year, it will be
readily understood that great interest
was aroused by
the arrival, on February 25, 1859, of
John Brown and
a part of his faithful band with the
eleven negroes
whom he had liberated in his famous
foray into Mis-
souri. Was this not a practical
demonstration of the
efficacy of Brown's plans? Here were
the men, women
and children that he had delivered from
the land of
bondage, now well on their way to
freedom under the
protecting folds of the British flag.
The dusky charges
were distributed among the homes of
Springdale and
here for a time they rested before
starting on the final
stage of their journey to freedom. To
the young men
of the village especially there was a
strong appeal in this
spectacular exploit and its antecedent
adventure.
But among the older citizens of
Springdale misgiv-
ings began to find guarded expression.
The news came
that the United States authorities were
on the trail of
this band of liberators, that a large
reward had been
offered for the capture of Brown.
The officers of the government might
appear at any
time. The young men of the village, a
number of them,
were ready to take up arms to prevent
the return of the
slaves and the awful possibility loomed
up of a pitched
and bloody battle in the streets of
Springdale. The
408
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
Quakers, of course, did not wish to
witness this. They
were not yet ready for the results to
which their agita-
tion and teachings were unintentionally
but inevitably
leading.
Much to their relief the armed conflict
did not occur
and John Brown with his dusky freedmen,
on March 9,
left to take the train and continue
their journey to
Canada. They went to West Liberty, from
which sta-
tion Richman thus graphically describes
their departure:
"Huddled together in a little group
near the track, stand the
negroes, patient, wondering. Near them,
leaning on their Sharp's
rifles, heavy revolvers in their belts,
on the alert, stand Kagi and
Stephens. In a few minutes the freight
car which has been got
with so much trouble, and by not a
little prevarication as to the
use to which it is to be put, is pushed
by a crowd of men down
the side-track to a point convenient for
the loading. Brown
mounts into it and shakes the door and
lays hold of the sides
that he may judge of its capacity for
resistance in case of attack.
Clean straw is then brought to him which
he spreads over the
floor. After this, the negro babes and
small children, of whom
there are several, are handed up to him
and he tenderly deposits
them among the straw. The older negroes
are next helped in,
and all is ready. The passenger train on
the Chicago and Rock
Island Road rolls in from the west. For
a moment there is
suspense. Is the United States Marshal
on board? No! The
train draws out from the station, stops,
backs down on the side-
track and is coupled to the freight car.
Kagi and Stephens get
into one of the passenger coaches, and
John Brown is leaving
Iowa for the last time."3
Many of the Quakers of Springdale
heaved an
audible sigh of relief when Brown and
the negroes de-
parted, but they followed him with
ardent prayers for
the success of his enterprise and the
hope that he might
reach Canada in safety and permanently
liberate the
fugitives without "the snapping of
a gun" or the shed-
ding of a drop of blood. It need not be
added that there
was sincere rejoicing when the news
finally came that
Edwin Coppoc 409
the long journey of Brown was
successfully accom-
plished. Among those to whom this news
was especially
gratifying were the Coppoc brothers,
who had already
enlisted in the great adventure, the
details of which
were rapidly taking shape in the
secretive mind of their
visionary and indomitable leader.
After the final departure of Brown from
Iowa,
Edwin and Barclay Coppoc remained for a
time in
Springdale and then went to visit
friends in the old
neighborhood near their birthplace
south of Salem, Ohio.
This is attested by the letter of their
uncle, Joshua Cop-
pock, to Governor Wise under date of
November 24,
1859, in which he says:
"He [Edwin] lived with John Butler
a number of years
until his mother went to Iowa where he
remained the most of
the time until last spring. He came
back and worked here for
some time and went from here to
Kansas."2
Edwin Coppoc in his last letter to his
uncle Joshua
also refers to this visit:
"Your generous hospitality towards
me during my short
stay with you last spring is stamped
indelibly upon my heart;
and also the generosity bestowed upon
my poor brother."
Just what the motive of this visit was
is not very
clear, but it was certainly fitting
that the brothers should
visit again the scenes and kindred
about their old home
before entering upon the enterprise
that was to mean so
much of loss and gain to each of them.
Early in July, 1859, John Brown wrote a
memoran-
dum for Kagi in which occurs the
following direction:
"Write Carpenter [supposed to be
Edwin Coppoc] and Haz-
lett that we are all right and ready as
soon as we can get our
boarding house fixed; we will write
them to come and by what
route."4
410
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
On July 25 Barclay Coppoc is reported
to have said
to his mother:
"We are going to start for Ohio
today."
"Ohio," said his mother,
"I believe you are going with old
Brown. When you get the halters round
your necks will you
think of me?"
After they left Springdale little was
heard of them
until the village was thrilled and the
country was startled
with the news of the attack on Harper's
Ferry.
The exact date of the arrival of the
brothers at the
Kennedy Farm in Maryland, where John
Brown's men
were assembling for the attack on
Harper's Ferry, is
not definitely known. They were
probably there before
the end of the first week in August,
however, and did
not leave for excursions to any great
distance before the
night of the attack. Brown's men did
not all live at the
Kennedy Farm but it was the rendezvous
of the band
and the Coppocs were among the regular
boarders.
As early as July 19, Annie Brown,
afterward Annie
Brown Adams, the daughter of John
Brown, and
Martha, the wife of his son Oliver,
came to take charge
of the housekeeping at the Kennedy
Farm. Both were
young; the former only sixteen and the
latter seventeen
years old. Years later Mrs. Adams gave interesting
accounts of life on the Farm from the
date of their
arrival to September 19, when they left
for their home
in North Elba, New York. Colonel
Richard J. Hinton
in his John Brown and His Men, quotes
one of her
accounts at length. In writing of the
evenings on the
Farm she says:
"All questions on religion or any
other subject were very
freely discussed by the men, and father
always took an interested
part in the discussions, and encouraged
every one to express his
opinion on any subject, no matter
whether he agreed with him or
Edwin Coppoc 411
not. Stevens had a copy of Paine's 'Age
of Reason' there; that
was read by some of the men and
discussed. Father subscribed
for the Baltimore Sun, and Kagi
used to send down a bundle of
papers and magazines from Chambersburg
when the wagon went
up. They had a manual of military
tactics that was studied a
good deal. Cook obtained directions for
browning or coloring
rifle-barrels in the arsenal at Harper's
Ferry, and the men spent
a part of the time in this work on their
Sharp's rifle-barrels,
making belts, pistol holsters, etc. They
also played checkers,
cards, and other games, and sang a deal
of the time. Stevens
and Tidd were very fine singers, the
former having an excellent
baritone. They often sang 'All the Old
Folks Are Gone,' sub-
stituting 'All the Dear Ones' for the
first words; 'Faded Flowers,'
and 'Nearer My God to Thee.' "4
The days of August slipped away.
September came
and long before it waned the men of
Brown's party
began to grow impatient at the delay.
Each had to be
constantly on his guard to avoid
suspicion which was
ever rife near the boundary between the
free and the
slave states. Efforts of slaves to escape from their
masters in this region were not
infrequent and the
agents of the Underground Railroad were
increasingly
active.
The days of September were finally gone
and time
moved on with leaden feet through the
early days of
October. In the meantime commissions
were issued to
a number of Brown's men, designating
the rank of each
in the little army to be formed if the
raid should prove
successful. Following is a copy of the
one issued to
Edwin Coppoc:
No. 10.
GREETING
HEAD-QUARTERS WAR-DEPARTMENT
NEAR HARPER'S FERRY, MD.
WHEREAS, EDWIN COPPOC has been nominated a
Lieu-
tenant of Company in the Army
Established under the PRO-
VISIONAL CONSTITUTION,
412
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
NOW, THEREFORE, In pursuance of the
authority
vested in Us by said Constitution, We do
hereby Appoint and
Commission the said EDWIN COPPOC a
Lieutenant.
Given at the office of the Secretary of
War, this day, October
13, 1859.
JOHN BROWN, Commander-in-chief.
H. KAGY, Secretary of War.
At last on Sunday night, October 16,
nineteen men
fully armed marched from the Kennedy
Farm. Edwin
Coppoc was among the number. Barclay remained
behind with Merriam and Owen Brown to
guard arms
and stores.
Onward in silence under the shades of
night the res-
olute little band marched into Harper's
Ferry. In ac-
cordance with previous plans, carefully
laid, Albert
Hazlett and Edwin Coppoc took charge of
the United
States armory as soon as the guards
there were over-
powered and made prisoners. Long before
dawn of the
next day Harper's Ferry, the United
States arsenal, the
rifle works, the engine house and the
approaches to the
town were in the hands of the invaders.
As the startled
inhabitants awoke they realized that
they were captives
in the hands of an unknown military
force. The story
of the fighting that followed on those
memorable days,
October 17 and 18, between Brown and
his followers
and the Virginia militia and the United
States marines
under the command of Lieutenant Colonel
Robert E.
Lee, now in a uniform of blue but later
in a uniform of
gray and commander-in-chief of the
Confederate
army, has been told often in graphic
detail and need
not here be dwelt upon at length. On
the day following
the attack Edwin Coppoc was driven
under fire from the
armory into the engine house where John
Brown made
his last stand, fighting the infuriated
Virginians and
Edwin Coppoc 413
the marines as they battered in the
doors behind which
he and the remnant of his followers
were beaten down
and captured. Strange to say, Edwin was
not even
wounded.
Jesse W. Graham, a workman in the
United States
armory and a captive of John Brown,
related this inter-
esting incident of the siege of the
engine house, after
the arrival of the marines under
Lieutenant Colonel
Robert E. Lee:
"Early on Tuesday morning I peeped
out of a hole and saw
Colonel Lee, whom I had seen before at
the Ferry, standing
close by with the troops behind him. A
negro stood near him,
holding a large military cloak. Just
then Edwin Coppoc thrust
me aside, and thrust the muzzle of his
gun into the hole, drawing
a bead on Lee. I interposed, putting my
hand on the rifle and
begging the man not to shoot, as that
was Colonel Lee, of the
United States army, and if he were hurt
the building would be
torn down and they'd all be killed.
Green again put up his
pistol and Coppoc readjusted his rifle.
During this momentary
altercation, Robert E. Lee had stepped
aside, and thus his life
was saved to the slaveholder's
Confederacy."4
Shortly after the capture of the engine
house, S. K.
Donovan, the first newspaper
correspondent on the
ground after the raid commenced,
impressed with the
apparent youth of Edwin Coppoc, his
bearing and frank
face that seemed out of harmony with
the tragic experi-
ences of the last two days and nights
went up to him and
said:
"My God, boy, what are you doing at
a place like this?"
"'With remarkable coolness' said
Donovan 'the boy an-
swered, as I recall the words, I believe
in the principles that
we are trying to advance and I have no
apologies for being
here. I think it is a good place to be.'
"
The capture took place on the morning
of October
18. Coppoc was held with the other
prisoners in the
414
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
armory guard room until noon of the
following day
and then taken with them to the jail at
Charlestown,
Virginia, the seat of justice of the
county in which the
raid occurred.*
Governor Henry A. Wise, of Virginia,
went on the
train that carried the prisoners. Years
afterward, Rev.
Joseph L. Coppoc, a younger brother who
was not at
Harper's Ferry, in a magazine article
said:
"While on the train carrying the
prisoners from Harper's
Ferry to Charlestown, Governor Wise
approached my brother
and eyeing him a moment said to him,
'You look like too honest
a man to be found with a band of
robbers.'
"'But, Governor,' he replied, 'we
look upon you as the rob-
bers.' "
It was while in jail that Edwin wrote
to Dr. H. C.
Gill and other friends at Springdale,
Iowa, a character-
istic letter containing a tribute to
his comrades and a
description of the fight as he saw it.
Following are the
essential portions of the letter:
"And with them are the forms and
faces of those that, to
me, were more than comrades, who fell in
the fearful struggle.
Eleven of our little band are sleeping
now in their bloody gar-
ments with the cold earth above them.
Braver men never lived;
truer men to the plighted word never
banded together. Five
of them fell while fighting in
self-defense for the cause for which
they had enlisted; three on the
afternoon of the 17th; the first
a negro by the name of Dangerfield
Newby; he fell on the street
by my side, whilst we were running to
the aid of some of our
friends who were surrounded by the
enemy. Two men, Steward
Taylor and Oliver Brown, fell by the
engine-house. Taylor
lived about three hours after he was
shot; he suffered very much
* F. B. Sanborn quotes Coppec as making
the following statement
to the Virginians after his capture:
"I am a Republican philanthropist
and came here to aid in liberating
negroes. I made the acquaintance of
Captain Brown in Iowa as he re-
turned from Kansas, and agreed to join
his company. Brown wrote to
me in July to come on to Chambersburg,
where he first revealed the
whole plot. The whole company was
opposed to making the first demon-
stration at Harper's Ferry, but Captain
Brown would have it his own way.
and we had to obey orders."
Edwin Coppoc 415
and begged of us to kill him. Oliver
died in about fifteen min-
utes after he was shot; he said nothing.
During these last
moments we could not administer to their
wants such as they
deserved, for we were surrounded by the
troops who were
firing volley after volley, so that we
had to keep up a brisk fire
in return to keep them from charging
upon us. Two more fell
in the engine-house on the morning of
the 18th, when the last
charge was made-Jeremiah Anderson and
Dolph Thompson.
"They both had surrendered after
the first charge, which
was repulsed, but, owing to the noise
and confusion, they were
not heard. Captain Brown and I were the only ones that
fought
to the last. The negro Green, after I had stationed him
behind
one of the engines, the safest place in
the house, laid down his
rifle and pulled off his cartridge-box,
and passed himself off for
one of the prisoners. He and I were the
only ones not wounded.
"Watson Brown was wounded about 10
o'clock on Monday
at the same time Stevens was, while
passing along the street
with a flag of truce, but was not so
badly wounded but he got
back in the engine-house. During the
fight in the afternoon he
fought as brave as ever any man fought,
but as soon as the fight
was over he got worse. When we were
taken in the morning he
was just able to walk. He and Green and
myself were put in
the watch-house. Watson kept getting
worse from then until
about three o'clock Wednesday morning
when he died. I did
everything in my power to make him
comfortable. He begged
hard for a bed, but could not get one,
so I pulled off my coat
and put it under him, and placed his
head in my lap, and in that
position he died.
"Cook and Tidd had left the Ferry
early in the morning, by
order of Captain Brown, to cross the
river for the purpose of
taking some prisoners and to convey the
arms to a schoolhouse
about one and a half miles from the
Ferry, there to guard them
until the Captain came, but, hearing a
heavy firing, Cook went
down to learn the cause. On gaining the
side of the river op-
posite the Ferry, he found we were
surrounded, so he ascended
the mountain in order to get a better
view; while there he saw
parties firing on us. In order to
relieve us he fired on them
and in doing so he drew the fire on
himself, the result of which
was the cutting of a limb and giving him
a fall of about fifteen
feet down the mountain side, tearing his
clothes, and lacerating
his flesh. There were thirty or forty
men in the first party he
fired on who, after the second shot,
were taken with a sudden
leaving, having no doubt important
business elsewhere. The
Virginians who were present give him the
credit of being a
splendid shot at a long range, as they
admit they made a very
near acquaintance with some of his
bullets.
416
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
"But enough of this. Whatever may
be our fate, rest assured
we shall not shame our dead companions
by a shrinking fear.
They lived and died like brave men. We,
I trust, shall do the
same. And our souls with no sin of
intention on their robes will
gaze unmoved upon the scaffold and the
tomb. We were de-
ceived in some things. Even Captain
Brown acknowledges that;
but all is over now, so let it pass.
There are true and brave
men in Virginia who deeply sympathize
with us in our misfor-
tune. I suppose within the last two days
from eight hundred to
one thousand persons have visited us,
some through sympathy,
but more through animosity.
"Among those who called to-day were
three young ladies from
Harper's Ferry, friends and
acquaintances of Cook. They
stood and gazed on us for a moment with
deep earnestness and
then burst into tears. One of them told
Cook that all of his
friends and acquaintances at the Ferry
had formed the highest
opinion of him and regretted he should
have gone into such a
scheme. They parted from us with
tear-dimmed eyes and the
deepest expression of sympathy for us in
our sad position.
* * * I have not seen the Captain or
Stevens since our trials,
but the jailer tells me they are doing
well; their wounds will soon
be healed. J. E. Cook sends his love to
all."4
Edwin Coppoc was brought into court for
arraign-
ment chained to his old leader, John
Brown. His trial
immediately followed that of Brown. When
asked if
he had anything to say why sentence
should not be
passed, he spoke briefly as follows:
"The charges that have been made
against me are not true.
I never committed any treason against
the State of Virginia. I
never made war upon it. I never conspired
with anybody to in-
duce your slaves to rebel and I never
even exchanged a word
with any of your servants. What I came
here for I always told
you. It was to run off slaves to a free
state and liberate them.
This is an offense against your laws, I
admit, but I never com-
mitted murder. When I escaped to the
engine house and found
the captain and his prisoners surrounded
there, I saw no way
of deliverance but by fighting a little.
If anyone was killed on
that occasion it was in fair fight. I
have, as I said, committed
an offense against your laws, but the
punishment for that offense
would be very different from what you
are going to inflict now.
I have no more to say."5
Edwin Coppoc 417
The meditations of this youth while in
prison doubt-
less took a wide range. There were
hours of regret
and the feeling that his allegiance to
the cause of free-
dom did not require or justify the
hazardous enterprise
on which he had embarked. There were
recurrent
hours of sadness that he should have
taken up and used
arms against his fellowman, in
violation of the prin-
ciples that had guided his early life
at home and in the
church. Then there was the natural
longing at times
for the peace and comfort that he had
known on the
farm in Columbiana County or later with
his mother at
Springdale. In such reflective mood he
penned the fol-
lowing letter:
"CHARLESTOWN, Nov. 5th, 1859.
"Dear Mother and Father: It is
with much sorrow that I
now address you, and under very
different circumstances than
I ever expected to be placed, but I
have seen my folly too late
and must now suffer the consequences,
which I suppose will
be death, but which I shall try and
bear as every man should;
though it would be a source of much
comfort to me to have died
at home. It has always been my desire,
that, when I came to
die, my last breath should be among my
friends; that in my
last moments they could be near me to
console me. But alas!
such is not my fate. I am condemned and
must die a dishonor-
able death, among my enemies, and
hundreds of miles from
home.
"I hope you will not reflect on me
for what I have done, for
I am not at fault, at least my
conscience tells me so, and there
are others that feel as I do. We were
led into it by those that
ought to have known better, but who did
not anticipate any dan-
ger; but after stopping at Harper's
Ferry we were surrounded
and compelled to fight, to save our own
lives, for we saw our
friends falling on all sides. Our
leader would not surrender
and there seemed to be no other resort
than to fight, though I
am happy to say that no one fell by my
hand, and am sorry to
say that I was ever induced to raise a
gun. I was not looking
for such a thing. I am sorry, very
sorry, that such has been
the case. Never did I suppose that my
hand would be guilty of
raising a gun against my fellow men.
After our capture, which
was on the morning of the 18th, we were
kept there until the
Vol. XXX-27
418
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
evening of the 19th when we were removed
to this place, where
we have been ever since. We are well
cared for. The jailer
seems to do all he can to make us
comfortable.
"Nov. 6th. -I have just finished a
letter to Mr. Painter,
which I expect to send out tomorrow with
this. I sent one yes-
terday to Dr. Gill, stating to him that
it was not worth while
for any of you to come, but on thinking
more about it, I con-
cluded that I would like to see some one
from there, so tomorrow
I intend -to telegraph for the Doctor to
come.
"I have written J. Painter and told
him what to do with my
land, but whatever money is spent by
anyone coming here, I wish
to have it replaced out of the land.
"The captain has had some apple
pies and preserves sent
him from Ohio, by some friends. I
presume they do not go bad
though I have not had a taste.
"If the Doctor has not started when
this gets there, and you
have any sweet cakes or other
nick-nacks, just send them along.
They will go very good here between the
iron bars. We get
plenty to eat here, but it is not
from home. It is not baked by
the hands of those we love at home, or
by those whom I never
expect to see.
"I don't feel like writing more. I
hope and trust the Doctor
will come, and if anything is in the way
so he cannot come, I
hope some one else will come in his
stead. I believe I have
nothing more to say. This may be the
last letter you may get
from me. If it is, think of me as one
who thought he was
doing right.
"Give my love to Brigss' and
Maxsons' folks and to all in-
quiring friends for [of] such I feel I
have a large circle, and I
trust that what I have done will not
make them enemies. My
love to all the family.
No more,
EDWIN COPPOC."5
In prison and condemned to die, Coppoc
was yet
jealous of the honorable reputation he
had borne in the
communities where he had lived. An
anonymous writer
had sent to the New York Tribune a
letter which had
been published in that paper, derogatory
of his charac-
ter. This was copied in many papers
including the
Virginia Free Press, published in Charlestown. To this
letter Edwin Coppoc replied through the
same paper in
Edwin Coppoc 419
a communication bearing date of
November 14, 1859, as
follows:
"MR. EDITOR: I see in your last
issue, a letter purporting to
come from Salem, Ohio, which was published in the New
York
Tribune. In regard to the statements which are made in that
letter, which place my character in an
unenviable light before
the public, I will only say, that they
are fake from beginning to
end. Any person, who under the
circumstances in which I am
placed, would stoop so low as to
circulate such a libel about a
doomed man, places himself below the
level of the brute. And
then the base and cowardly manner in
which it has been
done bears at once the mark of fakehood
on its front. No name
has been signed, but simply the letter
S. at the conclusion. If
he was a man; if he was telling the
truth, why was he afraid to
sign his name to it? It is true, my
Father died when I but six
years of age, when I went to live with
John Butler four miles
from Salem, Ohio, and with whom I lived
nine years, and might
have remained until the present time,
had not my mother wished
me to go with her and the other members
of our family to Spring-
dale, Cedar County, Iowa, where I
remained till the spring of
1858, when I went to Kansas for the
express purpose of pur-
chasing some land. I took no part in the
difficulties of Kansas,
and never, while there, had any
association or acquaintance with
Capt. Brown or any of his company. I
remained in Kansas till
the following autumn, when I returned to
Iowa. I had no ac-
quaintance with Capt. Brown until last
winter, and last spring
agreed to join him, while he was at
Springfield [Springdale].
In regard to the truth of my statement I
will refer you to Mr. John
Butler, my former guardian, Amos Fossit,
and David Parker,
William Fisher, Jacob Heaton, Isaac
Carr, and William Mead,
all of Salem, Ohio, and its
neighborhood. In Springdale, Cedar
County, Iowa I would refer [to] Messrs.
Thomas Winn, P. M.,
Dr. H. C. Gill, Thomas James, Emmor
Rood, Jesse Bowersock,
John Parynive, Moses Varney, Nathan
Tabor, James Schooler,
Ebenezer Gray, Steven Dean and William
Madison, all of
Springdale and its vicinity. In Pedee,
of the same county and
state, I would refer to William Street,
P. M., Samuel Moore,
John Moore, Preston Roberts, and Burton
Gifford. In Pardee,
Atchison County, Kansas Territory, I
would refer to Dr. Moore,
P. M., James Booth, Amos D. Taylor,
Mahlon Oliphant, Ben-
jamin Ball, William Cummings and Richard
Allen. If these
are not references enough I can give you
ten for every one I
have here named, who will testify to the
falsity of the statements
of the cowardly calumniator, who has
written from Salem, Ohio.
420
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
"By giving the above an insertion
in your paper you will
greatly oblige, -Yours truly,
EDWIN COPPOC."2
In contradiction to the anonymous
letter, John But-
ler made a statement which appeared in
the Salem
(Ohio) Republican of November
29, 1859. The follow-
ing excerpt is here reproduced:
"* * * In the spring of 1842 his
mother applied to me
to take Edwin into my family and have
the care of him, he then
being, as we supposed, near seven years
old, his father having
died a few months previous to that time.
He accordingly came
without any time being fixed then how
long he should remain
and stayed with us until the spring of
1850, during which time
there was nothing particular to remark
in point of character,
except that he gave evidences of an
unusually strong will in
trying to carry out his own views and
also that he was very
fearless, never manifesting anything like cowardice in times of
danger or by night. He was a very
industrious and careful boy,
more careful and particular that
everything was kept in its
proper place on the farm and about the
buildings and to have
his work done well and prompt to have it
done in a given time,
than is common for boys of his age. * *
*"
In the meantime strenuous efforts were
made to save
Edwin's life. His previous good record,
his deportment
in prison, his courage and frankness,
together with the
large number of highly respectable
Quaker friends who
interceded in his behalf, appealed very
strongly to the
Virginia authorities, including
Prosecutor Hunter,
Judge Parker and Governor Wise. Thomas Winn, a
Quaker friend of the Coppoc family from
Springdale,
took the lead in the effort to have the
sentence com-
muted to life imprisonment. And most
adroitly and
effectively he pressed the plea for
mercy. In reading
the papers he presented, one cannot
fail to be impressed
with the pursuasive power that he
brought to bear to
accomplish his great desire. Himself a consistent
*
Edwin Coppoc 421
Quaker who was opposed to the
settlement of any ques-
tion by the arbitrament of war, he was
in a position to
disclaim all sympathy with the armed
invasion of Vir-
ginia. The following extract from his
letter to Gov-
ernor Wise, dated "Springdale,
Cedar County, Iowa,
11th mo. 4th, 1859," indicates the
line of his plea:
"Edwin Coppoc is a Quaker by birth
and education although
not strictly a member of that body of
Christians. He has mingled
almost daily in the society of those who
in relation to the vexed
question of slavery and other questions
of public interest, are
known by all the world to believe in and
pray for a peaceful
solution of surrounding difficulties as alone desirable and most
truly calculated to secure the Divine
favor Knowing this I
cannot but believe that his being found
at Harper's Ferry in a
course of conduct so totally repugnant
to all his previous modes
of thought and action must have been the
result of a temporary
alienation of mind, something akin to
insanity, if not insanity
itself. I have no sort of sympathy
whatever for the leaders in
this movement. In my opinion all such
proceedings involve a
grievous wrong, and result in serious
and widespread mischief
to both sections of our common country.
They must be con-
demned by all right-thinking persons.
"In the case of Edwin Coppoc,
however, there are mitigating
circumstances which I have endeavored
to bring into view and
I beg the Governor to take these calmly
into consideration. I
feel encouraged to invoke thy friendly
offices in his behalf, on
the score of his youth and inexperience,
and because having
known him from his boyhood I am
constrained to believe that
in embarking on the enterprise he was
not in his right mind and
had no adequate conception of its
character. * * * I be-
lieve Edwin to be incapable of doing,
intentionally, a mean or
unworthy action. Indeed there is a
native nobility of char-
acter about him which I think must have
been observed by those
who have been brought into contact with
him since the sad
event which we all deplore. I fervently
hope, therefore, that
his life may not be taken. * * * Surely
in a case like this
the 'Old Dominion' can well afford to be
magnanimous. * * *
In the consciousness of her strength,
let her pity this child's
weakness. Spare the fatherless boy to
his poor, broken-hearted
mother now fast passing into the evening
of her days -then
shall the language be truly applicable,
'The blessing of him that
422
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
was ready to perish came upon me and I
caused the widow's
heart to sing with joy.'
"Very respectfully and truly thy
friend,
THOMAS WINN,
Postmaster of Springdale."2
Mr. Winn afterward went to Harper's
Ferry, Char-
lestown and Richmond, Virginia. On his
arrival in the
last named city he at once addressed a
letter to Governor
Wise in a friendly and grateful vein,
expressing the
hope that his mission might be
successful. He wrote in
part:
"On my arrival in Charlestown, 3oth
ult. I immediately
reported myself to Andrew Hunter, Esq.,
and was most cor-
dially received by him and his excellent
family. I frankly stated
to them the object of my visit to
Virginia, and my hopes were
greatly strengthened at finding that
their sympathies were al-
ready kindly enlisted on behalf of
Edwin. The fact of his
youth, and having been undoubtedly
deluded into John Brown's
wicked schemes without a full
appreciation of their true nature
and extent; his uniformly good conduct
since his confinement
in jail, and the unexceptionable
character of his correspondence,
had already produced a favorable
impression. 'He is the best
of all our prisoners,' said Mr. Hunter
to me. 'I give him all
the letters that come for him. I find
them so entirely unex-
ceptionable.' It was also very
gratifying to learn that Judge
Parker was inclined to a merciful
view of this case, and that the
feeling of sympathy is general and the
desire freely expressed
by influential persons that Edwin's
sentence might be commuted.
"At Harper's Ferry I found the same
sentiment existed.
Armistead Ball and some other gentlemen
to whom I was intro-
duced stating very clearly their belief
that no one fell by Edwin's
hand, and that his conduct throughout
was very different from
that of those with whom he had (although
but for a brief period)
most unfortunately connected himself,
and concluded by ex-
pressing the hope and belief that
Governor Wise would commute
his punishment."2
That these letters and petitions had
much weight
with the Governor is evidenced by the
remarks of Hon.
A. H. H. Stuart, who on December 12,
1859, presented
to the Virginia Senate and House of
Delegates the
Edwin Coppoc 423
memorial of Thomas Winn, asking for
commutation of
the death sentence of Edwin Coppoc. Mr.
Stuart said
in part:
"I called to see the Governor, and
he authorized me to say
that, from his personal knowledge, and
from information
gathered by him during his stay in
Charlestown, the case of this
man stands upon a very different footing
from that of the other
individuals who have been sentenced. He
informs me that he
is a youth of about 23 years of age and
that he has borne an un-
exceptionable character up to the time
of the difficulty. There
are present here in our lobby several
members of the Society
of Friends, who have an intimate
knowledge of this man since
he was seven years of age. * * * These
gentlemen inform
me that he was their trusted agent in
the transaction of business,
and frequently in the collection of
money, and that in all cir-
cumstances he acquitted himself with
fidelity and truthfulness.
They express the deepest sympathy for
him and the Governor
informs me, moreover, that this young
man, while he was in the
engine house at Harper's Ferry, was the
means of saving the
lives of the prisoners * * * that he
frequently remonstrated
with them about the exposure of their
persons and pointed out
places of safety which he insisted they
should occupy, while he
remonstrated against the murder of
others on the street by some
of his associates. I know nothing of the
facts myself, * * *
I give them to you as they have been
communicated to me."6
Mr. Thomas of Fairfax, in discussing
the report of
the legislative committee on the
memorial of Thomas
Winn, made an even more explicit
statement of the
favorable attitude of Governor Wise:
"The Governor of Virginia appeared
before the committee
and enlightened that body very much in
reference to the action
and extent of Coppoc's guilt in the
Harper's Ferry affair so far
as it was known to him. He said,
moreover, that from his
knowledge of Coppoc's relation to the
whole movement, and
particularly his course with reference
to the prisoners whom
Brown had captured, he would have taken
upon himself the
responsibility of commuting his sentence
to imprisonment for
life, though in that act he should not
have the approval or sanc-
tion of a single individual in the
State. And this he said he
would do because he believed the act to
be just and right."6
424 Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
Among the papers of Governor Wise is
the petition
of Thomas Winn endorsed by the governor
as follows:
"This man's plea for Coppoc
coincides with my own view
of the case, from his confession to me
in this:--that he is the
only one entitled to the least mercy.
Whether he is, is question-
able."
Novm. 15, 1859. H. A. WISE.."2
This was written before Winn's visit to
Virginia.
Later the Governor was confirmed in his
view and rec-
ommended the commutation of Coppoc's
sentence as in-
dicated in the address of Mr. Thomas.
In an interview published in the St.
Louis Globe-
Democrat, as late as 1888, Andrew Hunter referring to
the persistence of an "old
gentleman," evidently Thomas
Winn, gives the following interesting
reminiscence:
"When he (Coppoc) was in jail an
old gentleman came all
the way from his people to see him,
bringing him a pound cake
to comfort him. The old gentleman
stopped at my house on
the way in, and I advised him to wait
until I went down town,
but he would hurry on ahead with his
pound cake, and when I
got down, sure enough, he was in the
guard house, as I antici-
pated. I got him out and passed him into
the jail, with the
cake for Coppoc. After he had visited
the prisoner, he went
all the way to Richmond to intercede. I
believe he would have
got commutation for Coppoc if I had not
shown that treason
could not be pardoned."6
Among the touching appeals for mercy is
a letter
from the young man's uncle, Joshua
Coppock, dated
"Salem the 11 mo. 24th 1859."
After explaining his re-
lationship to the prisoner he said:
"I feel for my dear nephew. I hope
thee will not have him
hung. * * * Thee will see by his advice
to the prisoners in
the arsenal to keep out of danger he did
not want to see them
hurt. Governor Wise, please to read
this, and if thee can avoid
hanging, do, I entreat thee."2
Edwin Coppoc 425
It was left for Mr. Isbell, the member
from the
county of Jefferson in the Legislature,
to voice the atti-
tude of Virginia, not only toward the
imprisoned Har-
per's Ferry raiders, but toward the
North. Because of
the representative character of his
address, a somewhat
extended extract is here presented. Mr.
Isbell said:
"This is the first time that so
grave an offense has been
committed against the state of Virginia,
and, so far as I am in-
formed, the first proceeding under the
law of treason that has
ever taken place. This proceeding sprang
from an offense which
is calculated to disturb the inhabitants
of our whole northern
border and it becomes us to make such
examples of the marauders
now convicted and under sentence as will
operate to restore
confidence to these people and deter
others from similar acts
of murder and rapine. It is said, Mr.
President, that this man
Coppic was deceived as to the motives of
John Brown in coming
to Virginia. He could not have been
deceived. He was one of
that band who had put upon his
conscience the oath of fidelity
to Brown in subverting the government
and exciting the slaves
to rebellion. He is as much guilty of
murder as any man con-
victed before the courts-as much guilty,
if not more guilty,
than John Brown himself; for, so far as
I am aware, it was not
shown in evidence that Brown shot
anybody in that struggle.
This man Coppic was, moreover, fully
cognizant of and partici-
pator in the military preparations set
on foot at Brown's farm,
some months previous to the invasion. He
stands precisely in
the same position with the other
prisoners who were convicted
of murder and exciting slaves to
rebellion. All of them pre-
sented the plea that they came not for
the purpose of slaughter-
ing our citizens, but of carrying off
their property--with the
intention not to commit any act of
personal violence upon the
people of the commonwealth except when
that people decided
to resist them in their unlawful course.
In view of these facts,
Mr. President, I am in favor of
withholding, from the executive
of this state, the power of pardoning
Coppic, or any other of
the prisoners convicted at Charlestown
for their connection with
the Harper's Ferry invasion. But, sir,
it is said that having
upheld our laws, and enforced our
authority-that having
vindicated ourselves before the whole
country, and shown to the
North and to the South, and to the whole
world in fact, that we
can defend ourselves, and mean to do it,
and enforce our laws
against whomsoever may dare to violate
them - that having
presented these vindications to the
world we might temper
426
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
justice with mercy and pardon these men
who have been the
greatest offenders against our laws that
have ever been brought
before our courts for trial. I say that,
in the existing relations
between the North and South, it becomes
rather the duty of Vir-
ginia to give notice to the whole
world--that he who dares
place his foot upon her soil, with the
same hellish purpose that
actuated the prisoners now in custody at
Charlestown, shall hang
as high as Haman, and that no mercy
shall be accorded to him
who comes in the dead of night to murder
our citizens. I be-
lieve that it is impolitic to extend
this pardon to Coppic, or any
other of those prisoners. I believe that
we shall best subserve
our interests by upholding our laws and
executing all persons of
this class as soon after conviction as
may be convenient. While
I am a law abiding man, while I have
been educated to believe
that all criminals should be brought
before a court of justice
and have the benefit of all the forms of
trial, yet, on occasions
of this sort, on the spur and excitement
of the actual transaction
itself, with all these preconceived
opinions and feelings, I fear
I should almost doubt my ability to
insist that the criminals
should have the benefit of a trial,
should they be taken by our
own citizens. For this reason I am
utterly opposed, in every
aspect in which this case can be
presented, to any mercy being
shown to this man."6
"In the existing relations between
the North and
South." This is the real basis of
the fervid appeal of
Mr. Isbell. Governor Wise and other individual Vir-
ginians in high position might be
willing to extend clem-
ency, and under all the circumstances
the attitude of the
Governor was generous, chivalrous and
courageous, but
no power could withstand the resolution
of the chosen
representatives of the commonwealth, of
Virginia. The
"irrepressible conflict" was
already on, and the Legisla-
ture of Virginia was resolved from the
first that no
guilty man from the North should
escape.
Among those who sought other excuse for
with-
holding clemency were some who found it
in the publi-
cation in the New York Tribune of
December 12, 1859,
of a letter of November -, purporting
to have been
written from Coppoc to the wife of John
Brown. As
Edwin Coppoc 427
this letter has figured somewhat
prominently in the case
and was referred to in the Legislature
when the memo-
rial of Thomas Winn was up for
consideration, it is here
reproduced in full:
"Mrs. John Brown -Dear Madam: I was
very sorry that
your request to see the rest of the
prisoners was not complied
with. Mrs. Avis brought me a book, whose
pages are full of
truth and beauty, entitled 'Voice of the
True-Hearted,' which
she told me was a present from you. For
this dear token of
remembrance, please accept my thanks.
"My comrade, J. E. Cook, and
myself, deeply sympathize
with you in your sad bereavement. We
were both acquainted
with Anna and Martha. They were to us as
sisters, and as
brothers we sympathize with them in the
dark hour of trial and
affliction.
"I was with your sons when they
fell. Oliver lived but
a few moments after he was shot. He
spoke no word but yielded
calmly to his fate. Watson was shot at
10 o'clock on Monday
morning, and died about 3 o'clock on
Wednesday morning. He
suffered much. Though mortally wounded
at 10 o'clock, yet at
3 o'clock Monday afternoon he fought
bravely against the men
who charged on us. When the enemy were
repulsed, and the ex-
citement of the charge was over, he
began to sink rapidly.
"After we were taken prisoners, he
was placed in the guard
house with me. He complained of the
hardness of the bench on
which he was lying. I begged hard for a
bed for him, or even
a blanket, but could obtain none for
him. I took off my coat
and placed it under him, and held his
head in my lap, in which
position he died without a groan or a
struggle.
"I have stated these facts,
thinking that they may afford
to you, and to the bereaved widows they
have left, a mournful
consolation.
"Give my love to Anna and Martha,
with our last farewell.
'Yours truly,
"EDWIN COPPOC."
Some of the members of the Virginia
senate spoke
of this letter and made certain
expressions in it the occa-
sion for their vote in withholding
sanction of executive
clemency. Thomas Winn was convinced that
the publi-
cation of this letter at the critical
time when it appeared
428
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
was the chief influence that turned the
scale again the
life of Coppoc. In a letter to the widow
of John Brown,
written January 13, 1860, he says:
"Governor Wise appeared before the
committee and ably
advocated the commutation of his
punishment. Many of the most
influential senators were also in favor
of it. Unfortunately,
however, while the subject was before
the Legislature the New
York Tribune made its appearance,
containing a letter signed
Edwin Coppic, addressed to thyself,
which was used success-
fully to defeat the application for
mercy. Senators objected to
the tone of the letter and particularly
to the paragraph which
speaks of the Virginians as 'enemies'
and refused to show him
any mercy."10
Winn states further that Edwin denied
writing the
letter and said that it had been
written by Cook, his
fellow prisoner. It is said to have
been sent by Mrs.
Brown to Winn and soon afterward to
have disap-
peared.
It should be explained in this
connection that the
letter got into the Tribune in
an account of the funeral
of John Brown at North Elba, New York.
Rev. J. M.
McKim, in delivering the funeral
sermon, read the letter.
It appears that neither Cook nor Coppoc
left any
written statement in regard to the
letter, and in the
absence of the original manuscript
discussion as to its
authorship would probably leave the
reader in doubt.
It must be admitted, however, that the
language is much
like that of Coppoc and does not
resemble the style of
Cook's letters. If Cook wrote it, the
motive for not sign-
ing it himself, of course, would be
that he thought Mrs.
Brown would appreciate the letter more
if it were not
signed by him, but it expresses
sentiment and relates
experiences that were Coppoc's, not
Cook's.
After all it is much more than probable
that the
Edwin Coppoc 429
letter had little weight in determining
Edwin's fate.
The speech of Isbell in any event would
have swept
away all pleas for mercy. It made
Coppoc the chief
offender in the raid, and the result
would doubtless have
been the same regardless of the letter.
Virginia at this
time was determined to go to the limit
in dealing with
"invaders and traitors," and
to hang "as high as
Haman" those who came with arms in
their hands to
liberate the slave. From the beginning,
there was small
reason to expect clemency from the
Legislature of Vir-
ginia. That hope went out when it
became known that
Governor Wise did not have the power to
commute the
sentence of Edwin Coppoc.*
The time for his execution was rapidly
approaching.
On December 13, 1859, he wrote to his
uncle, Joshua
Coppock, the remarkable letter that
deserves to rank
among the poignant and prophetic
utterances called
forth by the long anti-slavery struggle
preceding the
Civil War. If at other times what he
wrote had the
tone of regret to be expected from a
farmer boy caught
in the net of circumstance, this letter
reveals the man,
mindful still of his impending fate,
but sustained by de-
votion to a cause and faith in the
speedy coming of that
"glorious day" which he could
see in vision almost from
the platform of the scaffold. Following
is the letter:
CHARLESTOWN, Dec. 13th, 1859.
"MY DEAR UNCLE;
"I seat myself by the stand, to
write for the first, and last
time, to thee and thy family. Though far
from home and over-
taken by misfortune, I have not
forgotten you. Your generous
* Hazlett and Stevens were not executed
until March 16, 1860. The
part of the former in the raid was
slight and the latter was shot down
while bearing a flag of truce, but no
mercy was shown to either. Virginia
was determined to have the life of each
of these condemned men.
430 Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications. hospitality towards me, during my short stay with you last spring, is stamped indelibly upon my heart; and also the gen- erosity bestowed upon my poor brother, who now wanders an outcast from his native land. But thank God he is free. I am thankful that it is I, who has to suffer, instead of him. "The time may come when he will remember me, and the time may come when he will still further remember the cause in which I die. Thank God, the principles of the cause in which |
|
we were engaged will not die with me and my brave comrades They will spread wider and wider, and gather strength with each hour that passes. The voice of truth will echo through our land, bringing conviction to the erring, and adding numbers to that glorious army who will follow its banner. The cause of everlasting truth and justice will go on conquering, to conquer, until our broad and beautiful land shall rest beneath the banner of freedom. "I had hoped to live to see the dawn of that glorious day. I had hoped to live to see the principles of the Declaration of our Independence fully realized. I had hoped to see the dark stain of slavery blotted from our land, and the libel of our boasted |
Edwin Coppoc 431
freedom erased, when we can say in
truth, that our beloved
country is the land of the free, and the
home of the brave.
"But this cannot be. I have heard
my sentence passed. My
doom is sealed. But two more short days
remain for me to ful-
fill my earthly destiny. But two brief
days between me and
eternity. At the expiration of those two
days, I shall stand
upon the scaffold to take my last look of earthly
scenes, but
that scaffold has but little dread for
me; for I honestly believe
that I am innocent of any crime
justifying such punishment.
But by the taking of my life, and the
lives of my comrades, Vir-
ginia is but hastening on that glorious
day, when the slave shall
rejoice in his freedom. When he can say,
"I too am a man, and
am groaning no more under the yoke of
oppression."
"But I must now close. Accept this
short scrawl as a re-
membrance of me. Give my love to all the
family. Kiss little
Josey for me. Remember me to all my relatives
and friends.
And now farewell for the last time.
"From thy Nephew,
"EDWIN COPPOC.
"P. S. Thee wished to know who was
here with me from
Iowa.
"Thomas Winn is here and expects to
stay until after the
execution; and then will convey my body,
to Springdale. It is
my wish to be buried there.
"I would of [have] been glad to see
thee or any of my other
relatives: but it is now too late.
"I did not like to send for any of
you, as I did not know
whether any of you would be willing to
come.
"I will say, for I know that it
will be a satisfaction to all of
you, that we are all kindly treated
and I hope that the North will
not fail to give Sheriff Campbell and
Captain Avis due acknowl-
edgment for their kind and noble
actions. "E."7
"While there is life there is
hope," -so runs the
trite adage. When Edwin Coppoc wrote
the foregoing
letter he did not expect to escape
execution, but he was
even then working out with his fellow
prisoner, John E.
Cook, a plan devised by them to regain their liberty.
Along one side of the cell in which
they were confined
was a heavy plank, held in place by
screws. With the
aid of two knives and a long heavy
screw taken from
432 Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
their bedstead they loosened the plank
and under the
shadow of darkness took out some of the
bricks from
the jail wall. A few of these were
concealed in the bed;
others were left loose in the aperture
that was forming
back of the single outer layer of brick
that remained to
be removed on the night chosen to make
the final effort
for freedom.
And a faithful friend was ready to
assist, just out-
side of the prison walls, - an active
Free State partisan
from Kansas, who had arrived at the
Ferry too late to
join the followers of John Brown in the
attack. His
name was Charles Lenhart. In the hope
that he might
in some way aid his old leader and the
other prisoners
he took on the disguise of a
pro-slavery sympathizer, de-
nounced the raiders, enlisted in the
Virginia militia, was
present at the execution of John Brown
and had re-
mained in Charlestown in the hope that
he might be of
service to his friends. On the night
chosen by Cook
and Coppoc for the escape, Lenhart was
sentinel at the
angle of the jail where they had
planned to scale the
wall. He of course was not to see them,
they were to
flee to the mountains - and liberty.*
Thus far fortune had favored their efforts.
On the
evening of December 14, Lenhart was at
the post out-
side of the prison wall. The shadows of
night fell on
the valley and over the mountains. The
sentry paced
* Colonel Richard J. Hinton, in his John
Brown and His Men, states
that Charles Lenhart was in all
probability in the same file of Virginia
militiamen with John Wilkes Booth at the
execution of John Brown. In
his account of the attempted escape of
Coppoc and Cook he says: "In the
town was a Kansas man, Charles Lenhart,
who under disguise was striv-
ing to be of service. On the night of
the 14th of December, Lenhart was
on guard at the angle of the jail wall
where, the next night, the spectacle
of their heads above its edge created
the alarm of a faithful pro-slavery
sentinel."
Lenhart enlisted in the Union army at
the outbreak of the Civil War,
was commissioned lieutenant, and died in the service in
1863.
Edwin Coppoc 433 |
|
PLAN OF JAIL AT CHARLESTOWN This plan and the explanation are taken from John Brown and His Men, by Colonel Richard J. Hinton, and are here reproduced by special permission of the publishers, Funk and Wagnalls Company. Vol. XXX-28 |
434 Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
back and forth eagerly looking through
the darkness for
the appearance of his friends on top of
the wall back
of the jail. Anxiously he watched and
listened. Mid-
night, and no sign from the gloomy
prison. Slowly and
silently passed the hours until a new
day faintly dawned
over the mountains, - and the
imprisoned men did not
come forth.
In the meantime Cook and Coppoc were in
serious
whispered conference in their cell. On
the very day pre-
ceding this night, Cook's
brother-in-law, Governor
Ashbel P. Willard, of Indiana, Mrs.
Willard, his sister,
and a lady friend of the family had
called for their final
farewell. The parting was very
affecting, for Mrs. Wil-
lard was strongly attached to her
brother. She was so
overcome that she and her husband did
not leave
Charlestown that evening as they had
planned.
Cook felt that his escape that night in
accordance
with the carefully laid plans would
involve his brother-
in-law and his sister in charges of
complicity, and he
refused to leave the jail.* He urged
Edwin Coppoc to
go, but he would not desert his comrade
in the crisis.
They decided to wait until the next
night and take their
chances when a stranger was on guard
outside.
* In these times political excitement
ran high in Indiana. Governor
Willard, the brother-in-law of Cook, had
been attacked by an influential
Republican paper of Indianapolis as a
confidant in the Harper's Ferry
raid. Democratic papers very generally
were charging that Republicans
were responsible for this and the
Republican press in Indiana could not
forego the opportunity to retaliate by
ascribing all sorts of motives to
Governor Willard, who was a Democrat and
who did all he could, with
the aid of Daniel W. Voorhees and Joseph
E. McDonald, both afterward
United States senators, to save Cook's
life. Governor Willard was wholly
innocent of the charges brought against
him by the politicians and his
course throughout this trying experience
was highly honorable. He died
in 1860, before the expiration of his
term of office. It was because of
this unjust criticism that Cook was
resolved to do nothing to make his
brother-in-law still further an object
of suspicion.
Edwin Coppoc 435
Early in the night of December 15, they
removed
the thin layer of brick and without
difficulty reached the
open space in the jail yard. The
scaffold on which John
Brown had been executed was there. Up
this Coppoc
climbed to the top of the outer wall
and lay there at full
length. Cook followed, but before
mounting the wall
held up his hat on a stick to learn
whether the guard
outside was on the watch. The prisoners
were detected,
the alarm given and the chance to escape
was gone.
Had the attempt been made the night
before with
Charles Lenhart on guard it is needless
to say that there
would have been a very different record
to write. On
the morning of the execution, Cook
wrote an account
of the attempt to escape which was
signed by him and
Coppoc. It is as follows:
"Having been called upon to make a
fair statement in regard
to the ways and means of our breaking
jail, I have agreed to
do so from a sense of duty to the
sheriff of the county, our
jailer, and the jail guard. We do not
wish that any one should
be unjustly censured on our account. The
principal implements
with which we opened a passage through
the wall of the jail
were a barlow knife and a screw which we
took out of the bed-
stead.
"The knife was borrowed from one of
the jail guards to
cut a lemon with. We did not return it
to him. He had no
idea of any intention on our part to
break out, neither did the
sheriff, jailer, or any of the guard,
have any knowledge of our
plans.
"We received no aid from any person
or persons whatever.
We had, as we supposed, removed all the
brick except the last
tier, several days ago, but on the
evening previous to our break-
ing out, we found our mistake in regard
to that matter.
"We had intended to go out on the
evening that my sister
and brother-in-law were here, but I knew
that it would reflect
on them, and we postponed it -but I
urged Coppoc to go and
I would remain, but he refused. We then
concluded to wait.
"I got a knife blade from Shields
Green, and with that made
some teeth in the barlow knife, with
which we sawed off our
shackles. We had them all off the night
previous to our getting
436
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
out. Coppoc went out first and I
followed. We then got up on
the wall, when I was discovered and shot
at. The guard outside
the wall immediately came up to the
wall.
"We saw there was no chance to
escape, and as it was dis-
covered that we had broken jail, we
walked in deliberately and
gave ourselves up to the sheriff,
Captain Avis, and the jail guard.
There was no person or persons who aided
us in our escape.
This is true, so help us God.
"JOHN E. COOK,
"EDWIN COPPOC."4
Intense excitement followed the attempt
of the pris-
oners to escape. The people flocked in
from the sur-
rounding country to witness the
executions. These
were times when a legal hanging was
still regarded as
something of a holiday. The exhibition
had not yet
been driven by public opinion from the
light of day to
the darkness of midnight and the
seclusion of the dun-
geon. It is claimed that four or five
times as many
were present as at the execution of
John Brown. The
place and scaffold were the same.
Newspaper reports
differ in detail, even in the
statements in regard to the
weather. From the Associated Press we
learn that "the
weather was bright and cheerful and
much milder than
for several preceding days," while
the correspondent of
the Cincinnati Gazette reports
that "the heavens were
overcast, the air raw and bitter and
the ground covered
with a slight snow."
So far as known, the very last letter
written by
Edwin Coppoc was the short note to his
faithful and
resourceful friend, Thomas Winn. It was
as follows:
"MY DEAR FRIEND THOMAS WINN: For
thy love and sym-
pathy, and for thy unwearied efforts in
my behalf, accept my
warmest thanks. I have no words to tell
the gratitude and love
I have for thee. And may God bless thee
and thy family, for
the love and kindness thee has always
shown towards my family
and me. And when life with thee is over,
may we meet on that
Edwin Coppoc 437
shore where there is no parting, is the
farewell prayer of thy
true Friend,
"EDWIN COPPOC."8
On the morning of December 16 the
prisoners were
aroused early and prepared for
execution. The minis-
ters and a few others besides the
officers were permitted
to meet them before they left the jail.
"It is hard to die," remarked
a Quaker to Coppoc.
"It is the parting of friends, not
the dread of death
that moves us," was the reply.
The two men were remarkably cheerful
before leav-
ing but seated on their coffins their
expressions changed.
One correspondent wrote:
"The countenance of Coppoc changed;
his face wore a set-
tled expression of despair. He looked
wildly around upon the
crowd, and his large eyes lighted with
an unnatural luster. Many
a heart sighed for him. Most of the
community were anxious
for a commutation of his
sentence."
Like John Brown, this youth in his last
hours was
sustained by the faith that the cause
was worthy of the
sacrifice. But he was young and the
current of health
coursing through his veins made life
precious and its
surrender sad.
Arriving at the scaffold, "the
calm and collected
manner of both was very marked."
"They both exhib-
ited the most unflinching firmness,
saying nothing,
with the exception of bidding farewell
to the ministers
and sheriff." "After the cap
had been placed on their
heads, Coppoc turned toward Cook and
stretched forth
his hand as far as possible. At the
same time Cook
said, 'Stop a minute -where is Edwin's
hand?' They
then shook hands cordially and Cook
said, 'God bless
you'."
Edwin Coppoc 439
After everything was in readiness, Cook
said "Be
quick -as quick as possible,"
which was echoed by
Coppoc, and in a few moments they
departed this life
forever.
After receiving a letter from his
nephew, Joshua
Coppoc had gone at once to Charlestown.
The day be-
fore the execution he talked over with
Edwin and
Thomas Winn matters of mutual interest
and the for-
mer changed the request, expressed in
his letter, to a
preference for burial near his
birthplace in Columbiana
County.
Back to Salem Joshua Coppock and Thomas
Winn
brought the body in a coffin provided
by the state of
Virginia. Arrangements were promptly
made for a
quiet funeral in accord with Quaker
custom. No daily
papers then announced the latest news
to the people in
the rural districts, but in spite of
that fact they came in
great numbers on December 18 to attend
the funeral.
Until late in the afternoon they
continued to come, some
through curiosity no doubt, but very
generally through
sympathy. All were seriously
respectful. The number
that came, many to remain but a short
time, was esti-
mated at between two and three
thousand, and the last
simple rites took on the aspect of a
large public funeral.
In the little room at the home of
Joshua Coppock where
the body lay, a neighbor woman, Rachel
Whinnery,
from an adjoining farm, rose and in
fitting voice read
the following address that she had
prepared only the
evening before:
"Friends: A brother lies before us,
murdered by brothers'
hands! Every heart present should swell
up in deepest sympathy
for the youth, who, apparently, is
taking a calm slumber here,
to recuperate a system which looks full
of health and vigor. How
can we realize that this is Death? No
sickness has wasted his
440
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
natural form, nor has an unforeseen
accident laid him low. With
the stamina of life about him to have
lengthened his time to
fourscore years and ten, the cord of
life is rent asunder at twenty-
four years. The violent hands of man
have been laid upon him.
His own words are, 'I am thankful that
no one fell by my hands!'
He, as one of old, fell among thieves,
and though the good
Samaritans were there to bind up his
bleeding, mental wounds,
his physical life was sacrificed, and he
was murdered for a
principle, and that principle was
Freedom! On that broad and
expanded brow, may be traced the
lineaments of Liberty.
Slavery has snatched, as it were, a
birdling from our own dove-
cote, a brother from our own
fireside-what can she more?
"The people of Virginia have
manifested a great degree of
hospitality towards the friends of the
departed, who were with
him; but what can they give equivalent
to that which they have
taken away? Can that mother, whose sight
is almost obliterated,
feel that she can be thus recompensed
for so sad a bereavement?
Every mother's heart that looks on the
lifeless form before us,
will feel that Virginia has not only
done HER, but themselves,
too, a grievous wrong. Would that I
could this day summon
Governor Wise and the Legislative body
of Virginia here to let
them gaze on the victim of their
barbarous vengeance, and from
thence direct it to the aged
grandmother, over whose head the
snows of four-score winters have passed,
bowed with grief, that
one so full of life, and so young in
years must cross the valley
of the shadow of Death before his time.
I would have them
gaze on the saddened faces, the falling
tears of Other relatives
and friends, and if they were not affected
by this, need we won-
der at the infamous deed they have
committed.
"Not one smiling face is here
today. Sadness overhangs
us like a pall! But this is only for the
physical; mortality has
put on immortality, and to him the
physical is laid aside. He
died, as died other martyrs before him,
and the good and the
true, among the present and coming
generations, will feel that
for him there is a crown of glory, where
dungeon walls will not
loom over him; where manacles cannot
gall his limbs, and where
that awful feature of barbarism, THE
GIBBET, will not appall
his soul. With the beautified throng of
angels, we leave thee,
Oh! our Brother! Thy physical form we
consign to Mother
Earth; thy soul to thy Father, God, who
gave it."8
As evening approached the body was borne
out into
the yard and permitted to rest a short
time while the
silence was broken briefly by a solemn
voice closing with
this appeal:
442
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
"Let us here over this lifeless
body and as if standing at
the altar of Christ, consecrate our
lives anew to go and battle
manfully for truth and righteousness, and for the
overthrow of
the bloody system that sacrifices
millions of our fellow men."9
As the setting sun in bars of red cloud
passed below
the horizon, the remains of Edwin
Coppoc were lowered
into the grave in the Friends'
Churchyard, among the
quiet hills and valleys of his childhood
days. When the
shadows of night had fallen and the
funeral crowd had
vanished, a few sturdy men entered the
Friends' Church
with arms in their hands to guard the
dead, for a rumor
had gone abroad that an effort would be
made to rob
the new made grave.
The salutation to John Brown when he
arrived at
Springdale, Iowa, among the Quakers
was, "Thee is
welcome, but we have no use for thy
guns." For the
first time rifles were carried into the
little Ohio church
and some Quakers were beginning to have
"use for
guns."
After the funeral, of course it was the
one topic of
conversation about the country
firesides for many miles
around, and there was much sympathy and
resentment
in the town of Salem. Dissatisfaction
was felt at the
quiet funeral. Fear was expressed that
the body would
be removed by pro-slavery sympathizers.
Someone said
in the midst of a crowd of listeners
that it was little
short of a disgrace to permit the body
of this young
martyr to remain in a coffin furnished
by the slave state
of Virginia. This view soon found
frequent expression.
There was a demand for a more public
funeral in order
that the sentiment of Salem and the
surrounding coun-
try might have adequate expression.
Announcement
was made in the papers and in a
handbill signed by
Edwin Coppoc 443
prominent citizens of Salem, a
facsimile of which ap-
pears on another page. December 30 was
fixed upon as
the date for the second and final
burial, in Hope Ceme-
tery, Salem, Ohio.
It occurred to one of the anti-slavery
leaders of the
town that the handbill with a personal
letter should go
to Governor Wise, of Virginia. A copy
of the original,
which is still in the archives of the
state of Virginia, is
here presented for the first time in
print:
"SALEM COL. Co. O. 12th Mo 28th 1859.
"To HENRY A. WISE:
"It has been on my mind for some
time to address a few
lines to thee but have waited until the
great tragedy in which
thee has been engaged is over.
"I am satisfied that an awful doom
rests over Virginia, not
only for her hugging the accursed System
of Slavery so close to
her vitals, but for the wilful murder of
some of the best men
that have graced the pages of history
for many generations. I
mean John Brown and his most noble
followers.
"Enclosed thee will find an
advertisement. We expect to
have 8 or ten thousand people present on
its occasion.
"Thine respectfully,
"DANIEL BONSALL.
"N. B. We shall not bury Edwin
Coppick in the Virginia
Coffin, but would be rejoiced if her
Governor would Come, or
send for it.
"D. BONSALL."2
The appointed day brought a very large
crowd of
people to Salem to attend the final
obsequies. The fol-
lowing account in the main is a
paraphrase of the one
published in the Salem Republican:
In the morning the people began to
arrive, some of
them from a considerable distance. Long
before the
appointed hour, one o'clock in the
afternoon, the town
was thronged with thousands of
strangers, who came
to pay the final tributes of respect
and sympathy. The
444 Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications. |
|
Edwin Coppoc 445
body of the dead youth was still well
preserved but his
face, so lifelike at the former
funeral, had begun to dis-
color. It was shrouded in a costly
metallic coffin to
which it had been transferred. Alfred
Wright at the
head of a committee of arrangements had
charge of the
funeral. The body lay in the Town Hall,
which had so
often, in the years gone by, rung with
appeals for the
cause that took Edwin Coppoc to
Harper's Ferry.
Rev. James A. Thome,* of Ohio City, now
a part of
Cleveland, offered a prayer, which he
followed with
brief remarks. He declared that
Coppoc's purpose was
righteous and that he died "a
martyr to the sacred cause
of liberty."
"I visited this place more than
twenty years ago," he said,
"before this young man was born, to
defend the doctrine of
human rights. Here before me lies the
victim of that irre-
pressible warfare upon human rights,
waged by the bloody system
of the slave states."
* Rev. James A. Thome was born in
Augusta, Kentucky, January 20,
1813. He died in Chattanooga, Tennessee,
March 4, 1873. In 1833 he
entered Lane Theological Seminary, but
withdrew from that institution
with other students rather than withdraw
from an anti-slavery society
that had demanded immediate
emancipation. In 1835, he entered the
theological school at Oberlin, Ohio,
from which he was graduated in 1836.
Soon afterward he became active as an
agent of the American Anti-
Slavery Society and was chosen as one of
its representatives to make a
tour of the West Indies and report the
effect of emancipation in the
British West Indies. He and his
associate made a report on their return,
which was widely circulated as an
anti-slavery document. He was a
professor in Oberlin college 1838-1848.
He then became pastor of the
Congregational Church of Ohio City,
later a part of Cleveland, and con-
tinued to preach there for twenty-three
years. In November, 1871, he
accepted a call to Chattanooga where he
preached until near the date of
his death. Prior to the war, after his
graduation from Oberlin, he was
frequently on the lecture platform
advocating the emancipation of the
slaves. His near relatives in his native
state liberated their slaves, largely
through his influence. With William
Lloyd Garrison he was a delegate
to the International Anti-Slavery
Society that met in Paris after the
close of the Civil War. His funeral
services were conducted from the
First Congregational Church of Cleveland
where he was buried.
446
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
Through the Town Hall passed the
throng, estimated
at six thousand, unusually silent and
solemn, even for
such an occasion.
Later the body was borne out of the
hall to the
hearse and the procession moved to the
grave on the hill
in the following order: First, the near
relatives; Sec-
ond, the pall bearers; Third, the
colored people for
whose race the deceased had given his
life; Fourth, cit-
izens on foot, followed by those from a
distance in car-
riages.
The coffin was lowered into a strong
plank box, well
ironed, in a grave of unusual depth.
In the evening all that could enter the
Town Hall
listened to the impressive funeral
discourse by Rev.
Thome. The meeting was organized by
calling to the
chair Jacob Heaton, who for years had
been a recog-
nized leader in the anti-slavery cause.
After prayer by
Rev. Burke of Wayne County, the
congregation sang
the stirring hymn, "Blow, ye
trumpet, blow." The
speaker took as his theme, Daniel and
the writing on
the wall, declaring that "like the
message to Belshazzar
was John Brown's to enthroned
iniquity." "Here," said
he, "is grandeur; here is God's
own work and grace,
here where it is treason to proclaim God's
truth; here
in an age of sounding brass - are these
great souls,
like living organs through whose
trumpet notes God has
blown an anthem that shakes the land
like an earth-
quake."
The sermon was described by one who
heard it as
remarkably eloquent - such as one is
permitted to hear
only once in a lifetime.5
And thus the remains of this
unpretentious youth,
this warrior in the anti-slavery cause,
whose life was
Edwin Coppoc 447
full of vicissitudes, found a final
resting place in a spot
that he had known in childhood days.
His warfare was
over and his sleep so deep that it
could not be broken by
the opening gun at Fort Sumpter, the
marching of "that
glorious army" to the southland,
the thunders of con-
tending hosts on a hundred battle
fields, the final over-
throw of Lee whom he had spared to lead
the Confed-
erate legions, the triumph of liberty
and union, the "Dec-
laration of Independence fully
realized." All this, which
he was not permitted to witness with
mortal eye, he saw
in vision before he went to his final
rest.
A number of estimates of the character
of Edwin
Coppoc are now at hand. Without
exception they are
favorable. Mrs. Annie Brown Adams, the
daughter of
John Brown, who knew Coppoc at Harper's
Ferry, thus
speaks of him:
"He was of fair skin, had a well
balanced, large head, dark
brown hair and eyes. * * * He was quite simple and fas-
cinating in his ways: - a rare young
fellow caring for and fear-
ing nothing, he yet possessed great
social traits and no better
comrade have I ever met."4
George B. Gill has left the following
interesting
estimate:
"Edwin had a birthright in the
Society of Friends. All of
his nearest relatives, with the
exception of his brothers, were
zealous adherents of that Society.
[Edwin] early developed a
business capacity, accumulating horses,
oxen and also land. He
was a young man of great force and
decision, accompanied by
the most winning manner and amiable
ways. Intellectually his
peers in his country home were few. His
courage was equal
apparently to any emergency. Amiable,
loving and brave, no
gathering whether of mind or muscle,
whether the aims were
physical or social, was complete without
him. Honorable, loyal
and true, mirthful, yet full of the
thoughtful sympathies of life;
a magnetism attracting and holding all within the firm
clasp
448
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
of friendship; some five feet seven or
eight inches in height,
with a rugged, well-knit frame which
accepted without fear all
the tests that a life of labor gives.
One world at a time, and
that world this, was all the world that
he knew; another to him
was a thing of beauty, full of joy and
song.
"But the world went wrong. A blight
came-a crushing
of hopes in a manhood whose intensity
could not dream of love's
resurrection or time's healing power.*
Amid the dream a larger
love was born and for that love he died."10
Edwin Coppoc was not forgotten in the
section of
Ohio where he was born. His death made
a deep im-
pression which did not pass with his
obsequies. It in-
spired the volunteers who answered
their country's call
when the slogan, "No union with
slaveholders" was
changed to "The union with no
slaveholders"; and
many a Quaker boy renounced the
non-resistant article
of his creed, put on the uniform of
blue and marched
away under the flag to battle for
liberty and union.
When the struggle ended and the country
was electrified
by the news that Lee had surrendered,
the people of
Salem, men, women and children, came
forth to cele-
brate "that glorious day."
Among them was a youth,
a teacher in the high school, born and
reared a Quaker
in the country south of the town, who
suggested that an
effigy of General Lee be placed in the
coffin in which the
body of Edwin Coppoc had been brought
from Harper's
Ferry - an exhibit of the compensating
justice of his-
tory. This was promptly done, and on
the shoulders
of this youth and three others the
coffin with the effigy
was borne at the head of the great
procession in the
midst of the wildest enthusiasm that
Salem had ever
known.
The youth who figured in this event
still lives to
*There are traditions of this
disappointment, but nothing more
definite than the above statement.
Edwin Coppoc 449 tell, in his modest way, the story which will be found on succeeding pages. Our readers will recognize in him one of the leading scholars and teachers that Ohio has produced, whose fame as such is state-wide, nation-wide and international. |
|
At the close of the Civil War Coppoc's memory was thus honored. His grave is at the entrance of Hope Cemetery. Past it the bodies of many a youth who fell in that conflict have gone to their rest. With them he is still remembered and on each Memorial Day the modest but substantial monument that marks his grave is crowned with a wreath of flowers. Vol. XXX-29 |
NOTES
1. Rebecca J. Douglas of Indianapolis, Indiana, is prepar-
ing a genealogy of the Coppoc family.
She has kindly consented
to the use of her notes in the
preparation of the preceding and
succeeding articles on Edwin and Barclay
Coppoc.
2. Oswald Garrison Villard, grandson of
William Lloyd
Garrison, editor of the Nation and
author of John Brown, A
Biography Fifty Years After, in the preparation of the latter
work collected much material relating to
John Brown's men.
He kindly loaned this to the writer for
use in the preparation
of the skecthes of Edwin and Barclay
Coppoc. This included
(2) papers from the Virginia archives;
(6) manuscript extracts
from scrapbooks and other papers in the
library of the Kansas
Historical Society; (10) copies of
manuscripts and letters in
the possession of the Brown family. This
material has been of
very great value, as will be seen, in
the preparation of these
sketches.
3. Irving B. Richman wrote a
contribution for the Histor-
ical Society of Iowa entitled John
Brown Among the Quakers.
This was afterwards published in
separate form. The refer-
ences bearing this number are to this
interesting contribution.
4. Colonel Richard J. Hinton, in 1894,
published his well
known work, John Brown and His Men. He was personally
acquainted with all of Brown's men and
was himself one of
them. He had expected to be at Harper's
Ferry but the pre-
cipitation of the attack there prevented
his participation. The
writer is under obligations to this work
for somewhat copious
extracts and frequent references. It is
an invaluable source of
information on the men who went with
John Brown on his
foray into Virginia.
5. The references bearing this number
are to the Salem
(Ohio) Republican, the early
files of which are in the public
library at Salem, Ohio. Extracts from
these files were made
by the writer, by the Librarian, Miss Anna P. Cook, and
her
assistant, Mrs. Blanche C. H. Lease, for
whose copy in type-
written form grateful acknowledgment is here made.
6. See (6) in note 2.
7. This is from the original letter,
long in the possession of
Sarah Coppock Bailey, daughter of Joshua
Coppock. This letter
(450)
Edwin Coppoc 451
is now, through her kindness, in the
possession of the Ohio State
Archaeological and Historical Society.
8. Typewritten copy furnished by Mrs.
Samuel Coppock
who has kindly given much information to
the author in the
preparation of these sketches.
9. Cleveland Leader, January,
1860.
10. See (10) in
note 2.
LOCK OF EDWIN COPPOC'S HAIR.
Recently the Ohio State Archaeological
and Historical
Society has received from Samuel
Coppock, of Winona, Ohio,
a lock of the hair of Edwin Coppoc,
which is now to be seen
with the other mementos in the museum of
the Society.
LETTER OF EDWIN COPPOC.
The letter of Edwin Coppoc to his uncle
Joshua is repro-
duced verbatim with a single exception:
in the twelfth line from
the top of page 431, between the word
"say" and "I" in the
original the word "that"
occurs. The italicized portions were
underscored in the letter. Slight faults in orthography
have
been corrected. The letter is written in
a clear and steady hand.
In view of the circumstances under which
it was written, it is
a remarkable production, as is also the
address of Rachael Whin-
nery at the funeral.
|
(396) |