664
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications
AFTERNOON SESSION
AUDITORIUM OF THE MUSEUM
AND LIBRARY BUILDING,
1:30 O'CLOCK.
The addresses delivered at the
afternoon session of
the meeting were of an unusually high
order. Members
of the Society and their friends came
in large numbers to
hear the two noted speakers on the
program. They soon
filled the auditorium to the limit of
its capacity and a
number were turned away for lack of
room. The high
anticipations of the audience were not
disappointed.
Both speakers were from outside of the
State, but
each had a distinctive Ohio connection
and their pres-
ence was, in a measure, a home-coming
after the
achievements of honorable distinction
in other fields.
ADDRESS BY PROFESSOR ARCHER BUTLER
HULBERT
After a few remarks President Johnson
invited Dr.
William Oxley Thompson, President
Emeritus of the
Ohio State University, to preside over
the afternoon
session. Dr. Thompson was given an
ovation on as-
suming the chair. In a few words he
introduced the
first speaker of the afternoon, Archer
Butler Hulbert,
college professor and historian, who
delivered his ad-
dress on "The Provincial Basis of
Patriotism."
From his first sentence, Professor
Hulbert held the
close attention of his audience. The
interest grew until
it reached a climax at the conclusion
of his address of
one hour. He did not rehearse merely
the facts of his-
Forty-Second Annual Meeting 665
tory, but he used those facts as a
basis for a philosophy
of history which was not commonplace
and hackneyed.
In other words, he exhibited
originality of thought in
tracing the development of our national
patriotism from
love of home, locality and province.
He manifested none of the tendencies of
recent writ-
ers of history to depreciate
patriotism, to hold up to
public view the delinquencies of
patriots, or to use a
slang expression of modern writers, to
"de-bunk his-
tory." Those who heard him must
have felt a healthy
optimism in regard to the future and a
higher apprecia-
tion of an intelligent and
all-embracing love of country.
He introduced his subject of American
provincialism
by a description of his acquaintance
with the topic at
first hand -- of his eighteen years in
New England,
twenty years in the Ohio Valley, ten
years in the Rocky
Mountain Region, and four years'
experience in recent
days on the Pacific Coast. "I have
begun in a slight
way," he said, "to become
acquainted with this country
of ours; it is only by experience that
one can come to do
that most important thing, To Love America
First, how-
ever little in one brief lifetime one
may happen to see;
for when one has seen the 'famous'
places of interest, he
has read only the first page of a book
of gigantic size."
The speaker said that, from the very
colonial begin-
ning of our history, the
United-States-to-be was a mar-
velous collection of curious provinces,
kingdoms, prin-
cipalities and dukedoms, regal in their
expanse, rich be-
yond counting, in their resources. In
each province was
developed that province's own
"peculiar people," so to
speak. As each region differed in
conformation, soil
and products, so the people in each
differed. This gave
666 Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications
rise to a vast series of antagonisms
based on different
outlooks, political bents, religious
convictions, social cus-
toms, local conceits and prejudices.
The speaker gave
many humorous illustrations of these
antipathies, em-
phasizing especially the boundary-line
disputes, taking
Pennsylvania's quarrels over each of
her four boundary
lines as an illustration.
By such means, the speaker established
his tenet that
the people of every one of these
American "nations" (as
they would have seemed to a European)
"discovered a
distinct pride in and love for their
own section or prov-
ince, the peculiar type of
provincialism which makes
Texans believe no land equals theirs,
the Kentuckian to
hold the 'Blue-Grass Region' as the
choice bit of God's
whole earth and the Oregonian to
consider his North-
west a Heaven compared with either
Texas or Kentucky.
The characteristics of such provincial
affection was dis-
cussed from the standpoint of the
various psychologists
of patriotism, that craving for the
sense of 'at-homeness'
which made Webster, on his death-bed,
desire the cows
should be driven from the barn to his
window that he
might once more smell their breath;
that longing which
made Napoleon cry out from his island
prison for one
more smell of Corsican soil; that
aching pain which
makes the 'mountain white,' a-dying in
a stuffy city
apartment house, long to be carried
back to his mountain
spring, certain that its waters will
effect a cure."
"The roots of patriotism,"
the speaker insisted,
"thrive in provincial soils. He is
a real patriot who is
truly fond of his 'home,' his
'section'; and the greatest
of patriots is he who truly loves the
greatest number
|
Archer Butler Hulbert, college professor, historian and author of many standard publications, is widely and favorably known in Ohio. He was graduated from Marietta College in 1895; was editor of the Korean Inde- pendent in the Far East; Professor of American History in Marietta Col- lege, 1904-1918, and in Colorado College, 1920-1925. He has been a lecturer in the University of Chicago and other universities. He is a voluminous writer. He is a member of the Phi Beta Kappa fraternity and author of almost forty volumes of standard books, including the Historic Highways of America, in sixteen volumes. His latest published book is The Making of the American Republic. His contribution in the December Atlantic, of last year, entitled "The Habit of Going to the Devil," is said to have been the "most widely quoted magazine article published in 1926." Professor Hulbert is a life member of the Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Society and has contributed to its publications. (667) |
668 Ohio Arch. and Hist.
Society Publications
of provinces -- sees why Kentuckians
and Texans and
Oregonians are so biased and loves
them for it! The
Man Without a Country' could never have
been so
dubbed had he had any real affection
for Gratiot, He-
bron or Kirkersville," said
Professor Hulbert. This
development of his theme was happily
illustrated by the
fact that seldom in any land do the
so-called "national"
songs have the vital hold upon the
masses that do the
songs redolent of section and province.
"The songs
which humanity hugs to its bosom
through generations
are the songs vibrant with specific
local phenomena, sat-
urated with provincial color, redolent
of indigenous
things; songs of Maxwelton's breezes,
of Alsatian
Mountains, of Beautiful Ohios, of
Kentucky Homes, of
Silv'ry Rio Grandes, of Suwanee
Rivers." The song
"Goodbye Broadway, Hello
France," the speaker said,
"would hardly have made the hit it
did had it been
worded 'Goodbye America, Hello France.'
The local
tang was requisite and, while few men
in those armies
could have given the various verses of
'My Country 'Tis
of Thee' or 'God Save the King,' every
man-jack in any
of them could have told every word of
'Tipperary' (with
its provincial references to Piccadilly),
or every word of
'My Indiana Home' or 'Dixie'."
"This exceedingly necessary place
of provincialism
as a true basis for nationalism,"
the speaker said, "has
been ignored by the formal historian,
largely because
the geologist has been the historian's guide
and mentor
and not the agriculturist. We have been
taught how the
frame-work of the continent was put
together; we have
learned much of 'faults' and
'anti-clines' and all the rest
Forty-Second Annual Meeting 669
of the important story of the building
of the continent's
skeleton; but we have been told little
about the super-
ficial background of our soils. We have
learned much
about the framework of which the
pioneers knew noth-
ing and we have remained in ignorance
of the soils
which meant everything in the world
to those pioneers;
for soils were the one and only topic
of vital importance
to our migrating fathers; they
dominated the planting
of colonies, determined whither men should
go and how
far; where turn and when to stop. The
planting of
every frontier was always a soil
proposition, whether it
were the founding of an Ohio, a Texas
or an Oregon.
Strike out, from migration, propaganda
to any impor-
tant zone of colonial expansion the
soil arguments and
you have practically a blank page. Yet
what of our
school histories even mention the
subject?"
"This story of province-creation
has been neglected,"
said Professor Hulbert, "just as,
formerly, the story of
the European background of American
history was neg-
lected. Here the geologist has his
important funda-
mental story; yet when he is done, the
most important
part of the tale remains to be
unfolded, so far as man's
actual experience in Republic-making is
concerned. For
only by seeing such a thing, as the
Valley of Virginia,
come into existence, and noting how it
resembled the
limestone Pennsylvania lands and
differed from tide-
water Virginia, on the one side, and
the Ohio Valley on
the other, can we sense the creation of
a distinct prov-
ince which gave birth, let us imagine,
to a distinct 'race
of giants'; a provincial type of pride,
attitude to the rest
of the world; a granary thrust
providentially into the
670 Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications
Southland from which Lee and Jackson
might get their
grain in times of trouble." The
speaker illustrated the
profusion of these distinct American
"nations" within
our Republic by letting them pass in
review before a
traveling automobile:
All delights of touring are, to me, as
nothing compared to
the sensation of crossing, every now and
then, an unseen
Tropic of Capricorn, so to speak, and
entering a new world.
Leave the western gate of Yellowstone,
for instance, and
cruise southward for a day. From Fire
Holes, Mud Pots, and
Geysers, you pass into the Big Woods,
another world; and on
to the Henry Lake Country; and on to a
former desert valley
now blossoming as only water can make
calcareous soil blossom;
and on to the magnificent farming lands
of northeastern Utah;
by eventide you are sliding down into
the lovely meadows and
orchards and fertile truck gardens about
princely Salt Lake
City. In the morning the smell of spruce
gum was in your
nostrils, and mosquitoes, big as bats,
hummed in your ears. At
night, boys and girls were offering you,
from the roadside,
peaches, plums, pears, grapes -- and you
are in a new King-
dom.
Head north from the "High Tide of
the Confederacy," at
Gettysburg, and you soon enter the more
fertile of the Penn-
sylvania Dutch country; on nearing the
Hudson, further north,
the gates of another land swing open to
you on the Divide -- a
world too busy, almost, for agriculture;
beyond the Hudson
your engine tells you that the
Berkshires are at hand, and you
cross that beautiful barrier which once
half-guarded New Eng-
land from the savage raids of the
Iroquois; stone walls, long
white houses, cod-fish and rustless window-screen
signs herald
the fact that you have, indeed, entered
another land.
Strike west from Santa Fe and you cross
the Rio Grande
and climb up and up to Gallup-land;
painted deserts and petri-
fied forests bespeak a strange new
province; the pines of Flag-
staff betoken another; faring south from
Ash Fork you cross
the rangy Bradshaws into an immense mesa
when -- look! as
the little boy said, "There are
trees with their pants on."
Palm trees! Giant cactus! Gila Monsters!
And from shiver-
ing in the cold by the Grand Canyon (in
February), in the morn-
ing, by night you are star-gazing
through the Phoenix palms.
And all that, to me, is my country. I am
the heir of my
friend on Long Island, with its lovely
vistas between glorious
Forty-Second Annual Meeting 671
roads; princely houses; exquisite
gardens; foam-covered rocks
white with the spray of the sea. I love
the swift tide of his
life; the crush and crash of commuting;
the intensity of business
rush; pleasure rush; contact with men
who are moving the
world, preaching its great sermons,
writing its great books and
plays, curing its great maladies,
building its Woolworth towers;
I revel in his pride of life, sense of
power, thrill of victory.
And yet I smile at the thought of his
suave certainty that the
world is bounded by his roads,
skyscrapers and offices!
I am heir of my friend in his ranch on
Wagon Hound
Creek. How interminable are those level
plains -- "where thar's
plenty o' elbow room to spit," as
he would say. How he de-
tests cities -- where folks live so
"hunched up" that you "can't
cuss a cat without gittin' hair in yer
mouth." How he glories
as King of a Royal Domain. How little
mere miles mean to
him -- with a Pharaoh's train of horses!
He looks abroad and
sees things I will never learn to see;
hears things I can never
expect to hear; senses changes, signs
and wonders on a dead
level prairie, where I sense nothing,
. . . .
The stars break out in millions on a velvet summer sky;
and feels:
. . . . the ardent yearning pain
Wide sage lands bring when damp with
summer rain.
The way the buffalo grass slants informs
him, but leaves me
ignorant. The piercing notes of birds
tell him a story; to me it
is but a song. In vast lands, he tells
me, the bird notes must carry
further, for flocks are few and far
between, and, if mates are to
find each other, the call must be louder
than in a hilly land "where
echoes live." The eyes of wild life
are, similarly, sharper, he says,
because distances are greater, and foes
and prey must be sighted
from afar, if at all. There is a sweep,
a majesty, in his outlook,
in his planning, in his care of loved
ones and stock, in the way his
latch-string hangs out his door. I am a
dullard in his presence
because I am only educated while he has
been educed.
Likewise, I am heir of my friend on that
old homestead in
Vermont; of my fisherman-friend in an
Alleghany cove who
knows "hants"; of my poet-friend.
"Joe, the Desert Rat," in his
Arizona foothills; of my golfing-friend
in his California orange
grove. No one of these friends would
feel much at home in the
shoes of another. Each is of his own
land -- knows its peculiar
secrets, cherishes the glories and
illusions belonging to it, breeds
its traditions. If you know them all
well enough to catch at least
a faint glimpse of their happiness and
virile pride, you are the
672 Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications
American patriot par excellence because
of your pride in so many
"nations" within your Country.
I could fight for "my" Otter
Creek in Vermont, for "my"
Goshen Hole in Wyoming, for
"my" Staked Plains in Texas,
for "my" Black Pool of the Little
Blue in Kansas, for "my"
Sapphire Land of the Carolinas, "my"
Squaw Hollow in Ohio.
The succeeding phase of the speaker's
theme was
also illustrated from nature:
A maple's patriotism is illustrated in
two ways; by growing
strong where it is -- right there -- not
somewhere else; in devel-
oping, let us imagine, a real love of
environment, of "home"; and
then, paradoxically, throwing all its
life, all its strength, enthusi-
asm and ardor into creating winged seeds
which will do everything
except stay at howe. We have long been taught that our nation,
politically, was of a curious two-fold,
two-in-one form; part na-
tional, part federal. So, too, we have
had a similar two-fold de-
velopment socially, psychologically.
Men, deeply loving New
England, or Virginia, or Tennessee, have
gone out to plant and
cherish just as lovingly an Ohio, a
Kentucky or a Missouri; and
Kentuckians and Missourians have, while
holding those home-
lands to be the garden-spots of the
world, readily cut home ties
to plant Californias, Montanas and
Arizonas and find nesting-
places for new broods of Americans; and
while these sang "My
Colorado" or "Little Gray Home
in the West," with the same
ardor with which their forebears sang
"The Hills of My Old New
Hampshire Home" or "Beautiful
Ohio," all were ready to unite
in "America" without any loss
in national affection, because they
had conceived so royal a provincial
pride and love of a specific
section.
This breeding of frontiers by frontiers
is as perfectly illus-
trated by the Rhode Islanders who, with
other Yankees, founded
Marietta in 1788, as in any instance
afforded by American history.
Let us turn to another type of
breeding-ground, one termed
by the late Professor Dunning, the most
"delicious" instance of
that lunging-forward instinct of
American frontiersmen. Many
of the New Englanders, whom General
Rufus Putnam led to
Marietta, were from the seafaring towns
of Rhode Island and
Massachusetts; block and tackle, mast
and jib, hawser and an-
chor-lore was a part of their very
blood. Before them they saw
the "Beautiful Ohio"
stretching away to the Mississippi, and that,
in turn, to their beloved ocean -- two
thousand miles away.
Forty-Second Annual Meeting 673
Washington had foreseen, in 1784, the
phenomenon of ocean-
rigged vessels descending the Ohio River. But within
three years
of Wayne's victory at Fallen Timber,
those irrepressible Ohio
Yankees had a brig, the St. Clair, of
110 tons on the stocks at
Marietta! From the forests they had
dragged the black walnut
for the hull; from their fields they
plucked the hemp for cordage;
and soon iron-works at Pittsburgh were,
to quote a pious contem-
poraneous advertisement,
"sufficiently upheld by the Hand of the
Almighty" to be able to furnish the
necessary metal. In every
major port on the Ohio, ship-building
yards were soon echoing
with tools of migration and commerce.
Far up on the Monon-
gahela, men of Delaware were constructing
the Monongahela
Farmer. These ships set sail for the Atlantic Ocean in the
first
year of the Nineteenth Century and
without a doubt the pessimists
laughed loudly at the idea of their ever
getting there! "How can
they make the innumerable bends in the
rivers ?" sneered the icon-
oclasts. But Yankee ingenuity met this
test as nonchalantly as
all the others -- and let the heavy tubs
down backwards, with
anchors dragging from the prows! By
alternately tightening and
slacking those anchor-lines, the ships
were safely eased around
the bends. Within seven years a hundred
ocean-rigged vessels.
some with a tonnage of 500 rating, had
been built between Pitts-
burgh and the mouth of the Ohio. How far
afloat these land-
lubber ocean vessels went will never be
known. The first to ar-
rive at Liverpool was the Duane, of
Pittsburgh, on July 8, 1803.
Two years later, "in the Year of
Human Salvation, 1805," the
non-plussed harbor master of Trieste,
Italy, at the head of the
Adriatic, made out papers, (now in the
Marietta College Li-
brary), which permitted the Louisiana
of Marietta, to set sail
from Trieste for London with a cargo of
oil, wood, box-wood,
apples, juniper berries and "other things."1
And not the least "delicious"
phase, of this unique episode in
pioneering, was the consciousness of those
irrepressible Yankees
that they were doing clever things!
He hath oped the way to Commerce,
sang a poet, on the occasion of the
sailing of the St. Clair, from
Marietta, in honor of the captain of the
ship, who was none other
than Admiral Abraham Whipple, who had
helped to fire the
Gaspee in Narragansett Harbor and precipitate the Revolution-
ary War.
1 Hulbert, A. B., "Western
Shipbuilding," American Historical Review
XXI, No. 4.
Vol. XXXVI--43.
674 Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications
Sirens attend with Flute and Lyre
and bring your Conks my Tritons
in chorus Blow to the Aged Sire
in welcome to my Dominions
continued the poet of the day, Col.
Jonathan Devol, picturing
Neptune, welcoming to his waves once
more, a hero of Narra-
gansett Bay.
By such a spectacular thrusting of one
frontier, the Ohio
Valley, upon another, the Mississippi
Valley, with all the inter-
national complications involved, a great
chapter in history was
written; because of the demand of the
West for an open Missis-
sippi channel this million-dollar fleet
of the Pittsburgh-Cairo fron-
tier was the dominating factor in
securing the Louisiana Purchase.
It may have surprised Jefferson's
delegates to Paris to be con-
fronted suddenly with the project to
purchase all of Louisiana, in
1803, instead of just the island at the
Mississippi's mouth, which
they intended to buy. But if the idea
was new to them, they had
not been reading the pugnacious western
newspapers, for, a whole
year earlier, in 1802, Pittsburgh papers
were advising the purchase
of the whole province and were even
stating the exact price,
of Fifteen Millions, (which was later paid), as one which Na-
poleon would take for the entire
province.
In this necessarily brief and somewhat
random re-
view, we have touched only upon the
speaker's chief
lines of argument. In one instance, he
tellingly outlined
the distinctive characteristics of
provincial life by form-
ing a reception line from great American
novels and
holding a unique inter-provincial
reception. The au-
dience was asked to "shake hands,
for instance, with
such outstanding individuals as Hester
Prynne, Ruggles
of Red Gap, David Harum, Ramona, Peter
Sterling,
Huck Finn, The Despot of Broomsedge
Cove, The Vir-
ginian, Janice Meredith, Old Man
Enright, Specimen
Jones, and an Outcast of Poker
Flat."
In conclusion, Professor Hulbert applied
the theme
of his address to present day frontiers.
"The need of equal individuality is
as great in this
day as it was in a former," he
said; he expressed a lik-
Forty-Second Annual Meeting 675
ing for the picturesque provincialisms
put in circulation
today by intercollegiate athletics, for
the flavor, (which
has its genuine background components),
carried by the
words "The Golden Bears of
California," the "Huskies"
of Washington, the "Badgers,"
"Buckeyes," "Jayhawk-
ers," and "Sooners" who,
in athletic togs, epitomize the
sense of provincial strength, local
pride, a virility ex-
uded by specific environments.
"After all," the speaker
asked, "is not provincialism the
merriest thing in our
national kaleidoscope, if not the most
American thing,
if carefully considered? It is even
illustrated today in
antipathies which echo the old colonial
bitternesses; as
when the Oklahoma gentleman stands back
from his
recalcitrant Ford and tells it, in an
even tone of voice
more deadly than if accentuated, that
it 'can go straight
to Hell and New England,' for all of
him!"
In conclusion Professor Hulbert said:
Today, frontiers are still planting
frontiers; tools for con-
quering our "Seas of Darkness"
in the air, are in the making,
just as in Henry of Portugal's time,
tools for the Lindberghs
and Chamberlains of centuries ago were
being fashioned; and
as boldly as ever do Hudsons and
Magellans and Cabots sail away
-- never to return. Let us not fear to
preserve the idiosyncrasies,
the colorful individualities, the
unpremeditated oddities of section
and province; for in them, in essence,
we have the factors which
make up a sincere and genuine
patriotism, virile with that confi-
dence that our national sense and
tolerance and even-mindedness
will always be equal to the gigantic
emergencies of the future.
Insofar as the erroneous educational
theory is abroad that any
educational institution puts a peculiar
"stamp" on its sons or
daughters, let us combat the implication
vigorously. Just so far
as resources are used to produce a
peculiar, institutional "stamp,"
instead of being used to develop the
individuality of the student
and prospective graduate, to just that
degree, human provincial-
ism is being stifled and our country is
being deprived of inherent,
creative assets -- perhaps blighting a
soul-frontier which might,
if encouraged to develop its own
individual role, plant new fron-
676 Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications
tiers of imperishable renown, such as
our Millikans, Eliots, Bur-
banks, Fords, Shapleys, and Grenfells
have given the world.
Professor Hulbert was generously
applauded at the
conclusion of his address.
Dr. Thompson then introduced the second
speaker
of the afternoon, Dr. G. Clyde Fisher,
Curator of Visual
Instruction in the American Museum of
Natural His-
tory, New York City. Dr. Fisher is a
native Ohioan,
whose scholarly attainments and
enviable record are a
source of pride to nature lovers within
and beyond the
limits of his native and adopted
states. His lecture was
instructive and entertaining. It was illustrated by a
large number of colored lantern slides.
The delighted
audience felt that they, through their
speaker, were
"WITH JOHN BURROUGHS IN HIS
FAVORITE
HAUNTS."
This subject Dr. Fisher introduced
briefly as fol-
lows:
Ladies and Gentlemen, Members of the
Ohio State Archaeological
and Historical Society:
It is a privilege and an honor to be
welcomed back to my
home State, and to speak before this
Society this afternoon.
I do not intend to try to talk about the
literature that John
Burroughs produced; except casually. It
was my privilege to
know John Burroughs a great many years.
In fact, I began
correspondence with him when I was a boy
on a farm in western
Ohio more than twenty-five years ago. I
later knew him per-
sonally, and had the privilege of
visiting him, during his last
years, in his various haunts.
It will be my plan to bring before you,
if I can, John Bur-
roughs the man, John Burroughs the very
human man. To know
John Burroughs was to love him. I have
been told by his pub-
lishers, who also publish the works of
other eminent naturalists,
that many more copies of Burroughs'
books have been sold than
of the others. I do not wish to make
comparisons, and I do not
664
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications
AFTERNOON SESSION
AUDITORIUM OF THE MUSEUM
AND LIBRARY BUILDING,
1:30 O'CLOCK.
The addresses delivered at the
afternoon session of
the meeting were of an unusually high
order. Members
of the Society and their friends came
in large numbers to
hear the two noted speakers on the
program. They soon
filled the auditorium to the limit of
its capacity and a
number were turned away for lack of
room. The high
anticipations of the audience were not
disappointed.
Both speakers were from outside of the
State, but
each had a distinctive Ohio connection
and their pres-
ence was, in a measure, a home-coming
after the
achievements of honorable distinction
in other fields.
ADDRESS BY PROFESSOR ARCHER BUTLER
HULBERT
After a few remarks President Johnson
invited Dr.
William Oxley Thompson, President
Emeritus of the
Ohio State University, to preside over
the afternoon
session. Dr. Thompson was given an
ovation on as-
suming the chair. In a few words he
introduced the
first speaker of the afternoon, Archer
Butler Hulbert,
college professor and historian, who
delivered his ad-
dress on "The Provincial Basis of
Patriotism."
From his first sentence, Professor
Hulbert held the
close attention of his audience. The
interest grew until
it reached a climax at the conclusion
of his address of
one hour. He did not rehearse merely
the facts of his-