GENERAL JOHN GRAVES SIMCOE--
The Canadian Governor Who Attempted to
Make Ohio
a Part of Canada*
Annual Paper by
JAMES A. GREEN
Historian of the Club
American visitors to Canada are always
struck with
the beauty and charm of Lake Simcoe
which is situated
fifty miles north of Toronto in the
midst of one of the
most fertile regions of Ontario. It is
a lovely lake, blue
as Como. Joined to it by a short and
narrow strait is
Lake Couchicing, equally lovely. In the
city park of
Orillia which is built upon this strait
stands a splendid
and heroic statue of Champlain. The
great explorer was
overtaken at that place by winter and
on the very spot
where his statue stands he made a camp
and spent sev-
eral months. They must, even to such a
bold and intrepid
spirit as that which possessed
Champlain, have been
dreary and trying months. He lived on
the wild meat
and the fish which the Indians
provided. How he would
be amazed were he able to return to see
these lakes as
they are now, with here and there upon
their shores a
prosperous town, handsome cottages of
the summer vis-
itors by the hundreds and all the
country which he knew
as an unbroken forest occupied by
farms, rich with corn
and oats and orchards and with the
pastures filled with
cattle. Even the meanest of the houses
of today would
* Read before the Cincinnati Literary
Club.
(35)
36
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications
have seemed a palace for Champlain in
that dreary
winter.
Lake Simcoe was named for John Graves
Simcoe,
who was born February 25, 1752, and
died in 1806. He
was an English soldier and saw seven
years of service in
America during the Revolution.
Unhappily for him he
was at Yorktown with Cornwallis and was
there sur-
rendered as a prisoner of war. He
returned to this con-
tinent in 1792 as Lieutenant Governor
of Upper Canada,
that is Ontario, and remained there for
four years. He
was a good husband, a good soldier, a
man of large
capacity, and estimable in his personal
and public life.
This paper will be devoted not to a
biographical sketch
of General Simcoe but to the crowded
years of his
services in Canada.
Had General Simcoe been able to carry
out his ideas
he would have profoundly changed the
course of Ameri-
can history. I think it can be said
fairly there never was
an Englishman, unless probably it was
Lord North, who
was so entirely hostile to the United
States, or who held
the New Republic in lighter esteem. He
deliberately set
about putting into effect a policy
which he hoped would
in a large degree undo the work of the
Revolution. Had
I lived in his time doubtless I should
have regarded him
as an extremely dangerous enemy, a man
of force, char-
acter and resourcefulness with all his
energies devoted
to wrongful ends. Now that nearly a
century and a half
have passed since he was Governor of
Ontario, I am
able to regard him detachedly and to
admire and respect
him. With the exception of Champlain he
is in my opin-
ion the most original and far-seeing of
the Europeans
who governed in Canada. And I am not
sure that he
General John Graves Simcoe 37
was as impracticable and visionary as a
hasty judgment
might pronounce. He was a Tory of the
Tories, devoted
to King and Church, an Englishman with
a mind and
body given solely to his country, her
glory and her ex-
pansion. There was in him no negative
quality. He was
positive in everything he said or did,
with never any
hemming or hawing, always direct and
outspoken. He
was one of those typical Englishmen of
that fine old
school which planted English Colonies
in every strategic
and important place in the world,
until, as Webster said,
the morning drum-beat of the British
garrisons follow-
ing the sun and keeping time with the
hours encircles
the globe with the continuous and
unbroken strains of
the martial airs of England.
The Governor General of Canada at the
time was
Lord Dorchester, better known to
Americans as Guy
Carleton, who gave our forefathers
during the Revolu-
tion some very bad hours. I think we
owe him a debt
of gratitude in that he checked
Simcoe's plans and finally
made him resign his position and return
to the old coun-
try. However, Lord Dorchester
thoroughly approved of
General Simcoe's ideas. He too was a
violently anti-
American. The trouble was that the two
could not get
along together. So our debt of
gratitude to Lord Dor-
chester should have its severe
limitations. Had Simcoe
been Governor-General instead of merely
Lieutenant-
Governor there is no telling what might
have happened,
but there is every reason to suppose a
good deal would
have happened which would have been
exceedingly dis-
turbing to the peace and to the dignity
of the United
States. As it was, General Simcoe went
far enough to
make things decidedly unpleasant. He
had inherited
38
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications
from his father a tradition which
became with him an
obsession. His father had been one of
the naval captains
in the fleet which played such a great
part with Wolfe
in the taking of Quebec. This father
had not lived to see
the destruction of the French power in
America, nor to
see the English flag go up to float
proudly on the Citadel
of Quebec. But he had a vision of a new
and greater
England extending over a vaster area
than even that
which was subject to the Roman Caesars.
In 1755
Captain John Simcoe, R. N., in writing
of Montreal
said--
it will become the center of
communication between the Gulf of
Mexico and Hudson Bay--formed for
drawing to itself the wealth
and strength of the vast interjacent
countries, so advantageously
placed, if not destined to lay the
foundation of the most potent
and best connected Empire that ever awed
the world.
There was an imperialist for you. These
words were
written when Montreal had not an
English resident,
when it was still hardly more than an
outpost of the
French missionaries and of the fur
traders. Certainly
its French residents had for it no such
dreams of glory.
If there were many captains in the
Royal Navy who
had such clear eyes to pierce the
future, little wonder
the English drum-beat salutes the
rising sun around the
world. At the beginning of the late War
a German said
that one of the reasons for the war was
they were tired
every time a German ship entered a
foreign port of hav-
ing an English official tell them where
to cast anchor,
and tired wherever they went of being
obliged to learn
English if they would do business. It
was just such men
as Captain John Simcoe and his son
General John Graves
Simcoe who brought about that state of
affairs. With
General John Graves Simcoe 39
such a father no wonder the son had his
own dreams of
empire.
The particular charm of the matter in
the case of the
son was he could fashion things from
their very begin-
ning. Up to the time of his arrival in
Quebec when the
proclamation was issued dividing Canada
into what we
know now as the Provinces of Quebec and
Ontario,
there had been but one central
administration for the
whole country. Now the westward portion
was cut off
from the eastern part and General
Simcoe was to be the
first governor, he was to lay the
foundations of the state.
I suppose there is no man of high
intelligence and gen-
uine imagination who has had the
ordering of a new
government to be chopped out of the
woods as it were,
but has had his dreams of a
civilization which was to be
better than anything known previously.
Governor Sim-
coe was justified in his large hopes,
more than justified
because high aims need no excuse. He
certainly aimed
high. His great purpose was to confine
the United States
to the Atlantic sea coast and to make
Ohio and the west-
ward country English. But his first
labor was to make
Ontario secure--to make it strong
enough to hold its
own and to make it so thoroughly
British that nothing
could shake its loyalty. To do this it
was necessary to
have a purely English population. Some
start had been
made by settling there the Loyalists
who had fled from
the Thirteen Colonies. They had proved
their devotion
to England by giving up everything they
possessed and
accepting the hard lot of exile. The
King rewarded them
by liberal grants of land in Ontario.
Today many of the
first families in Ontario were before
the Revolution first
families in New England, New York or
Virginia. We
40
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications
have been so accustomed to think of the
Revolution as
a mass movement of all the American
Colonists to throw
off the tyranny of England, it is
somewhat startling to
realize how many thousands of Loyalists
there were who
fled the country rather than desert
their allegiance. And
Canada was their natural refuge. It was
to these men
General Simcoe listened. They were
filled with a deadly
hatred of the United States. But they
also sincerely be-
lieved in its instability. They did not
see how Thirteen
Colonies with their immense divergent
interests could
hang together. They represented Vermont
and Connec-
ticut as being secretly in the interest
of the King and
ready to sever the bonds which united
them to Congress,
as they put it. But the big scheme was
to relocate the
boundaries of the United States by
running a line from
Buffalo Creek south to the Ohio River.
By 1792 the fur
traders in Montreal had developed a
magnificent busi-
ness. It was the first big business on
American soil. The
writer remembers as a boy a stately
street in Montreal
called Beaver Hill. It was lined with
pretentious grey
stone houses, the first houses of consequence
built in
that city. These were the visible
evidences of the wealth
and prosperity of the fur traders.
There on a street of
their own somewhat apart then from the
old city they
constructed what for the time were
magnificent dwell-
ings. A year ago I went again to see
Beaver Hill. Were
it in Cincinnati it would roughly
speaking be at Fourth
and Broadway. The modern city has
enveloped it,
spreading for miles around it. The
houses of these mag-
nates of the fur trade are dingy and
shabby, fallen from
their high estate, no longer the
residences of the mighty.
But they still stand as monuments of
the proud day when
General John Graves Simcoe 41
the fur traders bombarded General
Simcoe with letters
advising him that England had made a
bad treaty after
the Revolution and it should be
disregarded in their in-
terest especially and in the interests
of the Empire gen-
erally. It is to be remembered when the
Revolution ended
England was in possession of Detroit
and of a string
of forts, always then called "the
Posts," along our north-
ern border. These she held on the
pretext they were
guarantees for the fulfillment of the
treaty obligations,
principally the payment of
pre-Revolutionary debts. We
did not pay the debts and England held
the Posts. We
did not have the power to take them and
Washington
instituted a policy of watchful
waiting, thinking that
time would solve the trouble. As it
was, England had
war ships on the Lakes and was wholly
and absolutely
in possession of our northern boundary.
The Montreal
fur traders had a practical monopoly of
the fur trade
of the Great Lakes--their agents were
in northern Ohio
and in Michigan, and by way of the
portage at the Chi-
cago River they penetrated as far as
the Mississippi.
They had a more accurate knowledge of
the geography
of the country tributary to the Great
Lakes than any-
one else. To them the giving up of this
great region to
the Americans meant a serious loss of
business. They
frothed at the mouth when they thought
of it. They had
developed and established the trade,
built stockades and
storehouses, equipped vessels for
carrying and had an
immense capital at stake. The Treaty,
so they wrote
Governor Simcoe, stipulated that the
navigation of the
Mississippi should be free to both
British and Ameri-
cans. They argued that implied free
access to the Mis-
sissippi--when you sell a man a field
in the middle of
42
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications
your property, you cannot deny him
access to it--their
easiest road to the Father of Waters
was by way of the
Chicago and Illinois Rivers. Their
proposal was that
the boundary line should be redrawn so
that all of Ohio,
Indiana, Illinois, Michigan and
Wisconsin should be
British. To us this, in the light of
present knowledge,
seems the most fantastic of dreams.
Even when these
fur traders wrote in 1791 we were firmly
established on
the Ohio with Fort Harmar at Marietta
and Fort Wash-
ington at Cincinnati offering security
to the settlers who
were crowding westward. To the fur
traders these set-
tlers were an affront. To them it was
essential the wide
western spaces should remain Indian,
that the country
should remain in its primitive
condition so that it might
continue to yield the harvests of furs
on which they had
grown rich. This fitted in exactly with
the Government's
idea. General Simcoe did not have a
particularly tender
feeling for the fur traders but he and
the others thought
it dangerous to permit American
settlement on the bor-
ders of Canada. They wished between
them and us a
great gulf. They watched with uneasy and
anxious eyes
the preparations Governor St. Clair
made for his expedi-
tion against the Indians whom they
regarded as their
particular proteges. When General
Washington, in
transmitting a speech to the Western
Indians, called
himself their Father, Simcoe took
offense. What lan-
guage was this! What presumption! Only
the King of
England could call himself Father to
the Indians. And
that year the English saw to it the
Indians were boun-
tifully supplied--Governor Simcoe gave
special instruc-
tions to the posts that the powder
issued to the Indians
should be "prime." Officially
England was neutral, but
General John Graves Simcoe 43
it was a neutrality of fair words and
not of deeds. And
there was rejoicing in Canada when St.
Clair was de-
feated. Then it was that General Simcoe
proposed
mediation between the Indians and the
Americans, the
King to be the mediator. Simcoe had an
idea that prob-
ably the King would make him his deputy
in the media-
tion. There never was a more
preposterous or arrogant
proposal. The King really was one of
the main parties
at interest. Governor Simcoe had a hearty
sympathy
with the Indians in their demand the
Ohio River be made
the boundary--all the territory north
of the river to be
forbidden to white men and to remain
perpetually in In-
dian possession. General Washington was
far too wise
even to listen to the polite
suggestions of mediation. His
answer was to strengthen the western
forts and to ap-
point General Wayne to command of the
Army with in-
structions never to let up until the
Indians were defeated
and recognized the power and sovereignty
of the Re-
public. Perhaps a weaker President
might have yielded.
The country had been profoundly
depressed by St.
Clair's defeat. For a moment it seemed
as if the western
Indians were invincible; as if the
Government had no
ability to cope with them. A weaker
President might
have thrown up the sponge and listened
to the pacifists--
the country was full of them--who
declared we could not
subdue the Indians and that St. Clair's
defeat was the
judgment of God in that we were
endeavoring to wrong-
fully dispossess the Indian of what was
rightfully his.
That may be true but that argument in
America has
never been of weight. We had no choice.
This had
to be either a white man's country or
an Indian country.
We determined it should be a white
man's country and
44
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications
that was all there was to it. On
grounds of sentimental
morality we can speak of our injustice
to "Lo, the poor
Indian," but in our hearts we
regard all such stuff as
nonsense.
Now that so many years have passed, now
that the
Union is so firmly established and the
Middle West
States are a fundamental part of it,
this Canadian
project seems utterly foolish. But the
English held
Detroit, they had fleets of warships on
Lake Erie and
Lake Ontario, and we had none; they
held the fort at
Oswego and denied Americans passage to
the south
shore of Ontario. They had vast forces
at their com-
mand while the Americans in the first
battle they had
fought since the Revolution had
suffered under St. Clair
a complete and humiliating defeat. The
United Loyal-
ists whispering in Governor Simcoe's
ear, the fur traders
boldly demanding aggressive action,
found not only a
ready listener but a man ready to meet
them half-way.
He did not regard the Americans as
worthy of respect
--he habitually referred to the
Thirteen States as the
revolted Colonies and he was quite sure
that presently,
humbly, hat in hand, they would come
knocking at the
King's door and ask to be taken back. One
of the odd
arguments of the fur traders was that
when the Revolu-
tionary War ended the English were in
undisputed
possession of New York. They had given
that up, the
fairest prize in America, without a
suitable quid pro
quo. Therefore, in payment for the city
and harbor of
New York it was quite proper for
England to demand
the North West. Among these fur traders
was James
McGill who had gone out to Canada from
Scotland and
made a fortune. He bitterly complained
that unless
General John Graves Simcoe 45
the Americans were checked he would be
ruined. But
somehow in spite of the fact that he
was foiled in his
schemes to undo the work of the
Revolution he man-
aged to grow richer and richer and on
his death he left
his money to found that noble
University in Montreal
which bears his name. Its original
endowment came
from
"Beaver-skins packed in
ninety-pound bales
Carried for miles over Indian
trails."
On our side of the border there was the
utmost re-
sentment against Canada and
particularly so in Ken-
tucky and the North West Territory.
They blamed
every Indian outrage on the Canadians.
This feeling
grew in intensity until in the War of
1812 it was the
frankly avowed intention of the West to
conquer and
annex Canada. They felt there never
could be peace
with such a pestilential neighbor to
the North. Gover-
nor Simcoe's policies had a good deal
to do with this
feeling. As an Englishman he could see
only those
things that were for the benefit of
England. Yet to do
him justice he did not at first propose
to go to war with
the United States, though he was
preparing for that
eventuality. He had a great vision of
making Ontario
such a model British state it would
shine when compared
with the states of the Union. It was to
be so much
better than anything else on the
Continent that the
Americans seeing the beauty of the
operation of the
British Constitution inevitably would
be led back to the
paths of rectitude and return to their
old allegiance.
He proposed to build a capital
city--the present Lon-
don. It was to have a bishop and an
established church
46
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications
on the English order. It was to have a
university and
a public library. He wrote to Sir
Joseph Banks, presi-
dent of the Royal Society, the foremost
scientist of his
day, asking his aid in the
establishment of a botanical
garden. He wrote:
I mean to be prepared for what ever
convulsions may happen
in the United, States and the method I
propose is by establishing
a free, honorable British Government,
and a pure Administration
of its Laws which shall hold out to the
Solitary Emigrant and to
the several States advantages that the
present form of Govern-
ment does not and cannot permit them to enjoy. There
are in-
herent defects in the Congressional form
of Government, the
absolute prohibition of an order of
nobility is a glaring one. The
true New England Americans have as
strong an Aristocratical
spirit as is to be found in Great
Britain; nor are they anti-mon-
archial. I hope to have a hereditary
council with some mark of
Nobility. * * * This Colony which I mean
to show forth with all
the advantages of British protection as
a better Government than
the United States can possibly obtain, should in its
very Founda-
tion provide for every assistance that
can possibly be procured for
the Arts and Sciences, and for every
establishment that hereafter
may decorate and attract Notice and may
point it out to the
neighboring States as a Superior, more
Happy and a more pol-
ished form of government."
Of course all this was highly
commendable--and
Governor Simcoe must have had a fine
sense of self-
satisfaction in building such
magnificent air-castles not
in Spain, but in Canada.
I have read many a fantastic prospectus
issued by
Americans trying to sell town lots in
cities yet to be.
These remarkable documents promised the
ideal city,
but I have never read one, not even
those of the wild
real estate boomers of California, that
was more glit-
tering in its promises than the
proposals made by Gov-
ernor Simcoe.
His original intention, however, was to
call this mar-
General John Graves Simcoe 47
velous city Georgiana, after His
Majesty George III.
Not long ago in touring through Ontario
I stopped
overnight at London. It was in 1793
that Governor
Simcoe chose its site to be the capital
of the province.
The Home Government, however, did not
take kindly to
the idea. They could not see, as the
Governor did, that
London was destined to be the
metropolis of the West
--drawing to itself the commerce of
Hudson Bay and
of New Orleans. As a matter of fact the
London which
he designed and of which he had such
great hopes did
not materialize in his lifetime. It was
not until 1826
that the first building was erected on
its site. But to
do it justice now it has two bishops,
one Anglican, the
other Roman; it has a college and a
public library and a
fine park. Its 40,000 people are
prosperous and it is
an exceedingly attractive and
up-to-date city. The
great thing which the Governor thought
would make it
a mercantile and a military center, its
location on the
River Thames, has little or no value.
He thought of
the River Thames as a navigable stream,
which, flow-
ing through the heart of the Province,
would be a short
cut between Lake Huron and Lake Erie.
Now, of
course, London's commerce is carried by
the great
Canadian Railway systems and by superb
highways.
The Thames is a mere bit of pleasant
water where one
may swim and boat in the summer and
skate in the
winter. But Governor Simcoe in putting
such high
value on the Thames was in good
company. Our fore-
fathers regarded every stream as
navigable. We have
before our eyes a glaring example. John
Cleves
Symmes in locating North Bend did so
because it was at
the junction of the Big Miami with the
Ohio. He
48
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications
gravely stated that the Big Miami would
open the
interior of Ohio to trade. As a matter
of fact the
Thames is vastly more navigable than
the Big Miami
having a much gentler current and three
or four times
as much water. Certainly no man of
Governor Sim-
coe's generation would have regarded
his estimation of
the Thames as too high.
The most practical thing that Governor
Simcoe did
was to revive the Queen's Rangers. This
was the regi-
ment he commanded as Colonel during the
Revolution,
and about whose exploits he wrote a
readable book.
These Rangers were something of free
lances. He was
fortunate in being able to get together
a good many of
his old officers and men--all of whom
seem to have been
greatly devoted to him. The King
allowed the Rangers
to wear their old uniform of green. For
years the
Queen's Rangers did good service in
Canada. One of
the features of the Rangers which
followed the old
Roman precedent was that on retirement
they were
given land. In this way they became
settlers. As
Rangers they did all kinds of frontier
duty, cleared land,
built roads and bridges, constructed
forts and were
generally handy men. Another thing was
that having
served against the Americans in the
Revolution, indeed
many of them were Americans who had
remained loyal
to the King, they were most truly
pro-British.
The Governor had selected the site of
London from
a study of the map. It must have given
him a genuine
thrill to visit the place and see for
himself he had made
no mistake. That was in the winter of
1793 when he
made his first visit to the English
garrison at Detroit.
The Major of the Green Rangers kept a
diary and
General John Graves Simcoe 49
stated that on arriving at the forks of
the Thames they
stopped a day "as the Governor
wished to examine the
situation and its environs. He judged
it to be a capital
situation eminently calculated for the
metropolis of all
Canada." He was pleased with
everything he saw, par-
ticularly a "Pinery upon an
adjacent high knoll and
other timber" so that material for
the construction of
the first houses was at hand. I myself am
enough of
a woodsman greatly to have envied the
Governor this
trip through the wilds even though it
was made in Feb-
ruary and March. The start from Fort
Niagara was
made in sleighs. Occasionally on the
ice of a river they
had easy going but apparently they
walked most of the
way. The party consisted of eight
Mohawk Indians
and six English officers. In August
this year I went
over the same route between lunch and
dinner--a long
afternoon automobile ride, but it took
them from Feb-
ruary 4th to the 20th to accomplish the
journey. It is
always a regret to me the men who laid
in the wilderness
the foundations on which our
civilization rests cannot
return to see the fruits of their
labors. I thought as I
swiftly rode over the magnificent
Ontario highways
it was a pity Governor Simcoe could not
have been with
me. How pleased he would have been with
the flourish-
ing little city of Simcoe. It is on the
highway and well
may have been one of the spots where he
made a camp.
At night the party slept in the bark
wigwams which the
Indians constructed so dexterously.
They stopped at
the Moravian village and the diary
noted that there they
received a seasonable refreshment of
eggs, milk and but-
ter. Otherwise their fare was salt pork
and venison
except when they killed a raccoon, the
flesh of which
Vol. XLIII--4
50
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications
they found good in part but rather
rancid. They also
killed a porcupine which they thought
tasted like young
pig. They must have been hungry--at
least my ex-
perience with porcupine is that it
tastes like shoe leather
and is equally tough. But it is odd how
even in a grave
official journal mention is made with
gusto of food.
The reason of course is they were
always ravenously
hungry and food had a value many times
greater than is
the case with the man who is well fed
and who has no
apprehensions regarding his next meal.
At the Mo-
ravian village their host was the famed
missionary
David Zeisberger, whose journal was so
admirably
translated and annotated by a former
member of this
Club, Eugene Bliss. Apparently Governor
Simcoe did
not fully appreciate the historical
significance of the
Moravian Mission. Zeisberger said the
breakfast he
gave the party tasted "right good
to them." The Gov-
ernor told Zeisberger flatly no one
could act as a min-
ister in the Province unless he took an
oath of allegiance
to the King. He also objected when he
found the Mis-
sion was a branch of the Moravian
Church at Bethle-
hem, Pennsylvania, reporting to the Bishop
there. He
directed in the future the Moravian
chief correspond-
ence should go directly to England.
These poor Mo-
ravians certainly had a hard time of
it--massacred at
Gnadenh??tten by our people, given a
friendly shelter in
Canada only to suffer again and have
their town burnt
when in the War of 1812 General
Harrison fought the
Battle of the Thames within sight and
sound of their
little settlement. The destruction of
the Moravian vil-
lage by our troops was a war outrage
which no one can
possibly excuse.
General John Graves Simcoe 51
At Detroit the Governor was welcomed by
a royal
salute, reviewed the 24th Regiment,
then went to the
River Rouge where Henry Ford now makes
automo-
biles, to visit the place where Pontiac
had made a stand
and where the slaughter of British
troops had been so
great the place still bore the name of
the Bloody Bridge.
They were pious and patriotic for
prayers were read
each morning and evening--as they
retired they sang
"God save the King." His
visit to Detroit had an
unusual significance for the United
States. Prior to
the Revolution the English had some
kind of a small
post at the "rapids of the Miami
of the Lake," that is
on the Maumee River 12 miles south of
our present
Toledo. In Indian days that was a place
of importance.
Our present Fort Wayne and its vicinity
was the home
of a large Indian population. So was
the valley of the
Maumee. There was an easy water route
between To-
ledo Bay and the Mississippi by way of
the Maumee,
the St. Mary's, then a portage at Fort
Wayne to the
Wabash and so on down-stream to the
Gulf of Mexico.
The Rapids of the Maumee necessitated a
transshipment
and was a natural place for trading.
The British did
not believe that St. Clair's expedition
had been pri-
marily against the Indians, they
believed he aimed at
Detroit. And now that Wayne was
gathering an army
Governor Simcoe proceeded with frantic
haste to make
a strong fort out of the old post. As
you drive south-
ward on the great highway that runs to
Cincinnati you
go through lovely suburbs on the banks
of the Maumee.
There by the side of the road you will
see high grass-
grown ridges and mounds of earth. That
is all that is
now left of the impudent fort which the
British built
52
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications
in Ohio. Well might it have been called
Fort Simcoe.
It was intended not only as "the
Citadel of Detroit," to
use Governor Simcoe's words, but as an
effectual control
of the Indian trade. It will be
remembered that Wayne
in his march rebuilt and strengthened
the forts which
St. Clair had constructed. These forts
were intended
as depots of supply and as refuges in
case of trouble.
They were Forts Hamilton, St. Clair,
Jefferson, Green-
ville and Defiance. Governor Simcoe in
his desire to
make Ontario secure proposed that the
English meet
this threat by destroying all the forts
as far south as
Fort Jefferson. The great fortified
camp which Wayne
had constructed at Greenville was of
course to be de-
molished. If this were not done, he
wrote to the Home
Office in London, soon all Ohio would
swarm with
American settlers. Ontario, so he
wrote, could not be
defended from within. The way to defend
it was to
keep the Americans as far away as
possible. So he in-
tended to march southward in Ohio
almost as far as
Hamilton and take possession. Governor
Simcoe wrote
to the Duke of Portland that he had
matured a plan of
campaign. It was the dearest wish of
his heart for
Great Britain and the United States to
go to war--this
he thought would be a war in the West.
He continued
in his letter to the Duke--
I have no doubt that the President, Mr.
Washington, in person
must have marched to crush it [that is
the army of invasion
which Governor Simcoe was to lead into
Ohio]. The first object
of my heart would certainly be, with adequate force and
on a just
occasion, to meet this gentleman face to
face. * * * The President
I believe to be among the most
treacherous of mankind and most
hostile to the interests of Great
Britain.
General John Graves Simcoe 53
There it was in a nut shell. Governor
Simcoe was
such a complete John Bull that anyone,
even President
Washington, who was not attached to the
interests of
Great Britain, was a traitor. And his
idea of a great
occasion was the affront to Great
Britain offered by the
United States in daring to build a line
of forts in Ohio
--territory which no one questioned was
ours. Yet
making ourselves strong within our own
borders so the
Indians could no longer kill and pillage
was to Governor
Simcoe a cause for war. Shortly before
Wayne's cam-
paign the great speculation of Mr. Duer
in lands in
northern New York had failed and these
lands were to
be sold at bankrupt sale. The Governor
proposed that
the British Government buy them, not
openly of course,
but by agents, and then occupy them by
a military force.
In that way the Americans were to be
shut off from the
St. Lawrence and the south shore of
Lake Ontario.
The Miami Fort on the Maumee and a
naval force were
to keep them from the south shore of
Erie. Vermont
and New Hampshire, so the Loyalists
said, were ready
on the first opportunity to return to
their old allegiance.
Ah, what large and delightful dreams of
empire! And
the Governor had a new argument--the
United States
had no right in the Middle West because
"of the ancient principles of
British Policy which
sought only to establish Maritime
Colonies."
It was eminently right for the British
to grab the
seacoast for their maritime colonies
and to drive out the
Indians, but when the Americans began
to drive out
the Indians in the Middle West then
that was an "en-
croachment"--a violation of the
sacred rights of the
54
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications
Indians as well as being against the
ancient policy of
Britain! Governor Simcoe's letters were
published by
the Ontario Historical Society in 1924,
four bulky vol-
umes of them. So it is only recently
they have been
available to students. The letter in
regard to Britain's
idea of maritime colonies only was
addressed to Baron
de Carondelet, the Spanish Commander at
New Orleans.
Governor Simcoe quite boldly suggested
that the Span-
iards drive the Americans out of the
Southwest and that
the English would drive them out of the
Northwest.
Had this letter been given publicity at
the time it was
written it would have been almost a
cause of war.
Meanwhile General Wayne settled the
question. By
slow and cautious marches he brought
his army unin-
jured and in perfect fighting trim to
the very gates of
Fort Miami. There he met the Indians
and defeated
them so decisively that the border had
peace for 15 years.
Then it was that Tecumseh made a last
desperate at-
tempt to stop the westward flow of
civilization. At
Tippecanoe General Harrison destroyed
the Indian
power just as General Wayne had
destroyed it at Fallen
Timbers. The Commandant at Fort Miami,
when
Wayne appeared, was in a quandary--he
dared not open
the gates of his fortress to shelter
the fleeing Indians--
that would have been too glaring a
breach of the neu-
trality which Britain professed. Nor
did he dare, much
as he desired, to open fire on Wayne's troops.
The fort
was armed with heavy cannon--Wayne had
only small
field pieces. It is probable that had
an attack been made
upon it the English would not have been
able to hold it.
General Simcoe stated that. But Wayne
felt he was
not authorized to attempt the fort and
so after destroy-
General John Graves Simcoe 55
ing the houses of the Indian traders
within the very
shelter of its guns as well as spoiling
the fields of the
Indians he withdrew to lay waste the
Indian towns in
northern Indiana and to construct a
fortification to
which his men proudly gave the name of
Fort Wayne,
and Fort Wayne it is today. In the
"Tippecanoe and
Tyler Too" campaign of 1840
General Harrison deliv-
ered an address on the site of Fort
Meigs, which he had
built in 1813 on the opposite side of
the Maumee from
Fort Miami. The British had reoccupied
their old fort
and we held our new fort. General
Harrison spoke to an
immense audience. He recalled the time
when as a young
captain he had marched with Wayne to
the gates of
Fort Miami; he remembered when as the
Commander
of the Army of the Northwest he had
forced the British
to evacuate their stronghold--the last
ground they ever
occupied in Ohio. Pointing across the
river to the ruins
of the old Fort the General exclaimed,
"There the indignant American eagle
frowned
upon the British lion."
Wayne's victory ended in making Ohio
secure. It
did not end Governor Simcoe's grand
ideas, but the
Government at London saw the situation
was impos-
sible. All along the boundary named in
the treaty--a
boundary which the officials in Canada
thought it pre-
sumptuous and insolent for an American
to approach
(indeed the little settlements along
Lakes Erie and On-
tario Governor Simcoe thought should be
wiped out by
military action)--all along that border
there was
trouble. Besides, the power of America
was growing
at an extraordinary rate. Wayne had
demonstrated
56
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications
that the Indians could not be made an
effectual barrier
between Canada and the United States.
So it was that
London gracefully even though tardily
yielded and
agreed to give up the Posts. It was
more than poetic
justice that General Wayne himself was
sent to receive
them from the hands of the English. But
even in such
a matter Governor Simcoe tried to
interfere. He wrote
the Duke of Portland that if it could
be managed with
propriety he hoped Colonel Pickering
would not be Com-
missioner of the United States. He
strongly recom-
mended General Hull who in his behavior
was very ac-
ceptable to His Majesty's officers.
This is the same
General Hull who later gave himself an
immortality of
disgrace by weakly surrendering
Detroit. Then, as in
General Simcoe's time, his conduct must
have been very
acceptable to His Majesty's officers.
Our reading and study of American
history is
usually one-sided. Most of us here, I
take it, are fairly
familiar with our own local history. We
know of St.
Clair's defeat, we know of Wayne's
victorious march
across the State of Ohio, and we are
not unmindful of
the past. There is that little monument
in Cincinnati
marking the site of Ft. Washington. It
is the least
worthy of them all. At Hamilton is a
really fine re-
production in stone of the old Fort. At
Eaton the site
of Ft. St. Clair is a State Park--a
lovely place--and so
on to Ft. Jefferson, Greenville, Ft.
Defiance, all of the
old forts are now marked by fine
monuments. On the
heights above the battlefield of Fallen
Timbers stands
Wayne's statue, an heroic piece of
bronze. We have not
marked the British Fort Miami which
Simcoe built. In
a way it deserves a monument even more
than the
General John Graves Simcoe 57
others. The grass-grown ramparts and
ditches there
represent the last stand of the English
on our soil.
There the meteor flag of England
streamed in the face
of Wayne. There again it flew in the
face of Harrison
in 1812. As Simcoe studied the map that
fort was to be
his base. From there the redcoats of
the King were to
march southward and take the forts
which we had built
as our outermost line of defense. That
he could do it,
he was sure. No doubt ever crossed his
mind of the
invincible power of Britain. And so the
site of that
fort representing at once the pride and
the humiliation
of England should be marked. We might
even put upon
it the words of Scripture as applied to
the sea:
"Hitherto shalt thou come, but no
further;
and here shall thy proud waves be
stayed."
Still that would be bad taste even
though it be the
literal truth. More gracious on our
part would it be to
erect a statue of General Simcoe, as an
antagonist
worthy of our steel and whose defeat
was of the great-
est importance.
But we record the story of these
frontier campaigns
leaving for the most part the English
out of the picture.
One reason why we have done this is
because we did
not have the other side of the picture.
Our students
have not been able to read Simcoe's
letters and to see
the great preparations he had made to
meet the Ameri-
can advance, not only to check it but
to hold us per-
manently in check. And Simcoe was no
ultra Britisher
acting without authority remote from
the seat of gov-
ernment. In every way he had the active
and sym-
pathetic support of London. Lord
Grenville, the prime
58 Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications minister, wrote to Mr. Hammond, that curious diplo- matic personage who represented England in this country, that he had not hesitated to propose to Mr. Jay, the mediation of King George, to settle our differences |
|
with the Indians. And for Heaven's sake, said His Lord- ship in effect, do not deal with Edmund Randolph, secre- tary of state in Washington's cabinet. He is unfriendly to us. Deal with Alexander Hamilton if possible. Lord Grenville seemed to feel that Mr. Jay was favor- |
General John Graves Simcoe 59
able to the idea of the mediation of
George III, but Mr.
Jay was too sagacious to think of
anything like that.
The opinion that King George was to
render was vir-
tually prepared in advance. It was that he would
declare that the Indians should have
the Ohio River as
their southern boundary, the Lakes as
their northern
boundary. In this way, of course, the
Indians would be
satisfied, the Canadian fur trade would
be preserved
and the progress westward of the
republic would be
halted. It sounds to us in the light of
later days like
utter nonsense. Unconsciously we are
all believers in
manifest destiny. The triumphant march
of Columbia
for a century across the continent
seems to us as fore-
ordained, inevitable and as belonging
absolutely to the
eternal scheme of things, fitting in
generally with the
organization of the universe. But
Governor Simcoe
did not look at it in that way. He
believed he could
hold all our Northwest for Britain, and
there were even
great Americans in that formative and
uncertain period
who felt that the blood and treasure
the republic was
expending to reach the Mississippi was
a waste. There
was that bitter and narrow John
Randolph of Roanoke,
who sneered at the West--called these
great regions
mere geographical divisions. To him
there was only one
part of America worth while and that
was Virginia.
John Randolph lived until 1833; he saw
the wilderness
transformed into imperial states,
greater in population
and wealth than even Virginia, but he
never ceased to
sneer.
Of course, the men of the West knew
perfectly well
of General Simcoe's ideas. For their
part they had ex-
actly the same idea except in reverse.
General Simcoe
60
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications
thought there would be no peace or
security for Canada
as long as they had Americans for
neighbors. We
thought there would be no peace or
security for us as
long as England held Canada. The men of
the West
went to war in 1812 not because England
impressed our
seamen but because they intended to
annex Canada and
end that menace forever. Our own John
Cleves Symmes
wrote his son-in-law General Harrison
that we would
march through Canada and only the
Citadel of Quebec
would be able to give us trouble. This
feeling we had
against Canada was not a mere holdover
from the feel-
ing that the Revolution was not ended
until the whole
of the continent became the United
States of America--
it was intensified by the policies of
Governor Simcoe.
When the Posts were given up he thought
England had
abandoned Canada to the wolves, as it
were. Unhappy
and disappointed, he returned home. He
did not live
to see the War of 1812. Had he lived,
undoubtedly he
would have rejoiced to see our armies
thrown back when
they invaded Canada. But that war
really did end our
boundary troubles. Canada gave up the
idea of con-
tinually vexing us; we gave up the idea
of military con-
quest. For a hundred and fifteen years
we have been
the best of neighbors. All the old
Forts are gone. Some
of them are children's
playgrounds. The guns that
once frowned upon their ramparts have
been trans-
formed literally into plows and pruning
hooks. Gov-
ernor Simcoe's Ontario is still English--and
Ohio, thank
God, is still American.
GENERAL JOHN GRAVES SIMCOE--
The Canadian Governor Who Attempted to
Make Ohio
a Part of Canada*
Annual Paper by
JAMES A. GREEN
Historian of the Club
American visitors to Canada are always
struck with
the beauty and charm of Lake Simcoe
which is situated
fifty miles north of Toronto in the
midst of one of the
most fertile regions of Ontario. It is
a lovely lake, blue
as Como. Joined to it by a short and
narrow strait is
Lake Couchicing, equally lovely. In the
city park of
Orillia which is built upon this strait
stands a splendid
and heroic statue of Champlain. The
great explorer was
overtaken at that place by winter and
on the very spot
where his statue stands he made a camp
and spent sev-
eral months. They must, even to such a
bold and intrepid
spirit as that which possessed
Champlain, have been
dreary and trying months. He lived on
the wild meat
and the fish which the Indians
provided. How he would
be amazed were he able to return to see
these lakes as
they are now, with here and there upon
their shores a
prosperous town, handsome cottages of
the summer vis-
itors by the hundreds and all the
country which he knew
as an unbroken forest occupied by
farms, rich with corn
and oats and orchards and with the
pastures filled with
cattle. Even the meanest of the houses
of today would
* Read before the Cincinnati Literary
Club.
(35)