Ohio History Journal

  • 1
  •  
  • 2
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  • 4
  •  
  • 5
  •  
  • 6
  •  
  • 7
  •  
  • 8
  •  
  • 9
  •  
  • 10
  •  
  • 11
  •  
  • 12
  •  
  • 13
  •  
  • 14
  •  
  • 15
  •  
  • 16
  •  
  • 17
  •  
  • 18
  •  
  • 19
  •  
  • 20
  •  
  • 21
  •  

BOOK REVIEWS

BOOK REVIEWS

 

The Constitutional History of the United States, 1826-1876: A

More Perfect Union. By Homer C. Hockett. (New York,

Macmillan Company, 1939. 405p. $3.00.)

The first volume of this series, The Blessings of Liberty, was

reviewed in the QUARTERLY, XLIX (1940), 292-94. In it Pro-

fessor Hockett discussed the colonial background, the Revolu-

tionary Period, and the first third of a century under the new

Constitution. Here he treats of the slavery controversy but "to

minimize the boredom of readers who are familiar with the story,

the author has avoided narrative and restricted himself severely

to the constitutional phases of the matter."  There are other

topics in this middle period which, in the perspective of the

present, are of perhaps greater interest. The democratization of

the Federal Government, the rise of capitalistic industry, the

adoption of the corporate form of organization, and the territorial

expansion of the United States are developments of these years.

They affected our constitutional system in the long run, Professor

Hockett points out, quite as profoundly as the slavery issue.

This volume is in four parts, the first dealing with the reac-

tion against nationalism in which is presented the story of the

growth of constitutional theory in the eighteen twenties, the growth

of southern discontent and the attempt at nullification. The chief

significance of the latter controversy was that it brought into

prominence two rival constitutional theories which were to con-

tinue in conflict until one went down in the Civil War. The

author's view is that neither the theory of state sovereignty nor

of national sovereignty was new in 1832 but that men had been

seeking some satisfactory and consistent theory from the begin-

ning, and that these same views were the ones used by Webster

and Calhoun in the formulation of their opposing theories. Cal-

houn gave the belief in state sovereignty greater vitality than it

had had before and Webster merely broadcast more widely ideas

uttered by Marshall and others before 1830.

Part two is called "The Democratization of the Federal Gov-

ernment." In it is developed the coming of political democracy

(388)