MARK V. KWASNY
A Test for the Ohio National
Guard:
The Cincinnati Riot of
1884
Riots have been a part of our history
since the colonial days. Crowds
clashing with civil and military
authorities, violence in the streets, and
the deaths of citizens at the hands of
law enforcement agencies-these
are not unknown in the history of the
United States. The Cincinnati
Riot, March 28-30, 1884, contained all
of these elements. For three
days citizens, police, and soldiers of
the Ohio National Guard (ONG)
fought in the streets of Cincinnati,
leaving more than forty people dead
and well over one hundred injured. This
riot was remarkable, though
not unique, for the intense anger and
hostility exhibited by the crowd,
and the willingness of the police and
militia to meet these emotions
with all necessary force.
The Cincinnati Riot was a severe test
for both the ONG and the
entire state command system, from the
governor down to the regimen-
tal commanders. National Guard
organizations were relatively new
then, having replaced the state militia
units which had died out after the
Civil War. The 1877 Railroad Strike
impressed upon the states the need
for an effective internal police force,
and in that same year some states
began to hold summer camps for their
Guard units. Ohio held its first
in 1879.1 The riot in 1884 challenged
how much the ONG had improved
during these five years.
Domestic disturbances such as riots have
always posed a severe
problem for civilian and military
authorities. Civilian leaders often wait
too long before calling for military
assistance, usually because of an
unwillingness to admit they have lost
control of the situation, as well as
from a desire to avoid the costs
involved. At the same time, military
leaders are hesitant to involve
themselves in civilian affairs, preferring
Mark V. Kwasny is a Ph.D. candidate in
history at The Ohio State University.
1. Robin Higham, ed., Bayonets in the
Streets: The Use of Troops in Civil
Disturbances (Lawrence, Kansas, 1969), p. 27; William H. Riker, Soldiers
of the State
(New York, 1979), pp. 51, 56; John K.
Mahon, History of the Militia and the National
Guard (New York, 1983), p. 113.
24 OHIO HISTORY
to be summoned by civilian authorities
before moving.2 This tendency
to hesitate was a potential danger
during the hectic days in March 1884.
The civilian and military leaders of
Ohio had to pass such a test posed
by the Cincinnati Riot.
George Hoadly was governor of Ohio and
commander-in-chief of the
ONG during this crisis. He was not,
however, an experienced politi-
cian or military commander. Born in New
York and raised in Cleve-
land, by 1847 he was an aspiring young
lawyer in Cincinnati. He
married into a prominent Cincinnati
family, the Burnets, and held the
position of Judge of the Superior Court
of Cincinnati during the Civil
War. In 1883, during his gubernatorial
campaign, he needed the
support of the ethnic German vote, of
which Cincinnati had a large
proportion.3 Thus when the
riot began in March 1884, the commander
of Ohio's military force had little
political and no military experience,
while he had strong ties with Cincinnati
society and its German
population.
The governor received important help
from his staff during the crisis.
Adjutant General Ebenezer Finley,
Brigadier General Michael Ryan,
Quarter Master General and Commissary
General of the ONG, and
Colonels J. W. Harper, Samuel
Courtwright, and S. H. Church, all
aides-de-camp of the governor, were in
Cincinnati at various times
throughout the riot.4 Their
actions helped determine how well the ONG
reacted to this test.
The ONG at this time consisted of eleven
regiments, one battalion,
and two independent companies of
infantry, and seven batteries of
artillery. These units were scattered
throughout the state. Ohio had no
larger units of organization, though
Finley had previously advised a
reorganization. He believed that the
brigading of the regiments would
enable the officers to train with larger
field commands, which would
better prepare them for any emergency
that called for more than the
local militia. As of March the 4829
officers and enlisted men of the
ONG drilled only with their regiment,
company, or battery.5
The number of drills and level of
training of these units varied
widely. Attendance at unit drills was
poor, with less than one-half of
2. Higham, Bayonets, pp. 6-7.
3. Mary G. Roberts, "The
Governorship of George Hoadly, Governor of the State
of Ohio, 1883-1885" (M.A. Thesis,
Ohio State University, 1952), pp. 1-3, 6.
4. E. B. Finley, Adj. Gen., Annual
Report of the Adjutant-General, to the Governor
of the State of Ohio, for the Year
1884 (Columbus, 1885), pp. 4, 7. This
source cited
hereafter as AR 1884.
5. "Consolidated Report of Strength
of the Ohio National Guard for the Quarter
ending March 31, 1884," and
"Annual Report of Militia in the State of Ohio, Nov. 15,
1884," Ohio, Adjutant General, Ohio
National Guard, Administration, Morning, Quar-
terly, and Annual Reports, 1881-1890,
1898, 1907, 1911, ser. 2531, box 17,
1884, Ohio
The Cincinnati Riot of 1884 25
the members usually participating. Also,
the Guardsmen in general
were not veterans of the Civil War, and
their only experience in the
field came from occasional strikes and
riots.6 Thus, the ONG in March
1884 consisted of scattered regiments
and batteries of soldiers with
little training and experience.
Cincinnati provided a real test for this
military force.
The test came when the situation in
Cincinnati pushed the citizens
too far. The problem centered around
political leaders John R. McLean
and Tom C. Campbell, who together
controlled Cincinnati politics.
Campbell, a criminal lawyer, also had a
reputation for manipulating
juries and the law to suit his clients.
Under this corrupt system, crimes
increased while convictions became
scarce. As one newspaper, the
Cincinnati Enquirer, wrote, Cincinnati was a "COLLEGE OF MUR-
DER."7 Tension mounted as one
gruesome murder followed another.
In March, twenty-three men accused or
convicted of murder were in
the county jail. Some had been in jail
for months without a trial.
Thomas J. Stephens, the mayor, was
allegedly involved with McLean
in the control of city politics. This
corruption rested on a voting system
that the politicians manipulated. As one
historian of the time described
it, the elections were for sale.8 Cincinnati
citizens, therefore, were
angry with their government and their
criminal justice system, and by
March 1884 they were close to action.
The final transgression occurred in
mid-March when William Berner
beat his employer to death. The people
followed his trial closely and on
March 22, the final day of the trial, a
large crowd filled the courtroom.
When the jury handed down a verdict of
manslaughter, the judge called
it "a damned outrage," while
the crowd hissed and threatened to hang
the jury.9 The fact that
Campbell was Berner's defense attorney did not
ease the situation. Thursday, March 27,
the newspapers printed an
announcement calling for a meeting of
citizens on Friday to condemn
the verdict, citing disgust at the
"fixed" juries of this and many other
Historical Society, Columbus, Ohio. This
source cited hereafter as MQAR.
6. "Consolidated Report, March 31,
1884," MQAR, box 17; J. S. Tunison, The
Cincinnati Riot: Its Causes and
Results (Cincinnati, 1886), p. 68.
7. Carl Wittke, ed., The History of
the State of Ohio, 6 vols. (Columbus, 1943), vol.
5: Ohio Comes of Age, 1873-1900, by Philip D. Jordan, pp. 193, 197; Rev. Charles F.
Goss, Cincinnati: The Queen City,
1788-1912, 4 vols. (Chicago, 1912), I, 256; Cincinnati
Enquirer, 9 March 1884, quoted in Iola H. Silberstein, Cincinnati
Then and Now
(Cincinnati, 1982), p. 126.
8. History of Cincinnati and Hamilton
County, Ohio; Their Past and Present
(Cincinnati, 1894), p. 367; Henry C.
Wright, Bossism in Cincinnati (Cincinnati, 1905),
p. 17; Tunison, Riot, p. 22.
9. Cincinnati Enquirer, 23 and 25 March 1884.
26 OHIO HISTORY |
|
The Cincinnati Riot of 1884 27
cases. According to the Volksfreund, "Judge
Lynch would soon be
honored in Cincinnati."10
The meeting occurred as scheduled Friday
evening, March 28, in the
Music Hall. Attended by "solid
men" of the city, it was the largest
indoor meeting in Cincinnati history to
that date, with the hall holding
about 8000 people. The leaders of the
meeting, trying to keep the
people calm, proposed resolutions
condemning the verdict and the
court system. Despite their efforts,
however, the speeches stirred the
people and the crowd began shouting
suggestions to hang Berner. The
presiding chairman decided to end the
meeting around 9:30 P.M.11
As the people left the hall, a shout
sounded: "To the jail! Come on!
Follow me, and hang Berner!" With
about 200 men leading the way,
much of the crowd moved toward the jail.
The Enquirer caught the
mood: "At LAST The People Are
Aroused." According to the best
estimates, thousands actually went to
the jail.12
County Sheriff Morton Hawkins had been
expecting trouble that
night and had thirteen deputy sheriffs
with him at the jail. A veteran of
the Civil War who had risen from private
to company commander, he
reacted well to the situation. When he
received word of the crowd's
size, temper, and movements, he rang the
riot alarm to signal the police
around the city. He and his men then
waited inside the jail. Though
criticized later for ringing the riot
alarm because it attracted more
people to the scene, he had no choice.
In the days before radios and
cars, he had no other way to call the
police force to the jail. The crowd,
however, did swell, filling Sycamore
Street in front of the
jail. At 10:00 P.M. the situation
reached the first crisis point. (See map,
page 26.)13
Attacking the street level entrance to
the jailer's residence, the
leaders of the crowd broke through the
door. People then poured
through the residence and up into the
cells in search of Berner. Berner,
however, had been sent to the Columbus
Penitentiary earlier in the
10. Cincinnati News-Journal, 27
March 1884; Enquirer, 27 March 1884; Cincinnati
Commercial-Gazette, 27 March 1884; Cincinnati Volksfreund, 25
March 1884, quoted in
Zane L. Miller, Boss Cox's
Cincinnati: Urban Politics in the Progressive Era (New
York, 1968), p. 60; Tunison, Riot, pp.
10-11; Laird Kleine, "Anatomy of a Riot,"
Bulletin of the Historical and
Philosophical Society of Ohio, 20
(October, 1922), 235.
11. AR 1884, pp. 62-3; Enquirer,
29 March 1884.
12. AR 1884, p. 63; Enquirer, 29
March 1884; News-Journal, 29 March 1884.
13. G. M. Roe, Our Police. A History
of the Cincinnati Police Force, from the
Earliest Period until the Present Day
(Cincinnati, 1890), pp. 55-6; News-Journal,
29
March 1884; AR 1884, p. 63; Map
in The Great Cincinnati Riots! Being the only correct
history of that most Lamentable
outbreak in Ohio's Greatest City, Because of the
Villainous Verdict of the Berner jury
(Philadelphia, 1884), p. 9.
28 OHIO HISTORY
day, and the crowd did not bother the
other prisoners in the cells.
Hawkins and his deputies, pleading and
shoving, persuaded the people
to leave the cells after about thirty
minutes. At this point the police
wagons from around the city began to
arrive. The crowd on the streets
turned the first one back, but then
Chief of Police Reilly's wagon
arrived, driving up Sycamore to the jail
door. At this point a member
of the crowd fired the first shot, and
rioters nearer the jail fired several
more. A seventeen-year-old boy fell, hit
in the head. A thrown stone
knocked a policeman unconscious. With
the front of the jail blocked by
the crowd, Reilly led his men to the
Courthouse entrance on Main
Street and entered the jail through the
tunnel that connected the two
buildings. The police and deputies then
cleared the jail. Throughout
this initial violence, the police never
drew their guns.14
The worst was not over. The gathering in
the Music Hall-and the
majority of the people who first went to
the jail-had been a mixture of
wealthy, middle-class, and working
citizens who wanted justice. After
Hawkins and the police cleared the jail,
a change occurred in the
crowd, a change that many noticed. The
"solid men" gave way to
people who were only interested in
destroying and looting, and the
crowd "now degenerated into a
communistic mania to burn and
pillage," according to Adjutant
General Finley. This mob renewed the
assault on the jail, directing its
attacks against the main jail entrance
several feet below street level, while
others used a plank set over the
stairwell to crawl across to the windows
at street level. Breaking into
both levels, the rioters found iron
doors barring their passage to the
inside of the jail, so they began to
hammer at these doors.15
Around 11:00 P.M., with the doors about
to break, Hawkins sent a
call for help to the local 1st Regiment
of the ONG, which had two
companies on guard duty at the armory.
Colonel C. B. Hunt, regiment
commander, left Captain John Desmond and
five men on guard, while
he led fewer than forty soldiers
immediately to the jail. He also sent
men to assemble the rest of the
regiment. Arriving at the scene of the
riot, he led the Guardsmen into the
Courthouse and through the
tunnel. 16
The situation in the jail, meanwhile,
became critical during these
minutes before Hunt's arrival. Using
sledgehammers, the mob broke
down the doors and flooded into the jail
where Hawkins and Reilly had
14. News-Journal, 29 March 1884; AR
1884, pp. 63-4; Enquirer, 29 March 1884.
15. Great Riots!, p. 11; News-Journal, 30 March 1884; AR 1884, p.
64, and report of
Col. Church, p. 224; Enquirer, 29-30
March 1884.
16. News-Journal, 29
March 1884; AR 1884, p. 64, and report of Col. Hunt, p. 224.
The Cincinnati Riot of 1884 29
their men stationed with clubs. Hawkins
refused to allow his men to
draw their revolvers, even though the
rioters were wielding bricks,
stones, and pistols. Then the gas went
out, and the building went black.
There was a pause. The gas came back on,
and the attack renewed. It
was at this point that the ONG arrived.17
Hunt sent his men through the tunnel two
abreast because of its
narrow width. As they neared the jail
side, several rioters fired their
pistols and hit four soldiers. Hawkins
then ordered the Guard to fire
over the crowd's heads. The mob
hesitated at this fire, and the police
took advantage of the pause to push them
back. Ignoring the warnings
to stay back, the mob made a second rush
on the police and soldiers.
The Guardsmen fired four shots and
killed the crowd's leader. The
police and militia were then able to
clear the jail for the second time.18
This fight occurred around midnight.
Inside the jail were about 100
militia and police. Outside, only about
400 people were actually near
the jail, though hundreds of others were
still on the streets, and this
mob was still not ready to quit. After
firing their pistols and yelling for
about thirty minutes, the rioters
decided to set fire to the jail by pouring
oil down the stairs to the main entrance
and trying to light it. Hunt
quickly ordered a detachment of soldiers
out the door. They went out
and fired into the crowd. Under fire
from the mob but reinforced from
inside, the Guardsmen then advanced to
the railing at the top of the
stairwell and ordered the crowd back.
The warnings ignored, the
soldiers fired again into the mob,
hitting three rioters and one police
officer who was standing by a wagon in
the street. The crowd wounded
three Guardsmen during this encounter.
Then police and militia
together then went out and cleared
Sycamore, North Court, and South
Court Streets, which they held until
morning.19
Elsewhere, the looting spread. Looters
broke into the armory of the
Grand Army of the Republic and into B.
Kittredge and Co.'s gun shop,
where they found many guns but no
ammunition. Desmond and his
guard prevented a possible attack on the
ONG armory. Meanwhile, the
composition of the crowd continued to
change. The looters now were
mostly boys under sixteen and men
without jobs, a dramatic change
from the "solid men" at 9:30
P.M. Finally, between three and four in
the morning, the crowd began to
disperse. Four were dead, all
townspeople, with several militia and
police and an unknown number
17. Tunison, Riot, p. 62; Enquirer,
29 March 1884.
18. Reports of Col. Hunt and Surgeon
Jones in AR 1884, pp. 224, 227-28;
Commercial-Gazette, 30 March 1884.
19. News-Journal, 29 March 1884;
Report of Col. Hunt in AR 1884, pp. 224-25;
Enquirer, 29
March 1884.
30 OHIO HISTORY
of citizens hurt.20 It had
been a costly Friday night, but Hawkins and
Hunt had done a good job of protecting
the jail and prisoners and
preventing any major destruction.
The individual soldiers, too, had done a
good job, following orders
and firing only on command. The soldiers
felt justified in their actions.
In later interviews, one Guardsman said
he had fired on Friday evening
and would again. Another said this was
the most dangerous mob he had
ever seen. Not all of the Guard,
however, felt this way. One soldier
described how he shot into the air
because he and many others in the
regiment sympathized with the crowd. As
this was a local regiment,
many of the men probably did have such
sympathies. The regiment,
though, did its duty. The soldiers did
not use unnecessary force and
used their guns only when commanded by
Hawkins or Hunt to do so.
For inexperienced soldiers, in a cramped
tunnel with shouts, screams,
and shots ahead, their performance was
excellent.21
When Saturday dawned, the men inside the
jail did not fool
themselves. They knew the riot was far
from over. Hawkins therefore
called for more reinforcements early
that morning. At 9:00 A.M.
Captain Frank Joyce, commander of the
ONG battery in Cincinnati,
received an order from Hawkins to come
to the jail. Joyce reported for
duty at noon with only about twenty men
and no cannons. He
dismantled the guns and left them behind
with a three-man guard
because he had no ammunition for the
guns. His men instead armed
themselves with rifles and served for
now as infantry. By 10:00 A.M.
those of the 1st Regiment that would
ever show during the riot had
reported for duty. Altogether only 117
out of a total of 525 soldiers and
officers served. With these men and
Joyce's few, Hawkins now had
almost 200 deputies, police, and militia
to face a possible renewal of
fighting.22
The poor turnout of the Guard Saturday
morning was due to two
factors. Saturday's newspaper accounts
of the riot the previous night
"terrorized" the men,
according to Hunt, convincing them to stay
home. The Enquirer even admitted
on Sunday that certain newspaper
accounts had demoralized the members of
the Guard. The second
factor was the underlying sympathy many
Guardsmen had for the
people and their cause for discontent.
Six of Joyce's men "absolutely
20. Tunison, Riot, p. 86; John A.
Johnson, On The Roof of Europe; Behind the
Guardsman's Rifle (Covington, Ky., 1920), pp. 75-76; Enquirer, 29
March 1884; Report
of Col. Hunt in AR 1884, p. 225.
21. Enquirer, 30 March 1884;
Tunison, Riot, p. 84.
22. Reports of Col. Hunt and Capt. Joyce
in AR 1884, pp. 225, 237-38; "Consolidated
Report, March 31, 1884," MQAR, box
17; News-Journal, 29 March 1884.
The Cincinnati Riot of 1884 31
refused to turn out or give any excuse,
save that they did not propose
to guard and protect murderers and
thieves."23 The problems with
using local militia units to fight
fellow citizens became apparant in
Cincinnati.
The defenders of the jail, meanwhile,
prepared their defenses as well
as possible. Hawkins took overall
command, while Hunt commanded
the Guard and Reilly controlled the police.
They then held a conference
with the other officers and staff
members of the Guard to decide how
best to prepare for the coming night.
Hunt suggested concentrating
their small force to defend the jail.
The other leaders agreed that they
had too few men to defend the
Courthouse. They therefore ordered the
creation of three barricades around the
jail: one at the corner of South
Court and Sycamore, another at North
Court and Sycamore, and the
third at East Court and the canal basin.
They stationed about twenty-
five men at each. Desmond commanded the
reserve inside the jail. (See
map, page 33). Some police helped guard
the barricades while others
roamed the city, ready to move on
command.24
The morning conference also led to a
second measure for defense: a
request for more aid from the ONG.
Around 11:00 A.M. Saturday,
Hawkins sent his first request to
Adjutant General Finley for more
men. As Hawkins wired, "Great
danger apprehended to-night."
Colonel J. W. Harper, a member of
Hoadly's staff who was in
Cincinnati, wired the same message to
the governor. Just before noon
Hawkins asked Finley to send the 14th
(Columbus) and 4th (Dayton)
Regiments because he expected
"deadly work to-night."25
Governor Hoadly was reluctant to commit
more of the Guard so
quickly. He explained his dilemma that
afternoon: "I shall keep the
men under arms until the danger is past,
but am anxious to avoid
unnecessary expense to the State, and
unnecessary excitement. I don't
wish to stampede the State for nothing,
nor to fail to have the men on
hand if necessary." He also wanted
to avoid endangering his political
support in Cincinnati by acting too
rashly. In order to gauge the mood
of the civilian leaders of the city, he
asked for advice from leading
citizens, such as Henry C. Urner, on
whether the situation warranted
the mobilization of the ONG. Meanwhile,
he ordered the 4th and 14th
Regiments and a Springfield, Ohio,
battery to prepare to move at a
23. Enquirer, 30 March 1884;
Reports of Col. Hunt and Capt. Joyce in AR 1884,
pp. 225, 238.
24. Enquirer, 30 March and 3
April 1884; AR 1884, p. 65, and reports of Brig. Gen.
Ryan and Col. Hunt, pp. 221, 225; Roe, Our
Police, p. 69.
25. Hawkins to Finley, 11:01 and 11:55,
Harper to Hoadly, 11:16, 29 March 1884,
telegrams, in AR 1884, pp.
147-48.
32 OHIO HISTORY
moment's notice. All of this occurred
within one hour after Hawkins'
request. Hawkins quickly asked Hoadly to
send the regiments at
once.26
So far, all was going well from Hawkins'
viewpoint. Then compli-
cations arose. Around 1:30 P.M. Hoadly
received telegrams, one of
which was from Brigadier General Michael
Ryan in Cincinnati, that
said the riot had ended and no militia
would be needed. Unsatisfied,
Hoadly asked for more opinions. He
believed this pause to ask advice
would not delay the sending of the
Guard, if that proved necessary,
because the troops were not ready to
leave. If, on the other hand, the
reports were right and the riot were over,
Hoadly wanted Hawkins to
withdraw his request. Hawkins, however,
reconfirmed his request for
"all the military" possible.27
It was now past 2:00 P.M., more than two
hours after Hawkins' initial
request. The militia force was ready to
move, but Hoadly continued to
hesitate because the advice from the
citizens of Cincinnati continued to
be unanimously against sending the ONG.
Hawkins, Hunt, and Harp-
er, however, all agreed that the
soldiers were necessary. At 3:00 P.M.
Hoadly asked Ryan to consult with the
sheriff. Around 4:00 P.M.,
civilian advice began to change. Urner
and Ryan did finally consult
with Hawkins and they withdrew their
objections. With everyone now
in agreement in Cincinnati, Hoadly hesitated
no longer. By 5:00 P.M.,
the battery and the two regiments had
orders to move to Cincinnati.28
Five hours after Hawkins' first request
for two regiments, those
regiments received orders to move to the
city. As Hoadly said, the first
two hours probably did not matter
because the units were not yet ready
to move. The additional three hours of
delay are harder to justify.
Hoadly did need concrete knowledge that
the Guard was necessary.
He also wanted agreement from the
leaders of Cincinnati, his home
town and political base. The fastest way
to get advice was to consult as
many trusted people as possible, both
military and civilian. As long as
there was disagreement, he had some
reason to hesitate. From that
standpoint, it is understandable that he
hesitated until he received
unanimous agreement on the necessity of
sending the ONG.
26. Hawkins to Finley, 11:55, to Hoadly,
1:20, Hoadly to Urner, 11:55, to Mott,
12:04, to Sintz, 12:40, to Hawkins,
12:47, to Ryan, 3:00, 29 March 1884, telegrams, in
ibid., pp. 147-48, 151.
27. Ryan to Hoadly, 1:29, John Bell to
Hoadly, 1:30, Hoadly to Urner, 1:45, to Ryan,
1:55, to Bell, 1:55, Hawkins to Hoadly,
2:10, 29 March 1884, telegrams, in ibid., p. 149.
28. Finley to Mott, 2:25 and 4:46, Urner
to Hoadly, 2:26 and 2:49, Hoadly to Ryan,
3:00, to Hawkins, 5:00, Urner and Ryan
to Hoadly, 4:41, 29 March 1884, telegrams, in
ibid., pp. 150-52.
The Cincinnati Riot of 1884 33 |
|
34 OHIO HISTORY
Although understandable, his hesitation
still was not justified. The
advice he sought was not worth the
delay. Ryan, Urner, and the other
citizens he asked had not witnessed the
riot and had not yet been to the
jail. They were all against the use of
more troops until they went to the
jail, saw the results of the fight, and
talked with Hawkins and Hunt.
They then decided Hawkins was right.29
Meanwhile, the commanders
who were on the spot knew the situation
and urged the immediate
dispatch of the units requested. As
commander-in-chief, Hoadly
should have analyzed better the merits
of the different opinions.
The delay notwithstanding, Hoadly decided
to send the Guard. At
6:00 P.M. the 14th Regiment left Columbus. The 4th Regiment left
Dayton at 6:30 P.M., and the
Springfield battery joined them en route.
Hoadly told Hawkins to expect the
reinforcements in Cincinnati at 9:00
P.M. In addition to these units, Hoadly
had a Cleveland battery and
three additional infantry companies
prepared to move if necessary.30
Altogether, the equivalent of two and
one-half regiments and two
batteries, over 1200 men on paper, had
been mobilized. Once Hoadly
decided his course of action, he moved
with determination.
Cincinnati was fortunate that he did act
because Hawkins proved
correct. The riot had not ended. Hawkins
and Hunt did not expect
problems until evening, though, since
Saturday was a workday.
Unfortunately for them, Saturday was
also a payday, and they feared
that many workers would get drunk and
contribute to the problems. As
evening approached, the groups around
the barricades increased. Just
after dark the crowd swelled and filled
Main Street from the canal to
Ninth Street, and also extended west
past Clay. More people filled the
streets around the three barricades. It
was a clear, cold night, and as
the defenders feared, the crowd
contained many intoxicated men. The
situation grew ominous as the troops
repulsed a few initial pushes
against the barricades. The defenders
inside the perimenter could
only wait and hope that the promised
reinforcements would arrive by
9:00 P.M.31
Between 9:00 and 10:00 P.M., some
rioters began throwing stones and
shooting revolvers and shotguns at the
Courthouse windows, while
others started bonfires in the streets.
The defenders ignored these
provocations, and the crowd grew bolder.
Finally, several rioters
29. Ibid., p. 66.
30. Hoadly to Hawkins, 6:15 and 7:00, to
Harper, 7:26, 29 March 1884, telegrams, in
ibid., pp.
153-55, and reports of Col. Freeman and Capt. Smithnight, pp. 231, 259.
31. Kleine, "Anatomy," p. 241;
Johnson, On the Roof, pp. 77, 85; Commercial-
Gazette, 30 March 1884; News-Journal, 30 March 1884; AR
1884, p. 67; Great Riots!, p.
19.
The Cincinnati Riot of 1884 35 |
|
broke into the Treasurer's office in the Courthouse and set it on fire. The fire quickly spread to the other offices. At the same time other rioters tried to move east on North and South Court Streets toward the jail, but the troops at the barricades cleared the streets with gunfire. The mob retreated and charged again, shouting "Burn the town!" and "Kill the S-n of B-s!"32 These rioters were no longer trying to give justice a little help. They wanted revenge for Friday's wounded and slain. The fire in the Courthouse continued to spread as the mob prevented the firemen from working. Hawkins therefore ordered Desmond and the reserve through the tunnel to the Courthouse to protect and assist the firemen. When the soldiers emerged outside, a rioter shot Desmond in the head. Desmond fell dead, the only fatality of the ONG during the riot. After a second shot wounded another soldier, the troops retired back inside. The firemen also retreated.33 The Courthouse continued to burn through the night. Hawkins failed to save the Courthouse through no fault of his own. During the attack on the Courthouse, the troops around the jail had to
32. AR 1884, p. 67; Enquirer, 30 March 1884. 33. AR 1884, p. 67, and report of Col. Hunt, p. 226. |
36 OHIO HISTORY
repulse several attacks against the
barricades and down North and
South Court Streets. Hawkins committed
his only reserve, but it had to
retire after its leader fell. He also
had sent deputies to meet and hurry
the reinforcements to the jail, but the
reinforcements were late.34 He
could have done nothing else.
The expected reinforcements were indeed
late. The 4th Regiment,
commanded by Colonel Frank B. Mott,
arrived in the city by 9:30 P.M.
The battery accompanying the 4th arrived
later. By 9:45 P.M. the
regiment was at Ninth and Walnut, only
three squares from the jail,
when it halted. The mob mingled with the
soldiers, hurling taunts and
insults at them. Finally, the regiment
retreated to the train depot. The
regiment's 300 men never made it to the
scene of action Saturday
night.35
The reasons for the 4th's failure
provide a good example of the
problems National Guard units faced when
confronted by hostile
citizens. First, no staff officer met
Mott at the depot, though a deputy
apparently did. Guided by the deputy,
the regiment made it to Ninth
and Walnut where it halted because both
Mott and the deputy wanted
further orders from Hawkins. The deputy
went to find Hawkins but did
not return, so Mott decided to return to
the depot and attempt to
contact the sheriff by phone. Surrounded
by a threatening mob, Mott's
indecision did not inspire the soldiers.
Inexperienced, just called from
home, and not having eaten since noon,
many in the 4th could not have
been disappointed by the decision to
retire.36 Mott and the 4th did,
however, fail to do their duty, which
the noise from the Courthouse
square should have made clear.
The 4th's retreat left Hawkins in a
perilous situation. The fire had
roused the mob to fever pitch, and the
repulse of the 4th only increased
the rioters' boldness. The rioters
continued the fight around the
barricades and on North and South Court
Streets.37 No estimates of
the crowd's number were given, but it
probably reached its peak
around this time. Hawkins could only
defend the perimeter and await
the arrival of reinforcements.
The violence continued to spread beyond
the immediate vicinity of
the jail and Courthouse. At one point, a
group of rioters left the
34. Harper to Hoadly, 9:51, 29 March
1884, telegram, in ibid., p. 155, and report of
Col. Hunt, p. 225.
35. Ibid., p. 66; Enquirer, 30
March 1884.
36. Court of Inquiry, in AR 1884, p.
298; Enquirer, 30-31 March 1884, including an
interview with Mott on 30 March; Commercial-Gazette,
3 April 1884, including inter-
views with a captain and several
privates of the 4th Regiment.
37. Johnson, On the Roof, p. 88;
Tunison, Riot, p. 88.
The Cincinnati Riot of 1884 37
Courthouse and moved south on Main to
William Powell and Co.'s gun
shop. Several store clerks, armed with
rifles, warned the approaching
crowd to leave. The mob advanced anyway
until the clerks shot two
men dead and three wounded.38 The
mob then apparently decided that
Powell's gun shop was not worth the
price.
The Courthouse was burning and the
fighting was spreading when,
between 10:30 and 11:00 P.M., the 14th
Regiment, commanded by
Colonel George D. Freeman, arrived in
Cincinnati. A deputy sheriff
and Quarter Master Ryan met the new
arrivals with written orders to
proceed immediately to the jail. Hawkins
planned to avoid the confu-
sion the 4th had suffered. Freeman,
though, would not have allowed
such a failure to occur. He was a
seven-year veteran of the ONG, and
had commanded the regiment in two
previous crises. He and his
regiment were well prepared.39
The 14th arrived with a Gatling gun and
four extra companies, in all
about 425 men. At the depot Freeman told
his men to stand firm and to
fire only on command. After receiving
twenty rounds of ammunition
each, the men began the march to the
jail. On the way the crowds of
people insulted them, threw stones, and
fired pistols, but the soldiers
"remained cool and declined to be
provoked into making retort."
Freeman's command reached the perimeter
near the jail without
serious incident, and Freeman reported
to Hawkins. Hawkins told him
to send the Gatling gun to the Court
Street barricade, and then to clear
the streets around the Courthouse.
Freeman sent two companies to
support the Gatling gun, and then
divided the rest of his force into two
groups. One group marched past the
barricade at Sycamore and North
Court and moved up North Court to Main.
This detachment pushed the
crowd in front of it at bayonet point
north on Mair and out over the
canal. (See map, page 39.) They then
began to erect a barricade near
the bridge.40
The second group moved up Ninth to Main.
Freeman left three
companies at the intersection of Ninth
and Main to hold back the
crowds south and west of the crossroads,
while he sent one company
north on Main toward Court Street. As
this company neared South
Court Street, the mob began to resist,
throwing stones and firing
revolvers. An additional company from
the crossroads moved to the
38. Enquirer, 30 March 1884.
39. AR 1884, pp. 68, 127, and
reports of Col. Church and Col. Freeman, pp. 222, 231;
Enquirer, 30-31 March 1884; News-Journal, 31 March 1884.
40. AR 1884, p. 68, and Church to
Hoadly, 11:41, 29 March 1884, telegram, p. 156,
and reports of Col. Freeman and Maj.
Harper, pp. 231, 264.
38 OHIO HISTORY
support of the first company, but the
rioters continued to press
forward. Finally Freeman brought a third
company forward to support
the detachment, and he and several
officers warned the crowd to retire.
They instead advanced. Freeman ordered
the first platoon to fire, and
the mob fell back to Court Street, their
leader dead and several rioters
wounded. The detachment pushed to Court
Street and then west on
Court to Clay, where it held back the
crowd. Main was now clear from
the canal to Ninth, and Freeman reported
to Hawkins that the firemen
could return to fight the fire at the
Courthouse.41
Rioters hiding near the Market House a
block west of Court and Clay
continued to fire on the militia. A
platoon of soldiers finally returned
the fire after the rioters had wounded
ten soldiers. The troops then
gathered materials and constructed a
barricade. The units at Main and
Ninth also built a barricade, at which
point all streets leading to the jail
and Courthouse had defenses.42 For
the moment, the heavy fighting on
the perimeter subsided.
The importance of Hoadly's hesitation to
commit the Guard can now
be seen. The "fatal delay," as
Hunt called it, was three hours longer
than necessary. The 4th arrived in
Cincinnati around 9:30 P.M. Three
hours earlier the rioting had not begun,
and the 4th probably could have
reached the jail without incident. With
the addition of this regiment's
300 men, Hawkins could have defended the
Courthouse. The 14th
arrived around 11:00 P.M. At 8:00 P.M.
the rioting had just begun. At the
height of the crisis, this force cleared
the block around the Courthouse.
Had it been available earlier, perhaps
the fighting around the jail and
Courthouse could have been cut short.
When Hoadly sent these two
regiments, he wired Hawkins orders not
to move them from the depots
"unless absolutely necessary."43
Instead, Hoadly could have placed
these units in Cincinnati by 8:00 P.M.
under similar restrictions, and
then they would have been available at
the beginning of the action.
Events, however, could not be changed,
and the battle around the
Courthouse had now raged for hours.
Surprisingly, the rioters still had
not had enough. The saloons were busy,
and more drunken men and
looters were joining the crowds.
Meanwhile, the violence and looting
continued to spread throughout the city.
Around midnight thieves
broke into T. and A. Pickering's store,
but nearby police reacted
quickly and caught many of the criminals
inside. A little before 3:00
41. Ibid., p. 69, and reports of Col. Church and Col. Freeman, pp.
223, 231-32.
42. Ibid., p. 69, and report of Col. Freeman, p. 232.
43. Hoadly to Hawkins, 5:00 and 6:15, 29
March 1884, telegrams, in ibid., pp. 152-53,
and report of Col. Hunt, p. 225.
40 OHIO HISTORY
A.M. rioters broke
into the Music Hall and found Joyce's dismantled
guns. They reassembled the guns (Joyce
doubted the guns could have
been fired) and began hauling them
toward the jail. The Hammond
Street Police Station warned Hawkins,
who immediately sent three
companies of the 14th, the Gatling gun,
and a company of police to stop
this group. The police, not encumbered
with a hand-drawn Gatling gun,
moved faster, met the rioters pulling
the cannons, and captured the
guns and several of the rioters. They
brought the cannons to safety
within the perimeter.44
The fighting around the barricades
continued to rage. The rioters at
the Market House launched several
unsuccessful attacks on the
Court-Clay barricade, after which they
contented themselves with
sniping at the soldiers from under
cover. A Commercial-Gazette
reporter tried to enter the barricade at
Sycamore and Ninth but police,
hiding near the walls of the buildings
outside the perimeter, warned him
to stop. They told him an earlier group
had ignored a similar warning
and had continued to advance. The
reporter could see the dead bodies
in the street. Finally, a little after
3:00 A.M., the fighting began to
subside.45
Throughout the battle, the 4th Regiment
and the Springfield artillery
remained at their respective depots. The
4th, after its retreat, did not
venture forth again. The battery,
however, never left its depot. Captain
George Sintz, the battery commander,
arrived in the city at 11:00 P.M.
with two guns and thirty-one men. No
guides met them, and they could
not contact Hawkins at the jail or Mott
with the 4th. They had no
horses to move their guns (horses were
supposed to be supplied at the
depot), so Sintz placed his guns in a
defensive posture. He then went
to the 4th to ask the officers if they
would escort his battery to the jail,
but they refused.46 Neither
the regiment nor the battery participated
further in Saturday night's battle.
Governor Hoadly remained in Columbus
throughout the night,
performing the duties of a
commander-in-chief. He spent the entire
night in a railroad company's office
with a wire for his own use. He
kept in constant communication with his
aides in Cincinnati, with the
commanders of regiments and batteries
around the state, and with the
men in charge of the railroads. He did
not go to bed until almost five in
the morning, long after the firing had
ceased in Cincinnati.47
44. Commercial-Gazette. 30 March
1884; Enquirer, 30 March 1884; Reports of Col.
Freeman and Capt. Joyce in AR 1884, pp.
232, 238.
45. AR 1884, p. 69, and report of
Col. Freeman, pp. 232-33; Commercial-Gazette, 30
March 1884.
46. Report of Capt. Sintz in AR 1884,
p. 257.
47. News-Journal, 31 March 1884.
The Cincinnati Riot of 1884 41
Hoadly's decision to stay in Columbus
rather than to go to Cincinnati
was wise. Had he gone to Cincinnati, he
would have been out of touch
with everyone while on the train, and
his headquarters would have
been in transit, making communication
with it difficult. He then would
have had to get inside the perimeter to
consult with the commanders,
possibly losing contact with the
outside. He had able men on the scene
who could command the tactical movements
and who had had some
experience, and he had more important
duties to perform. By concen-
trating on the mobilization of the ONG,
he was able to coordinate the
necessary movements, trains, and logistics.
Thus, Hoadly was correct
to remain in Columbus at a central
headquarters.
His actions during the night prepared
the way for the amassing of
almost 2000 troops, as well as the
necessary ammunition and equip-
ment, in Cincinnati by the end of
Sunday. He based his moves on
information received from his aides
throughout the night. Harper and
Colonel S. H. Church, who had arrived in
Cincinnati with the 14th
Regiment, both wired the governor
several times, informing him of the
destruction, deaths, and injuries, and
of the failure of the 4th. By
midnight, Hoadly realized that the 4th
and 14th Regiments were not
enough. Wiring Harper that he would stay
at the wire "all night, if
necessary," he began to mobilize
the rest of the ONG.48
Between 12:30 and 5:00 A.M. Hoadly accomplished a great deal. He
ordered five regiments to assemble their
commands, and asked local
railway companies to prepare special
trains. Warned by Church that
the troops in Cincinnati were low on ammunition,
Hoadly prepared two
different shipments of ammunition,
totaling 50,000 rounds, along with
the necessary escorts, to move to
Cincinnati. He sent Adjutant General
Finley to Cincinnati to take command of
the ONG in the field, while
Hoadly tried to coordinate the arrival
of new units with escorts at the
depots. He ordered the 4th to move to
the jail, but that regiment
ignored the order. Throughout this
mobilization, he ignored costs:
ONG officers were to "spare no
expense" and use whatever trains
were necessary, as the state "Will
pay bills."49 By the time Hoadly
went to bed Sunday morning, he had the
entire ONG and 50,000 rounds
of ammunition on the move or preparing
to move.
48. Harper to Hoadly, 9:51, 11:06, and
12:00, Church to Hoadly, 11:41, Hoadly to
Harper, no time, 29 March 1884,
telegrams, in AR 1884, pp. 155-56.
49. Hoadly to Orland Smith, 12:30 and
2:00, to Harper, 12:30 and 12:35, to Entrekin,
12:35, to Pocock, 12:55, 2:10, 3:20, and
4:10, to Williamson, 1:00, to Church, 2:30, 3:45,
and 3:55, to Hetrick, 3:00, Harper to
Hoadly, 1:40, Church to Hoadly, 2:06 and 2:21,
F. Green to J. E. Rose, 4:41, 30 March
1884, telegrams, in ibid., pp. 157-61, 163-64, and
report of Col. Picard, p. 239.
42 OHIO HISTORY
As the sun rose on Sunday morning, the
ruins of the Courthouse
must have been a reminder to all within
the perimeter that they were in
the middle of a city gone berserk. At
9:45 A.M. Finley arrived at this
scene of destruction and took command of
the state troops. Finding the
soldiers exhausted and without food, he
arranged for as many meals as
possible. He also found that the
principal commanders in Cincinnati
expected more trouble that night. He
agreed and wired Hoadly of this
fear. The mayor, Thomas Stephens, made
his first appearance that
morning, having been ill with pneumonia.
He called for a meeting of
citizens and published a list of 100
names of the people he thought
should attend. By 9:45 A.M., Hoadly was
also up and at work again.50
He learned quickly that the trouble in
Cincinnati had not ended.
The mayor's conference met before noon
with twenty-five to thirty
"leading citizens" in
attendance. As a result of the conference, the
mayor closed all the saloons until
Monday, and he asked Hoadly for all
available ONG. He also called for the
citizens of the city to emerge and
join a special police force to help stop
the riot.51 After a two-day
absence, the civil government was back
on the job. The civil authori-
ties were finally helping the police and
military regain control of the
city.
The mobilization and deployment of the
ONG continued without a
pause on Sunday. At 6:30 A.M. Colonel
Frederick J. Picard arrived in
Cincinnati with twenty-seven men and
20,000 rounds of ammunition.
He knew the soldiers at the Courthouse
needed the supplies badly, so
when the 4th disobeyed an order to
escort Picard to the jail, he decided
to march with only his one company.
Three blocks from the jail a
crowd formed between him and the
perimeter. Using bayonets,
Picard's men continued their advance,
twice losing and recapturing the
precious ammunition wagon. They finally
reached the barricade in
front of the Courthouse and entered the
perimeter. Several of Picard's
men had injuries from thrown stones.52
Finley set up military headquarters in
the City Buildings about one
mile west of the defensive perimeter. He
then began preparations to
meet the expected reinforcements as they
arrived throughout the day.
He also ordered Sintz's battery and the
4th Regiment to the jail.
Around noon, Mott, commanding 115 men of
the 4th, arrived at Sintz's
50. Finley to Hoadly, 9:45 and 10:58,
Hoadly to Finley, 9:45, 30 March 1884,
telegrams, in ibid., pp. 165-67; Great
Riots!, p. 24; Enquirer, 31 March 1884.
51. Finley to Hoadly, 12:08, 30 March
1884, telegram, in AR 1884, p. 168; Enquirer,
30-31 March 1884.
52. Reports of Col. Freeman and Col.
Picard in AR 1884, pp. 233, 239-40.
The Cincinnati Riot of 1884 43 |
|
depot. The rest of the regiment had gone home during the morning. Horses were delivered, and together the battery and regiment marched to the jail, arriving by 2:15 P.M. During the afternoon, Finley, with Hoadly's permission, ordered a Cleveland battery to Cincinnati, and he sent a newly arrived regiment to the City Buildings as a reserve. Freeman remained in command at the jail.53 Hoadly continued to work from Columbus. Between noon and 1:30 P.M. he ordered the rest of the ONG to move to Cincinnati as soon as possible, while he communicated with the railroads to arrange special trains for the men to use. He also prepared to send more supplies and ammunition to the infantry and artillery and even considered declaring martial law, though he refrained from this as the civil authorities were
53. News-Journal, 31 March 1884; AR 1884, pp. 66-67, and Hoadly to Finley, 12:35, Finley to Hoadly, 2:16 and 6:51, 30 March 1884, telegrams, pp. 169-70, 173, 183, and reports of Col. Freeman, Col. Entrekin, Capt. Sintz, and Capt. Smithnight, pp. 233, 249, 257-59; Enquirer, 31 March 1884. |
44 OHIO HISTORY
beginning to take charge. Hoadly was in
command of the situation, and
by 6:00 P.M. he had the entire state
force in motion.54
The command arrangement in Cincinnati
between civil and military
authorities was also working well.
Finley announced to the soldiers
that he would take orders from the mayor
and that the ONG was in
Cincinnati to support the civil
authorities. Mayor Stephens, with
Finley's support, asked the mayors of
Newport and Covington to block
the bridges from their towns into
Cincinnati to prevent more people
from entering and joining the mob.
Stephens and Finley also stationed
squads of police to defend important
buildings such as Kittredge's and
Powell's gun shops.55 The
coordination between the city officials, the
police, and the state troops was a major
advantage for the defenders of
the law.
The soldiers already in Cincinnati spent
an uncomfortable Sunday,
though Quartermaster Ryan tried to feed
them as well as possible. He
had a hospital and two hotels provide
plenty of coffee while he used the
jail's kitchen and a local establishment
to prepare meals. The men,
however, got little sleep as they
remained on constant duty patrolling
the streets and manning the barricades.
Some members of the 1st had
not slept since Friday afternoon, and
the troops who had arrived
Saturday had not slept since their
arrival. In addition, the weather was
still cold, and the soldiers had few
overcoats.56 Altogether, it was a
miserable, uncomfortable day for the
soldiers and police on duty that
Sunday.
Cincinnati was fortunate to have these
Guardsmen and police on
hand. Throughout the day the crowds
increased and tension mounted
as rioters threatened the soldiers, and
police arrested some rioters near
the barricades. Finley reported a few
"disturbances" and the death of
one citizen, but no major fighting
erupted during the day. Many in the
crowd, however, had armed themselves
from the guns looted from the
stores the previous two nights. Finley
expected trouble that night.57
54. Hoadly to C. E. Henderson, 11:06, to
Williamson, 12:00, to McMaken, 12:15, to
Hetrick, 1:00, to Finley, 12:55 and 5:35,
to Thorp, 1:03, to Norton, 1:10, to R. Shurtleff,
1:15, to Harper, 1:24, to C. C. Waite,
1:30, to Pocock, 2:00, to R. Smith and B.
Eggleston, 4:50, R. Smith and B.
Eggleston to Hoadly, 3:50, 30 March 1884, telegrams,
in AR 1884, pp. 168-72, 177, 180-81.
55. Finley to Hoadly, 4:12 and 5:06, 30
March 1884, telegrams, in ibid., pp. 178-79,
181, and Gen. Order no. 1, 30 March
1884, p. 208; Enquirer, 31 March 1884;
News-Journal, 31 March 1884.
56. Enquirer, 31 March 1884; Ryan to Hoadly, 10:41, 30 March 1884,
telegram, in AR
1884, p. 188, and report of Col. Hunt, p. 226; Commercial-Gazette,
31 March 1884;
News-Journal, 1 April 1884.
57. AR 1884, p. 70, and Finley to
Hoadly, 4:12, 30 March 1884, telegram, p. 178, and
report of Col. Freeman, p. 233.
The Cincinnati Riot of 1884 45
A new regiment, escorting the ammunition
and artillery supplies,
arrived in Cincinnati at 7:00 P.M. As of
this time Finley's force was
formidable. He had units from six
different regiments and one battalion
of infantry, and two artillery
batteries, a total of approximately 1100
soldiers, six cannons, and one Gatling
gun. He positioned his men
throughout the town in cooperation with
the mayor, stationing about
700 men inside the perimeter and 400 in
reserve in the City Buildings.
One company went to the Hammond Street
Station to cooperate with
the police, while small detachments
garrisoned the Music Hall, ar-
mory, and gas works.58
At 8:00 P.M. Hawkins ordered Freeman to
send three companies to
guard the powder stored in Clifton
Heights, north of the city. Accord-
ing to reports, a crowd of 2000 was
threatening to attack. The troops
drew sixty rounds each and, with a
deputy sheriff as guide, marched to
Clifton. Their arrival stopped the
impending attack, but the soldiers
remained on guard until midnight when
local police took over the duty.
The soldiers returned to the jail later
that night.59
Despite the presence of such a strong
force of armed soldiers in the
city, the riot resumed Sunday night. By
now Hawkins, Finley, and
Hoadly must have been wondering what it
would take to stop the
violence. No one could have predicted
the determination and perse-
verance of the mob in the face of such a
formidable force. This mob had
been stirred to a fighting spirit and
had not yet vented its full wrath.
The violence in town began around 8:30
P.M. when a group of 150
rioters left the crowd near the jail and
moved several blocks away,
where they began to push streetcars off
the tracks. Thirty minutes later
they moved to Power Hall behind the
Music Hall, where they found the
disassembled parts of a cannon. The
police warned Finley, who then
had Colonel Samuel Courtwright, another
one of the governor's aides
on duty in Cincinnati, dispatch two
companies of about seventy-five
men from the reserve. These troops
quickly marched to the scene. As
they deployed in front of the halls, the
crowd scattered, leaving behind
the cannon and three men whom the police
arrested. There were no
casualties. The soldiers, joined by
fifteen police from a nearby station,
guarded the halls throughout the night.
At the same time, another
company went to strengthen the guard at
the gas works. Other police,
meanwhile, were busy with thieves who
were looting some pawn-
shops.60
58. Gen. Order no. 1, 30 March 1884, in ibid.,
p. 208, and reports of Col. Entrekin and
Col. Pocock, pp. 249-50, 261; Commercial-Gazette, 31
March and 1 April 1884.
59. Report of Col. Picard in AR 1884,
p. 240.
60. Enquirer, 31 March 1884;
Finley to Hoadly, 10:40, 30 March 1884, telegram, in
46 OHIO HISTORY
The fighting increased between 10:00 and
11:00 P.M. when rioters
near the Market House began shooting at
the soldiers behind the
Court-Clay barricade. Officers warned
the rioters to stop, but they
continued to fire. The soldiers then
fired twenty rounds from the
Gatling gun, inflicting several wounds
and scattering the crowd. For
the next couple of hours the Market
House crowd fired only a few
random shots, to which the troops did
not respond; they were under
orders not to fire individually, only on
command. Meanwhile, Finley
received word of shots near one of the
train depots. He sent one
company and some police to the scene to
stop that fight.61
Reinforcements began to arrive in the
city at midnight. One battery
and the equivalent of three companies
arrived with 30,000 more rounds
of ammunition. These units reported to
Finley at headquarters in the
City Buildings. At 1:00 A.M. a river steamer dropped off two companies
from the river towns, and at 2:30 A.M. the 3rd Regiment arrived.
Lieutenant Colonel James E.
Shellenberger, temporarily in command
of the 3rd, ordered his advance guard to
fire only single shots if they
met resistance between the depot and the
City Buildings. The 3rd
joined the growing reserve.62
Even the United States Army became
involved in the increasingly
serious state of affairs in Cincinnati.
As early as 5:30 P.M. on Sunday,
Hoadly had informed Finley that he was
free to requisition artillery
ammunition from the U. S. Army's Newport
Barracks. According to
the Enquirer, some ammunition was
sent to Cincinnati.63 The riot had
grown to proportions no one could have
imagined Friday.
The final outbreak of fighting occurred
at 1:00 A.M., again near the
barricade at Court and Clay. As a large
crowd prepared to advance on
the barricade, Hawkins, Hunt, and other
officers stationed themselves
at Court and Main to command the
situation. The rioters fired over fifty
shots, but the Guard did not respond.
Finally, with a shout to "clean
out those blue coats," the mob
charged the barricade. When they had
closed to a short distance, Freeman
ordered two volleys, by company,
in rapid succession. The crowd
retreated, leaving behind several
wounded. This was the last extensive
firing as the streets slowly
became quiet.64
AR 1884, p. 188, and report of Col. Entrekin, p. 250; Tunison, Riot,
p. 92.
61. Finley to Hoadly, 11:35, 30 March
1884, telegram, in AR 1884, pp. 188-89, and
report of Col. Freeman, pp. 233-34.
62. Reports of Col. Entrekin, Lt. Col.
Shellenberger, Capt. Smithnight, and Maj.
Harper, in ibid., pp. 250, 255,
260, 264-65; Enquirer, 31 March 1884.
63. News-Journal, 31 March 1884; Enquirer,
31 March 1884; Hoadly to Finley, 5:30,
30 March 1884, telegram, in AR 1884, p.
181.
64. Report of Col. Freeman in AR
1884, p. 234.
The Cincinnati Riot of 1884 47
Finley telephoned Hoadly at 3:00 A.M. to say that
he had enough men
for the moment. Hoadly then tried to
contact the regiments still on the
move, wiring: "War probably
over." Three regiments already en route
could not be stopped, but he was able to
contact and halt a fourth.65
The people of Cincinnati awoke Monday
morning to quiet streets. At
7:00 A.M. Freeman had his
men unload their weapons. During the
morning reinforcements reported to the
jail, which enabled Freeman to
relieve the men who had been without
sleep since Saturday. Almost
800 more men arrived in the city by
noon, completing the deployment
of the ONG in Cincinnati. The force deployed
as of Monday totaled
approximately 2500 soldiers, ten
cannons, and one Gatling gun from
ten regiments and one battalion of
infantry, and three batteries. Only
one regiment of the ONG was not on hand.66
The city seemed quiet but Finley took no
chances. He kept his forces
in place around the city: about 900 men
at the Music Hall; 1070 men,
six cannons, and one Gatling gun at the
jail; and over 400 men, four
cannons, and one police Gatling gun at
the City Buildings. He had two
companies support the police at the
Hammond Street Station, and one
company at the gas works. He also sent
two companies to the Plum
Street Station, and one to Fountain
Square. These preparations,
however, did not receive a test, and the
men spent a quiet night in their
positions. In fact, Freeman's men kept
their guns unloaded through the
night. The governor put it best:
"war over."67
Finley immediately began relieving units
on Tuesday. The first to
leave were those that had arrived first,
including the 4th and 14th
Regiments. As the soldiers left, the
civilians prepared to take over. The
mayor's committee began swearing in the
special police force to
augment the existing force.68
65. Finley to Hoadly, 3:00 a.m.,
telephone call, Hoadly to Hetrick, 5:00 a.m., Finley
to Hoadly, 5:05 a.m., telegrams, 31
March 1884, in George Hoadly Papers, 1847-1886,
MSS. 314, box 1, folder 3, March 1884,
Ohio Historical Society, Columbus, Ohio,
hereafter cited as GHP; Hoadly to
Finley, 5:43, 31 March 1884, telegram, in AR 1884,
p. 191.
66. Norton to Hoadly, 1:54, Hetrick to
Hoadly, 8:30, Hoadly to Thorp, 10:45, 31
March 1884, telegrams, in AR 1884, pp.
190-91, 193, and reports of Col. Freeman, Col.
Picard, Col. Norton, Col. Pocock, and
Maj. Harper, pp. 234, 240, 243-44, 262, 265.
67. Hoadly to A. L. Conger, 11:51, 31
March 1884, telegram, in ibid., p. 194, and Gen
Order no. 6, 31 March 1884, pp. 209-10,
and reports of Col. Norton, Col. Entrekin, Lt.
Col. Shellenberger, Col. Pocock, Maj.
Harper, and Col Hetrick, pp. 244, 250, 256, 262,
265-66; News-Journal, 1 April
1884; Commercial-Gazette, 1 April 1884.
68. Finley to Hoadly, 4:20, 31 March
1884, telegram, in AR 1884, p. 196, and Spec.
Orders nos. 7-9, 1 April 1884, p. 212,
and report of Col. Freeman, p. 234; News-Journal,
1 April 1884.
48 OHIO HISTORY
Wednesday the demobilization continued,
though Hoadly and Finley
decided not to empty the city entirely.
Hawkins, Mayor Stephens, and
the mayor's committee of citizens all
requested that Hoadly leave a
regiment in the city a few days longer,
possibly until Tuesday, April 8,
the day after the spring elections.
Finley ordered one regiment to stay
until that Tuesday, and upon Hoadly's
advice, he ordered a second
regiment to remain until Thursday, April
3, just to be safe. In addition,
forty-one men of the 1st Regiment would
remain at the armory until
April 17.69
The rest of the soldiers left Wednesday,
as did Finley. Ryan stayed
throughout the whole period, supplying
coats, blankets, and food to the
soldiers. Finally, at 8:00 A.M. Tuesday,
April 8, the day after Cincinnati's
spring elections and eleven days after
the riot had begun, the last unit
of the ONG left Cincinnati.70 As
the soldiers left, the police replaced
them on the streets. They allowed no one
near the jail or Courthouse
without a pass until Thursday, when the
barricades came down. Main
Street finally reopened. Police,
however, continued to guard the
area.71
The best estimate of the total
casualties during the riot is forty-five
dead and at least 139 wounded. Guard
casualties were approximately
forty wounded and two dead. The
fatalities were Desmond on Saturday,
and Private Israel Getz, who apparently
died by accident Tuesday,
April 1.72 The number of militia
casualties indicates the ferocity and
deadly intent of the rioters, while the
deaths among non-soldiers shows
the Guard's willingness to defend
itself.
Troubles began over a sham verdict of
manslaughter. Two weeks
later almost 200 men were dead or
wounded and the Courthouse was
destroyed. What were the results of this
display of hostility? For
Cincinnati there seemed to be few.
Monday, April 7, the people voted
in an election that changed nothing. The
political machine still con-
trolled the election and the same
politicians won. McLean was not
ousted until the next year. One gain,
however, was that Tom Campbell
fled the city soon after the riot. Crime
continued to increase while the
69. Finley to Hoadly, 5:50, 1 April, and
11:44, 2 April 1884, telegrams, in AR 1884,
pp. 201, 205, and report of Col. Hunt,
p. 226; Urner to Hoadly, 2 April, Executive
Committee to Hoadly, 2 April 1884, GHP,
box 1, folder 4, April 1884.
70. Finley to Hoadly, 12:02, 2 April,
Ryan to Hoadly, 10:36 and 12:10, 3 April,
Church to Hoadly, 4:04, 8 April 1884,
telegrams, in AR 1884, pp. 205-07, and Spec.
Orders nos. 13-39, 1-2 April 1884 (for
details of the departures of the various units), pp.
213-220.
71. Enquirer, 2-4 April 1884.
72. Ibid., 6 April 1884; Commercial-Gazette,
2 April 1884; Gen. Order no. 8, 2 April
1884, in AR 1884, p. 210, and
reports of Col. Freeman, Lt. Shepherd, Surgeon Guerin,
and Surgeon Hough, pp. 234-36, 241.
The Cincinnati Riot of 1884 49
people's indifference grew. Capital
punishment, though, also increased.
New laws were passed regulating criminal
trials. Thus there was some
gain in the legal justice system which
had, after all, been the spark that
had started the explosion. Cincinnati,
however, was not free from
violence. Six months later, during the
fall elections, more riots erupted,
though that time the ONG did not have to
intervene.73 Cincinnati paid
a heavy price for these few gains.
The local authorities deserve some
mention. Hawkins did an excel-
lent job as commander of the military
until Finley arrived. Though in
command when the Courthouse burned, he
could not defend every-
thing with his weak force. He accepted
the personal thanks of the
governor and, in 1890, he received
further recognition when he became
the Adjutant General of the ONG. The
police also were faithful to their
duty, serving side by side with the
soldiers throughout the crisis. They
deserved the praise they received from
the newspapers and authori-
ties.74 The mayor's absence
during the first two days of rioting marred
his performance. On Sunday, however, he
began to reestablish civilian
control, rallying the citizens and
coordinating, through Finley, the use
of the militia and police. His actions
during those days deserve credit.
The experience in Cincinnati disturbed
the ONG. Hunt feared that
the hostility of the rioters would have
an adverse effect on the 1st
Regiment, and he was right. Hunt
resigned in June, and the Lieutenant
Colonel, Major, and Chaplain of the 1st
all resigned before the end of
the year. Joyce's battery suffered a
similar fate as its three ranking
officers all resigned by the end of
September. The 4th Regiment,
meanwhile, faced a Court of Inquiry,
which relieved Mott of command.
The Court ruled that the 4th had failed
to do its duty, and found Mott
guilty of incompetence and disobedience
of orders. Rather than face a
court-martial, Mott "Resigned for
the good of the service" in July. On
May 31, 1884, the headquarters of the
4th disbanded, as did three of its
companies. The other companies formed
the nucleus of a new regi-
ment.75
73. Wright, Bossism, p.
23;Tunison, Riot, pp. 72-74; Wittke, History of Ohio, V, 198;
History of Cincinnati, 1894, p. 371; Johnson,On the Roof, p. 94; Gary
P. Kocolowski,
"Expanding Police Services in
Late-Nineteenth-Century Cincinnati," The Cincinnati
Historical Society Bulletin, 31 (Summer 1973), 117.
74. Hawkins to Hoadly, 2 April 1884, in GHP,
box 1, folder 4; D. F. Pancoast, Adj.
Gen., Report of the Adjutant General
of Ohio to the Governor of the State of Ohio for
the Year 1946 (Columbus, 1947), p. 19.
75. Enquirer, 3 April 1884; Ohio,
Adjutant General, Ohio National Guard, Adminis-
tration, Commissioned Officers'
roster, by Company, 1875-1917, ser. 73, 1884, Ohio
Historical Society, Columbus, Ohio, pp.
433, 505-10, 736; Regimental Rosters, 1863,
1870-1904, ser. 162, 1st Regiment, 1884, Ohio Historical Society,
Columbus, Ohio; Court
of Inquiry, in AR 1884, pp.
297-302.
50 OHIO HISTORY
Other organizational matters also
received attention. In April,
Hoadly and Finley implemented Finley's
suggestion to brigade the
regiments to increase large-unit drills
and to help ease future mobili-
zations. Hoadly had Finley study the
advisability of attaching a Gatling
gun to each regiment. As Hoadly
explained, "Gatling-guns seem to
extinguish a mob quicker than any other
weapon."76 The crowd facing
the Court-Clay barricade Sunday night
probably would have agreed.
Overall, Finley and Hoadly planned to
gain from the experience in
Cincinnati.
The Cincinnati riot did, in the end,
provide testimony to the
efficiency and skill of the state
command system and the ONG. The
governor received many messages of
congratulations, including one
from Mayor Stephens' executive committee
which thanked Hoadly for
the prompt concentration of a force
large enough to stop the violence.
The Cleveland Leader wrote:
"This was the Governor's first experi-
ence in military affairs. He is cool in
all his movements, and is
undoubtedly competent for any
emergency." Hoadly coordinated the
movements of all the units, maintained
the logistical support, and kept
abreast of the situation in Cincinnati.
In short, he ably performed the
functions of a commander in chief. His
hesitation on Saturday delayed
the arrival of the Guard Saturday night,
which left the Courthouse open
to destruction. In light of Sunday's continued
violence, however, his
hesitation did not materially lengthen
the riot.77
The number of soldiers in Cincinnati did
not seem to impress the
rioters. They fought the police and a
few Guardsmen Friday night, they
battled over 500 Guardsmen Saturday, and
finally on Sunday they
fought over 1100 soldiers. With 2500
soldiers in Cincinnati on Monday,
the violence ceased. Hoadly, however,
was justifiably reluctant on
Saturday to send almost one-half the
entire ONG after one night's
rioting. He sent over 700 men on
Saturday, and without definite
knowledge that more were needed, Hoadly
could not justify a further
mobilization. When he received such
knowledge late Saturday night,
he immediately began a full
mobilization. His decision to commit the
ONG in stages was the best possible,
given the circumstances of the
moment.
The ONG in general earned the praise it
received. Finley cooperated
with the civil authorities, subordinated
the ONG to the mayor, and
several times Sunday coordinated the
movement of the military with
76. AR 1884, pp. 25-26, and
Hoadly to Finley, 10:00. 1 April 1884, telegram, p. 198.
77. Executive Committee to Hoadly, 2
April, Urner to Hoadly, 2[6] April 1884, in
GHP, box 1,
folder 4; Cleveland Leader, 31 March 1884, quoted in Roberts,
"George
Hoadly," p. 28.
The Cincinnati Riot of 1884 51
those of the police. His dispositions on
Sunday met all emergencies. As
of Monday he read the situation
correctly and pulled out quickly but
not prematurely. The governor's staff
also provided essential assis-
tance by sending information and
coordinating logistics in Cincinnati.
The soldiers themselves performed
admirably. They received praise
from Hoadly, the newspapers of
Cincinnati, and Finley, who wrote,
"Soldiers of the Regular Army could
not have done better." Called to
service unexpectedly, these men entered
a confused and dangerous
situation but stayed under control,
obeying orders and avoiding
unnecessary use of force. Finley summed
this restraint in his report:
"Repeated assaults by the mob were
repelled by the troops, with as
little injury as possible." Freeman
and the 14th Regiment justifiably
received special recognition from the
governor. Finley praised both the
14th and 1st Regiments, reporting that
they "were admirably handled,
and exhibited cool behavior and splendid
discipline, unsurpassed by
veterans of long service." The
people of Ohio showed their approval of
the entire ONG through their State
Senators and Representatives, who
made large appropriations for the losses
and injuries, and for the
continuance of the ONG.78
Thus events in Cincinnati proved that
the ONG was an efficient
military force capable of dealing with
unexpected state emergencies.
The modernization of the ONG since 1877
proved sufficient. The
command system from governor to
regimental commander responded
to the crisis, and the soldiers did
their duty with restraint and
efficiency. The ONG passed the test
faced in the Cincinnati Riot of
1884.
78. Enquirer, 4 April 1884; AR
1884, pp. 69-72, and Hoadly to Freeman, 12:12,
1 April 1884, telegram, p. 199, and Gen.
Order no. 9, 2 April 1884, p. 211.
MARK V. KWASNY
A Test for the Ohio National
Guard:
The Cincinnati Riot of
1884
Riots have been a part of our history
since the colonial days. Crowds
clashing with civil and military
authorities, violence in the streets, and
the deaths of citizens at the hands of
law enforcement agencies-these
are not unknown in the history of the
United States. The Cincinnati
Riot, March 28-30, 1884, contained all
of these elements. For three
days citizens, police, and soldiers of
the Ohio National Guard (ONG)
fought in the streets of Cincinnati,
leaving more than forty people dead
and well over one hundred injured. This
riot was remarkable, though
not unique, for the intense anger and
hostility exhibited by the crowd,
and the willingness of the police and
militia to meet these emotions
with all necessary force.
The Cincinnati Riot was a severe test
for both the ONG and the
entire state command system, from the
governor down to the regimen-
tal commanders. National Guard
organizations were relatively new
then, having replaced the state militia
units which had died out after the
Civil War. The 1877 Railroad Strike
impressed upon the states the need
for an effective internal police force,
and in that same year some states
began to hold summer camps for their
Guard units. Ohio held its first
in 1879.1 The riot in 1884 challenged
how much the ONG had improved
during these five years.
Domestic disturbances such as riots have
always posed a severe
problem for civilian and military
authorities. Civilian leaders often wait
too long before calling for military
assistance, usually because of an
unwillingness to admit they have lost
control of the situation, as well as
from a desire to avoid the costs
involved. At the same time, military
leaders are hesitant to involve
themselves in civilian affairs, preferring
Mark V. Kwasny is a Ph.D. candidate in
history at The Ohio State University.
1. Robin Higham, ed., Bayonets in the
Streets: The Use of Troops in Civil
Disturbances (Lawrence, Kansas, 1969), p. 27; William H. Riker, Soldiers
of the State
(New York, 1979), pp. 51, 56; John K.
Mahon, History of the Militia and the National
Guard (New York, 1983), p. 113.