Ohio History Journal

  • 1
  •  
  • 2
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  • 4
  •  
  • 5
  •  
  • 6
  •  
  • 7
  •  
  • 8
  •  

REPORT ON THE PRESENT CONDITION OF

REPORT ON THE PRESENT CONDITION OF

MOUNDS AND EARTHWORKS OF OHIO.

HAVING been appointed by the Ohio Archaeological and

Historial Society Chairman of a Committee to consider

the necessity and the means of preserving the prehistoric

mounds and earthworks of Ohio, I arranged last summer

to spend a week, in company with Judge C. C. Baldwin,

of Cleveland, in making a tour of inspection which should

enable us to supplement investigations, which we had

previously made together, or singly, in the interests of the

same subject. The following are the results of the inves-

tigations. We will take the southern portion of the State

in order, beginning with Montgomery county, mentioning,

however, only the more important works:

The largest mound of the State is found at Miamisburg,

on the high lands to the southeast of the town. This

mound is sixty-eight feet in height, and is still well pre-

served; and, being near a railroad station, can be easily

visited. McLean estimates that it contains over 300,000

cubic feet of a material. It is certainly worthy of per-

petual preservation, and, being a single mound, the cost

of purchase could not be great.

A few miles southwest, near Carlisle Station, situated

partly in Montgomery county and partly in Warren county,

upon a bluff where Twin Creek joins the valley of the

Great Miami, is an important enclosure readily accessible

to tourists, the wall of which is about 3,600 feet in length,

and enclosing an area of about fifteen acres. This we did

not visit, but Mr. McLean reports the southern half of the

wall to be well preserved, but so covered with briers and

underbrush as to be almost inaccessible, while the northern

half of it is under cultivation, and will soon be entirely

demolished.

Butler county is one of the most interesting localities for

341