Ohio History Journal

  • 1
  •  
  • 2
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  • 4
  •  
  • 5
  •  
  • 6
  •  
  • 7
  •  
  • 8
  •  
  • 9
  •  
  • 10
  •  
  • 11
  •  
  • 12
  •  

Popular Errors in Regard to Mound Builders

Popular Errors in Regard to Mound Builders. 401

in the vicinity, and to decorate them in such way as they

can, even though the interments may have taken place

many years previously; would it be any greater mark of

respect or affection to add little by little to a mound under

which one of their tribe was buried ?

Will any one possessing the slightest knowledge of the

power of hereditary influences, pretend that a Logan, a

Corn Planter, a Red Jacket, or a host of other illustrious

men could be possible among a stupid and indolent

people ?

Could the brain that devised a conspiracy like Pontiac's,

reaching over hundreds of miles of wilderness, completed

to the smallest details under difficulties that would be in-

surmountable to many of our modern statesmen, kept

secret from the enemy until time for the blow to fall, and

failing at the last moment only from circumstances unfore-

seen and beyond control of the directing spirit-could

such a mind be incapable of planning the defensive works

of the Mississippi Valley ?

Can anyone suppose the largest and most complicated

of these works-even allowing them to be the outcome of

a definite, pre-arranged plan, which seems altogether im-

probable-overtax the mental powers of Tecumseh who

almost succeeded in perfecting a confederacy among many

tribes indifferent or hostile to one another, and extending

from the lakes to the gulf?

Can men like these originate and mature in the midst

of ignorance and degradation such as most writers picture

for the Indian? Is it likely that a people so energetic in

war and the chase, could be so inert in all other directions ?

Does such literature take its models from the Iroquois

Confederation, the Muskogees, the present inhabitants of

the Indian Territory, or from the drunken, diseased out-

casts of frontier towns, and the predatory nomads of the

West? In telling of our own civilization, does an author

describe the whining beggar, the spiritless pauper in our

alms-houses, the tramp on the highway, the clay-eaters of

 

Vol. II-26