COMMENTS, NOTES AND REVIEWS. |
|
THWING'S SKETCH OF OHIO. In Pearson's Monthly for February is the first of a series of articles which that magazine proposes to publish on "The Story of the States." This first article very fittingly is devoted to Ohio. It is from the pen of Charles F. Thwing, D. D., LL. D., President of the Western Reserve University at Cleveland, Ohio. It is a very entertaining and informing monograph on our native state. In a condensed form, Mr. Thwing gives the leading events in rapid succession in Buckeye history. "As to who were the first inhabitants of the Ohio Valley," Mr. Thwing says, "scientific research has never enabled us to give a reason- able guess although the facts are buried with the unwritten records of a long-vanished race. There are records in abundance, however, such as the mounds in Adams County and at Marietta, and, in fact, all through the river valley, which indicate that the land was once inhabited by a race superior to the Indians in intelligence, if not in prowess. Over ten thousand of these mounds have been located in different parts of the state. Many of them have been found to contain neatly fashioned imple- ments, and from the fact that some appear to have been raised as forti- fications, it is presumed that these mound builders were forced to defend themselves from enemies, perhaps from the Indians, who later occupied the valley, and who may have annihilated them, or driven them out of the region. At any rate they disappeared long before the era of historical record. Even before the time of this prehistoric race, the geologists tell us Ohio was the scene of mighty conflicts between the rival forces of nature. At one time, the whole region embraced within the borders of the state was covered with a vast sheet of ice half a mile in thickness. This ice- field, as it receded, piled up a great dam, five or six hundred feet in height, across the Ohio River, at the point where Cincinnati now stands, backing up the waters of the river, and forming a great lake, which ex- tended for many miles. The trial of strength between this dam and the waters which it restricted probably lasted for hundreds of years, but in the end the river triumphed and broke through the barrier in a tremen- dous flood, which must have surpassed in destructive power anything of the kind that has been witnessed within the historic period. This, the first of many Ohio floods, must have swept away any inhabitants living at that time in the valley." (525) |
526 Ohio Arch. and His.
Society Publications.
Whether there were any native Ohioans
before or at the time of this
ice gorge is a debatable question among
scientists, but whether there
were or not "cuts no ice" with
the present generation.
Mr. Thwing takes up and cursorily
disposes of the native Indians
and the various immigrations into the
territory that later became the
state; the English and French traders,
the expedition of Celoron De
Bienville from Canada in 1749, the first
Ohio Company of 1750 and the
opposing English expedition at the
instance of Governor Dinwiddie of
Virginia, who sent a message ordering
the French off the Ohio (?) grass.
"The bearer of this message,"
says Mr. Thwing, was "Adjutant General
George Washington of the Virginia
Militia, who thus made his appear-
ance in early Ohio history." Then
follows the contest between the Eng-
lish and the French for possession of
the country and the cession by
France to Great Britain of her claim to
the territory in 1763. Four col-
onies (Virginia, New York, Massachusetts
and Connecticut) subse-
quently laid claim to this part of the
country. The ordinance of 1787
established the Northwest Territory and
the various settlements from the
east and the south rapidly followed. The
Ohio Company of 1787-8 at
Marietta, the French settlement at
Gallipolis, (1790), the New England
settlements along the Western Reserve
and the rapid and marvellous
opening up of the territory until the
entrance of Ohio as a state into the
Union. Mr. Thwing then selects the more
prominent and picturesque
events along the course to the present
time. He sketches with a fluent and
racy pen the agricultural, commercial,
educational and political develop-
ment of what is now the fourth star in
the constellation of our Union.
Many of the leading personages in this
graphic panorama are spoken of
and characterized. The article does not
attempt or pretend to be an
exhaustive history, nor present
scholarly data for the accurate student.
Mr. Thwing admirably accomplishes his
purpose to give a sketchy sil-
houette of Ohio from its beginning to
the present day. It is artistically
done and gives one an excellent idea of
the wonderful growth and strik-
ing prominence of our state. No one can
read this article without having
his state pride raised to its proper
pitch.
These pages in Pearson recall to us an
incident in our own experi-
ence, when a few years ago we met in one
of the foreign capitals a mem-
ber of the House of Lords. During the
conversation his lordship asked
what part of America we were from. We
informed him with much gusto
that we were from Ohio. "Ohio,
Ohio," said he. "Seems to me we have
heard that name before. Let me see; I
think I saw something about that
place in one of our American almanacs
recently. It is a little town up
in Canada, is it not?" We hastened
to set his lordship right and we not
only revolutionized his knowledge of
geography, but we upset one of
his fundamental principles of
mathematics, viz.: that the whole is greater
than a part, for we convinced him in
short order that Ohio was greater
than all the rest of the United States.
We informed him that Ohio was
not only the great state in mineral,
agricultural and industrial resources,
Comments, Notes and Reviews. 527
but that it furnished "the
people" of the country; it produced all the
leading politicians, statesmen, orators,
presidents, generals, cabinet
officers, foreign embassadors, poets,
novelists, journalists, humorists,
inventors, that it supplied the main
part of the Union army and practi-
cally put down the rebellion and was now
"the mainstay and prop of the
nation." It was the first time in
the career of "me lud" that his British
bluff and bluster had encountered a
specimen of Buckeye bravado. When
we finished our descriptive discourse on
Ohio, his lordship was as dazed
as if wandering in a London fog, indeed
he quite "lost his balance" and
with great difficulty moved off in his
accustomed aristocratic and com-
manding perpendicularity.
Mr. Thwing wields a facile, felicitous
and prolific pen. It is natural
to him. He began when he and the writer
were classmates and co-editors
of The Philo Mirror-the literary
organ and intellectual outlet of the
students of the time honored preparatory
school, Phillips Academy,
(Andover, Mass.). That was a long time
ago-we were "Middlers"
then, "fitting" for college.
Thwing still writes and writes well. His
article on Ohio would be an excellent
stimulus to the young to study the
romantic and valuable history of our
state.
HISTORY OF ADAMS COUNTY.
We acknowledge the receipt of a history
of Adams County from its
earliest settlement to the present time
by Capt. Nelson W. Evans, a prom-
inent attorney of Portsmouth, a life
member of The Ohio Archaeological
and Historical Society, and Hon. Emmons
B. Stivers, a member of the
present legislature from Adams County,
and the author of "Outlines of the
United States History,"
"Recreation in School Studies," and other well
known educational works.
It is one of the best books of its kind
that has come under our eye,
and is really a valuable contribution to
the historical literature of Ohio,
particularly the southern part of the
state.
The historical portion of the work is by
Capt. Evans, and is of a lit-
erary merit of high order. Capt. Evans
has the true historical instinct,
has accurately gathered his data and
carefully classified it. He devotes
a chapter to the geology and the mineralogy of the county. He presents
a most interesting and complete sketch
of that interesting race known
as the Mound Builders, who left in Adams
County some of the most
remarkable evidences of their peculiar
traits that are to be found in any
part of the country. His description of
the Great Serpent mound is one
of the best to be found in any
publication and gives to his book a distinct
value. Speaking of the Mound Builders,
he says: "Whence they came
is enveloped in impenetrable mystery.
Some have supposed them to be
the lost tribes of Israel, which hardly
deserves passing notice. Others,
and there is much to sustain the theory,
suppose them to be of Mexican
528 Ohio Arch. and His. Society Publications.
origin, having pushed gradually to the
northward, where in time, they
were assailed by invaders from the
northwest, who perhaps came from
Asia when that continent was united in
the region of Alaska to America,
and who by reason of superior numbers or
more warlike natures swept
these people in turn back to the
southward. At what period of time these
people flourished, or when they ceased
to be, is problematical. The In-
dians had no tradition concerning them.
In fact, it is very generally
believed by those who have investigated
the matter, that there was at
least one intervening race of
inhabitants in the Mississippi Valley prior
to the advent of the Indians and
following the disappearance of the Mound
Builders. We refer to 'The Villagers'
who formed the 'garden beds' found
in northern Indiana, southern Michigan
and lower Missouri. These
'beds' are laid out with great order and
symmetry and do not belong to
any recognized system of horticulture.
They are in the richest soils and
occupy from ten acres to three hundred
acres each. That they are the
work of a race succeeding the Mound
Builders is evidenced by the fact,
that some of these 'garden beds' extend
over mounds which certainly
would not have been permitted by their
builders. Again, the formation
of these 'beds' cannot be ascribed to
the Indians, for no such system of
cultivating grain or plant foods was
practiced by them. And again, when
the white man's attention was first
called to the numerous mounds and
enclosures in the Ohio Valley as being
the work of an extinct race, it
was observed that forest growths over
these works were of the same
species as those in the outlying
regions, which would prove the great
antiquity of these structures. On some
of these mounds, as for instance,
one at Marietta, were found trees
showing 800 annual growths."
Capt. Evans has an interesting chapter
on the Indians, the principal
tribes that inhabited Ohio, their mode
of living and the pioneer expedi-
tions against them and their final
disappearance from Ohio. He devotes
much space to the Virginia Military
District, its first survey, the manner
of making the surveys and various
surveying parties, and the system of
entering and recording land patents.
Then comes in natural sequence
various settlements in the southern part
of the state. He gives in much
detail the civil organization in the
Northwest Territory particularly
of Adams County, its courts, townships
and the political organizations
pertaining thereto. He describes the
establishment of the public roads
and highways. He has an interesting
account of the early taverns and
inns, with many anecdotal and historical
incidents. The numerous bio-
graphical sketches of the pioneers which
occupies most of the volume,
are interestingly told and are replete
with valuable historical facts and
data. The work comprises nearly a
thousand pages and is produced in
the best mechanical art of the
publisher.
Comments, Notes and
Reviews. 529
HISTORY OF HARRISON COUNTY.
There has also just been issued from the
press the "Historical Collec-
tions of Harrison County," with
lists of the first land owners, early mar-
riages (to 1841), will records (to
1861), burial records of the early set-
tlers and numerous genealogies, by
Charles A. Hanna. This volume of
some 650 pages is mainly a publication
of the records indicated in the
title. Mr. Hanna devotes his opening
chapter to the Scotch-Irish in Har-
rison County. He says, "The truth
of the matter is, that a vast pro-
portion of American people sometimes
classed by the historians as Brit-
ish, have had their hard-earned laurels
transferred to the brows of the
so-called Anglo-Saxons, or English; and
very much of the honor and
glory which are so frequently claimed
for the English in this country,
really belong to the people of another,
and a distinctly different race.
These people are the Scotch-Irish, as
they have come to be called, who
have done vastly more in the settlement
and development of the central
and southern portions of our country
than the English, arid yet a
people who have been too busy making
history to spare the time to write
it; and one whose early annals, for this
reason, have been, until recent
years, so far neglected as to be
well-nigh forgotten."
He then gives a long list of the
distinguished Buckeyes whose blood
classes them with this famous
intermixture. In this list he names "Arthur
St. Clair, Jeremiah Morrow, Allen
Trimble, Duncan McArthur, Joseph
Vance, Wilson Shannon, Mordecai Bartley,
Reuben Wood, Rutherford
B. Hayes, Seabury Ford, William Medill,
James E. Campbell, Thomas
L. Young, Joseph B. Foraker, Charles
Foster, William McKinley and
of some few others who have been
governors of the state. Or, of Presi-
dents Grant, Hayes, Garfield and
McKinley. Or, of certain supreme
court judges, such as Jacob Burnet, John
McLean, Joseph R. Swan,
John C. Wright, Thomas W. Bartley, W. B.
Caldwell, William Ken-
non, Hocking H. Hunter, George W.
McIlvaine, W. J. Gilmore, Rufus
P. Ranney, Josiah Scott, John Clark, W.
W. Johnson and John H.
Doyle. Or, of certain well-known
journalists, such as Whitelaw Reid,
W. L. Brown, John A. Cockerill, Joseph
Medill, Samuel Medary, W.
W. Armstrong, the Farans and McLeans,
and Richard Smith. Or,
of Bishop Simpson, John A. Bingham and
Salmon P. Chase. Or,
William Dean Howells and John Q. A.
Ward. Or, Generals U. S. Grant,
Phil Sheridan, Quincy A. Gilmore, James
B. Steadman, Irvin Mc-
Dowell, John Beatty, O. M. Mitchell,
James B. McPherson, Henry W.
Lawton and the fighting family of the
McCooks."
Mr. Hanna also has valuable chapters on
"The Friends or Quakers
of Harrison County," and on the
Germans and Virginians; also, on the
first settlers in Eastern Ohio. He
devotes much space to the early days
of Cadiz, the county seat, and Harrison
County in 1813, and the early
churches of the various denominations
represented in the pioneer days.
His book represents a vast amount of
labor in gathering and transcrib-
530 Ohio Arch. and His.
Society Publications.
ing the records with innumerable brief
sketches of the leading settlers.
This material will be of great value to
genealogists and biographers.
It is rich in concise descriptions of
pioneer life, its perils and hardships
and detailed accounts of the settlement
and growth of the older com-
munities and institutions of the county;
and it is perhaps, not too much
to say that this book contains more information
and data relative to the
history of the various families of the
county in question that is usually
given in county histories. As a sample
of the extent of the work, the
list of early marriages in the county
numbers 7,500 and their early
burials 5,000. The book is produced in
attractive binding and will fill
a valuable place in the historical
biography of Ohio.
THE MOUND BUILDERS.
A late number of The Northwest
Magazine has a review of a note-
worthy paper read recently before the
Minnesota Historical Society by
J. V. Brower, of St. Paul. The reviewer
of the paper states that Mr.
Brower presented evidence tending to
show that the Mound Builders of
Minnesota were none other than the old,
full blooded Sioux Indians.
He traced these aborigines back to their
ancient habitations and villages.
and in the course of his researches
arrived at some surprising conclusions.
After describing every tribe of Indians
known to have been permanent
residents of the region explored, Mr.
Brower gave his attention to the
geological age of the lakes, the surface
of the ground, and to the rivers,
creeks and other streams.
It was shown distinctly, he says, that
the mounds were built on the
top of the black soil and of that
material, indicating that hundreds of
them are of more recent origin than many
suppose. From the numerous
village sites there have been collected
stone, copper, flint and earthen
objects and artifacts which are exactly
similar to the same kind of material
taken from the mounds adjoining the
village sites. That fact shows that
the people who built the mounds also
occupied the ancient villages.
Each of the village sites discovered has
been explored and charted.
By the side of the chart of 1900 the
Fauquelin chart of 1688 was placed,
and it was distinctly demonstrated by
the two charts that the Sioux vil-
lagers residing in Mille Lacs in 1688
were resident at identical places
where the village sites were observed in
1900.
The next proposition submitted was proof
from the records left by
Radisson, Hennepin, Duluth, Le Sueur and
Carver that the Sioux made
and used stone implements, clay pots,
copper crescents, flint knives,
quartz arrow points, and various stone
and copper objects, following
which it was demonstrated beyond dispute
that the Sioux removed the
flesh from the remains of their dead and
deposited the bones, in a bun-
dled condition, with the skull. Catlin's
works were here produced to
show that as late as 1835 the Sioux were
building mounds over their
Comments, Notes and Reviews. 531
dead. A chart was shown delineating the
bundled bones of Indians at the
surface of the ground at Mille Lacs,
with mounds of earth built over
them.
James W. Lynd, historian of the Sioux
nation, was quoted show-
ing that the Dakota people were at Mille
Laces at a very ancient period;
in fact, so long ago that no tradition
remained to show where they came
from or how long they had been there.
No trace of two distinct classes of
stone implements and earthen
pots had been found at Mille Lacs, and
the only island in the region
where the Sioux had a village, to which
Hennepin was taken in 1680, is
overspread with broken clay vessels and
stone implements.
PRE-HISTORIC BILL OF FARE.
A recent number of Chamber's Journal has
an interesting article
concerning what might be styled the menu
of the pre-historic man. The
article says:
Our attention has recently been called
to some curious experiments
conducted some time ago by Mr. Charters
White, M. R. C. S., lately
the president of the Royal Odontological
Society of Great Britain. Upon
examining some skulls dating back from
the stone age, he noted that
several of the teeth, although quite
free from caries, were thickly coated
with tartar. It occurred to him that it
would be possible by a rough ana-
lysis to identify any particles of food
that might be embodied in this nat-
ural concrete, and so reveal the
character of the aliment partaken of by
pre-historic man. Dissolving the tartar
in weak acid, a residue was left
which, under the microscope, was found
to consist of corn husks,
particles, hairs from the outside of the
husks, spiral vessels from
vegetables, particles of starch, the
point of a fish tooth, a con-
glomeration of oval cells, probably of
fruit, the barblets of down and
portions of wool. In addition to this
varied list were some round, red
bodies, the origin of which defied
detection, and many sandy particles,
some relating to quartz and some to
flint. These mineral fragments were
very likely attributable to the rough
stones used in grinding the corn,
and would account for the erosion of the
masticating surfaces, which in
many cases was strongly marked. This
inquiry into food of men who
lived not less than 4,000 years ago is a
matter of archeological interest.
OHIO PRESIDENTS.
The inauguration of William McKinley on
March 4th and the death
of Benjamin Harrison, on March 14th
leads to the inquiry from several
quarters concerning the date and place
of birth of the so-called "Ohio
Presidents."
We give them in order of their
succession:
532 Ohio Arch. and
His. Society Publications.
Ulysses S. Grant, born April 27, 1822,
at Point Pleasant. (Clermont
Co.). Nominated from Illinois at
Chicago, May 20, 1868. Inaugurated
March 4, 1869. Renominated,
Philadelphia, June 5, 1872. Inauguarted
March 4, 1873. Died at Mount Gregor, N.
Y., July 23, 1885. Buried
Riverside Park, New York, August 8,
1885.
Rutherford B. Hayes, born October 4,
1822, Delaware, (Delaware
Co.)
Nominated at Cincinnati June 14, 1876. Inaugurated March 5,
1877. Died Fremont, Ohio, January 17,
1893. Buried Fremont.
James A. Garfield, born November 19,
1831, at Orange, (Cuyahoga
Co.). Nominated Chicago, June 8, 1880.
Inaugurated March 4, 1881.
Died September 19, 1881, at Elberon, N.
J. Buried Cleveland, Ohio.
Benjamin Harrison born August 20, 1833,
North Bend, (Hamilton
Co.) Nominated from Indiana, at Chicago,
June 26, 1888. Inaugurated
March 3, 1889. Renominated Minneapolis,
June 10, 1892. Defeated.
Died Indianapolis, Indiana, March 14,
1901. Buried at Indianapolis.
William McKinley, born January 29, 1843,
Niles, (Trumbull Co.).
Nominated St. Louis, June 18, 1896.
Inaugurated March 4, 1897. Re-
nominated Philadelphia, June 19, 1900.
Inaugurated March 4, 1901.
COLONEL CHARLES PARROTT.
Colonel Charles Parrott, one of the
original members and a life
member of the Ohio State Archaeological
and Historical Society, and for
many years one of its active trustees,
died at his home, Columbus, Ohio,
January 22, 1901. Colonel Parrott was
born in Dayton, Ohio, September
2, 1834. A brief sketch of his life will
be found in Vol. IV, page 470,
of the Society's publications. The last
few years of his life were devoted
to the work incidental to his membership
in the Ohio State Board of
Charities, to which position he was at
first appointed by Governor For-
aker in 1889. He was an earnest student
in the subject of public char-
ities, and had become by both study and
experience, one of the best
authorities in matters of the conduct of
eleemosynary institutions. Col-
onel Parrott was a graduate of the Ohio
Wesleyan University and the
Cincinnati Law School, and was a
gentleman of much learning and
culture.
BY authority of the Ohio 74th General
Assembly (1900-1), Elliot
Howard Gilkey, Assistant Clerk of the
Senate, has prepared and pub-
lished the Ohio Manual of Legislative
Practice. The contents are divided
into five subjects. 1. Constitution of
the State of Ohio, with annotations
by E. O. Randall, Reporter of the
Supreme Court. 2. Legislative Sec-
tions of the Revised Statutes. 3. Rules
of Legislative Practice. 4 and
5. Official Directory of the Senate and
House of Representatives of the
74th General Assembly. The work
comprises some 540 pages, and the
biographical sketches of members of the
Legislature are accompanied
Comments, Notes and Reviews. 533
by half page portraits. Mr. Gilkey has
edited his part of the work in an
accurate and admirable manner. The
manual is a most valuable book,
not only to members of the Legislature
but to members of the legal pro-
fession in general.
A LITTLE pamphlet entitled "Tract No. 90 in Volume 4,"
has just been
issued by the Western Reserve Historical
Society. It is prepared by J.
P. McLean, Ph. D., Secretary of the
Society. It is devoted to the archae-
ological collections of the society,
giving at some length lists and desscrip-
tions of the archaeological relics
collected and now exhibited by
that society. It is profusely illustrated and valuable to the archae-
eologicalist, and particularly the
collector. It is something more than a
catalogue, for it not only fully
describes the relics in the possession of this
society, but it tells where they were
found, and so far as possible the
mode of their manufacture and their use
in the domestic life of the In-
dians and the Mound Builders. The
Western Reserve Historical Society
is very rich in its collections of this
character.
THERE has recently been published a most
attractive volume of stories,
legends, historical sketches, poetic and
prose selections, concerning the
Ohio Valley. The work is entitled
"The Hesperian Tree" -edited by one
of the most distinguished Ohio
literateurs, John James Piatt. The aim of
the editor has been, as he says in his
preface, to offer to the public a
magazine of literature miscellanies in
prose and verse, the contributors
to which are native to, or identified
with the Ohio valley. The literary
articles are accompanied in many cases
by beautiful illustrations by artists
also "native and to the manner
born." The volume is a gem in typo-
graphical and publisher's art. Each
article is by some well known or
eminent writer, and the table of
contents presents a literary feast, calcu-
lated to furnish great pleasure and
profit to the patron or lover of what
might be called Ohio literature. The
contributions were prepared ex-
clusively for this publication, and do
not appear elsewhere. Among the
writers are such names as William Dean
Howells, James Whitcomb Riley,
Kate Brownlee Sherwood, Henry Watterson,
William Henry Venable,
Maurice Thompson, Murat Halstead, John
Hay, the Piatts and a score
of others almost equally well known.
This volume will be a welcome
guest to the libraries of choice
literature.
COMMENTS, NOTES AND REVIEWS. |
|
THWING'S SKETCH OF OHIO. In Pearson's Monthly for February is the first of a series of articles which that magazine proposes to publish on "The Story of the States." This first article very fittingly is devoted to Ohio. It is from the pen of Charles F. Thwing, D. D., LL. D., President of the Western Reserve University at Cleveland, Ohio. It is a very entertaining and informing monograph on our native state. In a condensed form, Mr. Thwing gives the leading events in rapid succession in Buckeye history. "As to who were the first inhabitants of the Ohio Valley," Mr. Thwing says, "scientific research has never enabled us to give a reason- able guess although the facts are buried with the unwritten records of a long-vanished race. There are records in abundance, however, such as the mounds in Adams County and at Marietta, and, in fact, all through the river valley, which indicate that the land was once inhabited by a race superior to the Indians in intelligence, if not in prowess. Over ten thousand of these mounds have been located in different parts of the state. Many of them have been found to contain neatly fashioned imple- ments, and from the fact that some appear to have been raised as forti- fications, it is presumed that these mound builders were forced to defend themselves from enemies, perhaps from the Indians, who later occupied the valley, and who may have annihilated them, or driven them out of the region. At any rate they disappeared long before the era of historical record. Even before the time of this prehistoric race, the geologists tell us Ohio was the scene of mighty conflicts between the rival forces of nature. At one time, the whole region embraced within the borders of the state was covered with a vast sheet of ice half a mile in thickness. This ice- field, as it receded, piled up a great dam, five or six hundred feet in height, across the Ohio River, at the point where Cincinnati now stands, backing up the waters of the river, and forming a great lake, which ex- tended for many miles. The trial of strength between this dam and the waters which it restricted probably lasted for hundreds of years, but in the end the river triumphed and broke through the barrier in a tremen- dous flood, which must have surpassed in destructive power anything of the kind that has been witnessed within the historic period. This, the first of many Ohio floods, must have swept away any inhabitants living at that time in the valley." (525) |