Ohio History Journal

  • 1
  •  
  • 2
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  • 4
  •  
  • 5
  •  
  • 6
  •  
  • 7
  •  
  • 8
  •  
  • 9
  •  
  • 10
  •  
  • 11
  •  
  • 12
  •  
  • 13
  •  
  • 14
  •  
  • 15
  •  
  • 16
  •  
  • 17
  •  
  • 18
  •  
  • 19
  •  
  • 20
  •  
  • 21
  •  
  • 22
  •  
  • 23
  •  
  • 24
  •  
  • 25
  •  
  • 26
  •  
  • 27
  •  
  • 28
  •  
  • 29
  •  
  • 30
  •  
  • 31
  •  
  • 32
  •  
  • 33
  •  
  • 34
  •  
  • 35
  •  
  • 36
  •  
  • 37
  •  
  • 38
  •  
  • 39
  •  
  • 40
  •  
  • 41
  •  
  • 42
  •  
  • 43
  •  
  • 44
  •  
  • 45
  •  
  • 46
  •  
  • 47
  •  
  • 48
  •  
  • 49
  •  
  • 50
  •  
  • 51
  •  
  • 52
  •  
  • 53
  •  
  • 54
  •  
  • 55
  •  
  • 56
  •  
  • 57
  •  
  • 58
  •  
  • 59
  •  
  • 60
  •  
  • 61
  •  
  • 62
  •  
  • 63
  •  
  • 64
  •  
  • 65
  •  
  • 66
  •  
  • 67
  •  
  • 68
  •  
  • 69
  •  
  • 70
  •  
  • 71
  •  
  • 72
  •  
  • 73
  •  
  • 74
  •  
  • 75
  •  
  • 76
  •  
  • 77
  •  
  • 78
  •  
  • 79
  •  
  • 80
  •  
  • 81
  •  
  • 82
  •  
  • 83
  •  
  • 84
  •  
  • 85
  •  
  • 86
  •  
  • 87
  •  
  • 88
  •  
  • 89
  •  
  • 90
  •  
  • 91
  •  
  • 92
  •  
  • 93
  •  
  • 94
  •  
  • 95
  •  
  • 96
  •  
  • 97
  •  
  • 98
  •  
  • 99
  •  
  • 100
  •  
  • 101
  •  
  • 102
  •  

26 Ohio Arch

26       Ohio Arch. and His. Society Publications.

 

The largest was Cincinnati with 115,000, and in them all there

were less than 200,000 of population. The following year the

convention assembled which framed the new constitution for the

state of Ohio. That convention provided and laid down an iron-

clad rule that all cities should be governed by a general law,

and that there should be no special charters. That, perhaps, was

not an unreasonable rule at that time, for then there were but

the nine cities, the largest 115,000, altogether less than 200,000

people. It would not be a very hard thing to provide one law

which should control those nine cities.

Another fifty years went by, and the supreme court of the

state had reaffirmed the iron-bound rule of the constitution.

The general assembly was called in extra session. Then we found

that Ohio had seventy-one cities with more than 5,000 people.

The largest was your own splendid city of Cleveland with its

370,000. In them all there were 1,800,000 people to be governed

by the new law. What was an easy task in 1851 was a most diffi-

cult task in 1902. A new general law was made for the govern-

ment of our cities. The general assembly, considering all its

difficulties, did the best that it could; but, from the din which

has surrounded my ears for the last few months, I am quite

sure there are quite a few people among the 1,800,000 who are

not satisfied. (Laughter.) But I trust, fellow citizens and mem-

bers of the Chamber of Commerce, that you will remember that

the best code can be spoiled by bad administrators, and that

the poorest code will seem to be the best with good adminis-

trators. I therefore hope that you as good citizens of Cleveland,

that all good citizens of the state, will take the new code and do

the best they can with it by seeing that honest, intelligent and

upright men are elected to your municipal offices in April next.

(Applause.)

Going back to  1805, I discover that Cleveland under the

census had but 17,100 inhabitants, and I also discover that my

own city of Columbus had 17,800. We were ahead of you then,

but we have given up the race. We are willing to take off our

hats and say 'Cleveland men go ahead, for this place belongs to

you.' (Applause.)  But Cincinnati still thinks that she is in the

race. To be sure, since 1850, Cleveland has become twenty-two