Ohio History Journal

  • 1
  •  
  • 2
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  • 4
  •  
  • 5
  •  
  • 6
  •  
  • 7
  •  
  • 8
  •  
  • 9
  •  
  • 10
  •  
  • 11
  •  
  • 12
  •  
  • 13
  •  
  • 14
  •  
  • 15
  •  
  • 16
  •  
  • 17
  •  
  • 18
  •  
  • 19
  •  
  • 20
  •  
  • 21
  •  
  • 22
  •  
  • 23
  •  
  • 24
  •  
  • 25
  •  
  • 26
  •  
  • 27
  •  
  • 28
  •  

PONTIAC'S CONSPIRACY

PONTIAC'S CONSPIRACY.

 

 

BY E. 0. RANDALL.

For a century and a half (1600-1750) France and England

had been rivals for the possession of the fairest part of the

North American continent. Each nation had acquired a fixed

tenancy but the extent of those re-

spective  holdings  was  unequal.

France by her discoveries and occu-

pancies had preempted Canada, the

region of the Great Lakes, and the

Ohio and Mississippi valleys; Eng-

land, through her colonies, the New

England Coast from near the Gulf

of St. Lawrence to the Gulf of Mex-

ico, and inland to the Alleghany

and Appalachian Mountains. Eng-

land claimed, through the charters

of her colonies, the territory west to

the Mississippi, and even beyond

"from sea to sea." The valley of

the Ohio was the garden portion of

this contested claim. The time had

come for a final test of the supreme power of each claimant. The

expedition of Coloron de Bienville, on the part of the French,

through the Ohio country, and of Christopher Gist through the

same territory on the part of the English, precipitated the conclu-

sion as to the respective rights of the parties. Each proposed to

secure at once this fair land by military occupation. The clash of

arms was preluded by attempted arbitration. Legardeur St. Pierre

as envoy of the French authority; Tanacharison, the Half King

of the Iroquois tribes, on the part of the Indians; and George

Washington as representative of Governor Dinwiddie of Vir-

ginia, on the part of the British, held tripartite conferences at

(410)