OHIO HISTORY AND
NATIONAL HISTORY.
OHIO HISTORY TEACHERS' ASSOCIATION.
At a meeting of the Ohio History
Teachers' Association, held
in April, 1915, a committee was
appointed to consider the pub-
lication of one or more volumes
pertaining to the history of the
state. This committee decided that it
would be wise to make a
beginning by collecting a series of
extracts from the sources in
such a way as to make clear the part the
state has taken in impor-
tant phases of the history of the
country at large. A handy vol-
ume of such material, it was believed,
would afford excellent col-
lateral reading for high school students
of United States history,
and would serve to quicken the student's
appreciation of the his-
tory of his own state without danger of
giving distorted ideas of
the state's importance, such as might
result from studying purely
local history. It was believed that high
school teachers would
welcome such an addition to the
collateral reading resources of
their classes, and that the volume would
not be without attrac-
tions for the citizen who is interested
in the history of nation and
state. The work of preparing the volume
is now well under way,
and it is hoped that it may be completed
without undue delay.
The collaborating committee is composed
of Professor J. E.
Bradford, Miami University, Professor C.
L. Martzolff, Ohio
University, Miss Juliette Sessions, East
High School, Columbus,
Professor E. J. Benton, Western Reserve
University, and Pro-
fessor H. C. Hockett, Ohio State
University, chairman.
Chiefly to give an idea of what might be
done in such a
book, three members of the committee
prepared papers which
were read at a session of the
Association held October 21st, 1915.
The main portion of these papers are
given here. The first is
by Mr. Bradford, the second by Mr.
Hockett, and the last by
Miss Sessions.
(135)
136 Ohio Arch. and Hist.
Society Publications.
THE HISTORY OF OHIO AS ILLUSTRATIVE OF
OUR NATIONAL HIS-
TORY IN THE EIGHTEENTH
CENTURY.
The study and teaching of history within
our state has had
two fundamental faults. One has been a
study and teaching of
national history that did not give due
consideration to those
great facts concerning the growth of our
state that immediately
relate to our national development. The
other has been the
study and teaching of local history
without setting forth its re-
lationship to our national development.
Either of these methods
has value, but if the relationship be
duly established, this com-
posite method will prove doubly valuable
in quickening interest
and imparting a fuller comprehension of
our national growth.
Let us for a little consider how this
relationship evinces itself,
to the time of the admission of Ohio to
statehood.
We pass over the geography of Ohio as a
part of the great
valley which has served not only as a
trough through which civ-
ilization has poured from the Atlantic
Coast Plain to the Great
Prairies and Far West, but also as the
seat of a great middle
empire, which, by certain geographical
bonds, is related to the
area that lies to the eastward of the
Appalachians. We likewise
pass over the aboriginal period, with
its Mound Builders and
their abundant remains, and the Ohio
Indians, of whom Smith
has left us such an interesting account,
and who had a part in
excluding the French until the English
were ready to contest for
its possession, and who aided in holding
the settlements east of
the mountains until political
institutions were organized, con-
tributed to colonial unification, and
both stimulated trade and
prepared fields ready for cultivation by
the first comers into the
wilderness.
Let us note first the era of discovery
and exploration. Who
were the white men who uncovered or made
known Ohio to the
world? Let it be borne in mind that long
before the coming of
the actual settlers the forest paths of
this region had been
threaded by the white man. Who were
these first comers? Was
it the French La Salle in 1669-1670,
when he crossed, as some
hold, from Lake Erie to the Ohio and
descended it to the Falls?
Or was it the English governor of
Virginia, who, with his com-
Ohio History and National
History. 137
panion Knights of the Golden Horseshoe,
stood on what they
regarded as the divide between the
Atlantic and the Ohio flow-
ing streams and looked upon what he
thought to be the waters
of Lake Erie? True, it was but a mist he
saw, induced, perhaps,
by a too liberal draught of champagne in
emptying a bottle in
which to enclose the formal claim to the
Ohio Valley in the name
of the King of England. Be that as it
may, he saw in a very real
sense the Ohio region, and wrote to the
English authorities call-
ing attention (I) to the accessibility
of the Ohio Valley and Lake
Erie from Virginia; (2) to the menace of
French occupation of
that region; (3) to the danger of losing
the fur trade thereby;
(4) to the desirability of establishing
military posts on Lake
Erie. This was in 1716, more than thirty
years prior to actual
attempt at English occupation.
And then there were those explorers, the
traders, chief of
whom was Croghan, with their post
Pickawillany, and Conrad
Weiser, the Moravian missionary, Captain
Trent and Christopher
Gist, the agents of the Ohio Company,
all of whom threaded these
Ohio forests. How interesting is their
story! How well they
did their work in making known this
region is shown by Frank-
lin's letter of 1754 in which he speaks
of this Ohio area as "the
finest in North America for the extreme
richness and fertility of
the land, the healthy temperature of the
air and mildness of the
climate," and in which he proposes,
among other things, the es-
tablishment of a colony on the Scioto,
"the finest spot of its big-
ness in all North America," which
he affirms "has the particular
advantage of sea coal in plenty (even
above ground in two
places) for fuel when the woods shall be
destroyed."
The relation of Ohio to the French and
Indian War is so
apparent as to require little more than
suggestion. It had its
place in causing the outbreak of that
war, which was fought,
in part, for the possession of the Ohio
Valley; it lay adjacent
to one principal seat of military
operations; the attitude of its
population was a determinate factor in
the issue of the struggle
in the West, while as a result of the
war the Ohio region became
definitely recognized as the possession
of the English crown.
"But," says the old-time
history teacher, "you have now
reached your limit, for how will you
connect Ohio with the be-
138 Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
ginning of the American Revolution, with
its Stamp Act Con-
gress, its Continental Congress, its
Boston Tea Party, its Boston
Massacre, and its Lexington and Concord?
Surely the causation
of that momentous struggle lay within
the folk on the Atlantic
seaboard." Let us enquire. Scarcely
had the Treaty of Paris
been signed when there broke out on the
frontier that notable
Indian uprising which bears the name of
Pontiac's Revolt, in
which the natives of Ohio played an
important part, which brought
into Ohio some hundreds of white
captives, and which made
Ohio the scene of certain military
operations. This war had
several important results. It led to the
issuance of the Procla-
mation of 1763, which, in theory if not
in fact, temporarily
stopped westward migration beyond the
crest of the Alleghanies.
This was followed in 1774 by the passage
of the Quebec Act,
which transferred all the region
northwest of the Ohio to the
Province of Quebec, and placed it under
a more highly cen-
tralized administration. It further led
to the sending of troops
to America, one purpose of which was to
protect the frontier.
The burden of maintaining these troops
was to be laid in part
upon the colonies, hence the necessity
of raising a revenue in
America. Here, then, we have the main
causes of the revolt as
set forth in the Declaration of
Independence. It should be added
that, in 1774, and upon Ohio soil, a
body of officers connected
with Dunmore's expedition united in
setting forth the grievances
of the colonists against the mother
country.
In the revolutionary struggle itself,
while the area imme-
diately embraced within Ohio did not
contribute any soldiers to
the patriot ranks, it was nevertheless
the scene of numerous
military expeditions under both British
and American leadership.
It was the condition north of the Ohio
that led to the concep-
tion and execution of plans for the
conquest of British posts in
the West. This resulted in the
organization of the territory
northwest of the Ohio into Illinois
County and the establishment
of civil administration. It was the
military conquest and civil
administration of this region that, at
the Treaty of Versailles in
1783, secured the Mississippi River,
rather than the crest of the
Appalachians, as the western boundary of
the United States.
Ohio History and National History. 139
In the period 1783-1803, when
Ohio evolved from a wilder-
ness into a state, we see her relation
to our national history be-
coming even more intimate. It was the
presence of the squatter
within the bounds of Ohio prior to 1787
in such numbers as to be
reckoned by thousands, causing the
government to make an
abortive attempt to exclude them, which
led the old Congress
of the Confederation to provide for
civil government by the
passage of the Ordinance of 1787, which,
when adopted by the
first Congress under the constitution,
became a sort of postscript
to the constitution, and the foundation
of our colonial system.
The problem of the public domain led to
the passage by Congress
of certain land laws. The problem of
securing an outlet to the
world's markets for the surplus products
of Ohio farms, as also
those of adjacent communities, led to a
series of negotiations
that climaxed in the purchase of
Louisiana. Then, too, Ohio
illustrates in an unprecedented way the
process of Americaniza-
tion. Into this area was first extended
the Virginia-Pennsyl-
vania frontier with its Scotch-Irish
squatter class with their
characteristic indifference to legal
restrictions. Then came the
New England Puritans into the valley of
the Muskingum, the
Western Reserve, and, in a more
individualistic way, into prac-
tically all parts of Ohio. After these
came the representatives of
all the middle states: English Quaker,
Dutch religionists of vari-
ous creeds-Lutherans, Reformed,
Dunkards, and United Breth-
ren-and Scotch-Irish Presbyterians, who
settled the Miami
Valley. Then there were the
Pennsylvanians, Marylanders, Vir-
ginians, and Kentuckians, who flowed
into the Virginia military
district. From the Carolinas, Georgia,
Tennessee, and Kentucky
came numbers of English, Scotch-Irish,
and French Huguenot
descent who were dissatisfied with the
institution of slavery.
Here also came some direct from England,
Wales, Scotland, Ire-
land, Germany, and France. These several
elements mingled
and commingled, affecting each other and
being affected by each
other. And when, in 1803, having the
requisite population, Ohio
was admitted to statehood, it could be
said of her as of no other
state until that time, that she was the
typical American state, the
first of her class.
140 Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
Thus and in other ways may the history
of Ohio be used to
illustrate our national history during
the period of early settle-
ment.
SOURCE ILLUSTRATIONS OF OHIO'S
RELATIONS TO NATIONAL
HISTORY 1816-1840.
The close of the War of 1812 is
regarded as the begin-
ning of a new era in our national
history, because interest then
shifted from foreign relations to
problems of domestic develop-
ment. The termination of the war marks
also the close of the
pioneer period in the upper Ohio Valley,
and it was, in large
measure, the rapid development of Ohio
and her sister common-
wealths that gave character to the next
quarter-century. The dis-
cussions of internal improvements, the
tariff, and banking, which
filled these years show the influence of
the rising West, for the
demand for improved means of
transportation and protection to
home industries was most insistent
there. The history of Ohio
in this epoch therefore illuminates
national history in an unusual
degree.
With a little care in selecting and
arranging material, and
a few explanatory notes, the sources can
be made to tell the
story of Ohio's relations to these
developments vividly and in-
terestingly. Some idea of what might be
done may be obtained
from the few extracts which follow. The
first is taken from the
message of Governor Worthington, in
1816. While by no means
the first evidence of interest in
internal improvements, it serves
very well as an expression of Ohio
opinion at the time when
Congress was discussing the Bonus Bill:
"* * * Navigable rivers and public
roads as the means of con-
veying the surplus produce of the
country to market, are of the first
importance to the state. Notwithstanding
the great fertility of our soil,
if the surplus produced from it, beyond
our own consumption, does not
command a price sufficient to reward the
husbandman, the spring to
industry is in a great measure
destroyed."
New York had hoped that the passage of
the Bonus Bill
would lead to federal aid in the
building of the Erie Canal. The
veto of that bill by Madison resulted in the
determination to go
Ohio History and National
History. 141
ahead with the project as a state
enterprise, but during the winter
of 1816-1817 New York sought aid not
only from the federal
government, but also from Ohio. De Witt
Clinton wrote to Gov-
ernor Worthington urging that as the
citizens of Ohio would
share in the benefits of the canal they
should also participate in
the expense. Worthington transmitted the letter to the legis-
lature with this comment:
"The advantages of such a water
communication to the state of
Ohio generally, and in a particular
manner to the northern part of it,
are so manifest, that I am persuaded you
will not hesitate to give to the
subject that careful examination its
great importance requires * * *
It will become the duty of the people of
Ohio, to give all the aid in their
power towards effecting an object in
which they are so deeply interested."
From this time on the people of Ohio
took a keen interest
in the New York canal, but that interest
led eventually, not to a
subsidy, but to a system of connecting canals. Worthington's
successor, Governor Brown, stated the
argument for roads and
canals in words which echo Calhoun's
speech on the Bonus Bill:
"Our productions, which form our
only great resource, are gen-
erally of that bulky and ponderous
description, as to need every easement
in conveyance, that we can afford.
Experience is a faithful monitor, and
the millions expended for transportation
during the late war, may teach
an useful lesson * * *. Roads and canals
are veins and arteries to
the body politic, that diffuse supplies
[sic], health, vigor and animation to
the whole system * * * Nature strongly invites us to [such]
enter-
prise * * *."
Interest in the Erie canal was by no
means confined to that
part of Ohio which would be nearest its
western terminus. Even
the remote regions saw in a connecting
system a promise of a
new outlet for produce which would have
great advantages over
the old route down the Ohio and
Mississippi. The issue of the
Inquisitor and Cincinnati Advertiser for July 24, 1820, for ex-
ample, contains a two-column editorial
on the progress of the
Erie project, while an editorial in the
next issue declares:
'Should Ohio imitate [New York and build
a connecting system of
canals] * * * we should be able to send
the immense surplus produce
from nearly every part of our rich and
fertile territory to the city of
New-York at less expense than we can now
transport it to New-Orleans,
142 Ohio Arch. and Hist.
Society Publications.
and be able to return with groceries and
other heavy articles of common
necessity at one third of the expense we
are now compelled to pay for
the transportation of the same up the
Mississippi and Ohio rivers
* * *"
Another phase of western opinion was the
demand for fed-
eral action. In the Inquisitor for
October 30, 1821, a writer who
signs himself "H." discussed
the importance of removing ob-
structions to the navigation of the Ohio
and Mississippi rivers;
and the improbability of success through
state action, as shown
by the failure of the plans for a canal
around the Falls of the
Ohio at Louisville, through interstate
jealousy and mismanage-
ment:
"The immense benefit that would
arise to the nation from an un-
obstructed navigation of these two
immense rivers of the Western
country, the Ohio and Mississippi, is so
palpable to every person
acquainted with the geography of our
country and with the state of the
population west of the Alleghany
mountain, that I should suppose the
subject worthy of the consideration of
congress. * * * [The West]
must now look to the enlightened
advocates of internal improvements in
the national legislature for
assistance."
"Dion," writing on "The
Interests of the West," in the Cin-
cinnati Gazette during the summer of 1819, was more insistent.
He complains that while the West is the
source of much of the
federal revenue, it receives too small a
share of the expenditures,
and demands improvement of western
commercial outlets at the
hands of Congress:
"Let any person cast his eye on the
map and trace the line formed by
the Apalachicola, and the Allegheny,
into Pennsylvania, and thence to
lake Erie, and he will see at once what
proportions of country pay and
what receive the national
revenue. - On the one side are cities, harbors,
roads, public works of every
description, and an old, well cultivated
country; on the other, an immense
wilderness, interspersed with a few
infant, tho' flourishing towns, but
generally peopled by emigrants yet
struggling with the hardships of first
settlements, felling the forests
around them, building their rude cabins,
toiling industriously for sub-
sistence [sic], with no money to spare
even for the comforts of domestic
life, much less for those public
improvements so important to the pros
perity of any country. From every corner
of both these sections the
public revenue is collected, and where
is it distributed? * *
Ohio History and National
History. 143
" * * * This we do expect, and have a right to claim, that some
part of the revenue shall be employed on
public improvements among us.
Several objects of this sort might be
mentioned; I will name one, per-
haps of more immediate consequence than
any other; it is a continuance
of the National Road from Wheeling to
St. Louis. * * * Besides the
money distributed in payment for the
labor, it would lay open to market
the very heart of this country, and
scatter riches along its sides through-
out its whole extent. None, who have not
experienced the difficulty of
our roads can form any idea of its
importance. * * *"
The effect of inferior transportation
facilities on prices of
western produce can be made clear by a
few quotations. During
the winter, when the navigation of the
Mississippi was closed,
prices soared in the New Orleans
market. When the spring
freshets came, the vast quantities of
produce which reached the
city glutted the market and depressed
prices, often to a point
below the cost of production. The Supporter (Chillicothe) of
January 13, 1819, prints the following
extract from a letter
written at New Orleans on December 21,
1818:
"Flour very scarce and is worth 15
and 20 dollars per barrel, as in
quality. Pork is also scarce and sells
at 20 and 23 * * *."
On the sixteenth of the following June
the same paper quotes
New Orleans prices of May 24 as follows:
"Flour, 1st quality, 5.50 per bbl.
Flour, 2d quality, 5.00 per bbl.
Hams and bacon, per lb., .10.
Lard, per lb., .09.
Corn meal, ber bbl., 3.00."
In no way can the rise of protectionism
be made clear so
well as by extracts portraying actual
conditions and contem-
porary sentiment. A starting point is
found in the belief that
too many articles of foreign manufacture
were imported in ex-
change for the products of the farms, so
that the state was
drained of money to settle the balance
of accounts. Such is the
view of Governor Worthington in
advocating the encouragement
of manufactures, in 1818:
"* * * The continued importation of
foreign manufactured arti-
cles is producing the worst effects on
the country. To this cause * * *
144 Ohio Arch. and
Hist. Society Publications.
may be attributed in a great measure the
extraordinary scarcity of
money, so universally felt among us * *
* When we consider the
great abundance of the raw materials we
possess to manufacture most
of the clothing necessary for our
comfort and convenience, and the state
of improvement of our own manufactures,
it is to be deeply regretted
that our fellow citizens should give a
preference to foreign manufactured
articles, generally inferior to those we
can, and do make of the same kind
at home: the result must be a state of
dependence and embarrassment,
producing the worst consequences on the
country."
The low prices of western produce during
the years follow-
ing the panic of 1819 show plainly why
the farmers were eager
for measures which would improve markets
and raise prices.
Conditions may be imagined from the
following quotations given
in the Cincinnati Inquisitor and
Advertiser for May 29, 1821:
"Prices in market this morning:
Flour $1 per cwt.; Eggs 4c per
doz. Hams 4c per lb.; beef same, choice
pieces; inferior 2c. Butter
8c. corn meal, bu., 20c Lard 4c Oats 16c
bu., Potatoes, 37c Pork, choice
pieces 3c, inferior 2c"
The inference drawn from continued low
prices was that
there was overproduction in agriculture,
and that more of the
productive energy of the country should
be devoted to manu-
factures. A typical view is that of an
anonymous contributor to
the Cincinnati Advertiser of
January 27, 1823:
"* * * It appears pretty evident
that there is already too much
[1]and under cultivation, witness the
price of its produce. What use can
there be in cultivating land when its
produce cannot find a market * * *
does not the fact speak trumpet tongued
to the people of the United
States? Does it not prove, to a moral
certainty, that the time is arrived
that they should turn their attention to
manufactures, when it evidently
appears that the produce of what land is
already under cultivation cannot
command a market to advantage? * * *
Yes, we say, now is the
time for the ranks of the manufacturer
to increase. Agriculture has
been pursued to its acme. The number
employed in it is disproportionate
to that of the mechanical branch-and the
true interest of the whole
community will be promoted by producing
an equilibrium between them."
Much effort was made to encourage
domestic manufac-
tures by appeals to public sentiment and
exhortations to the peo-
ple to patronize home industry wherever
possible. As an ex-
ample the following is taken from the Greensburgh
Gazette:
Ohio History and National
History. 145
"Domestic Manufactures, are in
everybody's mouth--but not on
everybody's back. Less talk and more
action would look better. He that
wears a suit of homespun, does more to
encourage domestic manufactures
than the whole herd of scribblers, who
write so zealously on the subject.
What is to hinder a club * * * of
citizens, from throwing in from
10 to 50 dolls. a piece, and sending an
agent to Steubenville for domestic
cloths to the amount, to be distributed
in due proportions amongst the
club? This might be made into coats and
pantaloons for the approaching
winter, and would be of more real
advantage to society, than all the
abuse that could in a year be heaped on
agents, brokers and merchants,
by those who wear their stuffs * *
*."
"This," comments another paper
(Supporter), "looks like
doing business * * *. It is to be hoped
that other districts of
country may imitate the above patriotic
example--it will be
the only effectual way to prevent our
money travelling over the
mountains for English cloths--and will
teach storekeepers,
through the medium of their interests,
that it will be better for
them to sell domestic cloths than none *
* * ." The popular
fancy for imported goods was not to be
corrected by voluntary
action, however, and the friends of home
manufactures became
convinced of the necessity of political
action. The friends of
home manufactures, moreover, included by
1824 the bulk of the
population of the Ohio Valley, who were
ready to declare, with
the governor of Pennsylvania, that
"the limited demand for, and
consequent low prices of, our
agricultural products in foreign
markets, cannot fail to suggest the
necessity as well as the policy
of promoting domestic manufactures,
which, if properly en-
couraged, would provide a sufficient
home market for all our
surplus produce * * * ."
The extracts quoted will serve as some
illustration of how
the topics of internal improvements and
the tariff might be illus-
trated on the Ohio side during the
decade from 1815 to 1825.
The other topics of the period indicated
in the caption can, of
course, be similarly treated. The
citations given, moreover, can
doubtless be improved upon, for the
problem is chiefly one of
selecting the most suitable material
from the abundance which is
available.
Vol. XXV- 10
146 Ohio Arch. and Hist.
Society Publications.
OHIO AND THE NATION SINCE THE CIVIL WAR.
The discussion of the question,
"How Ohio History illus-
trates our National History in the
Period Since the Civil War?"
presents a problem quite different from
that of the earlier peri-
ods. In the first place, the passing of
the States' Rights theory
and the national enthusiasm which the
war engendered tended
to submerge state interests in those of
the nation. Further, quick
and easy means of transportation and
communication have led
the people of all the states to the East
or the West, to the North
or the South, on the trail of better
economic opportunities. Peo-
ple move hither and yon so often they
hardly know to what state
they do belong, and state history,
particularly here, in the chief
pathway between the East and the West,
has ceased to have any
particular individuality.
Then, secondly, the very nature of this
later period in our
national life makes it the most
difficult of all for the young stu-
dent to understand, and it is in the
interest of the young student
especially that this discussion has been
undertaken. The Ohio
Company and the Indian treaties, the
National Road and the
"Walk-in-the-Water," Webster's
defense of the Union, the un-
derground railroad, Lincoln's
"homely, honest arguments for
laws and humanity," all make a
clear and direct appeal, and the
young student grasps them with avidity.
But the protection of
business, government as a means for
making secure the produc-
tion and accumulation of wealth, whether
or not a certain tariff
was helpful to the laborer, the question
of money in politics, of
"invisible government" - these
do not touch young people. Eco-
nomic questions and political machinery
have not the romantic
and emotional interest that pioneer life
and the earlier ethical
problems have. Of course the history we
have been making in
the last fifteen years or so is going to
be, already is, a rich period
for the secondary school teacher.
"Curbing the trusts," "con-
servation of natural resources,"
"health protection," "how the
other half lives," "the cry of
the children," "the shame of the
cities," "those that knock at
our door," are all watchwords of a
new crusade, a new emancipation program,
that has much of the
fervor of the old anti-slavery days. And
just now the United
Ohio History and National
History. 147
States on the outer edge of a world war
makes absorbing history
But my effort has been to find what
there may be in our own
state history to make real and
illuminate for boys and girls the
rather barren period from the Civil War,
say, to the Spanish
War.
A state that has furnished six out of
ten Republican candi-
dates for the presidency, besides many
other favorite sons and
the greatest president-maker of our
history, and elected its candi-
date five times in forty years, has
surely been "in politics" and
must have some stories to tell of her
experiences there. I think
it is no exaggeration to say that in no
state have more exciting
political games been played than right
here in Ohio. The con-
tested election of 1876 is made
especially vivid by a study of the
conduct of Governor Hayes during those
long trying months.
In the newspapers of the day (I have
examined the State Journal
and the Cincinnati Enquirer as
representing the two extremes of
opinion) the governor is shown going
quietly on with the state's
business, not once expressing the least
personal ambition or ani-
mosity. Even the Enquirer, bitter
to the point of vindictiveness
against the "Eight to Seven
Tribunal," as it calls the Electoral
Commission, and especially hard on
Justice Bradley, speaks as
follows of the governor on the occasion
of his visit and address
to a Bar Association in Cincinnati, on
February 12, 1877:
"Throughout all the trying hours
since and before the election,
Governor Hayes has done nothing to
forfeit the respect of his fellow
citizens. He has some wicked partners,
though, and if he would only
say to the conspirators who are seeking
to force him into an office to
which the people have not elected him,
'Be done!,' he would pass into
history as the greatest man of the
times."
Later, when the Commission had reported,
on Friday,
March 2, the same paper headlines Mr.
Hayes as "Joe Bradley's
man Friday;" and when it reports
his taking of the oath of office
on Saturday evening, March 3, because
there was thought to be
real danger in a possible interregnum,
its headlines read:
"Sworn in! In Silence, Secrecy and
Darkness! Fitting con-
summation of the Rape of the Presidency."
And then it quotes
the New York Sun as follows:
148 Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
"These are days of humiliation and
shame and mourning for every
patriotic American citizen. A man whom
the people rejected at the
polls has been declared elected
President of the United States through
processes of fraud. A cheat is to sit in
the seat of George Washington."
I believe any normal Ohio boy would feel
that to be a sort
of challenge and want to get to work and
find out if it were
true that Ohio had had one more
president than was rightfully
hers.
It does not matter at all to what conclusion he comes;
that will probably depend on the
politics of his father; but it
will be good for him to be able to give
a reason for the faith
that is in him. Perhaps a reading of a
bit from the speech Mr.
Hayes made here at the station in
Columbus, as he took the train
for Washington on noon of March 1, will
make more vivid than
anything else the great uncertainty the
country was in up to the
very day of the inauguration:
"I understand very well the
uncertainty of public affairs at Wash-
ington. I understand very well that
possibly next week I may be with
you again to resume my place in the
Governor's office and as your fellow
citizen. [His resignation as governor
was in the hands of his private
secretary to be presented if he were
declared elected president.] I also
understand that it is my duty to be at
Washington prepared to assume
another position, higher and more
responsible and with much more
difficult duties."
Ohio furnishes illuminating material in
this period, also, on
the struggle against the spoils system.
When Hayes was elected,
he was referred to in the Enquirer as
"the angel of the post-
offices," and his firm stand for
civil service reform in his in-
augural address and later in his
messages, his contest over the
New York City postoffice and custom
house, brought forth a
huge opposition in his own party and
constant derision of "snivel
service" reform, as Conkling called
it. Today no reputable
statesman would dare speak against the
principle of the merit
system, even though his practice may be
against it, and no paper
attacks it except to show how the
opposite party is or has been
making it a farce and a pretence. It
will give a young student
some hint that at least some of our
national ideals are higher
than they used to be if he can read of
the early struggle for the
reduction of political patronage by the
men of his own state.
Ohio History and National
History. 149
Hayes started the movement against the
spoils system, Garfield
fell a victim to it, and Pendleton was
the author of the act of
1883. The speech of the latter in the
Senate is easily accessible
in Professor James' Readings in
American History.
In the seventies and eighties and
nineties, when political
contests seem to have been mere selfish
struggles of the two
great parties to get power into their
own hands, the rise of a
party of the people, of a party that
should place the interests
of the toilers, the interests of men and
women and children,
equal to or above the interests of
property, should be a subject
of study in every high school class in
history. Ohio furnishes
almost a complete sequence of events
from the famous conglom-
erate convention held in Cincinnati in
May, 1891, when the first
People's Party was born, to the days of
the Progressive Party
of 1912. Here is a description of the
convention of 1891 from
the Ohio State Journal of May 20,
1891:
"Perhaps never in the history of
politics were there gathered
together a more incongruous body than
that which yesterday morning
began its sessions at Cincinnati. There
is not one element whose ideas
are not violently antagonized by half a
dozen other elements and no two
elements probably that agree exactly
upon the same thing. Here, for
instance, are the various Farmers'
Alliances, representing a vast class of
men who recognize a day's work of anyone
in their employ as beginning
as soon as the dew is off the grass and
lasting as long as one can see in
the evening, meeting with the Knights of
Labor and hundreds of indus-
trial unions whose cardinal idea is the
reduction of a day's work to
eight hours.
"Here are the enthusiastic Kansas
men demanding above all other
things the organization of a new
political party, yet seeking to coalesce
with the cunning Bourbon politicians of
the South who have no use for
Farmers' Alliances or anything of the
sort except as they may be used
for putting the old Democratic party in
power.
"Here are the laboring men of the
North, East, and West, who
know more keenly than they have ever
known before that the very life
breath of American industry is involved
in maintaining the principle of
protection, yet striving in some way to
strike hands with cranky 'doc-
trinaires' on one side and Jefferson
Davis's principles on the other, whose
devotion is as fanatical as a
Mussulman's is for free trade.
"There are organizations which look
with undisguised contempt
upon all the machinery of secret
rituals, grips and pass words, yet whose
150 Ohio Arch. and Hist.
Society Publications.
members, nevertheless, are met to form a
political alliance with other
organizations into whose meetings they
cannot secure even a moment's
admittance without first giving the
necessary 'sign.'
"Here are the howling advocates of
the free and unlimited coinage
of silver trying to get cheek by jowl
with those who only want silver
restored to the place it occupied in
1873, positions which are as widely
sundered as the poles of the earth or of
the heavens.
"There are the agriculturists,
whose standing cry is against the
excessive taxation they are compelled to
pay upon their lands, meeting
in conference with the single tax men,
whose one idea is that all taxes
of every description should be levied
upon and raised from land. * * *
If there is anything that marks all
these various organizations it is the
intense spirit of socialism that
distinguishes them all. With one accord
they believe, each for itself, however,
that its peculiar views must be
placed upon the whole community through
the mischievous instrumentality
of legislation. * * *
"Will the Cincinnati meeting result
in placing a new party in the
field? It is not at all unlikely that
the preliminary steps thereto will at
least be taken. * * * And what will it
all amount to? Well, new
party or not, these seething elements of
unrest and discontent will un-
settle and disturb all political
calculations until after the presidential
election of 1892."
Surely the "times were out of
joint", and there
"Each sufferer said his say, his
scheme of the weal and woe."
A
few selections from the
platform adopted at Cincinnati
might be added:
"We believe the time has arrived
for the crystallization of the
reform forces of our country and the
formation of what should be
known as the People's Party of the
United States of America.
"We demand the free and unlimited
coinage of silver.
"Believing in the doctrine of equal
rights, especial privileges to
none, we demand that taxation, national,
state, or municipal, shall not be
used to build up one class or interest
at the expense of another.
"We demand a just and equitable
system of graduated tax on in-
comes.
"We demand the most rigid, honest
and just national control and
supervision of the means of public
communication and transportation,
and if this control and supervision does
not remove the abuses now
existing, we demand the government
ownership of such means of com-
munication and transportation.
Ohio History and National
History. 151
"We demand the election of the
President, vice-president and
United States senators by the direct
vote of the people."
Resolutions for universal suffrage
(woman suffrage), the
abolition of the liquor traffic, and
against great combinations in
industry, were suggested but did not
carry.
In two years after this convention came
the hard times of
1893 and 1894 and one phenomenon of the
times, Coxey's army-
and its march on Washington, was an Ohio
event, and con-
temporary accounts in local newspapers,
easily accessible in li-
braries, will interest young people and
easily lead to an inquiry
into what was the trouble, what was the
real grievance.
Then comes the presidential election of
1896 with McKinley
at the head of the ticket and Mark Hanna
to prove himself the
greatest campaign director the country
has known. What called
forth his great powers at just this time
was this restless dissat-
isfaction with things as they were, the
feeling that government
was too much occupied with the
protecting of property and the
promotion of its increase and not with a
fair and just distribu-
tion of that increase. Mark Hanna stood
for the old system
was the ablest exponent of that system,
and he was the Repub-
lican campaign manager when Bryan and
the free silver issue
as by magic gathered into one great army
all the diverse elements
of dissatisfaction and made a mighty war
on things as they were.
How Mark Hanna won that campaign and
made the people wait
is one of the great stories in our
political history, and Ohio was
the great battle ground and McKinley's
front yard at Canton
was the location of the greatest siege
gun. Let me suggest this
reading from Herbert Croly's Life of
Hanna:
"The action of the Democratic
Convention took the country by sur-
prise and completely upset the
calculations and plans of the Republican
leaders. They had never suspected that
the currency issue, even if made
decisive, would entirely supersede the
tariff issue. * * * A few weeks
before the Republican Convention it
looked like plain sailing for the
Republican nominee. A week after the
Democratic Convention it looked
as if by sheer audacity and misguided
enthusiasm the Democrats had
obtained the right of way, and the Boy
Orator would be elected. * * *
No one could tell with any confidence
what effect Mr. Bryan's gallant
and strenuous appeal to the American
people would have upon the
actual vote. * * * The one thing necessary
[for the Republican man-
152 Ohio Arch. and
Hist. Society Publications.
agers] was to establish clearly and to
popularize the real meaning of the
demand for the free coinage of silver
and the real necessity of an
assured standard of value. * * * The
manifest duty of the Republi-
can National Committee was that of
explaining to the voters the meaning
of the Democratic platform and
convincing them of its palpable error.
It was confronted, that is, literally
and exclusively by a campaign of
education, or better, of instruction. *
* *
"One of the major necessities of
the campaign as a whole was the
adoption of some measure which would
counteract the effect of Mr.
Bryan's stumping tour, a tour that
covered a large part of the country
and aroused great popular sympathy and
interest. Of course the counter
move was to keep Mr. McKinley's
ingratiating personality as much as
possible before the public; but the
Republican candidate cherished great
respect for the proprieties of political
life and refused to consider a
stumping tour of his own. It was
arranged, consequently, that inasmuch
as McKinley could not go to the people,
the people must come to Mc-
Kinley. The latter abjured the stump,
but when his supporters paid him
a visit he could address them from his
own front porch. This idea was
employed and developed to the very
limit. Several times a week [accord-
ing to the papers I have examined it was
every day for several weeks]
delegations of loyal Republicans came to
Canton to pay their respects to
the candidate. The chairman of the
delegation would make a short
speech, telling Mr. McKinley a few
little truths with which he was
already familiar, and Mr. McKinley would
reply at smaller or greater
length, according to the importance of
the delegation or the require-
ments of the general campaign at that
particular juncture. These dele-
gations were not mere committees. They frequently included some
thousands of people and had to be
carried to Canton in trains of several
sections.
"* * * It is characteristic of both
Mr. Hanna and Mr. McKinley
that every detail of these visitations
was carefully prearranged. In the
first place while many of the pilgrimages
were the result of a genuine
desire on the part of enthusiastic
Republicans to gaze upon their candi-
date, others were deliberately planned
by the Committee for the sake of
their effect both upon the pilgrims and
upon public opinion. But, whether
instigated or spontaneous, Mr. McKinley
always had to know just what
the chairman was going to say. The
general procedure was about as
follows: a letter would be sent to the
National Committee or to Canton,
stating that a delegation of farmers,
railroad employees, cigarmakers,
wholesale merchants, Presbyterians or
what-not would, if convenient,
call on Mr. McKinley on such a day. An
answer would immediately be
returned expressing pleasure at the
idea, but requesting that the head of
the delegation make a preliminary visit
to the candidate. When he
appeared, Mr. McKinley would greet him
warmly and ask: 'You are
going to represent the delegation and
make some remarks. What are
Ohio History and National
History. 153
you going to say?' The reply would
usually be: 'Oh! I don't know.
Anything that occurs to me.' Then Mr.
McKinley would point out the
inconvenience of such a course and
request that a copy of the address
should be sent him in advance, and he
usually warned his interlocutor
that he might make certain suggestions
looking toward the revision of
the speech. * * * Such a course was not
calculated to produce bursts
of eloquence on the part of the chairman
of the delegation, but the can-
didate preferred to provide the
eloquence."*
An examination of the files of any paper
of that year re-
veals the truth of this account by Mr.
Croly. I quote here two
or three reports of a day's doings at
Canton as given in the Ohio
State Journal. Besides
such accounts of the day there are al-
ways extensive reports of the
candidate's speeches, some being
given in full. Rarely is there any
quotation from the speeches
of the heads of delegations, only when
some specially significant
thing was said. I take these accounts at
random. That of any
other date of September and October,
1896, would do as well:
"CANTON, OHIO, Sept. 20, 1896. In spite of rain and bad weather
people began pouring into Canton this
morning at a lively rate, and,
with the exception of yesterday [which
had been the day of the opening
of the campaign] furnished the largest
crowd of the campaign. The
first arrivals were railroad men from
the railroads entering Chicago
* * * each road having a train or more.
In all there were eleven
trains. The first one arrived at 9:15
and at intervals of 15 minutes
others arrived, the last coming at noon.
In the meantime trains from
other directions came in with loads of
people to be provided with shelter.
They were sent to various halls about
the city. Aside from the railroad
men, the delegations for the day were
Republicans from Hulton, Pa.;
two trainloads from the Carnegie steel
works at Homestead; people from
the stations between Jamestown, N. Y.,
and New Castle, Pa.; from
points on the Western New York and
Pennsylvania railroad, etc., etc.
* * * There were ten visiting
delegations of from 1000 to 6000,
utilizing 26 special trains and
estimated from 10,000 to 15,000 people.
There was a cold, drizzling rain all the
forenoon and when it ceased the
temperature fell rapidly and overcoats
were in demand. * * * After
two receptions in the Opera House the
speech making was transferred
to the McKinley lawn, part of it being
done in the rain. It was the big
delegation of railroad men, too large
for any hall, who set the example
of defying the elements. They with the
300 to 400 telegraphers who came
with them, surrounded the little
receiving stand on the major's lawn and
* Croly,
Life of Marcus Alonzo Hanna, pp. 209-216.
154 Ohio Arch. And Hist. Society Publications.
listened to and cheered the assurances
of his hearty support delivered by
their spokesman."
"CANTON, OHIO, Sept. 26. Four or five states were represented in
the day's doings, and delegations came
from between 20 and 30 towns.
* * * The delegations were so massed
that Major McKinley managed
to address them all in eleven speeches.
"The closing demonstration of the
day was that of the People's
Patriotic Club of Cleveland, the Ladies'
Marching Club and band and
other organizations of Cleveland. It included organized bodies of
naturalized Americans who were former
subjects of Bohemia, Italy,
Poland, Hungary, Germany, Afro-Americans
and first voters."
"CANTON, OHIO, October 27. Today's
demonstration was full of
beauties and features. It was notable
for a large crowd. It was notable
for the wide range of territory
represented by the visiting delegations. It
was notable for the varied interests of
the people who came.
"The demonstration began in earnest
at noon with the arrival of a
party representing three states and it
continued till dark. All that time
the McKinley residence was surrounded by
an interested crowd, shouting
and applauding the splendid delegations
which marched up the street.
All that time the air was filled with
the music of bands and at no time
was the street leading to the McKinley
home without a line of men and
women, either marching or waiting orders
to march. In the first party
were 16 coach loads from eastern West
Virginia, western Maryland, and
Martin's Ferry, Ohio. * * *
"After these came the New England
delegation under the banners
of the New England Sound Money Club.
This party occupied a special
train of six sleepers and two dining
cars and was on the way from
2 o'clock Monday afternoon until 2
o'clock this afternoon. The party
came largely from Boston, but a number
of other New England towns
were represented. It was composed of
former Democrats as well as
Republicans, and one of the men
presented to Major McKinley was
introduced as one who had for over fifty
years voted nothing but the
Democratic ticket, but who this year
will vote for McKinley and Hobart."
The demand for the popular election of United
States sen-
ators expressed in the People's Party
platform at Cincinnati in
1891 grew steadily and our history
pupils now have to study the
consummation of that demand in the
seventeenth amendment.
Perhaps some of the reasons for that
demand might be found
by them in reading the following account
of the election of Sen-
ator Hanna by the Ohio legislature in
January, 1898. This is
also from Croly's Life of Hanna:
Ohio History and National
History. 155
"During the five intervening days
Columbus had been the scene of
probably the most embittered and
desperate fight ever developed by
American party politics. The action of
the Republican malcontents in
combining with the Democrats to defeat
Mr. Hanna had taken the state
by surprise. His election had been
considered secure. An extraordinary
outburst of indignation followed. The
whole state was in an uproar.
Mass meetings were held in the great
majority of towns and cities all
ever Ohio to denounce the traitors and
their treachery. The meeting in
Cleveland was attended by eight thousand
people. Vigorous measures
were taken to make these protests felt
in Columbus. Delegations were
sent to the capital from many parts of
the state and particularly from
those counties whose representatives
were members of the conspiracy.
The delegates from Cleveland included
one hundred of the most con-
spicuous business men in the city.
"Columbus come to resemble a
mediaeval city given over to an angry
feud between armed partisans. Everybody was worked up to a high
pitch of excitement and resentment.
Blows were exchanged in the hotel
and on the streets. There were threats
of assassination. Timid
feared to go out after dark. Certain
members of the Legislature were
supplied with body-guards. Many of them
never left their rooms. De-
tectives and spies who were trying to
track down various stories of
bribery and corruption were scattered
everywhere. * * *
"The excitement was caused, not
merely by indignation and re-
sentment, but by the fact that the
decision one way or the other would
depend on the votes of a very few men.
Mr. Hanna required four addi-
tional votes * * * assuming, of course,
that he could keep all of his
existing supporters. The most extraordinary efforts were made,
con-
sequently, to capture these doubtful
men. For instance, among the As-
semblymen who had stayed away from the
Republican caucus was John
E. Griffith, of Union County. He had
announced definitely soon after he
reached Columbus that he would not vote
for Mr. Hanna. Prior to the
time of this declaration he had been
living at the Neil House, the Hanna
headquarters; but on the day of the
announcement he suddenly disap-
peared, and Mr. Hanna's friends were
unable to locate him. If they
could get at him they thought they could
do something with him, because
his constituents had been outraged at
what they regarded as his treachery,
and had been passing resolutions
denouncing him and calling upon him to
redeem his pledge. Finally it was
discovered that the man had been
drugged or intoxicated, and concealed in
the rooms of the McKisson
men at the Southern Hotel. At the same
time they learned that Griffith
was weakening and was scared by the
denunciations which had been
showered upon him. So one night a
carriage was sent to the rear of the
Southern Hotel, and both Mr. Griffith
and his wife were brought back
rapidly and secretly to the Neil House.
There they were kept under
lock and key-not only for the remainder
of the night but until the day
156 Ohio Arch. and Hist.
Society Publications.
of the first ballot. It was feared that
an attempt would be made to
abduct them, and as a matter of fact
certain partisans of McKisson did
attempt to force their way to the room.
"In the meantime the friends of Mr.
Hanna were busily circulating
a paper, absolutely pledging its signers
to vote for him. The great ma-
jority of the signatures were readily
obtained; but the pledges of the
last two or three men, necessary to
assure his election came hard. A
negro Representative from Cleveland
named Clifford gave a great deal
of trouble, and required constant
solicitation and surveillance, although
he signed and voted true to his
signature. By one or two o'clock in the
morning previous to the day of the
ballot the pledges of seventy-two
legislators had been secured.* * *"
The vote of at least seventy-three was
necessary to a choice,
and here Croly has an account of
how the seventy-third vote
was secured:
"On Tuesday, January 11, the two
Houses balloted separately; Mr.
Hanna received seventeen votes in the
Senate and fifty-six in the House.
On that day the total number of McKisson
supporters was only sixty-
eight, one Democrat being absent and
three bolting the caucus nominee.
But the anxiety was not yet over. It
required a joint ballot to assure the
result, and one deserter would spoil
everything. The seventy-three Hanna
legislators went to the State House
under the protection of Mr. Hanna's
friends. Armed guards were stationed at
every important point. The
State House was full of desperate and
determined men. A system of
signals was arranged and operated so
that Mr. Hanna and his friends at
the Neil House could be informed of the
progress of the ballot. The
seventy-three voted as they had voted
the day before against seventy
for McKisson. A white handkerchief waved
violently by a man on the
steps of the State House gave notice to
Mr. Hanna, who was watching
anxiously at a window, that he was
elected."*
I believe these suggestions are
sufficient to show that there
is much material in the recent history
of Ohio that can be used
to illuminate and make real many
movements of our national
history. Any library that has a file of
local newspapers fur-
nishes admirable material. For instance,
the comments I have
found concerning the first compulsory
education law passed by
our legislature, in 1877, make
entertaining reading and throw a
great light on the distance we have
traveled since that date. If
teachers all over the state would just
open their eyes to it, abun-
dant material would be found at their
command.
* Croly, Life of Marcus Alonzo Hanna,
pp. 255-259.
OHIO HISTORY AND
NATIONAL HISTORY.
OHIO HISTORY TEACHERS' ASSOCIATION.
At a meeting of the Ohio History
Teachers' Association, held
in April, 1915, a committee was
appointed to consider the pub-
lication of one or more volumes
pertaining to the history of the
state. This committee decided that it
would be wise to make a
beginning by collecting a series of
extracts from the sources in
such a way as to make clear the part the
state has taken in impor-
tant phases of the history of the
country at large. A handy vol-
ume of such material, it was believed,
would afford excellent col-
lateral reading for high school students
of United States history,
and would serve to quicken the student's
appreciation of the his-
tory of his own state without danger of
giving distorted ideas of
the state's importance, such as might
result from studying purely
local history. It was believed that high
school teachers would
welcome such an addition to the
collateral reading resources of
their classes, and that the volume would
not be without attrac-
tions for the citizen who is interested
in the history of nation and
state. The work of preparing the volume
is now well under way,
and it is hoped that it may be completed
without undue delay.
The collaborating committee is composed
of Professor J. E.
Bradford, Miami University, Professor C.
L. Martzolff, Ohio
University, Miss Juliette Sessions, East
High School, Columbus,
Professor E. J. Benton, Western Reserve
University, and Pro-
fessor H. C. Hockett, Ohio State
University, chairman.
Chiefly to give an idea of what might be
done in such a
book, three members of the committee
prepared papers which
were read at a session of the
Association held October 21st, 1915.
The main portion of these papers are
given here. The first is
by Mr. Bradford, the second by Mr.
Hockett, and the last by
Miss Sessions.
(135)