INTER-STATE MIGRATION AND THE MAKING
OF
THE UNION *
BY DR. EDWIN ERLE SPARKS
President Emeritus of the
Pennsylvania State College
I hear the far-off voyager's horn;
1 see the Yankee's trail, --
His foot on every mountain-pass,
On every stream his sail.
. . . . . . . . .
Behind the scared squaw's birch canoe,
The steamer smokes and raves;
And city lots are staked for sale
Above old Indian graves.
I hear the tread of pioneers
Of nations yet to be;
The first low wash of waves, where soon
Shall roll a human sea.
In such words does the good poet, John
Greenleaf
Whittier, picture the onward march of
civilization
across the North American continent;
the building of a
nation while conquering an empire.
I can fancy the poet writing that
poem. On the
desk before him lay an eagle's quill
which some ad-
mirer had sent him from the Lake
Superior region.
It had been made into a pen, and as the
poet looked
at it, he said, "But yesterday the
eagle was mon-
arch of the north-west: to-day comes
man, plucks a
quill from the eagle, and fashions it
into a pen. So
civilization treads upon the heels of
savagery."
* Annual address at meeting of the Ohio
State Archaeological and
Historical Society, September 9, 1922.
(295)
296 Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications Behind the scared squaw's birch canoe, The steamer smokes and raves; And city lots are staked for sale Above old Indian graves. In the onward march of the people across the con- tinent, in a thousand different valleys, at the foot of a |
|
thousand different mountains, beside a score of water- falls, at the great meeting places -- the great places where the paths converge -- there have been enacted the countless different incidents making up this great drama that we call our national history. I come this afternoon to this, my own country, and, |
Interstate Migration and the Making
of the Union 297
please let me say, to you, my own
people and Ohioan
kindred, to address you briefly on a
certain phase of the
sociological aspect of our national
history. Had I been
sufficiently versed in political
history, I might have
chosen a topic which would have been
more to your in-
terest, perhaps, than the one I have
selected. Had I
followed the local history of my native
state as closely
even as I have pursued that of the states
in which I
have been resident since leaving you, I
might have
hoped to add something to the splendid
collection of
local data your Society is making. But I must choose
as I can and speak to you on the
unification of the
American people through free migration
and inter-
state communication. In this aspect of our national
history, Ohio has been foremost; first
in respect to her
geographical situation; next in the
contributions she
has made to sister states, and
especially in the fact that
she has been the repository of some of
the best blood
that was produced on the Atlantic Coast
Plain and the
heritage of the finest intellectual and
moral standards
that have crossed the barrier of the
Alleghenies.
This remarkable Plain varies in width
from fifty to
two hundred miles. In it are located
Concord and Lex-
ington, Valley Forge and Yorktown. Upon
it were en-
acted the stirring events that marked
the birth of the dif-
ferent colonies. Here the people
recruited their strength
for the march across the
continent. If you will re-
member, it took about four generations
to produce the
men who fought the Revolutionary War.
George Wash-
ington was the fourth of the
Washingtons in America.
John Adams was the fourth of the
Adamses. Samuel
Adams the same. It is true that some
men, like Robert
Morris, the great financier of the
American Revolu-
298
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications
tion, had no American ancestry. Morris was born in
England. But, generally speaking, on this Atlantic
Coast Plain were bred three generations
of men who
were preparing this land of ours for
freedom. For two
hundred years these English, German,
and Dutch
colonists cast eager eyes toward the
West; beyond them
towered the summits of the great
Appalachian system,
barring the way to the West; while the
French in their
swift canoes, through the great lakes
and over a dozen
different portages to the Mississippi,
simply cut a half
circle around them from Quebec to New
Orleans. But
by and by the English began with
uncertain steps to
feel their way by numerous waterways
and passes
across the mountains.
If I had here a map of the United
States, I would
call your attention to the fact that
the first routes across
the mountains were along navigable
waters, illustrat-
ing one great point in local history in
its relation to
national history, -- that the waterways
were the natural
highways. The Hudson and Mohawk to the
north, the
Potomac and Monongahela in the middle
and the James
to the headwaters of the Tennessee and
Cumberland to
the southward offered a ready-made
passage way to
the waters of the Mississippi Valley.
It is interesting to notice that there
is today a great
railway trunk line along each of these
first routes. Our
forefathers, groping their way across
the continent,
chose the lines of least resistance for
their routes. In
time the waterway gave way to the post
road. It gave
way to the canal, and the canal gave
way to the rail-
way. Today along the Hudson and Mohawk
rivers
we have the New York Central and Hudson
River Rail-
road, which goes far to the west; the
West Shore Road
Interstate Migration and the Making
of the Union 299
paralleling it. Along the middle route, we have the
Pennsylvania system and the Baltimore
& Ohio sys-
tem, and farther to the south, along
the southern route,
we have the Chesapeake and Ohio Road.
These great
trunk lines follow in large part the
early pathways
traced by the pioneers.
If I had the frontier line of 1790
portrayed upon a
map before me, you would find one
protuberance of
people (if I may so use the term)
running up the Con-
necticut river, another running up
along Lake Cham-
plain, a third down through
Pennsylvania encompassing
the present city of Pittsburgh, and a
fourth running
out along the head waters of the
Tennessee and Cum-
berland rivers. These were the early routes to the
north and west, and each projection was
caused by the
presence of a waterway.
The frontier has always moved fastest
in the middle
and slowest on the sides. This may be illustrated by
a stream which flows fastest in the
middle, because the
current is retarded by the banks on
either side. It may
be illustrated still further by the
fact that throughout
the middle of our continent there lay
ready-made to the
use of these pioneers a continuous
waterway. If in
your mind's eye you will trace the
Potomac to its source,
you will remember that it rises very
nearly at the head-
waters of the Ohio river, requiring a
portage of no
great distance to unite the two
waterways. When we
once reach the Ohio it has a slightly
southern turn, but
in due time on the bosom of that river
we shall reach
the Mississippi in the west. The Mississippi River
from the mouth of the Ohio to the mouth
of the Mis-
souri has a northwestern turn. Following the Mis-
souri and the Kansas or Kaw River we
are carried due
300
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications
west again until we come to the present
situation of
Topeka. Consequently, in the early days, before we
had so completely stripped the land of
timber and in-
jured our navigable streams, we had
navigable water
from the Atlantic to the heart of our
national domain.
Over half the continent was traversed
by the almost
continuous streams named above.
The frontier life which made use of
these routes of
travel produced the American
character. Along the
northern route passed the settlers,
under Moses Cleave-
land, to found the city of that name --
the pioneers in
the territory of the Connecticut
Reserve. Along the
middle route went the pioneers who
founded the city of
Marietta, the first settlement in the
Northwest Terri-
tory. Farther to the south, through the
great Cumber-
land Gap, which someone has well called
the "Gate-
way to the West," came in the
early days, Daniel Boone,
and other pioneers. Colonel Durret, of
Louisville, had
Daniel Boone's rifle; that is, he
always claimed it was
Daniel Boone's rifle. If it is not his
rifle, it is just as
good; because it shows the kind of
rifle that men like
Daniel Boone used to carry. Standing
the butt of the
rifle upon the floor, the end comes
just between the eyes
of a man of my stature. And you may
still see upon
the barrel the hammer marks where it
was fashioned
by hand. With these long rifles, with
nothing but the
bullet pouch, the powder horn and a bag
of parched
corn, the pioneer felt his way across
the mountains,
blazing his path with tomahawk marks on
trees, so that
he might find his way back to
civilization. And these
are the pioneer fathers of ours --
Cleaveland at the
north, Putnam in the middle, Boone,
Robertson and
Donaldson on the south -- what a host
of names flock
Interstate Migration and the Making
of the Union 301
to the lips as one thinks of these
Columbuses of the land,
as they really were. These pioneers, who always
figured largely in local history, went
out into the ad-
venturous West, depending solely upon
the power of
might, and taught us the great national
trait of self-
dependence. If I wanted to take national types, I
should take such local types as I have
indicated crossing
the mountains.
As illustrating later times I should
take the case of
John Calhoun, a type in local history
before the type
in national history. Calhoun's
grandfather was scalped
by the Indians far in the uplands of
Virginia, and Cal-
houn showed that invincible hatred
toward the Red man
which paved the way toward the almost
extermination
of the Indian during his administration
as Secretary of
War.
Going northward to the middle West, I
should
choose Henry Clay as a type. He was a
product of local
history; born in Virginia, the son of a
dissenting
clergyman. If he had lived in Virginia he would al-
ways have been under an aristocratic
ban. His father
belonged to the dissenting church; he
was a Baptist,
and was not permitted to use the
churches of the es-
tablished religion. He preached often
under the great
trees of Virginia to congregations
coming miles in their
wagons to worship in God's first
temples. His son,
Henry Clay, born in aristocratic
Virginia, migrated
across the mountains and came into
democratic Ken-
tucky, and there he found others on the
same plane as
himself. When he reached Kentucky as a
young man
it was still the frontier. He said, in
later life, he could
remember in those days how much the
hunters depended
upon their rifles. One had to shoot his
way into
302 Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society
Publications
politics in
Kentucky. He himself told of entering
his
first campaign. He said, "I was a candidate for the
State Legislature,
and one day I came upon a party of
men firing at a
target, and before I knew it I was drawn
into the group. I had been bred in a lawyer's office
and had never
learned to use the rifle; but one of the
party said, 'Here's
Harry Clay; he is a candidate for
the Legislature: let
Harry Clay try a shot.' I tried to
get out of it. I
said, 'Gentlemen, if I had my own gun
here I would shoot
with you.'" In truth, he did not
own a gun. "One
of the hunters then held up his gun.
'Here is Old Bess',
he said, 'if you can not shoot with
Old Bess you could
not shoot with your own gun.' Not
willing to give
offense, Clay said, 'I took the gun, and
I aimed about where
I thought the target was; I shut
my eyes and pulled
the trigger.' A great shout went
up. I had hit the
bull's-eye right in the center exactly.
One said, 'Harry
Clay, that is an accident: you do that
again.' He said, 'When the rest of you have done
that well, I will do
it again.'"
As we go on toward
the West we get more of
these types. If I
wanted a type of the pioneer of the
middle West, I
should go no farther than that first
great original
American, Abraham Lincoln. Suppose
Lincoln had been
born and reared over on the Atlantic
Coast Plain; suppose
he had inherited for three or four
generations the
instincts of that plain, reflected as those
instincts were from
the Old World. But he was
born
and raised on the
western frontier. Reared
without
that inheritance and
without those eastern surround-
ings, he became an
original American because he was
separated by the
Appalachian Mountains from the
European environment
of the Atlantic Coast Plain.
Interstate Migration and the Making
of the Union 303
He was an original man. The frontiersman made
local history, and he had to be an
all-around man. Lin-
coln was an all-around man; he
learned no piece-work
on the frontier. Lincoln was a rail-splitter; he was a
postmaster; he was a soldier for a
short time; he was a
flat-boatman, and a farmer on a small
scale; a lawyer,
a statesman -- an all-around man. He often called
himself a jack of all trades. And yet,
when he became
President of the United States, he
needed above all
things to be an all-around man. The
Nation needed a
man who could be statesman, president,
diplomat, finan-
cier, soldier -- all these things; and
the compelling en-
vironment of the frontier had made
Lincoln the man
for the occasion.
What does the poet, Lowell, say?
Nature, they say, doth dote,
And cannot make a man
Save on some worn-out plan,
Repeating us by rote:
For him her Old-World moulds aside she
threw,
And, choosing sweet clay from the breast
Of the unexhausted West,
With stuff untainted shaped a hero new.
When Abraham Lincoln was climbing up
the pegs
set in the wall in the little cabin in
which he dwelt, to
sleep throughout the night in a garret
upon a bed made
of hay and fodder, it was the
compelling environment
of local history that was making a
national character.
When his mother died there in that
lonely cabin in In-
diana, there was no physician within
eighteen miles, and
she died of that unknown, indefinite
thing they called
"milk sickness," that swept
over the frontier. Some
thought it came from the cows eating a
poisonous herb
and trasmitting the poison to human
beings. Such
304 Ohio Arch. and Hist.
Society Publications
were the hardships of the frontier. If
I go still farther
west I should take Thomas H. Benton as
a type: and
as a representative of the interests of
a single state,
Stephen A. Douglas, of Illinois -- all
belonging to what
was the stump-speaking age of the
frontier.
When the history of the seventeenth,
eighteenth and
nineteenth centuries is finally summed
up, it is safe to
say that no incident will be more
marvelous than the
evolution of the American nation and
the unification of
the American people. The
exemplification of self-gov-
ernment on such a magnificent scale
must claim a large
share of attention; especially its
development on a ter-
ritory measured by thousands of miles
in extent and by
nearly a hundred million of people
dwelling contigu-
ously. The republics of Greece, the
states of Holland
and the republic of Switzerland by
contrast become
mere counties in extent and population.
Yet the success of this vast Republic
depends in the
last analysis upon the unification of
its people. In-
sularity, contiguity, intermingling,
inter-commercial
relations, freedom of movement to and
fro -- all these
have been contributory to the upbuilding
of the Repub-
lic and the conquest of the
continent. This conquest
has been accomplished in a shorter time
than that of
any other territory containing anything
like the same
extent. Above all, it has been done in
this brief space
of time without losing any of the arts
of higher civiliza-
tion.
It is to be supposed that the front line of
people on its onward march would have
become re-
duced to a lower scale of living, to a
lower standard
of ideals, and would have lost
something of the higher
ideals and standards which they had
left behind in the
older states from which they had
emigrated.
Interstate Migration and the Making
of the Union 305
A little thought of the effect of
hardships upon
human character, of the stimulating
effect of labor and
toil for subsistence, of the
development of will power
in a climate not too severe for human
life nor yet too
soft and enervating will show the
reasons for this preser-
vation of the American character and
even for the ab-
sorption of constant Nile-like deposits
of foreign con-
tributions to our racial soil. Witness the difference
between our nation, occupying a
temperate zone where
severe winters compel incessant toil
and storing of foods
during the summer season and the
over-hardships of
the Esquimo to the north of us or the
indolent and
care-free nation on the south. Why should anyone
subject himself to toil when a dinner
may be gathered
from a tree or a drink from a cactus
plant?
Prophetic Bishop Berkeley had said in
colonial days:
"Westward the course of empire
takes its way." As
early as 1837 the French visitor to
America, De Tocque-
ville, saw the importance of this
steady westward move-
ment of the people of America and
declared that they
flowed on "like a people driven
onward by the relent-
less hand of God himself." We ourselves seemed not
to grasp the significance of this
advance until recent
times. To only a few of its aspects
will my time per-
mit me to call your attention this
afternoon.
Last autumn I stood by invitation of
your Society
and a patriotic society of the energetic
women of your
state before the house of General Rufus
Putnam, at
Marietta, to help celebrate the coming
of that noble band
of pioneers from far-off Massachusetts
to found the
first colony to the north and west of
the Ohio river.
Your Society honors itself in honoring
these historic
sites by the erection of tablets and
monuments for
Vol. XXXII--20.
306
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications
future generations to receive the
inspiration which must
come from Ohio's historic
heritage. The heroic men
and the brave and enduring women who
settled there
had crossed the fearful barrier of the
Allegheny Moun-
tains. Where once they had been held
back and cooped
up on the Atlantic Coast Plain by these
lofty mountains,
they were now cut off by them from
their friends and
relatives remaining on the coast. They were isolated
and thrown upon their own
resources. Thus was
American character developed and
initiative engen-
dered.
In order to people these new lands and
territories,
additions of population were necessary
at regular in-
tervals. Naturally there have been three sources upon
which we have drawn for increase of
state population:
1. Migrants from one state to another.
2. Importa-
tion of foreign born. 3. Birth of
children.
The first of these is the one of which
we hear little.
The second has absorbed our
attention. Transfer of
person and property from one
commonwealth to an-
other is so easily accomplished by us
as compared with
the people of the Old World that we pay
slight heed
to shifting of residence, except in the
matter of voting.
A citizen may at will pass with his
family and property
from one state to another without being
conscious of
having crossed a boundary line.
The shifting of surplus population from
the older
to the newer states has thus built up
and peopled the
civilized continent in a manner
unparalleled in history
and not likely to be equalled on any
unsettled continent
of the future. Increase of communication and of
means of transportation are responsible
for the onward
march of the people from the Atlantic to
the Pacific
Interstate Migration and the Making
of the Union 307
over a space of three thousand miles in
longitude and
nearly as great in latitude in the
brief time of two
hundred and fifty years; or, at the
most, in three hun-
dred years. From Jamestown in 1619 to California
in 1869, about the time of the
completion of the Pacific
railway lines to the coast, marks the
first span; and to
1919 the second.
The East has always been the hive from
which these
swarms of people went forth into the
new West to de-
velop it and bring its standards up to
those of the states
they left behind. "Out of the
cradle, rocking endlessly,"
sings Whitman of this spectacle. Greeley, in giving
his advice to the young idlers of the
East to "Go West,
young man," might well have said,
"Go due west," for
that is what the people have done. The
movement of
the people has been almost wholly due
west along the
same lines of latitude. Let a few statistics from a
census report bear out the statement.
Take the state of Ohio in 1900, for
example. At
that time increased means of
transportation had not
abnormally enlarged the number of
persons who mi-
grated permanently from one state to
another and gives
us a more accurate data than later
reports. In that
year there were in Ohio 215,000
American-born resi-
dents, natives of another state. Where
had they come
from? From the eastward. Due east of
Ohio lies the
commonwealth of Pennsylvania. In 1900 there were
131,000 natives of Pennsylvania
residing in Ohio, more
than from any other state, and as many
as from all the
other states together. New York furnished Ohio the
second largest number of citizens from
other states --
yet but little over one-third the
number from Pennsyl-
vania.
308
Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications
Further to the eastward lie the New
England states.
Of these Massachusetts gave 7,000 but
New Jersey,
more due east, with a population of
half a million less
than Massachusetts, more than equalled
her contribu-
tion to Ohio. Connecticut, Vermont,
Maine and New
Hampshire followed in order.
Of the South Atlantic states, Georgia
was the most
populous. How many Georgians had come
northwest
to live in Ohio? While Pennsylvania had given
131,000, or more than half the
outside-born residents of
Ohio, Georgia had sent 1,700, but
little over one per
cent as many. Virginia, the next largest southern
state and much nearer to Ohio, gave her
32,000 while
New York supplied nearly twice as many.
And it is
to be remembered that those were in
part the pre-
West Virginia days when nothing but the
Ohio river
lay between the states of Ohio and
Virginia.
If your patience will allow, let us now
examine the
due west movement from Georgia and see
whence it led
in inter-state migration. Two and a quarter million
Georgians had sought other states for
permanent resi-
dence, nearly as many as were left
within the state. Of
those migrating, Alabama had attracted
the largest
number, followed by Tennessee.
Emigration from Georgia to Texas
illustrates the
ease with which the people will leap
over intervening
lands and settle upon those that are
made attractive by
a crisis or by sudden repute. The third largest con-
tribution from Georgia was given to the
far-off state of
Texas. Here the settlers passed through Alabama,
Mississippi and Louisiana to reach the
fabulous lands
of Texas. "Texas or bust" had followed the acquisi-
Interstate Migration and the Making
of the Union 309
tion of the Mexican lands as
"Pike's Peak or bust" fol-
lowed the days of '49 and California.
With your permission I shall carry the
statistical
investigation a step further and make
inquiry concern-
ing the migration from the state
of Ohio. To the
average Ohioan, such an inquiry would
seem to be of
no avail; for what true native of Ohio
can conceive of a
man migrating voluntarily from its
prosperous and
happy limits to drag out an attenuated
existence in any
other state of the Union? Unbelievable
as it is, never-
theless, in 1900 there were 178,000
natives of the real
mother of presidents who had for one
reason or an-
other removed to Indiana and 137,000 so
short-sighted
as to have removed to Illinois. Then
followed Kansas,
Michigan and Iowa in order.
In contrast with these states lying
mostly in a west-
ern direction from Ohio, Mississippi
could boast of only
1,500 Buckeyes within her limits whilst
Texas has
nearly ten times as many. Distant Oregon had taken
nearly six times as many residents away
from Ohio as
had Louisiana. This so-called "due
westward" move-
ment is owed, as you will readily have
surmised, to cli-
matic reasons. A northern climate will attract north-
erners and a southern climate will
similarly affect south-
erners. Similar climates mean similar occupations,
similar food crops, similar
agricultural working condi-
tions and similar clothing and manner
of living. The
Ohioan migrating to Iowa finds all
these things much
the same in his new home as they were
in the home he
has left behind; but if he removes to
Mississippi or to
Maine, he finds all known customs and
practices largely
overthrown and must learn new ways of living
and of
310 Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society
Publications
working. This means loss of time and loss of wealth.
One can only guess at
the amount of money that has
been lost by adventurous
farmers, who have been suc-
cessful in raising corn
and hogs in Ohio, going to de-
velop orchards and raise
citrus fruit in Florida or in
California.
Thus I have tried to
show how the states lying to
the west have been
recruited by fresh swarm after
swarm of people who left
the eastern home hive and
"struck out for the
tall timber" of a western state or
territory with a freedom
of movement which could not
in the least be
comprehended in a European country.
This movement of the
people continued in its great task
of covering the
continent from East to West until the
front line had about
reached the Great Plains, as the
western prairies of what
is now Kansas and Nebraska
and the Dakotas were
called. Then came a sudden
turn of the tide, a
deflection of the stream which had
set in westwardly for so
many years. Gold was dis-
covered in California.
In 1840, no enumeration of
that state was made for
the region was part of Mex-
ico. In 1850, there were
nearly 100,000 people within
the bounds of modern
California and that number had
increased more than four
times over in the next ten
years.
This started a counter
movement from west to east
which in time affected
Idaho, Nevada and Arizona.
This is shown by the
fact that in 1900 there were 7,195
residents of Nevada who
were natives of California and
only 60 who had come
from Ohio. But this back fire
died out in the arid
regions between the Sierra Nevada
and the Rocky Mountains.
Now there are 88 Ohioans
living in Kansas to
every one Californian.
Interstate Migration and the Making
of the Union 311
Nor has there ever been any other
marked return
movement. The course of empire has never pursued
its way from west to east, save for
those who were dis-
satisfied with the West and returned to
some eastern
state and also naturally for those who
were given in
marriage. Ohio sent 16,762 citizens to dwell in the
state of Washington. That state
reciprocated by send-
ing 253 Washingtonians to live in the
Buckeye state. It
would, consequently, require the
migration eastward of
16,509 Washingtonians to balance the
books with Ohio.
Ohio has given to Minnesota eighteen
times as many
people as she has received from the
northwestern state.
Nor is there a difference in the
proportions of ex-
change of citizens in the southern
states. Texas has
been a pronounced offender in taking
away many citi-
zens and returning but few. From
Tennessee she drew
130,000 inhabitants and repaid that
state with 4,000.
From distant Massachusetts she
attracted 1,524 people
and gave in return one-fourth as many.
She took away
25,000 people from Illinois and repaid
for them with
3,000.
In Ohio there are 1,075 Texans residing; in
Texas 10,588 Ohioans resident.
In this interchange of people, some see
the real birth
of the unity of the Nation; the failure
of secession; the
force which has helped to overcome the
decentralizing
tendencies of various race
contributions; and the per-
petuity of the church, the schools,
newspapers and all
the higher attributes of our
civilization. Well may
one, after even such a brief and
inadequate considera-
tion of inter-state migration, have a
new conception of
that clause in our beloved Constitution
which reads,
"The citizens of each state shall
be entitled to all privi-
leges and immunities of citizens in the
several states."
INTER-STATE MIGRATION AND THE MAKING
OF
THE UNION *
BY DR. EDWIN ERLE SPARKS
President Emeritus of the
Pennsylvania State College
I hear the far-off voyager's horn;
1 see the Yankee's trail, --
His foot on every mountain-pass,
On every stream his sail.
. . . . . . . . .
Behind the scared squaw's birch canoe,
The steamer smokes and raves;
And city lots are staked for sale
Above old Indian graves.
I hear the tread of pioneers
Of nations yet to be;
The first low wash of waves, where soon
Shall roll a human sea.
In such words does the good poet, John
Greenleaf
Whittier, picture the onward march of
civilization
across the North American continent;
the building of a
nation while conquering an empire.
I can fancy the poet writing that
poem. On the
desk before him lay an eagle's quill
which some ad-
mirer had sent him from the Lake
Superior region.
It had been made into a pen, and as the
poet looked
at it, he said, "But yesterday the
eagle was mon-
arch of the north-west: to-day comes
man, plucks a
quill from the eagle, and fashions it
into a pen. So
civilization treads upon the heels of
savagery."
* Annual address at meeting of the Ohio
State Archaeological and
Historical Society, September 9, 1922.
(295)