Ohio History Journal

  • 1
  •  
  • 2
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  • 4
  •  
  • 5
  •  
  • 6
  •  

REVIEWS, NOTES AND COMMENTS

REVIEWS, NOTES AND COMMENTS

 

BY THE EDITOR

OLENTANGY RIVER

The name "Olentangy," applied to an important trib-

utary of the Scioto River, has been a puzzler to the ety-

mologists. It is said to be of Indian origin, but its root

significance has never been determined.

The statement is made in the Ohio Archaeological

and Historical Society Publications, (Vol. 6, page 93)

that this name was legalized through the interest of

Colonel Kilbourne. We are told that "in the year 1833,

Colonel James Kilbourne, then being a member of the

Legislature of Ohio, had an act passed giving Indian

names to a number of streams in central Ohio and by

that act substituted the 'Olentangy' for the then common

name of 'Whetstone'."

Colonel Kilbourne was not a member of the Legisla-

ture in 1833 but such an act was passed in that year.

Who introduced it we are not able to say. This could

probably be learned by a page to page investigation of

the Journals of the House and Senate, which in the year

1833 were very poorly indexed.

Following is the full text of the act that gave to the

river, which now bears it, the name "Olentangy."

 

AN ACT TO RESTORE THE INDIAN NAMES TO CERTAIN RIVERS AND

CREEKS WITHIN THIS STATE, AND TO CHANGE THE

NAMES OF OTHERS.

Whereas, a number of the rivers and other streams of this

state, watering extensive districts of fertile and handsome coun-

(403)