Ohio History Journal

  • 1
  •  
  • 2
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  • 4
  •  
  • 5
  •  
  • 6
  •  
  • 7
  •  
  • 8
  •  

METHODS OF TREATMENT OF SOME OF THE MORE

METHODS OF TREATMENT OF SOME OF THE MORE

COMMON DISEASES BY THE PIONEER

PHYSICIANS OF OHIO

 

By DAVID A. TUCKER, M.D.

 

As a preface to the description of the treatment of some

common diseases in the Ohio Valley a century or more ago, I

should like to sketch briefly the knowledge with which the phy-

sician of that period was equipped.

First, he was familiar with the gross appearance of body in

health and disease as anatomical studies were greatly stressed,

but knew little or nothing of microscopic structure of tissues. His

knowledge of physiology was meager and had scarcely any prac-

tical application. He was familiar with a multitude of symptoms

to which undue diagnostic significance was often attached. The

art of percussion had been developed and auscultation was intro-

duced in the early 'twenties, forming a basis for a more scientific

method of diagnosis. Laennec's works were translated into Eng-

lish and then appeared in American editions. Indeed, extensive

excerpts with critical commentary appeared in Daniel Drake's

Western Journal of the Medical and Physical Sciences.

As a rule the doctor served both as physician and apothecary;

he prepared many of his own crude drugs, made tinctures and

effusions, put up his own prescriptions and in addition taught

simple nursing procedures to friends or relative of his patients.

To give a general picture of the diseases of the country as

described 100 years ago, I quote freely from Nathaniel Potter

as follows:

With regard to our diseases, pleurisies, rheumatisms, and inflamma-

tions generally prevail during the winter in the northern states. Catarrh,

too, is common, and often terminates in the consumption; which may be

(211)