Ohio History Journal

  • 1
  •  
  • 2
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  • 4
  •  
  • 5
  •  
  • 6
  •  
  • 7
  •  
  • 8
  •  
  • 9
  •  
  • 10
  •  
  • 11
  •  
  • 12
  •  
  • 13
  •  
  • 14
  •  
  • 15
  •  
  • 16
  •  
  • 17
  •  
  • 18
  •  
  • 19
  •  
  • 20
  •  
  • 21
  •  
  • 22
  •  
  • 23
  •  
  • 24
  •  
  • 25
  •  

PLACE-NAMES IN FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO

PLACE-NAMES IN FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO

 

BY W. EDSON RICHMOND

 

Introduction

For at least three centuries it has been manifestly impossible

for any one man to "take all knowledge as his province." The

specialization brought about by the widening strain of human

knowledge is most easily seen in the fields of modern science.

Especially among the younger and smaller sciences, there is no

self-sufficiency, however, and each finds it necessary to rely upon

its sisters. So it is that place-name study, a comparatively young

field closely related to the science of linguistics, trespasses con-

tinually on the fields of the historian, the archaeologist, the geogra-

pher and sometimes even takes material from    botanists and

geologists. For, ever since Isaac Taylor published Words and

Places in 1864, the guessing about place-names which has gone

on from time immemorial has been losing face, and scepticism,

the hand maid of science, has made place-name study a true science.

Popular etymology, the ex post facto explanation of the

origin of words, has ever been the bane of the linguistic scientist.

Only by placing a strong reliance upon the findings of his brother

scientists and upon his own eyesight has the student of place-names

been able to overcome the dangers inherent in the popular explana-

tions of place-names.

The techniques developed for the study of place-names have

reached their culmination to date in the Survey of English Place-

Names conducted by the English Place-Name Society and the

Survey of Missouri Place-Names conducted by the University of

Missouri. The curious may turn to the Introduction to the Survey

of English Place-Names (1925) by Mawer and Stenton for an

explanation of the English methods, and to the Introduction to a

Survey of Missouri Place-Names published in the University of

Missouri Studies in 1933 or to Progress in the Survey of Mis-

135