BOOK REVIEWS
Lost America: The Story of Iron-Age
Civilization Prior to Columbus. By
Arlington H. Mallery. With the
assistance of Mary Roberts Harrison.
Illustrations by Paula Mallery.
Introduction by Matthew W. Stirling,
Director of the Bureau of American
Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution.
(Columbus, Ohio, and Washington, D. C.,
The Overlook Company, 1951.
xviii+238p., illustrations, maps,
tables, references, index, and appendix.
$4.50.)
This little volume has created a minor
sensation in Ohio and other parts
of the country. Many newspapers
throughout the nation have carried news
items and special feature stories of Mr.
Mallery's reported discoveries. Mr.
Mallery has continued to be active in
the field since his book appeared,
and news stories appear from time to
time of his work.
Since much of the author's evidence to
suggest that the Norse peoples were
in America centuries before Columbus
visited its shores was found in Ohio,
the state historical society has felt a
responsibility to evaluate that evidence
and Mr. Mallery's conclusions. Five Ohio
State University professors, not
on the staff of the society, were asked
to examine Lost America from the
point of view of their respective
specializations: Dr. Paul A. Varg, asso-
ciate professor of history, the history;
Dr. John W. Bennett, associate pro-
fessor of anthropology, the archaeology;
Dr. Hans Sperber, professor of Ger-
man, the linguistics; Dr. Earle R.
Caley, associate professor of chemistry, the
chemistry and metallurgy; Dr. Lawrence
A. Hoffman, assistant professor of
geography, the geography and
cartography. Their brief statements follow.--
EDITOR.
The History
This is an amazing story of a Celtic and
Norse civilization in America in
the centuries preceding the discovery of
America by Columbus in 1492.
The author is deeply aware of the fact
that this is a revolutionary thesis
which scholars will approach with a
highly sceptical state of mind.
Unfortunately, by employing unsound
historical methodology, the author
fails to meet this expected scepticism.
In a number of instances he
asks the reader to accept as fact what
is little more than daring conjecture
or, at best, theories which are still in
dispute among scholars. This is true
of his account of Pythias, in which he
asserts, as if it were a fact beyond
dispute, that this famous Greek explorer
discovered Iceland. To be sure,
285
286 Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Quarterly
there are scholars who think that this
is probably true. Vilhjalmur Stefansson
is of this opinion but also recognizes
that many able scholars have come to
a different conclusion. Among those who
have come to the opposite con-
clusion concerning the land of Thule
(Iceland) is Walter Woodburn Hyde
in his book Ancient Greek Mariners. It
would seem that the author who
asks the reader to accept such an
unorthodox thesis would take the trouble
to examine all the evidence and
especially the evidence which seems to
contradict him.
The author bases part of his case for a
well-advanced pre-Columbian
civilization in America on the
Kensington Stone. It is particularly dis-
turbing to find that he claims the
Smithsonian Institution has accepted
the famous stone as having authentic
runic inscriptions, and documents
this statement by citing an article in
the Washington Times-Herald. In sharp
contradiction to this is the statement
by F. M. Setzler, Head Curator, De-
partment of Anthropolgy, Smithsonian
Institution: "From the standpoint
of vouching for its authenticity or
disclaiming it, the Institution assumes
the position that the entire matter
needs considerable study and evaluation
by experts on runic writing before any
final opinion can be reached."
Much has been written concerning the old
stone tower in Newport, Rhode
Island. Some have held that it was built
by the Norse, while others believe
that it was built by a governor of Rhode
Island in 1675. The most scholarly
study of the problem of who built this
stone tower is that by Philip
Ainsworth Means entitled Newport
Tower. After an exhaustive examina-
tion of all the available evidence Mr. Means
comes to the conclusion that
the tower may have been built by the
Norse but that the available evidence
does not permit a definite conclusion to
this effect. Mr. Mallery makes no
reference to this excellent study by Mr.
Means. Nor does he exercise the
caution which distinguishes the writing
of Mr. Means. It is true that Mr.
Mallery cites some very pertinent and
significant evidence to support his
case, but to this reviewer, at least, it
does not warrant his conclusion that
the tower was unquestionably built by
the Celts.
Pythias may have reached Iceland, the
Norse may have left their runic
inscriptions on a stone in Minnesota,
and the Celts may have built the tower
at Newport. Indeed there is more
evidence to support these possibilities
than most historians have recognized.
Yet it is hazardous to permit in-
teresting speculations to become rather
dogmatic assertions of "fact."
One of the dangers confronting any
scholar is that he becomes so in-
trigued with his own hypothesis that he
seizes upon all evidence that can
be made to support it. This reviewer is
quite convinced that while Mr.
Book Reviews 287
Mallery has suggested some interesting
lines for further investigation he
has failed to exercise that caution and
care so necessary if the historian is
to avoid the many pitfalls awaiting
those who would try to reconstruct
the story of the past.
PAUL A. VARG
The Archaeology
Matters of archeological interest occupy
a central position in this rather
breathtaking and curious volume, for the
author proposes that the prehistoric
Indians of the eastern United States--or
at least those in the vicinity of
Chillicothe, Ohio--possessed the art of
smelting iron. Since the author
seems to show no particular familiarity
with the precise chronological and
comparative cultural knowledge gathered
by professional and hobbyist
archaeologists of the past thirty years
(for example, the word "Hopewellian"
appears not once in the entire volume,
though most of the sites discussed
belong to that ubiquitous horizon), it
is not easy to identify the Indians or
the peoples whereof he speaks, although
in the last three pages of the
book, the Old World Bronze Age, the
"New World Bronze Age," the
Aztec, Maya, Toltec, megaliths, and a
miscellany of cultural artifacts and
developments are all mentioned in some
rapid and soaring paragraphs.
The "highly civilized Iron Age
people with a history rich in human ac-
complishment" who inhabited
(eastern?) North America in pre-Columbian
times (see pages 214-215) are most
certainly missing from the pages of
the hundreds of archaeological
monographs and from all the museum col-
lections available on the area. But the
author has an explanation for this.
It seems, on page 213, that the several
generations of American archae-
ologists who have been digging (and
destroying) the mounds of the
East, "did not realize, when they
opened the furnace mounds, that they
were the relics of an industrial
civilization. The iron tools had all dis-
integrated and disappeared." Such
implications of omniscience are frequent.
The book is full of positive statements
concerning the nature and
and uses of various features the author
has excavated in Ohio mounds.
These are invariably iron furnaces, with
all the typical European furnace
features: flues, large iron bars, ore,
lime, and so forth. Some of these
statements sound as if they are verified
by independent check, but in such
cases the checkers, for example, the
Battelle Institute, have been either
passive observers or analyzers of specimens
which the author has provided
for them. There is really no independent
verification of Mr. Mallery's
assertions and conclusions, and nowhere
is there a carefully documented,
step-by-step account of the excavation
of an alleged "furnace," and analytical
288
Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Quarterly
proof of identification and
interpretation. The photographs of "furnaces"
could either be those of holes in the
ground or ambiguous inner features
of Indian mortuary mounds.
The reviewer has seen documentary
materials showing that the "iron
furnaces" for the Arledge and
Haskins mounds, described in detail by the
author, are the remains of American
pioneer-period lime kilns. Other of the
author's "iron furnaces,"
according to the drawings he reproduces in his
book, based on archaeological accounts
and excavations, are excellent speci-
mens of Hopewellian crematory
arrangements of several familiar types. The
reviewer wonders what might have
happened if the author had conducted
his researches in the Davenport, Iowa,
area, where the Hopewellian
crematory practices became really elaborate.
In an earlier chapter of the book an
additional theory is advanced, namely,
that the Vikings influenced the Iroquois
and the Fort Ancient Indians from
top to bottom. Practically everything
from the Iroquois "Nordic" ap-
pearance, and the long house, to the
interlocking scrolls on Fort Ancient
pottery are traceable to the Norsemen,
whose iron trash, as well as furnaces,
incidentally, seems to be scattered on
the hilltops of the eastern United
States. How several generations of
American historians could have over-
looked these ubiquitous Vikings is very
odd. And apparently the total
absence of historic or European
materials in Iroquois and Fort Ancient
sites, save the very late, eighteenth
and nineteenth century trade goods,
is a matter of little importance to Mr.
Mallery's theories.
The hypothesis that some American
Indians might have attempted iron
manufacture is not completely
outlandish. As a hypothesis, it deserves some
attention. But the author's methods and
approach to the problem are hardly
such as to instill much belief in the
critical reader, the smooth and persuasive
writing notwithstanding. In place of all
the "proofs," the omission of
contradictory evidence, and the piling
up of statement after statement of
"fact" without sound evidence,
one might wish for simply one single,
carefully documented and illustrated
piece of research. Each of the many
sites which are freely and confidently
labeled "iron furnaces" would require
separate and painstaking analysis and
publication before such a sweeping
and revolutionary theory could be taken
seriously. The reviewer's dis-
tinguished colleague in anthropology who
wrote an introduction to the book
might well devote some thought to these
matters also.
JOHN W.
BENNETT
Book Reviews 289
The Linguistics
In one section of his book Mr. Mallery
endeavors to show that a large
number of Scandinavian loan-words are to
be found in various Indian
idioms. Such an attempt can, of course,
only be successful if based on a
thorough knowledge of all the languages
concerned. And while I can not
properly evaluate the author's
familiarity with aboriginal American languages,
it is quite clear that his handling of
the Scandinavian word material is so un-
satisfactory that the result of his
effort must be deemed a complete failure.
In most cases the similarities he points
out are restricted to two or three
letters and even where a closer affinity
seems to exist, an examination of
his examples reveals serious errors and
inaccuracies. A word equation like
Norse kagattu-Canadian quagathoma, both
of which according to Mallery
mean "to perceive," may at a
first glance look quite impressive, but a closer
investigation shows that Cartier, from
whose vocabulary the Indian word
is taken, has quatgathoma not quagathoma
and that the meaning is given
not as "perceive," but as
"look at me" (The Voyages of Jacques Cartier,
Publications of the Public Archives of
Canada, No. 11, p. 243); however,
these inaccuracies are relatively
unimportant in comparison to the fact that
an Old Norse word kagattu, "to
perceive," simply doesn't exist. Other
words in Mallery's lists that will be a
great surprise to any student of the
Scandinavian languages are giota, "grandfather";
undlade, "leaf"; smoreise,
"fat"; krongast, "marriage";
onyta, "neck"; sa, "she"; jungum, "son";
hage, "dog"; gagaya, "dog." As
long as the author does not give his
sources, we will have to assume that
these words and a number of others
have found their way into his lists
through misreading and misinterpretations.
In general, it must be stated that the
presence of a "Norse" word in Mallery's
word lists is no guarantee that either
its meaning or its form are given
correctly.
Question to Mr. Matthew W. Stirling,
Director, Bureau American
Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution: Does
your statement in the Intro-
duction that "the author should
have the readers' full admiration for the
scholarly manner in which he has handled
so controversial a subject, and
for the way in which he has followed his
evidence no matter how far it
leads him from conventional points of
view," encompass Mallery's treat-
ment of linguistic problems? If so, I
must regretfully disagree. But perhaps
these parts of his work belong to the
portions about which you say, "This
writer suggests that the reader make his
own evaluation of the evidence
presented and draw his own conclusions."
This certainly is sound advice.
HANS SPERBER
290 Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Quarterly
The Chemistry and Metallurgy
In recent years the scientific
examination of materials found in excava-
tions has often yielded information of
considerable value to the archaeologist.
But such materials must be carefully
collected from established sites and
be properly authenticated as to their
antiquity. Even the most exact and
extensive examination of doubtful
materials will at best yield information
of questionable value, and it may yield
very misleading information. In
the opinion of this reviewer many of the
samples of materials collected
by Mr. Mallery and submitted to various
experts for chemical or metallur-
gical examination do not meet the
fundamental criteria of being carefully
collected and properly authenticated.
There is ample indication in his book
that many samples were collected in a
haphazard way without much regard
to the possibility that they may have
been intrusive or otherwise unreliable.
Hence the reported results of the
chemical or metallurgical examination of
all such samples are of questionable
value from the standpoint of the
archaeologist.
It is important also that the scientific
examination of materials from
excavations be thorough enough that no
doubt exists as to their identity.
In several places in Chapter 22 of his
book he speaks of iron slag as being
present in abundance at certain sites in
southern Ohio. But no complete
chemical analyses are shown to prove
that the samples collected from
these sites were really iron slag rather
than some other natural or artificial
material containing iron. The mere fact
that iron was found to be present
in high proportion in the samples is no
proof that they were iron slag, as
similar high proportions of iron occur
in various minerals such as hematite
or in iron rust of recent origin. It may
be that adequate chemical analyses
were actually made, but he reports only
a few percentage figures for iron
content, and these are not sufficient to
establish the identification.
Even when reliable samples of materials
from excavations are subjected
to adequate examination, the
archaeologist should exercise due caution in
drawing conclusions from the scientific
data, and he should certainly not
come to conclusions not justified by the
data at hand. In the opinion of
this reviewer Mr. Mallery frequently
errs in drawing very extensive and
very general conclusions that are by no
means justified by the meager data
he presents, even assuming that these
data are both reliable and adequate.
His descriptions of primitive iron
smelting in Europe and elsewhere
outside of the Americas are technically
acceptable, but his attempts to use
such descriptions as evidence for the
practice of primitive iron smelting
in Ohio and elsewhere in North America
do not seem at all justifiable.
Book Reviews 291
Again, the technical evidence he
presents for the existence of the practice of
melting and casting copper at an early
date in North America is important
and appears to be both sound and
adequate, but his attempt to use this as
evidence for the pre-Columbian smelting
of iron does not seem reasonable.
The simple melting and casting of a
native metal of relatively low melting
point is a very different matter from
the smelting of an ore, especially
iron ore. The second process is such a
radical technical advance over the
first that the ability to perform the
first process is by no means an indication
that the second was ever discovered.
In general, this reviewer is forced to
conclude that the chemical and
metallurgical evidence presented by Mr.
Mallery is neither reliable enough
nor adequate enough to lend any support
to his theory about the existence
of an Iron Age in pre-Columbian North
America.
EARLE R. CALEY
The Geography and Cartography
Since the end of the Wurm-Wisconsin ice
sheet (about 6500 B.C.),
there have been greater climatic changes
in the northern hemisphere than
is usually realized, but none as great
as assumed by Mr. Mallery in his
interesting but highly speculative
thesis of pre-Columbian Celtic and Norse
colonization of the southeast quadrant
of North America.
Glaciologists have considerable evidence
that about 500 B.C. the high
latitudes experienced a deterioration of
climate, with cool, wet conditions
predominating during the next millenium.
Without mentioning this, Mr.
Mallery assumes that during this period
the Celts colonized the North
Atlantic islands and parts of the North
American mainland. There is good
historical evidence that the Irish did
colonize at least Iceland and Greenland,
but the generally warm, dry period from
about 400 A.D. to the eleventh
century seems a more likely period, and
indeed the few historical evidences
date from the earlier part of this
climatically milder period, rather than
from the Roman period as hypothesized.
There is also good historical evidence
that just previous to the tenth
century the climate of the North
Atlantic area was even more genial than
today, with areas in Iceland and
Greenland then being cultivated which
today are just being uncovered by the
retreating ice sheets. During this
period the North Atlantic atmospheric
circulation was comparatively mild,
at least partially explaining how the
Vikings' small boats were able to use
the Arctic Circle route to North America
in their ninth and tenth century
voyages, and why they later shifted to
more southerly tracts during
the twelfth century and later, with the
return of stormier conditions pre-
292
Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Quarterly
ceding the return of the "little
ice age" which ended about the middle of
the nineteenth century.
Mr. Mallery's reasons for these climatic
changes and interruption of
oceanic contact between Norse Europe and
North America are highly con-
troversial. While there is evidence of
small-scale reduction and expansion
of the Greenland ice sheet in historic
times, his hypothesis of a great ex-
pansion in the width of Greenland to
bridge a central strait and cover part
of an archipelago ("Gunnbiorns
Skerries") seems far-fetched, and not
substantiated by his manipulation of a
many times copied old chart (pp.
23a, b). There is also evidence of
small-scale uplifts and downwarps in
coastal areas since the ice sheets have
been retreating, but no substantial
evidence of large-scale diastrophism in
the Denmark and Davis straits
during the recent past to explain the
recurrence of colder conditions, as
postulated by Mr. Mallery. More likely,
the return of ice-covering to the
Arctic Ocean prevented the influx of
warm currents from tropical areas,
which had modified the climate during
the fifth to eleventh century period.
The author's section on Norse maritime
activity in the northeast quadrant
of North America--Greenland,
Newfoundland, Labrador, Baffin Island--
seems better substantiated and a
contribution of importance. His speculation
about Norse knowledge of the North American
Arctic coastlands westward
to Alaska is at least plausible, as
there is some evidence that the Arctic
Ocean was largely free of ice during the
period from the fifth to the
eleventh centuries, allowing either
Norse exploration or (more likely)
Eskimo movements which the Norse became
familiar with. Later on, with
the return of ice conditions in the
Arctic Ocean, such northerly exploration
became less feasible, and the stormy
tract just south of the resurgent ice
made even regular Arctic Circle navigation
from Norway more hazardous.
In the thirteenth century there is
evidence that the Eskimos, who had not
inhabited the Greenland areas which were
settled by the Norse in the tenth
century (Eastern Settlement just west of
Cape Farewell; Western Settle-
ment 170 miles up the west coast), began
migrating southward after the
seal following the edge of the ice
sheets, and by the middle of the fourteenth
century had occupied and probably
destroyed the Western Settlement. As
the climate became worse, the Greenlanders
had become dependent or
Norwegian grain, but the visits of
supply ships became fewer and fewer
and apparently ceased altogether in the
fifteenth century, during the time
that Norway itself was passing through a
time of stress.
In discussing the Markland and Vinland
settlements, the author bases
his arguments on sound grounds, but his
speculation about large-scale
colonization in the favored southeastern
quadrant of North America--the
Book Reviews 293
Canadian Maritimes, the American Eastern
Seaboard, the American Middle
West--is interesting but certainly not
proved by his flimsy cartographic
evidence. His deciphering of copies of
supposedly old Norse maps (pp.
26a, b; 159a, b) seems a slender reed on
which to support his contention
of widespread Norse colonization in
eastern North America, and seemed
to this reviewer to better indicate the
author's geographic knowledge than
that of the Norse.
L. A. HOFFMAN
The Keystone in the Democratic Arch:
Pennsylvania Politics, 1800-1816.
By Sanford W. Higginbotham. (Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania Historical and
Museum Commission, 1952. x+417p.,
illustrations, notes, bibliography,
and index. Cloth, $3.00; paper, $2.50.)
During Jefferson and Madison's
administrations, Pennsylvania Republicans
repeatedly asserted that they formed
"the keystone in the democratic arch."
Sanford W. Higginbotham's book is a
detailed study of a complicated
period in Pennsylvania politics which
analyzes the relationships between
national and state politics,
demonstrating that the undeviating loyalty of
the Keystone State did much to buttress
the national ascendancy and prestige
of Jeffersonian Democracy. As the
subtitle indicates, however, the author
concentrates his attention on state and
local issues, thus bridging the gap
between the recent work by H. M. Tinkcom
on The Republicans and
Federalists in Pennsylvania,
1790-1801 and the older one by Philip
Klein on
Pennsylvania Politics, 1817-1832.
The major portion of the book is devoted
to a chronological presentation
of the political developments of the
period, but a secondary feature is the
analysis of changing political
techniques, so that the book becomes a
study of party politics as a method of
translating the conflicting desires
of antagonistic groups into popular
rule. Essentially, it is an examination
of the vicissitudes of the Democratic
Republicans, who dominated the
political picture from 1800 to 1816. The
regularity of their triumphs would
make monotonous reading were it not for
the fact that the period is enlivened
by internal differences over vital
issues, and spiced with intrigue, per-
sonality conflicts, and downright
political chicanery.
Aroused by the arbitrary measures of the
Federalists, the Republicans
perfected their political machinery in
Pennsylvania by 1799 when they elected
Thomas McKean as governor. Capitalizing
on the Federalist "reign of
terror," the Republicans stressed
such national issues as the passage of the
alien and sedition acts, direct
taxation, and the suppression of Fries's
"Rebellion," contrasting the
conservative features of Federalist political and
294 Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Quarterly
economic philosophy with their
principles of democracy, which emphasized
universal suffrage, frequent elections,
rotation of, and responsibility in,
office, and freedom of opinion in both
civil and religious matters. The
Federalists never overcame their
tradition of terrorism; the party's precipitate
decline in Pennsylvania was noted in
1802 by John Quincy Adams, who
asserted that Federalism was "so completely
palsied, that scarcely a trace
of it is to be discovered except in here
and there a newspaper edited by
New England men." The Federalists
become important in this study, there-
fore, only when they cooperate with
dissident Republican blocs who oppose
the policies or control of the
Republican majority in Pennsylvania.
The political history of these sixteen
years falls into two periods. The
year 1808 is not only the halfway mark
mathematically; it is also the divid-
ing point in political events. From 1799
until 1808, during Governor
McKean's three terms, the political
scene was dominated by such state
issues as constitutional reform, feuds
over patronage, the conflicting am-
bitions of party leaders, and McKean's
capacity for alienating the majority
of his original followers. In the
absence of a strong opposition to enforce
party unity, the Republicans split into
conservative and reform wings. The
majority in the legislature attacked the
prerogatives of the judiciary and
favored several amendments to the state
constitution. The conservatives,
taking the name of Constitutional
Republicans or Quids, supported the
governor, who was a former chief justice
of the state, in his opposition to
constitutional reform and to the impeachment
of supreme court judges for
their severe exercise of the summary
power to punish for contempt. In 1805
these contending factions nominated
rival candidates, the legislative majority
backing Speaker Simon Snyder, who
symbolized legislative prerogatives,
and the pro-McKean minority favoring the
reelection of the governor. By
identifying McKean with the
constitution, the conservatives tried to make
an attack on the governor tantamount to
an attempt to overthrow the
government. These tactics won the
support of the Federalists, who viewed
the return of McKean as the only
alternative to Jacobinism and the de-
struction of the constituted order.
Although the governor received a minority
of the Republican vote, his support by
the Federalists and the anti-Snyder
Germans gave him a third term.
From 1808 until 1816, during Governor
Snyder's three terms, foreign
policies and national issues were the
dominant themes in Pennsylvania
politics. When Jefferson's embargo
threatened to renew the strength of the
Federalist party in 1807-8, the Quids
bolted their marriage of convenience
with the Federalists and rejoined the
ranks of the Republicans. The renewal
Book Reviews 295
of Democratic unity in the face of
resurgent Federalism resulted, as usual,
in another Democratic sweep of the state
in 1808. Nonetheless, the internal
strife between the Philadelphia machine,
headed by those two colorful
characters, Congressman Michael Leib and
editor William Duane, and the
country faction, led by Governor Snyder,
did not slacken until 1811, by
which time the Snyderites had won a
decisive victory.
The War of 1812 dominated the election
of that year, and the Republicans
once again subordinated their internal
differences to support the national
administration, furnishing Madison's
margin of victory over Clinton. Demo-
cratic divisions within the Keystone
State, however, were too irreconcilable
to be suppressed completely, even by the
pressure of war. Following the
treaty of Ghent, the Federalists, who
administered their own death blow at
the Hartford Convention, disappeared,
thus leaving the Republicans free
again to fight their internecine wars,
as the so-called Era of Good Feelings
dawned.
Because of its microscopic examination
of sixteen years in thirteen
chapters, this book will be read almost
exclusively by specialists in party
politics and constitutional and
political history. Mr. Higginbotham is
especially illuminating in his
discussion of McKean's resort to libel pro-
ceedings against Democratic editors who
were critical of his public actions.
The first important measure passed after
Snyder replaced McKean was a
revised libel law, which forbade
criminal prosecutions for publications
respecting the official conduct of
public officers or proceedings of the legis-
lature. The author also gives full
treatment to the dramatic Olmstead Case,
which involved armed resistance by the
state militia to the service of
federal court writs, although his
discussion of side issues sometime obscures
the real cause of the conflict over the
alleged encroachment of the federal
judiciary upon the rights of the state.
The outstanding shortcoming of the book
is the lack of any map showing
the county boundaries and the
congressional districts. During these years
the number of counties grew from
thirty-five to fifty-one and the state was
redistricted for representation in
congress. The bibliography and the annota-
tion show that Mr. Higginbotham has
exploited personal papers, official
documents, newspapers, and other
original sources. In addition to the
secondary accounts which he cites, he
certainly would have found Dumas
Malone's Public Life of Thomas Cooper
helpful, especially the two chapters
devoted to Cooper's career as land
commissioner and state judge in Penn-
sylvania from 1801 to 1811.
Ohio State University JAMES
MORTON SMITH
296 Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Quarterly
Iroquois Pottery Types: A Technique
for the Study of Iroquois Prehistory.
By Richard S. MacNeish. National Museum
of Canada, Bulletin, No. 124.
(Ottawa, Canada, Minister of Resources
and Development, 1952. vii+
166p., charts, plates, and index. Paper,
$1.50.)
During the years 1947-49 Richard
MacNeish carried on an extensive
survey of Iroquois archaeological
materials in museum and private collec-
tions throughout the Northeast. This
report contains the results of his
analysis of the ceramic data and some
conclusions based on the overall
study of the collections.
This research was the first attempt in
many years to collate the body
of data collected by American and
Canadian archaeologists in over a century
of field work so that it could be
applied to the problem of the origin of
the Iroquois. The view that the Iroquois
represented a migration into the
Northeast in late prehistoric times was
generally accepted until in 1944
James B. Griffin of the Museum of
Anthropology of the University of
Michigan pointed out the possibility of
a local development. The Museum
of Anthropology and the Indiana
Historical Society sponsored MacNeish's
investigations.
MacNeish applied the direct historical
approach to establish the complex
of traits characteristic of the tribal
units on a historic level and to trace
these complexes into prehistoric times
on the basis of similarity to historic
sites. In some cases the evidence for
the identification of historic sites is
very limited. The assignment of sites to
historic tribes is especially un-
convincing for the Neutral-Wenro and the
Erie, who were uprooted by
1650 and whose territory is only vaguely
delineated. No detailed con-
sideration was given to the
archaeological materials from the Whittlesey
Focus of Ohio, which have also been
suggested as the products of an Erie
occupation.
The site seriations have been postulated
on the evidence from pottery
types which were defined from rim sherds
showing "temporal and spatial
significance." Thus only a part of
the cultural data has been selected for
the basis of the seriations. The attributes
utilized in establishing the pottery
typology were chosen by inspectional
methods solely for the purpose of
seriation. No attempt was made to
exhaust the ceramic data. Furthermore,
inaccuracies in the statistics--evident
also in the names of sites and their
excavators--weaken the evidence
presented.
After fifty-seven pottery types were
defined and eight seriations es-
tablished for the Huron, Neutral-Wenro,
Erie, Seneca, Cayuga, Onondaga,
Book Reviews 297
Oneida, and Mohawk, MacNeish has
suggested certain general conclusions.
Early Iroquois sites are believed to
have developed from localized Owasco
manifestations in Late Woodland times.
The latter in turn developed from
the Point Peninsula culture of the Early
and Middle Woodland periods.
Four regional variants of the Owasco may
represent the first differentiation
of the proto-Iroquois.
In the Ontario Peninsula, for example,
one variant is ancestral to the
Neutral-Erie-Huron group. Later
differentiation occurred as the Huron
separated from the Neutral-Erie and
moved north. Finally the Erie separated
from the Neutral in late prehistoric
times and moved into their historic
position south of Lake Erie in western
New York and northern Pennsylvania.
MacNeish has pointed out that many of
his conclusions are tentative
and require additional data and thorough
testing in the field before they
can be assessed. He has presented the
first comprehensive classification of
Iroquois pottery and has suggested a
framework which future studies in
Iroquois archaeology may test.
Museum of Anthropology MARIAN E. WHITE
University of Michigan
Forests for the Future: The Story of
Sustained Yields As Told in the
Diaries and Papers of David T. Mason,
1907-1950. Edited by Rodney C.
Loehr. Publication of the Minnesota
Historical Society, Forest Products
History Foundation Series, Publication
Number V. (St. Paul, The Forest
Products History Foundation, Minnesota
Historical Society, 1952. xi+
283p., illustrations, appendix, and
index. $3.50.)
This book is based on the diaries of a
crusader for sustained yield forest
management in the United States. Prior
to 1920 most American forest
businesses were forest exploitation
enterprises that cut the timber without
regard for continuity of operation.
Under such management or lack of
management forests had an uncertain
future. It was only when forests
began to be managed for sustained yield
through the adoption of measures
which resulted in their perpetuation and
renewal that they began to have a
dependable future.
Mason's diaries show that during the
past thirty years, whenever he had
in opportunity, he discussed with and
urged upon private owners sustained
yield forestry. He defined sustained
yield management for a given forest
is "limiting the cut of trees for
each year to the continuous productive
capacity of the forest. Such regulation
of cutting is most advantageously
298
Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Quarterly
applied to a unit of forest area at
least sufficiently large to supply con-
tinuously an efficient size plant
converting the forest products into salable
material."
Mason did not invent sustained yield.
His contribution, through many
years of persistent effort, was to make
many lumbermen and others under-
stand it, to lead some of them to
practice it, and to promote legislation
on the subject.
Mason did for sustained yield forestry
what many advertising men have
done in establishing a name or a
characteristic in the public mind. In a
sense, sustained yield forestry was a
slogan which at first appeared merely
utopian and improbable of realization,
but has now become a practical
reality on an ever increasing scale. He
had no interest in the passage of laws
forcing sustained yield upon the
operators. His persistence and persuasiveness
through his one-man educational campaign
for over 30 years has resulted
in such wide acceptance for the
sustained yield concept that it is now a
commonplace, not only with respect to
forests, but in some other fields
as well.
The editor, Rodney C. Loehr, did an
excellent job in going through
Mason's diaries and other materials and
coming out with an exciting story
of the development of sustained yield
forestry in this country.
Ohio Agricultural Experiment
Station OLIVER D. DILLER
Bourbon Democracy of the Middle West,
1865-1896. By Horace Samuel
Merrill. (Baton Rouge, Louisiana State
University Press, 1953. viii+274p.,
bibliography and index. $4.50.)
The generation after the Civil War, the
legendary Gilded Age, witnessec
rising captains of industry successfully
plotting, through the media of the
Republican and Democratic parties, to
"contain" the strivings of the laboring
and agrarian classes toward greater
freedom and justice. Covering the
Middle West (Ohio, Indiana, Illinois,
Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa, Minne
sota, and Nebraska), the only
"vulnerable outpost in the political-economi,
empire of big business" (p. 2),
were the Bourbon Democrats of that area
Why were they called Bourbons? They were
"Bourbons in the sense o
being wealthy, self-esteemed,
self-appointed guardians of an already fixed
pattern of living. . . . They jealously
guarded the machinery of materia
progress against threats of restless
farmers and wage-earners" (pp. vii-viii)
The Democratic party renounced its
Jeffersonian heritage, succumbed t
Bourbon thinking, and sat on the lid of
reform. This is the theme
Book Reviews 299
Professor Merrill's volume. Is it a
valid one? In the eyes of this reviewer
it is not.
To begin, while it is conceded that the
Republican party emerged from
the Civil War as "the party of big
business," it does not necessarily follow
that the Democratic party was an
anti-Big Business party. Indeed, as the
author points out, some of our greatest
industrialists, men like James J.
Hill and Cyrus McCormick, were Democrats.
Why therefore should we
expect an attitude other than that
exhibited by the Bourbons? The point
here is that both parties were
controlled by business interests. Personalities
rather than issues were the really
distinguishing features of our major
parties. It would seem to be stretching
the fiber of history to set off one
particular political group and accuse it
of frustrating progress, when, in
fact, our whole political and economic
atmosphere militated against such
progress. Although Professor Merrill
holds no brief for any party or
person connected with these
"reactionary" proceedings, he is especially
irritated by the midwestern Bourbon
Democrats. One might ask, was not the
guilt of the Republicans in betraying
Lincoln's ideals as grievous as that
of the Democrats in betraying
Jefferson's? Whereas the Republicans were
apparently hopeless in this regard, the
author would reply, the Democrats
had a real opportunity, but fumbled it
like a Cleveland shortstop.
As we proceed through the volume it
becomes increasingly unclear as to
just whom we are talking about. In
handling Cleveland's first term, more
and more the author criticizes the
reactionism of both national parties with
little reference to midwestern Bourbon
Democracy. He is angry at the
weakness, insincerity, and hypocrisy of
our congressmen (Republican and
Democrat) as evinced, for example, in
the interstate commerce and Sherman
anti-trust acts. Following the election
of 1888, the victorious Harrison
acknowledged the role of Providence in
his triumph. Professor Merrill
drily prophesies, "Perhaps the day
would come when Providence or some
other factor would cause the voters to
arise in earnest against the hierarchy
of both old parties" (p.
200; italics mine). Repeatedly he aims his barbs
at Bourbons and Republicans combined and
loses sight of his principal
target, the midwestern Bourbon
Democrats. This seems to sustain the
argument that the major thesis is
artificial.
An undercurrent of sarcasm, pervading
the volume from beginning to
end, detracts from the fine scholarship
which Professor Merrill has poured
into his study. The worst meaning is
attached to all deeds of the Bourbons,
and the best meaning to those of the
"liberals," "reformers," "progressives,"
or whatever you call them. For example,
in the 1892 Illinois gubernatorial
300 Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Quarterly
campaign, Altgeld violently attacked the
anti-parochial school Edwards
act. It came out subsequently, although
too late to figure in the campaign,
that Altgeld himself had been active in
urging the bill's passage. Altgeld's
tactic here the author terms
"shrewd" (p. 236). Yet had a Bourbon per-
petrated such a subterfuge he would
doubtlessly have been labeled a
"hypocrite." Similarly loose
use of such words as reactionary, plutocrats,
Wall Street, and so forth, mars the
book's effectiveness.
An associate professor of history at the
University of Maryland, Pro-
fessor Merrill has done an admirable
piece of research, utilizing nineteen
manuscript collections (eleven of them
at the Wisconsin Historical Society,
where the author carried on his graduate
work), and a formidable array
of secondary volumes. It is the
synthesis which is held in question. Apart
from this there are several unusual
looking footnotes. Witness number 61
on page 230:
Id. to id., July 20, 1892; id. to id., August
12, 1892; id. to id., (telegram),
August 13, 1892; id. to id., September
8, 1892; and id. to id., November 30, 1892,
ibid.
Technically, I suppose, this is proper,
but could it not have been simplified?
Finally, the style is awkward and
labored. A little more editorial oil would
have lubricated the literary squeaks.
Rio Grande College EUGENE C. MURDOCK
Horse Power Days: Popular Vehicles of
Nineteenth Century America. By
Ivan L. Collins. (Stanford, Calif.,
Stanford University Press, 1953.
ix+88p., illustrations. $2.50.)
A vital but often neglected element of
the nineteenth century scene--
the horse-drawn vehicle--receives
unusual treatment in this small volume. The
years between the birth of the American
Republic and the advent of the
automobile witnessed a succession of
vehicles whose common denominator
was the faithful horse. The field of
inland transportation was invaded,
to be sure, by the canal boat (itself
dependent upon the horse or mule),
by the railroad, and by the steamboat,
but to the average American in 1900
as in 1800 the horse was a sine qua non
to travel. At one time or another
the Conestoga wagon, the Concord coach,
the sleigh, and the farm wagon
were as familiar to the eye as they were
important to the development of
a rapidly expanding nation.
Horse Power Days is not a treatise on transportation. It makes no
pretense of being a serious study in the
usual sense. In its own way
Book Reviews 301
it is something more than this, for here
is a collection of photographs
depicting many typical horse-drawn
vehicles with a clarity and detail that
could never be achieved with words. Each
of the forty illustrations is
accompanied by approximately one-half
page of text describing the use
of the vehicle. These are grouped under
three headings. Under "Long
Distance Transportation" one finds
the stage wagon, the road coach, and
five others. The dozen employed for
"Short Journeys and Social Uses"
include the canopy-top surrey, the
barouche, and the victoria. "Serving
the Growing Nation" were the
logging, brewery, and express wagons, the
hook and ladder, the hotel omnibus, and
some sixteen others.
The book is actually the by-product of a
much larger project, for the
vehicles pictured on its pages are
miniatures constructed by the author,
Ivan L. Collins. This fact in no way
detracts from the usefulness of the
volume. After extensive travel,
research, and observation, Mr. Collins built
his models at one-eighth scale,
reproducing the original vehicles which he
found scattered (often in a dilapidated
condition) throughout the country.
The miniatures are authentic to the last
detail, including the paint colors.
The last twelve pages of the book show
the various steps in the con-
struction of one miniature, from the
discovery of the original in a field
to the application of the seventh coat
of paint. By placing each vehicle
close to the camera and a considerable
distance from the background,
Mr. Collins successfully creates the
illusion that the models are full size.
Horse Power Days is a fascinating and captivating volume. It is at-
tractively printed by Stanford
University Press, with the names of the
vehicles appearing in type which varies
in weight and character to harmonize
with the rugged Conestoga, the more
delicate fringe-topped surrey, the
starkly severe hearse, and so on. The
spiral binding leaves much to be
desired, but this is at best a trivial
criticism.
Ohio State Archaeological JOHN S. STILL
and Historical Society
John McMillan: The Apostle of
Presbyterianism in the West, 1752-1833.
By Dwight Raymond Guthrie. (Pittsburgh,
University of Pittsburgh
Press, 1952. x+296p., frontispiece,
maps, appendices, bibliography, and
index. $3.00.)
This is a carefully documented account
of the career of a pioneer
missionary preacher among the early Scotch-Irish
settlements of south-
western Pennsylvania. The author is an
ordained minister, now professor
302 Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Quarterly
of Bible at Grove City College, who
thoroughly understands the back-
ground of his research.
A native of Chester County
(Pennsylvania) and the son of Scotch-Irish
parents, McMillan early saw the need for
religious ministrations west of
the Allegheny Mountains, and his first
missionary journey to that region
was in the summer of 1775. His work as a
minister, revival preacher, and
teacher for fifty-five years entitles
him, according to the author, to be con-
sidered "without question . . . the
father of the Presbyterian churches in
the West" of that time.
He was an intensely practical man, not
without humor, but, like other
Scotch-Irish ministers, blunt in
denouncing what he deemed vanity and
wrongdoing, and insistent upon correct
theological doctrine. Yet so great
was the sensitivity of the period to
possible heresy, that he was once
accused of unorthodox views regarding
the Trinity. He, however, was
such a staunch supporter of
well-established doctrines that the presbytery
recognized the charge, in the words of
Professor Guthrie, as "utter
foolishness."
His zeal in teaching pioneer candidates
for the ministry and in giving
assistance to many schools, including
Washington Academy and Jefferson
College (antecedents of Washington and
Jefferson College) made him
one of the fathers of education in
western Pennsylvania.
Not a politician in the ordinary sense,
he was a staunch defender of law
and order and lent his influence against
the Whiskey Rebellion in the area.
The author summons a wealth of
information to give a vivid picture
of the personalities with whom McMillan
worked and with some of whom
he disagreed. Much of the material will
be of interest only to students of
religious history, but to such it will
illustrate anew the sources of the
strength and the limitations of
organized Presbyterianism in what has con-
tinued to be one of its centers of
greatest influence--southwestern Penn-
sylvania.
Ohio State University FRANCIS P. WEISENBURGER
Proud Kate: Portrait of an Ambitious
Woman. By Ishbel Ross. (New York,
Harper and Brothers, 1953. 309p.,
illustrations, bibliography, and
index. $4.00.)
This is the study of an era and of a
woman. The woman is Kate Chase,
the spoiled but talented daughter of
Salmon Portland Chase, governor of
Ohio, United States Senator, secretary
of the treasury in Lincoln's cabinet,
Book Reviews 303
and chief justice of the supreme court.
But he never became president
of the United States.
This significant omission in the record
is the hard core of the theme of
this engrossing book. Salmon, more than
anything else, would be president
of the republic; Kate, more than
anything else, would be the mistress of
the White House to her widowed father!
Out of this situation emerge the
portraits of a madly ambitious father
shadowed by his imperious daughter,
and around the two many notables of the
Civil War drawing rooms.
Except for a romantic entanglement with
Roscoe Conkling, Kate lived
every minute to no other end than to
make her father president, or, perhaps
more properly, to make herself mistress
of the White House. As hostess
to her father in the governor's
residence in Columbus, Kate charmed all
visitors with her beauty and wit and
polished manners. Whitelaw Reid,
William Dean Howells, and James A.
Garfield were among the promising
young men who attended her levees and
festivals. Each wielded a trenchant
pen that might contribute to the cause.
Kate caught the ogling eyes of the young
blades of the city with
a cold relish, and ignored the whispered
talk behind ruffled curtains that a
local married man paid her court.
Marriage itself was for sale, and later
she married Senator William Sprague of
Rhode Island, scion of the
wealthy textile family of that state. Obviously,
social prestige and money
were indispensable to Salmon's feverish
ambitions. To the end, Kate
remained her father's daughter rather
than her husband's wife.
The story was the same in Washington.
All was attention when the
stately figure of Kate Chase swept
across the foyer at Willard's Hotel, or
in a grand ball at the White House. A
bid to one of her parties was some-
thing cherished and sought by the Perle
Mesta crowd of another era.
Artists, generals, diplomats,
statesmen--all swarmed around the glamorous
woman. At Mary Todd's dances Kate all
but took over the affairs. She
dared to snub the hostess. For one
thing, Mary spoke such abominable
French as compared to the fluent French
Kate acquired at Miss Haines's
elite New York finishing school!
Besides, Mary's husband dared to hold
the office rightfully belonging to
Salmon! It seems petty and trivial enough
to us today. But at the time it tied in
to the next presidential election.
When Roscoe Conkling crossed Kate's path
her house of cards began
to crumble. Titian-haired, tall and
elegant, every inch a man, Conkling
stirred Kate to the depths. Compared to
jealous, bibulous Sprague, he was
a giant among pygmies. Scandal followed.
There were scenes, one such
involving a shotgun, that made the
headlines in Providence, New York,
304 Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Quarterly
Cincinnati, and Washington. The divorce
that followed left Kate tarnished.
It was the beginning of the end. The
Sprague fortune dwindled and
Salmon died. Kate flew from pillar to
post with her three growing daughters.
Aging, at times almost destitute, thrust
aside as a bad woman by the more
punctilious social leaders that rose to
power in the second half of the
nineteenth century, Kate, with head
unbowed, died an outcast within
sight of the splendor she once knew. She
lies buried beside her father
in a Cincinnati cemetery.
The story is one of stark tragedy.
Kate's great mistake was to accept her
father on his face value. The man had
assets in his quenchless thirst for
the presidency--a noble bearing, a fine
mind, and lofty spiritual qualities.
But he was ambitious beyond Caesar or
Macbeth. And he possessed grave
political liabilities--an icy and smug
exterior that chilled his public like
the cold winds of his native New
Hampshire. And he changed parties as
readily as he changed overcoats. Such
inconstancy is seldom rewarded in the
political arena. But what is a young and
spirited girl expected to know of
such things? The essence of great drama
is in the situation.
The book rustles with crinoline and
organdy, the tinkling of tea cups and
the popping of corks, and the pale
chit-chat of ambitious dowagers. At
times it seems the Civil War was a mere
incident in the lives of these
women close to the scene of authority
through their husbands and families.
Only an observing woman could write this
book, and catch the spirit of
polite banter and brazen jealousies of
the women of Washington during
the Civil War.
The author is at her best in passages
like, "In soft candlelight, wearing
pink moir6, her hair burnished and her
eyes alight with animation, she
[Kate] conversed with Sumner about his
experiences abroad" (p. 92)
Or, "Her skin was as white and
smooth as the long velvet train of her
dress. Her lace veil was held in place
by a parure of pearls and diamonds
in orange blossom design, the gift of
the bridegroom" (p. 140).
A study of this kind is something more
than a biography and something
less than a history. Unless the two
genres are kept in a reasonably nice
balance, events either overtake the
character or the character runs away
with the events. In either case the
result is chaos. Only in a few mino
instances are events lumped around Kate
rather than integrated with he
motivation. The author manages this
difficult problem of integration ad
mirably, and her final chapter impresses
this reader as the definitive essay
on capricious but tragic Kate Chase.
Ohio State University EARL W.
WILEY
Book Reviews 305
South Carolina Negroes, 1877-1900. By George Brown Tindall. (Columbia,
University of South Carolina Press,
1952. xii+336p., illustrations, ap-
pendix, bibliography, and index. $5.00.)
For the first two hundred and fifty
years of our history the relations
between the white man and the Negro were
those of master and slave.
Today, according to most sociologists,
that relationship is best described
as one of caste. The transition from
slavery to caste has seldom been traced.
One might guess that the road was
neither a straight nor an easy one.
Just how the transformation did occur,
at least in the crucial state of South
Carolina, is faithfully and thoroughly
reported in this excellent book. It
adds greatly to our understanding of the
course of race relations in the
United States, and fills in an important
gap in our knowledge of the history
of the American Negro.
The author begins with a brief sketch of
the coming of the Negro to
South Carolina, and of the system of
slavery as it developed and functioned
there. He next treats, also briefly, the
turbulent period of Reconstruction.
Some attention is given to the role
played by Wade Hampton, for the
author insists that this heroic figure
has been grossly misunderstood. Says
he, "It is . . . irony that Wade
Hampton . . . should be canonized in the
white folklore, not as a man of generous
sentiments and great moral courage,
so much as the leader of a violent
campaign to remove the Negro from
the government of the state."
The greater part of the book is devoted
to the political, economic, and
social developments, insofar as they
affected the Negro, in the period follow-
ing the withdrawal of federal troops.
The author discusses, among other
matters, the decline of the Republican
party from its post-war position of
dominance, the techniques and processes
whereby the Fifteenth Amendment
was nullified, the economic adjustments
made by the Negro to his new
status, and the emigration of Negroes
from the state--to Liberia, to the
West, and to the cities.
The book brings out many novel,
surprising, even incredible, facts--at
least to this reviewer, who was himself
born and reared in South Carolina,
but in the present century, when the
system of segregation and caste was
firmly established. The color line, as
this book demonstrates, was not so
clearly drawn prior to 1900, and Jim
Crow was but a young, though husky
and growing, infant.
The book is interesting and readable,
and at the same time scholarly and
dispassionate. It treats the good and
the bad, the pleasant and the un-
pleasant. It ends, moreover, on an
optimistic note, for the author cites
306 Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Quarterly
some evidence for his belief that
"there has been demonstrated a profound
shift of public sentiment which promises
a revival of the spirit of inter-
racial good will and cooperation that
was lost in the aftermath of
Governor Hampton's administration."
This reviewer is basically in agreement
with the point of view of this
author, who also is a native of South
Carolina, and is a graduate of the
University of North Carolina and a
member of the history department of the
woman's college of that university. He
commends him for writing so
frankly and fairly on so controversial a
subject. He suspects, however, that
Governor Hampton and his followers were
somewhat less magnanimous
and somewhat more expedient than this
author believes, and that the progress
toward equality is somewhat less
conspicuous.
Ohio State University BREWTON BERRY
The Bounty Lands. By William Donahue Ellis. (Cleveland and New York,
World Publishing Company, 1952. 492p.,
end-paper illustration. $3.95.)
This historical novel tells the story of
young Tom Woodbridge who
migrates from Concord, Massachusetts, to
"Mesopotamia" in the Northwest
Territory in 1799 with two fixed
purposes--to secure a land grant for his
father's military bounty warrant and to
raise pedigreed pigs. Mesopotamia
is described as a private land purchase
in the United States Military Tract
near the Greenville Treaty Line, and its
proprietor is Elnathan Shuldane, a
shrewd and influential New England
speculator who is selling lands for
bounty warrants and runs into
difficulties with Woodbridge over land and
pigs. He sends his daughter Veronica and
his attorney, Jonathan Blair,
to the new settlement to checkmate the
rugged hero, but the latter turns
the tables on Shuldane by getting
Veronica to marry him after he has
unwittingly compromised her--the most
improbable incident in the book.
The father-in-law remains unreconciled
and the rivalry of the two men
runs on through twenty years of early
Ohio history. The complicated plot
introduces frontier problems, an array
of frontier types, and a new breed
of frontier porkers. An especially significant
character is Slover Navarre
(or William Hogland), called the
squatter governor, who turns up at
opportune times all over the Northwest
Territory to assist Woodbridge
and protect squatters.
The leading characters are well drawn,
the action is handled skillfully
and reader interest is well sustained.
The story is carried along almos
entirely by conversation and reads like
a series of episodes in a radio serial
Book Reviews 307
The action is too rapid, however, and is
not sufficiently tempered by de-
scription and character analysis to
picture effectively life in a frontier settle-
ment. This reader missed the sights and
sounds and smells of the Ohio
woods, and the brawling, sinning, raw
humor, religious revivals, and other
emotional outlets of the pioneers. The
minor characters are generally nice,
simple-minded people who listen to their
leaders, solve frontier problems
satisfactorily, establish good
government, and work over the ruggedly in-
dividualistic hero into a pillar of the
community.
But a more serious criticism applies to
the author's use of historical
materials. Only a few examples may be
cited. The purported survey of the
United States Military Tract has been
lifted from the survey of the Seven
Ranges some thirteen years earlier and
does not fit the former. Winthrop
Sargent, depicted as leading a party of
surveyors in the military tract, was
actually governor of Mississippi
Territory in 1799. Rufus Putnam surveyed
the military tract in 1797, two years
before the book begins. The exaggerated
description of Indian difficulties which
interrupted the survey also belongs
to the earlier period. Thomas Hutchins,
mentioned as geographer of the
United States in the book, died in 1789
and the title had been dropped
before 1799. The Geographer's Line did
not extend "due west from the
southwest corner of Pennsylvania"
and it was not the base line for the
military tract, nor was Section 16
reserved for schools in this area.
The account of Indian troubles in the
early 1800's, as given in the book,
makes the Treaty of Greenville in 1795 a
useless performance on Anthony
Wayne's part. Nor was Tecumseh
organizing his Indian confederacy around
1800. Not until the War of 1812 was
there a British-Indian danger. The
author's story of a far-reaching web of
squatter organizations under Navarre
(alias Hogland), who is elected to the
first Ohio legislature, may be within
the latitude of a fiction writer's
creation, but Ohio squatters were hardly
so stupid as to expect the Ohio
legislature to amend federal land laws.
Federalists and Republicans did not
battle over land policies in Ohio, and
squatters' cabins were not being burned
by troops in the period covered by
the book. A Hogland was sometimes termed
the squatter governor in the
1780's but disappears after that.
The location of Woodbridge's farm is
given as Section 15, Township 7,
Range 5, in the military tract. This
would put Mesopotamia in northern
Coshocton County. Yet characters in the
book make frequent trips by wagon
to Cincinnati for supplies, thus
crossing two-thirds of Ohio (then almost
without roads), when Marietta could have
been reached far more easily
by the Tuscarawas-Muskingum route or
Wheeling by way of Zane's Trace.
308
Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Quarterly
And the feat of Attorney Blair and
Veronica in driving a light surrey
across central Ohio from the upper Miami
River in 1799 staggers the
imagination.
Space does not permit further examples
of the book's historical lapses
and improbabilities. Certainly, the
author does not let the facts of history
interfere with his plot. He has written
an entertaining story, but this
reviewer refuses to believe that early
Ohio was quite like that.
Ohio State University EUGENE H. ROSEBOOM
The Course of Empire. By Bernard De Voto. (Boston, Houghton Mifflin
Company, 1952. xvii+647p., maps and end
maps, list of comparative
dates, notes, bibliography, and index.
$6.00.)
Before Lewis and Clark: Documents
Illustrating the History of the Missouri,
1785-1804. Edited, with introductory narrative, by A. P. Nasatir.
Two
volumes. (St. Louis, St. Louis
Historical Documents Foundation, 1952.
xv+853p., illustrations, maps, and
index. $15.00.)
George Rogers Clark: Soldier in the
West. By Walter Havighurst. (New
York, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1952.
vii+216p., illustrations, index,
and end maps. $3.00.)
Although the last to appear, The
Course of Empire is chronologically
the first of three volumes by the same
author tracing the fulfillment of "a
feeling which, historically, the
American people have always had, a feeling
that properly they must become what they
have become, a single society
occupying the continental unit" (p.
xiii). De Voto's Across the Wide
Missouri and The Year of Decision have already earned for
him the right
to complete the story with this
background volume.
Across the pages of this book march
Narvaez, Cartier, Cabeza de Vaca
Fray Marcos, DeSoto, Coronado,
Champlain, Nicolet, Groseilliers, Radisson
Jolliet, Marquette, LaSalle, Kelsey,
Verendrye, Carver, Mackenzie, Gray
and many others. To chronicle their
activities and to use their motivating
ideas and the events in which they figured
to support the central theme is it
itself a tremendous undertaking. To
accomplish it in a volume of approxi
mately five hundred pages of text is a
more difficult task. But when the
author devotes well over one hundred
pages to the Lewis and Clark stor
alone he sacrifices the effectiveness of
the remainder considerably.
It is this contraction which weakens The
Course of Empire. Of necessit
it is reduced in many places to a
statistics-like account. Reading becomes
Book Reviews 309
labored process. Perhaps two separate
volumes would have been more ade-
quate, if indeed all of the detail
contained in the present one is considered
necessary to support the theme.
Aside from this imbalance, however,
other aspects of De Voto's work
should be noted. The literary style used
lends itself to well-turned phrases.
"Louisiana welded the implicit
significance of the American political ex-
periment to the implicit logic of continental
geography. Thereafter they
were not to be distinguished from each
other" (p. 400). At the same time
this style renders some sentences so as
to be of little meaning to the average
reader. "When Cabeza de Vaca walked
naked out of a miracle," he writes,
"imperial ingredients were waiting
in solution for just such a precipitant
as he at once became." Continuing,
"This slight increment of force, itself
a minute integer of experience in a sum
of fantasy, made the first whorl in
what would be a vortex of forces, and
that vortex would become the con-
tention of four empires" (p. 10).
Or again, after Gray's discovery of the
mouth of the Columbia River, De Voto
says, "It was as if a whirling sphere
had detached an asteriod that traveled
in a concentric orbit, and yet the
attractive force was in the direction of
the asteroid--pulling the sphere
toward it" (p. 410).
Characterizations of some of the men who
cross these pages are excellent.
Wilkinson is called a "small-time
confidence man" (p. 432), and "a very
small villain on a very large
scale" (p. 338). Genet was "as odd a figure
as ever represented a nation
anywhere" (p. 340). In summing up one of
his principal characters, De Voto says,
"To his contemporaries Thomas
Jefferson did not seem a bemused
ideologue. . . . His opponents thought of
him as the embodiment of realism and
even opportunism, as pragmatism's
pope" (p. 339). Literary
excellence, as well as historical accuracy, is attained
in describing such things as the coureurs
de bois, geographic features, the
fur trade, ethnographic data and modes
of travel through the wilderness.
Typographical errors are few and
unworthy of mention. Some historical
inaccuracies should be corrected.
Ouiatenon, for example, is not present
Fort Wayne (p. 223); and Quebec and
Montreal do not belong on an
early sixteenth century map (p. 56). The
volume is illustrated with a number
of maps, both good and bad. Some are
excellent aids in following the text,
but others are so detailed as to be of
little value--the end maps, for
example, with minutiae of
physiographical features that are too difficult
to interpret. And still others are
needed to clarify textual details that other-
wise call for intimate geographical
knowledge not possessed by most readers.
310 Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Quarterly
Though the place of geography and its
determinism in the narrative are of
prime significance, the maps, on the
whole, are not adequate in their
supporting role.
De Voto has taken a great number of
factors--missionary zeal, love
of adventure, desire to find an
all-water route across the barrier of continent
to India, the fur trade, the Indian,
greed for power--and has woven them
into one grand fabric. These are the
ingredients of the Spanish vs. French
vs. English struggle of empire, out of which emerges
logically and inevitably
a new factor triumphing over all others,
the United States. Manifest destiny
is indeed the thesis of The Course of
Empire.
The author frankly admits his work to be
primarily a synthesis of "an
appallingly large number of
historians." Nevertheless, much of what he
refers to as "the connective tissue
[and] the background of historical judg-
ment" is his. Although it does not
make for casual reading, a thing which
will discourage many, this work is a
significant piece of Americana.
Dealing alone with the two decades Before
Lewis and Clark, Professor
Nasatir has brought together some two
hundred and thirty-eight documents
into his two volumes. The basis of
selection of these items has been their
pertinence to the continuous story of
the exploration of the Missouri River
Although not intentionally planned as
such, his work is a source collection
that might well be used for a detailed
study of a portion of the De Vote
story. There are journals of journeys of
explorers, descriptive accounts o?
the natives, minutes of meetings,
proclamations, petitions, letters, statistics-
the usual selections for collections of
this nature.
More than half of these documents are
the products of four men. And
when it is further noted that the same
four men are also the recipients of
many more of the items, a rather clear
picture of Nasatir's emphasis can be
obtained. After the American Revolution,
the British not only continues
to control the Indian and fur trade
south of the Great Lakes, but the
penetrated as well into Spanish
Louisiana across the Mississippi River
Spanish fear that the British would go
further and thereby threaten Santa F?
and other outposts of their empire
spurred them to renewed activity. In
the spring of 1794 Jacques Clamorgan and
other merchants incorporate
the Missouri Company with the approval
of Zenon Trudeau, lieutenar
governor of Spanish Illinois (Upper
Louisiana) and commandant ??
St. Louis, and Francois Carondelet,
governor general of Louisiana. Counter
acting the British threat was the chief
concern of these officials and c
Charles De Lassus, lieutenant governor
of Louisiana. This is the story tol
by Before Lewis and Clark.
Book Reviews 311
For an introduction, Nasatir has written
a brief history of the Missouri
River concerning its discovery, the
little known French period, the Spanish
period, and the Anglo-Spanish rivalry.
Of necessity brief, it does, however,
serve especially as a valuable
introduction to the sources of the period.
This essay is illustrated by five
fold-in contemporary maps of the Missouri
and Mississippi rivers. Reproduced
apparently from photostat copies of the
originals, they are not too
satisfactory.
The documents have been assembled from
archives and collections both
European and American. In the case of
foreign language texts, only English
translations are printed. The editor has
confined editorial remarks generally
to cross-references and indications of
the sources of the documents. Although
some have appeared in print elsewhere,
they are included in the present
collection if deemed important to the
continuity of the story. Editorial
license has been kept to a minimum, and
this does not detract from the
usefulness of the items. One index for
both volumes at the end of the second,
although very adequate, makes its use a
bit awkward. Aside from these ob-
servations and the content of the
volumes themselves, a word of praise should
be given to the publishers for an
attractive format. Before Lewis and Clark
could well serve as a model for other
similar ventures.
Another phase of De Voto's story is
concerned with the Indian-British
attempt to keep the Americans from
pushing into and taking the Old
Northwest during the Revolution.
"The decisive stay to that effort was
provided by one of the suddenly
disclosed geniuses shaped to the need
and the hour," George Rogers Clark
(p. 267). Professor Havighurst has
chosen this man as the subject of his
most recent book.
Because of the pleasing literary style
of this hero study, the book should
sell well. It is in keeping with the
current trend of a number of similarly
written juveniles upon important
historical men. Readability is one thing;
accuracy, however, is another. A
combination of the two is of prime
necessity in any historical work,
regardless of the level on which it is
produced.
A surprising number of factual errors
and inaccurate generalizations
appear in this small volume. For
example, control of the British posts
in the Old Northwest would not mean
control of all of the Ohio and
Mississippi valleys (p. 99); Clark did
not give to the new nation "half
the territory it possessed" (p.
174); Vincennes was not the territorial
capital of the Old Northwest (p. 194);
and, the Treaty of Greene Ville
did not cede to the United States
"all the land that drains into the Ohio"
(p. 184). Also, the famous Logan speech
and the Henry Hamilton "hair-
312 Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Quarterly
buyer" stories are propagated. And
it would be difficult to support his
thesis that "without his [Clark's]
campaigns . . . the Ohio River would mark
the northern boundary of the United
States" (p. vi). These items will
suffice to illustrate the unreliableness
of George Rogers Clark: Soldier
in the West. Consultation of recent literature on Clark and general
histories
of the Old Northwest would have prevented
these pitfalls and a much more
valuable and reliable literary-style
biography would have resulted.
Miami University DWIGHT L. SMITH
Fleet Admiral King: A Naval Record. By Ernest J. King and Walter Muir
Whitehill. (New York, W. W. Norton &
Company, 1952. xv+674p.,
illustrations, maps and charts, and
index. $6.75.)
These memoirs add another volume to the
swelling list of reminiscences
of those who guided American military
and political policy during World
War II. Fleet Admiral Ernest J. King
served both as commander in chief,
United States Fleet, and chief of naval
operations throughout most of the
war, and represented the navy on both
the joint and combined chiefs of
staff. It was his initial intention upon
his retirement in December 1945
to write an account of the international
conferences he attended as a member
of the combined chiefs. Commander Walter
M. Whitehill, an officer on
his staff from 1943 to 1945, persuaded
him to enlarge the scope to a full-
scale autobiography. The views
expressed, the personal recollections are
King's; the research in public and
private files, the interviews with the
admiral's associates, and the text are
the work of Whitehill.
A native of Ohio, King was born in
Lorain in 1878, the son of a Cornish
mother and a Scottish father, who had
once been a fresh-water sailor. The
chance reading of an article on the
naval academy was the genesis of his
interest in a naval career, which he
entered upon in 1897 as an Annapolis
plebe. As he traces the history of his
next twenty years in various junior
commands at sea and ashore, a picture
emerges of a man of small foibles
and great strengths. Outstanding are his
probing, absorbent mind, keel
interest in theory combined with Scottish
common sense, confidence in hi
own abilities and opinions, and a
driving initiative. His faults are those
common to strong characters--a streak of
stubbornness, a frosty exterior, and
egocentricity.
During the First World War King served
on the staff of Admira
Henry T. Mayo, who confirmed some of
King's own convictions concerning
the manner in which a high command
should operate, especially the necessit
Book Reviews 313
and wisdom of delegating authority. To
broaden the scope of initiative
allowed subordinates became one of his
crusades. His high praise for Mayo
did not, however, extend to some of his
other superiors, whom he criticizes
with unhesitating frankness.
The years between the wars were the
period of final preparation for his
supreme task. His choice of duty is of
interest because it shows his pre-
science in anticipating the trend of
naval warfare. He did not seek out
cruiser and battleship commands or
identify himself with the so-called
"Gun Club" clique, who
monopolized top positions in the navy. Instead
he spent four years in submarine duty,
fourteen in naval aviation, and a
year (1931-32) in the senior course at
the naval war college, Newport,
Rhode Island, where he studied the
influence of national policy and economic
pressure on the strategy of war and the
relationship of naval strategy, tactics,
and command; and where, by something
less than coincidence, he worked
out a war-game problem to recover the
Philippines, which it was assumed the
Japanese had captured. Later he was able
to put to use his own solution
with some modifications.
King has detailed his activities in the
last war so fully that one can only
touch upon the high points. He describes
his relationship with President
Franklin D. Roosevelt as one of respect
and understanding, yet stiff and
impersonal principally through his own
choice. His associations with his
opposite numbers on the joint chiefs of
staff were similarly reserved.
Though at pains to point out differences
which occurred and to reiterate
the soundness of his own principles the
admiral does not fail to suggest
the mutual confidence which existed
among that body. He defends his in-
sistence that General Dwight Eisenhower
rather than the "indispensable"
General George Marshall be chosen to
head the allied landings in France,
a view that finally prevailed.
King admired the British counterparts on
the combined chiefs of staff,
but he had little respect for the stiff
prima donna, Charles de Gaulle; the
naively trusting, "political
general," Chiang Kai-shek; and the Russian top
commanders who had to run to Stalin for
their instructions. The admiral's
comments on the controversial Yalta
Conference will not please either
defenders or detractors of Roosevelt's
actions. King makes it clear that
he, together with the joint chiefs,
wanted Russian entry into the war against
Japan, but they thought the price asked
by Stalin too high. In their opinion
concession to the Russians of the
Japanese-held half of Sakhalin and all of
the Kurile Islands was enough
"sweetening" (p. 591).
Although the style is modeled upon the
bare-bones succinctness of an
314 Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Quarterly
operation order, these memoirs are
unduly lengthened by King's efforts to
salvage too much scrap trivia in his
life. There is minute detail of whom
he met or dined with and where, which
could profitably be jettisoned. While
these intrusions slow the pace of the
narrative, they do not obscure the
portrait of this great commander, who
represents the highest ideals of the
naval service and whose career justifies
the rigorous, variegated training
the navy imposes.
Kenyon College LANDON WARNER
The Great Railroad Conspiracy: The
Social History of a Railroad War.
By Charles Hirschfeld. (East Lansing,
Michigan State College Press,
1953. vi+128p., maps. $2.50.)
Since railroad companies were among our
first large-scale corporate enter-
prises, problems confronting the early
lines are of real interest. The troubles
of the Michigan Central Railroad which
came to a head in the Great
Conspiracy (1850-51) had three aspects
which provide comparisons with
what Ohio roads were facing at the same
time.
First, the Michigan line's monopolistic
charter had no parallel in the
state to the south. Ohio's constitutional
convention (1850-51) approved
the creation of new railroad companies
by a general incorporation law.
Almost simultaneously the Michigan
constitutional convention rejected such
a provision. Second, liability for
cattle killed by trains while "trespassing"
on railroad tracks, the issue which
culminated in the conspiracy, was fixed
on the carriers by the Michigan
legislature in 1855. In Ohio in that year
the same result was achieved by court
ruling.
Third, anti-railroad sentiment had such
deep roots in Michigan, even as
early as 1851, that the Michigan
Central's later policy of conciliation
could not eradicate them. "These
early struggles . . . formed the tradition
out of which the agitation of the
'seventies grew," is the author's con-
servative opinion. In Ohio there was
much less sentiment of that sort,
and what there was existed mainly among
the Democrats. In the other state,
that party was generally favorable to
the carriers.
Bitter feeling against the Michigan
Central in Jackson and adjoining
counties led to many lawless deeds.
Obstructions were put on the tracks,
stones were thrown at the cars, switches
were tampered with, firewood stocks
were set ablaze, and the company was
thoroughly bedeviled. Destruction
by fire of its freight house in Detroit
in November 1850 was the last
Book Reviews 315
straw. The company caused forty-four
persons to be indicted for conspiracy
to burn the building, hoping thus to
crush the leaders of the opposition.
The trial became a cause celebre, conducted nearly as much in the press
and on street corners as in the
courtroom. The case was seen either as a
public-spirited company trying to put
"a lawless gang of monsters" behind
bars, or an "insolent and overgrown
monopoly" persecuting citizens assert-
ing their rights. During nearly four hot
summer months in Detroit the trial
dragged on. Almost five hundred
witnesses were heard, two defendants died
in jail (impossibly high bail had been
set), and the defense brought the
great Senator William H. Seward from New
York to offset the luminaries
of the Michigan bar employed by the
railroad.
Twelve defendants were convicted, the
rest freed. Public opinion there-
after grew so steadily in the
"conspirators' " favor that in a few years
the railroad was paying indemnities to
some of those acquitted and joining
in pleas to pardon the imprisoned.
The author fully appreciates the
dramatic elements in this affair and
has told the story very well. While
observing every canon of scholarship,
he has brought out the essentially
"whodunit" nature of the events and
maintained the suspense as to guilt or
innocence almost to the last. His
agreeable style of writing, restrained
and with a light touch, well fits the
subject.
The publishers did less well. Two maps
(books about railroads must have
maps) are placed almost at the end,
without mention of them in the front
matter. There is no index or
bibliography, the text is divided merely into
two parts, without chapters, and the
typography is unattractive. The low
price, however, may be the explanation.
Columbus, Ohio WALTER RUMSEY MARVIN
Out of the Midwest: More Chapters in
the Ohio Story. By Frank Siedel.
(Cleveland and New York, World
Publishing Co., 1953. 240p. $2.50.)
Unquestionably one of the most difficult
types of books to review is that
which possesses no central theme or
continuity but consists, rather, of a
succession of short stories or anecdotes
each entirely unrelated to all the
rest. Such a book is Frank Siedel's Out
of the Midwest. Containing thirty-
one human interest tales drawn from his
popular radio program "The Ohio
Story," Siedel's latest volume
should be well received here in Ohio in
sesquicentennial year. Yet, as the title
suggests, the book is aimed at a far
316
Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Quarterly
wider market than merely the Buckeye
State. The stories have been selected
with a view to their national as well as
state-wide appeal, and care has been
taken to vary them so as to attract a
wide range of reader interest. Patriotism,
humor, pathos, sports, invention, law,
industry, transportation, politics,
medicine, slavery, philanthropy, pioneer
life, music, education, military
history, writing--all find expression in
one or more of the chapters of Siedel's
volume.
In reading Out of the Midwest I
found myself caught between two con-
flicting reactions. On the one hand, my
"literary self" responded most
favorably to his excellent portrayal of
fascinating people and events of Ohio's
past. Frank Siedel is truly a
"prince" among storytellers!
On the other hand, as a professional
historian, I found myself objecting
to certain aspects of these stories.
According to the publisher's jacket these
tales have been "drawn from legend
and historical accounts," to which I
might add, "and the author's very
fertile imagination." Quite obviously
much of the dialog together with a large
portion of the descriptive material
stems from the latter source. Starting
with a historical fact (or a legend)
as a nucleus, Siedel has apparently
built up each story from there. Thus, like
the popular biographies of Catherine
Drinker Bowen, many of Siedel's
tales should be properly regarded as
fictionalized history.
It is regrettable that in Out of the
Midwest a number of careless errors
were included which more careful
proofreading would have weeded out. For
example, on the dust jacket above the
title we read, "Archie Fields & 'The
Spirit of 1776.' " The painter's
name, of course, was Archie Willard. On
page 61, fourth line, the cognomen
"Brown" was inadvertently left off the
name of the runaway slave. On page 107,
Aaron Putnam, then a man of
close to forty years, is repeatedly
referred to as "lad." The town of Minerva,
Ohio, is described as forty miles east
of the Pennsylvania line on page 120.
In the first sentence of the tale,
"Report from the Field," on page 177, the
year is identified as 1785. The rest of
the story then concerns President
George Washington, while Secretary of
War Henry Knox is mentioned on
page 178. The year and the offices
should be reconciled.
While the book gives evidence of hasty
preparation, and the omission
of an index proves bothersome,
nonetheless it is worthy of inclusion in the
libraries of all who are interested in
the history and folklore of our great
state.
Kent State University PHILLIP R. SHRIVER
Book Reviews 317
This Is America, My Country. Edited by Donald H. Sheehan. Two volumes.
([New York], Veterans' Historical Book
Service, Inc. [Wm. H. Wise &
Co., Inc.], 1952. xi+vii+1004p.,
illustrations and index. $9.90.)
Readings in American History. Volume
One: 1492 to 1865; Volume Two:
1865 to the Present. Edited by Rudolph L. Biesele, Robert C. Cotner,
John S. Ezell, and Gilbert C. Fite.
(Boston, Houghton Mifflin Company,
1952. xi+361, xii+403p. Each volume,
$2.50.)
This Is America is an interesting and extensive effort to provide
students
and other readers of American history
with important original accounts
and documents to supplement their
general study. The two volumes carry
the reader chronologically through the
history of the United States from a
report of the Viking contact on North
America to a statement of American
foreign policy, communicated in 1948 by
Ambassador Walter Bedell Smith
to Russia's Premier Molotov. The
selections are presented in eight sections,
the first covering the years 1000 to
1750; the second, 1751-1789; the third,
1790-1828; the fourth, 1829-1865; the
fifth, 1865-1890; the sixth, 1891-
1914; the seventh, 1915-1929; the
eighth, 1930-1951. Within these sections
the selections are presented under
subject headings such as these: "Before
Columbus," "Spain in
America," "France in America," "Puritan New
England," "The French and
Indian War," "Steps to Independence," "The
Problems of Independence and the Framing
of the Constitution," "The
Cotton Culture of the South,"
"National Politics in the Reconstruction Era,"
"The Last North American
Frontiers," "Teddy Roosevelt and the Progressive
Movement in Politics,"
"America at War--The Home Front," "The Golden
Twenties," "The Coming of the
New Deal," "The Hopes and Tensions
of the Post-War World."
Here the reader may enjoy the words of
Columbus, Vespucci, Champlain,
Father Marquette, Captain John Smith,
William Bradford, Roger Williams,
and numerous Americans, famous or
relatively unknown, down to and in-
cluding Woodrow Wilson, Henry Ford,
Calvin Coolidge, Herbert Hoover,
David Lilienthal, Franklin D. Roosevelt,
and Wendell Willkie.
A feature of the book is its 32 color
plates and 530 prints and photographs
of persons, scenes, and events in
American life and history.
Readings in American History is an experiment of a similar nature. In it,
however, the purpose is to provide
important secondary writings as well as
a number of documents and accounts from
original sources. The first volume
begins with Columbus' letter to Luis de
Santangel, who helped finance the
318
Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Quarterly
voyage of 1492, and continues
chronologically through the Civil War. The
selections presented are divided into
sixteen chapters. Volume II begins with
Reconstruction and, in sixteen chapters,
continues to 1951.
The set is aimed to provide collateral
readings for freshmen and sophomore
college classes in American history, and
offer the young people an oppor-
tunity, through interesting selections,
to become acquainted with such great
historians as George M. Wrong, Reuben G.
Thwaites, Herbert L. Osgood,
Moses C. Tyler, Edward Channing, Claude
H. Van Tyne, John Fiske,
Andrew C. McLaughlin, Frederick J.
Turner, and Charles and Mary Beard,
as well as many prominent historians of
the present day. Among the original
narrative accounts the student may read
William Bradford on Plymouth;
Thomas Jefferson on industry and
agriculture; Elizabeth Cady Stanton on
the woman's rights movement; Henry Clay,
John C. Calhoun, and Daniel
Webster in speeches before the senate;
Stephen A. Douglas on popular
sovereignty in the territories; diary
excerpts on actions in the Civil War;
reflections of Abram Hewitt on the
election of 1876; Mark Twain on mining
in Nevada; Eugene V. Debs on socialism;
Franklin D. Roosevelt's "quar-
antine speech"; Walter Reuther on
the aims of American labor; and other
selections.
Either or both of these sets would be of
value in the homes of American
citizens interested in their national
history. They would be especially
valuable in homes where children are
seeking ready references for their
school work.
Ohio State Archaeological JAMES H. RODABAUGH
and Historical Society
COMMUNICATIONS
To THE EDITOR OF THE QUARTERLY:
In the January 1953 issue of the Ohio
State Archaeological and His-
torical Quarterly, Mr. Alfred A. Skerpan expressed his remarks about my
recently published treatise: The
Crisis of the Polish-Swedish War 1655-1660.
His remarks are literally one unbroken
attack on the thesis of my treatise.
Unfortunately he confined himself to
merely arbitrary and empty state-
ments, without taking the slightest
effort to undermine or put in doubt
either the authenticity or veracity of
the original sources on which my thesis
is based. In doing so the critic seems
to forget that also he is bound to
respect the basic principle of
scientific honesty.
In order to exhibit Mr. Skerpan's
complete baselessness and emptiness of
his remarks, it is necessary at first to
give here a brief statement of my
scientific thesis which may be summed up
as follows: Contrary to all the
BOOK REVIEWS
Lost America: The Story of Iron-Age
Civilization Prior to Columbus. By
Arlington H. Mallery. With the
assistance of Mary Roberts Harrison.
Illustrations by Paula Mallery.
Introduction by Matthew W. Stirling,
Director of the Bureau of American
Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution.
(Columbus, Ohio, and Washington, D. C.,
The Overlook Company, 1951.
xviii+238p., illustrations, maps,
tables, references, index, and appendix.
$4.50.)
This little volume has created a minor
sensation in Ohio and other parts
of the country. Many newspapers
throughout the nation have carried news
items and special feature stories of Mr.
Mallery's reported discoveries. Mr.
Mallery has continued to be active in
the field since his book appeared,
and news stories appear from time to
time of his work.
Since much of the author's evidence to
suggest that the Norse peoples were
in America centuries before Columbus
visited its shores was found in Ohio,
the state historical society has felt a
responsibility to evaluate that evidence
and Mr. Mallery's conclusions. Five Ohio
State University professors, not
on the staff of the society, were asked
to examine Lost America from the
point of view of their respective
specializations: Dr. Paul A. Varg, asso-
ciate professor of history, the history;
Dr. John W. Bennett, associate pro-
fessor of anthropology, the archaeology;
Dr. Hans Sperber, professor of Ger-
man, the linguistics; Dr. Earle R.
Caley, associate professor of chemistry, the
chemistry and metallurgy; Dr. Lawrence
A. Hoffman, assistant professor of
geography, the geography and
cartography. Their brief statements follow.--
EDITOR.
The History
This is an amazing story of a Celtic and
Norse civilization in America in
the centuries preceding the discovery of
America by Columbus in 1492.
The author is deeply aware of the fact
that this is a revolutionary thesis
which scholars will approach with a
highly sceptical state of mind.
Unfortunately, by employing unsound
historical methodology, the author
fails to meet this expected scepticism.
In a number of instances he
asks the reader to accept as fact what
is little more than daring conjecture
or, at best, theories which are still in
dispute among scholars. This is true
of his account of Pythias, in which he
asserts, as if it were a fact beyond
dispute, that this famous Greek explorer
discovered Iceland. To be sure,
285