Book Reviews
The Jacksonian Persuasion: Politics
and Belief. By Marvin Meyers. (Stan-
ford, Calif.: Stanford University Press,
1957. vii~234p.; appendices,
bibliography, and index. $5.00.)
This slim volume is the latest in the
recent series of attempts to discern
the elusive meaning behind that
deceptive textbook phrase, "Jacksonian
democracy." Professor Meyers'
monograph will not win a Pulitzer prize, be
chosen as a book-club selection, or reappear
in paper-bound dress as a lay-
man's treat. It will, for years to come,
be considered required reading
among historians seeking an
understanding of the 1830's.
Meyers deliberately eschews more usual
terms to write of the Jacksonian
"persuasion": the
"attitudes, beliefs, [and] projected actions" comprising
the "half-formulated moral
perspective" which he sees as the common bond
among that diverse group we know as the
Jacksonians. He finds his key to
their "persuasion" in
"the tension between Old Republican values and
nineteenth-century experience," a
tension which produced the Jacksonian
struggle "to recall agrarian
republican innocence to a society drawn fatally
to the main chance and the long chance .
. . to reconcile again the simple
yeoman virtues with the free pursuit of
economic interest, just as the two
were splitting hopelessly apart."
Obviously, such language is not the
historian's common coin. Meyers'
book is not easy reading. Analytical
rather than narrative, it is occasionally
confusing, perhaps at times even
obscure. He is probing new dimensions in
the relationship of society and
politics, and can hardly be criticized for resort
to unfamiliar phrasings. As a result,
however, his work is likely to prove
valuable more to those already
conversant with the issues in controversy
than to students seeking their
introduction to the Jackson period.
He develops his theme in ten topical
essays, scrutinizing the political
rhetoric of the day in an attempt to
uncover its contemporary appeal, and
probing the social climate in which this
rhetoric found response. Two
chapters examine Jackson and Van Buren
as key figures in leadership. Two
more derive interpretations of the Jacksonians'
world from close analysis of
Tocqueville's Democracy in America and
the novels of James Fenimore
Cooper. A chapter on "economic
processes" makes effective use of recent
BOOK REVIEWS 273
scholarship in exploring the tangled web
of banking and business develop-
ment, while another considers the
"economic purposes"--the goals and
values--of the Americans who made up
Jackson's mass electorate. Theodore
Sedgwick, William Leggett, and Robert
Rantoul, Jr., each receive a chapter
as representative Jacksonian ideologues.
The capstone of Meyers' analysis
comes in a fascinating study contrasting
the dialogue of political parties in
1821 and 1846 as displayed in the New
York constitutional conventions of
those years, one just before the
Jacksonian era and the other at its close.
Methodologically, the book is
significant for its careful textual analysis
of contemporary utterances. Too often
historians have employed quotation
not to elucidate the state of mind of a
bygone age, but to provide a vivid
frame for their own interpretation. A
case in point is the error of assuming
that the Jacksonians' use of
class-conflict terminology reflected attitudes
paralleling those of a later industrial
age. As Meyers points out, in the
Jacksonian persuasion classes were
distinguished "not by their economic
position as such, but primarily by their
moral orientation." His argument
deserves close attention; it is not a rejection
of economic influence, but a
sophisticated refinement in its
application to historical understanding.
Meyers' pages are packed with
penetrating insights, many of which de-
serve further elaboration. As an
example, there is his wry comment that
"Americans who followed the
Jacksonian persuasion with their votes . . .
were in some degree censuring their own
economic attitudes and actions."
Again, "the republican yeoman on
his hundred acres, building his farm
and character together and taking his
reward in self-sufficient independence,
populates the speeches of Jacksonian
Democrats but not the countryside that
observers viewed." This reviewer
regrets that Meyers did not extend his
analysis to encompass those notable
contradictions of democratic values, the
Jacksonian attitudes toward the Indian and toward the
Negro slave. But
he has made a major advance in our
knowledge of the nature of "Jacksonian
democracy" and in doing so has
enriched historical literature in both content
and method.
Baldwin-Wallace College MARTIN DEMING LEWIS
The Papers of Sir William Johnson. Volume XII (1766-1774). Prepared for
publication by Milton W. Hamilton.
(Albany: University of the State of
New York, 1957. viii~1,124p.;
illustrations, maps, and index. $8.00.)
The melancholy history of race relations
on our planet continues to throw
doubt upon the sincerity of national
professions of brotherly love, justice,
and equality. Each country has its Kashmir
or Algeria or Kenya, America
274
THE OHIO HISTORICAL QUARTERLY
included. However, we have tended to
forget about our problem because the
Indian is no longer a potent factor in
our body politic. To study the problem
in its most meaningful stage we must go
back to the colonial period, when
America's racial distinctions were seen
not in sentimental and theoretical
terms but in fearful and practical ones.
The Indian "nations" then were
"nations" despite the formal
assertion of sovereignty over them by
the
English crown. Sir William Johnson was
as much ambassador to the
northern Indians as he was
"superintendent" of them. The involved
language and customs of diplomacy were
maintained at all times and--
significantly--shaped in Indian terms,
not in English.
In the middle of the eighteenth century,
however, the northern Indians
were gradually losing their status as
"brothers" and becoming "children" of
the English; and their life as
"children" was a harsh one. English settle-
ment and influence advanced inexorably.
The documents printed in this
volume demonstrate the English failure
to carry out the trust assumed in
their guardianship over their red
"children." Over and over again Sir
William Johnson in the North, John
Stuart, superintendent of Indians in
the southern district, General Thomas
Gage, commander-in-chief of the
British forces in America, Governor John
Penn of Pennsylvania, and other
colonial officials regret the fact that
murders of Indians by frontiersmen must
go unpunished because of the
unwillingness of the people to abide by prin-
ciples of justice in their dealings with
the red men, and because of the
inability of government to enforce such
principles. Johnson and those in
positions of control could only make
"Attonment," as the Indian agent
George Croghan expressed it following a
particularly barbaric murder of
ten Indian men, women, and children by a
German named Stump, by
"Condoleing and presents Very Early
this Spring." The atonement was
calculated in monetary terms and
justified in political ones. Few officials
allowed their sense of moral outrage to
disturb their domestic or mental
tranquillity. From a political standpoint,
the policy was largely successful.
English settlement advanced. English
"governments" were established in the
Indian country and the power of the
Indians declined. All of these results
were facilitated by the decline of
French influence following the French and
Indian War, which automatically deprived
the Indians of their strategic
"balance of power" situation
between the two opposing European powers.
The documents in this volume show the
significance of this changed rela-
tionship, as they reveal also the
continued English fear that French in-
fluence had not been extinguished in the
trans-Appalachian West.
The publication of Volume XII of The
Papers of Sir William Johnson
brings a long-term publishing venture
near to a close. Although a wide-
spread search was made for documents for
this last volume of the second
BOOK REVIEWS 275
chronological series, it was not
possible to include everything in it. An
addenda volume is promised which will
include items missed as well as
corrections and errata in the series,
and a chronological finding list of
documents.
Whatever reservations one might have
about the methods used by the
editor--the lack of extensive
explanatory documentation, the retention of
abbreviations and superscribed letters,
the waste of space in following the
exact spatial arrangement of complimentary
closes, endorsements, and the
like--one must accept them as necessary
to maintain consistency with the
forms initiated by the first editors.
However, one can also point out that
The Papers of Sir William Johnson represent the last of the old style docu-
mentary collections, fortunately made
obsolete by the standards set in projects
like The Papers of Thomas Jefferson. Originally
conceived as a one volume
selection, the Johnson project grew to
its present twelve-volume-plus size
after several intermediate "final
volumes" along the way. This uncertainty
of purpose resulted partly from the
several changes in the office of state
historian following the start of the
project, and partly from inadequate
preliminary surveys of materials. The
result is an unfortunate organizational
confusion, marked by two duplicate
chronological series.
One of the ways in which the confusion
can be partially overcome is by
the preparation of a comprehensive
index, which is promised as a final
volume. Next to the publication of the
documents themselves the prepara-
tion of a full index is perhaps the most
valuable service the historical
editor can perform. An imaginative
indexer could make the many volumes
of Johnson Papers valuable to
researchers in fine arts, psychology, morals,
and so forth, as well as to ethnologists
and historians, by including such
subject categories as the specific objects
used in trade and ceremonies,
instances of criminal offenses committed
by each group against the other,
instances of Indian ethical reasoning,
and the like. Only with the com-
pletion of the index will the Sir
William Johnson Papers be truly available
to all scholars and begin to be cited as
frequently as they deserve to be.
Smithsonian Institution WILCOMB E.
WASHBURN
The Negro in Indiana: A Study of a
Minority. By Emma Lou Thornbrough.
(Indianapolis: Indiana Historical
Bureau, 1957. xiii~412p.; index.
$4.50.)
During a period when racial integration
is a subject of tense controversy,
this study is especially timely, for it
analyzes carefully the deep-seated prob-
lems of race relations in a northern
state with a large population of southern
276
THE OHIO HISTORICAL QUARTERLY
background. The author finds that prior
to 1900 in Indiana the doctrine of
Negro inferiority was "accepted
without question and in line with this
belief racial barriers, both legal and
social, were tightly drawn."
As early as the middle of the eighteenth
century Negro slaves were
found in the French settlement at
Vincennes. Thereafter, during the terri-
torial period, in spite of the free
status provision of the Northwest
Ordinance (1787), practically all
Negroes were held in slavery or under a
type of long-term indenture which
differed only slightly from outright
slavery. The first Indiana state
constitution was drafted in 1816, at which
time opponents of the extension of
slavery were dominant. Yet their opposi-
tion was based largely on a desire to
preserve Indiana as a white man's
abode and was influenced relatively
little by any humanitarian regard for
the Negro.
Before 1861, in the state of Indiana,
colored people were regarded as
aliens whose entry was opposed by white
settlers. Efforts were made to
exclude them and to send to Liberia
those already resident in the state.
Laws denied them the right to vote and
imposed severe legal disabilities
upon them, and Negro children were not admitted
to the public schools.
Yet the "free" soil of Indiana
attracted many free Negroes and escaped
slaves from the South, and some of these
aided others to flee from bondage
by means of the Underground Railroad.
The Society of Friends had a considerable
number of local meetings in
Indiana, and these Quakers--among other
humanitarians--endeavored to
assist Negroes and to obtain the repeal
of discriminatory laws against them.
In a period of dominant rural life
before the Civil War, Negroes, living
largely in the country, were especially
numerous in areas of Quaker settle-
ment. Philanthropic Quakers and others
aided them in founding schools and
churches, and Indiana Negroes became so
attached to the life of their com-
munities that they frowned on efforts to
induce them to go to Liberia.
The drastic fugitive slave law of 1850
and the second Indiana constitu-
tion of the same year (the latter
specifically prohibiting the entry of Negro
settlers) meant that the Negro population
increased only slightly from 1850
to 1861. During the rest of the century
the Negro population increased
more than fivefold. The newcomers,
largely emancipated slaves from the
upper South, settled mainly in the towns
and cities, contributing to the pre-
dominantly urban status of the Indiana
Negro by 1900.
While legal and political gains after
1865 were substantial, Negroes being
recognized as citizens, voters, and
officeholders, and the children being
admitted to the public schools (although
mostly on a segregated basis), dis-
crimination continued in a drastic way.
A double standard of justice prevailed
BOOK REVIEWS 277
(with lynchings increasing toward the
end of the century); schools for
colored children were frequently
inferior; social and economic obstacles
tended to restrict Negroes to menial
employment; and Negroes were in
practice barred from places of
entertainment patronized by whites. Churches
(especially of Baptist and African
Methodist Episcopal affiliation), lodges,
and newspapers established by the
Negroes served as means of organiza-
tion, communication, and protest. The
author comments:
By 1900 patterns of racial relationships
had evolved which were to re-
main largely unbroken for almost half a
century. The condition of Negroes
in Indiana remained far more favorable
than that of members of their race
in the states of the South where white
supremacy was rampant, but the
hopes of equality and opportunity which
had been bright in the years follow-
ing Emancipation had fallen far short of
realization.
The author, a faculty member of Butler
University, has performed a
thorough and craftsmanlike research
task, using newspapers, public records,
and other pertinent materials. Almost
any reader will gain from the volume
much that is interesting and
enlightening.
Ohio State University FRANCIS P. WEISENBURGER
Forty Years in Politics: The Story of
Ben Pelham. By Aris A. Mallas, Jr.,
Rea McCain, and Margaret K. Hedden.
(Detroit: Wayne University
Press, 1957. xi~92p.; illustrations.
$3.00.)
Benjamin B. Pelham, born in 1862 of free
Negro parents who had
migrated to Detroit from Virginia in
1859, entered public life via the news-
paper route. He began publishing a Negro
newspaper the Plaindealer, some-
time in the early eighties (the authors
neglect to tell us when), and the
journal apparently enjoyed some
influence in Detroit political circles. Active
service in the Republican cause during
the campaign of 1894 earned Pelham
an appointment as junior clerk in the
office of the Wayne County treasurer.
From this post he moved on to become
clerk for the register of deeds in
1903, and in 1908 he was named
accountant to the board of county auditors,
a position he held until his retirement
in 1942. During this long period of
service Pelham also became clerk to the
board of auditors and committee
clerk to the board of supervisors.
Now if anyone would like to learn
something about the board of county
auditors, or the board of county
supervisors, or anything else about Wayne
County government, let me advise him not
to read this book. And if anyone
278
THE OHIO HISTORICAL QUARTERLY
would like to really learn what Ben
Pelham was doing in these forty-seven
years, what he actually did to merit the
title "the executive head of Wayne
County Government," let me again
advise him to go elsewhere. From the
few snatches one gets of the man, it
seems safe to say that a good, substantial
biography could be written about Pelham.
Forty Years in Politics is not a
good, substantial biography.
The book is too short--ninety-two
pages--to do justice to anyone who
was in public life for nearly half a
century. It has no documentation, it has
no index, it has too few dates, and it
has too many memorials, testimonials,
eulogies, and so forth. The authors have
completely failed to subject their
data to scientific scrutiny. According
to them, Pelham never did anything
wrong--I am sure he must have made an
occasional slip, like spilling soup
on his tie. Moreover, all the action is
in a vacuum. You see Pelham, but he
is not in perspective.
If Ben Pelham was important he is worth
a book; if he was not important
he is not worth a book. However this may
be, Forty Years in Politics does a
disservice to both Pelham and posterity.
Marietta College EUGENE C. MURDOCK
The Baptist Church in the Lower
Mississippi Valley, 1776-1845. By
Walter
Brownlow Posey. (Lexington: University
of Kentucky Press, 1957.
ix+166p.; index. $5.00.)
The Baptists, though multifariously
splintered, claim more adherents than
any other single American Protestant
body. And in the lower Mississippi
Valley they not only outnumber all their
rivals but also consider the area
between the Ohio River and the Gulf of
Mexico as the strongest Baptist
section in the nation. Quite naturally,
therefore, Walter B. Posey, professor
of history at Agnes Scott College and
Emory University, selected this de-
nomination as the climactic volume in a
series which began in 1933. First
came The Development of Methodism in
the Old Southwest, 1783-1824,
followed in 1952 by The Presbyterian
Church in the Old Southwest,
1778-1838, and finally the present study, incomparably the best in
format,
style, coverage, and interpretation.
Primarily concerned with the Regular
Baptists, Professor Posey follows
the same pattern of organization and
development employed in the earlier
volumes. He thereby facilitates a more
accurate comparison of the three
major Protestant denominations in their
struggles during the same period
in similar surroundings to bring moral
order out of frontier chaos. Vividly
the author describes the growing pains
of the infant Baptist Church, born
BOOK REVIEWS 279
amidst the hegira of Roger Williams from
Massachusetts to Providence, and
propelled across the frontier by a band
of farmer-preachers, "educated be-
tween the handles of a plough," who
only reluctantly accepted pay for their
ministerial services.
A substantial part of the work pictures
the exertions of the more liberal
leaders to consolidate their loosely
knit, democratically governed church in
the face of the disastrously
diversionary movements of Daniel Parker's anti-
missionary, anti-education, and
anti-evangelistic forces. To compete with the
matchless Methodist system and its
doctrine of free will, the Baptists re-
sorted to associational affiliations and
a diluted form of Calvinism. But both
denominations probably succeeded best in
frustrating the frontiersman by
forcing him to choose either a
dictatorial church government with a demo-
cratic God or an arbitrary God in a
republican church. Unhappily, both
bodies, failing to break slavery were
themselves broken on the issue, the
Baptist schism marking the close of this
study.
In all three volumes the author is fair
and objective, treating diverse
materials sympathetically, and relieving
the more stolid, unexciting portions
with fresh illustrations. Adequately
footnoted and indexed, the interpreta-
tions, though not new, are accurately
reinforced. One unfortunate error of
fact, however, slipped through in spite
of careful editing. In a short chapter
on interchurch relations James B. Finley
receives credit for the inter-
denominational disputations of that
venerable Methodist circuit rider William
Burke (p. 131), but since Finley himself
frequently crossed theological
swords with the Baptists, the confusion
is understandable.
In an age still striving for religious
liberty and the maintenance of a
separate church and state, the Baptist
contribution to republican ideals in
church government demands periodic
review. Both Professor Posey and
the University of Kentucky Press deserve
genuine praise for consummating
in this volume regional studies of the
major denominations in the South,
thereby enriching our cultural and
religious heritage.
Oberlin College PAUL H. BOASE
American English. By Albert H. Marckwardt. (New York: Oxford Univer-
sity Press, 1958. xi~194p.; appendix
and index. $4.50.)
Professor Marckwardt has organized a
large amount of varied material
into a particularly well-unified book.
It is inevitable that in sampling from
so much material for a relatively small
book aimed at a popular audience
he has exaggerated certain features of
American English (e.g., euphemism)
280
THE OHIO HISTORICAL QUARTERLY
at the expense of others of more
interest to the reviewer (e.g., intonation
and social dialect). It is to
Marckwardt's great credit that the book is as
evenly balanced and sensible as it is.
Chapter 1, "The English Language in
America," is an intelligent state-
ment of the relationship of American to
other varieties of English. Though
Marckwardt is of course quite aware of
the heterogeneity of modern Ameri-
can English, in order to dramatize the
contrast with other groups of dialects,
for the greater part of the book he
speaks of American English as if it were
a homogeneous entity; this gets him into
difficulties when he has to judge
whether particular items are in American
English or not.
Chapter 2, "The Language of the
Colonists," reminds us that the
language of the earliest American
colonists was, after all, Elizabethan
English, with all the characteristics
implied by that label. Although his
main point in the chapter, that the differences
between present American
and British varieties of English must
have arisen after the physical separa-
tion of the two, seems right, there is
the possibility, implied but not
developed (p. 20) by Marckwardt, that
present differences between the two
varieties may go back to social or
regional dialectal alternants existing side
by side in England during the
colonization period, but having different social
histories on the two sides of the
Atlantic.
Chapter 3, "The Melting Pot,"
considers the contributions of other
languages to the vocabulary. Here
Marckwardt is inconsistent in his evalua-
tion of the unity of American English;
localized terms like scuppernong,
lagniappe, cuarta, pot cheese, and snits are included without question as be-
ing in American English, while
all Yiddish words, except kosher, kibitzer,
and mazuma, common in
metropolitan dialects, are said not to have "passed
into American English generally."
Also annoying is Marckwardt's mislead-
ing characterization of Yiddish loan
words as "an interesting group of
borrowings related to, or really an
extension of [italics mine], the German
loan words" (p. 56).
Chapter 4, "The Colonial Lag,"
supplies interesting examples of phono-
logical, morphological, syntactical, and
lexical "archaisms" in American
English. Marckwardt's explanation of
such archaisms is picturesque:
Transplanting usually results in a time
lag before the organism, be it a
geranium or a brook trout, becomes
adapted to its new environment. There
is no reason why the same principle
should not apply to a people, their
language, and their culture. (p.80)
-- but specious, it seems to me. In
order to demonstrate that "colonial lag"
BOOK REVIEWS 281
actually operates here, one must
determine the amount of archaism in the
stay-at-home sister dialects and compare
this amount with that determined
for the colony. Without such
quantification and comparison, a term like
"colonial lag" remains
unconvincing, anecdotal, and unsuitable for serious
treatments of language.
Substantially the same remarks hold for
the chapters "Yankee Ingenuity
and the Frontier Spirit" and
"The Genteel Tradition and the Glorification
of the Commonplace," in which
Marckwardt gives plenty of illustration of
the effects of the alleged factors named
in the chapter titles, but no demon-
stration of any kind to show that the
same effects are not found to the same
degree, say, in England, where the factors
presumably have had little or no
force. The weakness of scientific method
in Marckwardt's case for the
effectiveness of such factors is all the
more surprising in view of the
sophistication he shows in his handling
of positive-case evidence, for
example on pages 95, 103, and 124.
Chapter 7, "Regional and Social
Variations," presents a very skillful
account of regional variation of
American English. The section (pp.146-150)
on "social" variation asks the
right question, "Is there a so-called vulgate
which has reasonably uniform
characteristics throughout the country, and if
so, what is it?" (p.146)--but gives
the conventional, wrong answer. For
example, Marckwardt asserts (p.148)
that "most speakers of the substandard
language might be expected to say the
book is hisn," in spite of the convinc-
ing evidence in C. C. Fries' American
English Grammar, page 81, that hisn
is not found at all in a large corpus of
substandard American English. My
feeling is that our best evidence
indicates that his question of uniformity of
the "vulgate" must be answered
either by "no" or "we don't know," rather
than the "yes" that Marckwardt
implies.
Chapter 8, "The Names
Thereof," succeeds very well in pulling together
a great variety of material to
illustrate general principles behind American
practices in giving proper names.
Chapter 9, "The Future of
English," indulges, as one would imagine for
such a subject, in a great deal of
guesswork. Marckwardt's guesses about
the future in structural matters
(summarized on page 180) seem well sup-
ported by presently observable
tendencies. But the future of our vocabulary
and of our social attitudes towards the
language are dependent on future
socio-political events and conditions
that we cannot predict in our capacities
as linguists.
It is characteristic of the popular
level at which this book is written that
Marckwardt chooses to end with a series
of high-sounding flourishes stating
282
THE OHIO HISTORICAL QUARTERLY
that English depends for its development
upon the "courage and resource-
fulness of the people who employ
it," advising that "it is our responsibility
to realize whither the language is
tending, and the duty of our schools and
teachers to promulgate healthy
linguistic attitudes," and finally, promising
that if his advice is followed "a
new era lies before all the English-speaking
peoples."
Ohio State University LEONARD NEWMARK
The Golden Lamb. By Hazel Spencer Phillips. (Oxford, Ohio: Oxford
Press, 1958. viii+68p.; illustrations,
maps, appendices, and index. $2.00.)
By the time the reader--especially the
Ohioan--has finished reading this
brief history of the oldest hotel in
Ohio, he will doubtless form the resolu-
tion to visit the Golden Lamb at Lebanon
at his first opportunity if he has
not already done so. For Hazel Spencer
Phillips has lovingly traced its
history from the log-tavern days of its
founding in 1803, through the stage-
coach days, its continuation under
changing managements as the Lebanon
House for half a century, and its return
to the name Golden Lamb in 1926.
Thumbnail sketches of its more
noteworthy proprietors add human interest,
especially the distinguished career of
its owner and host since 1926, Robert
H. Jones, and his wife.
The author has selected appropriate
extracts from various sources, includ-
ing Lebanon's Western Star and Democratic
Citizen, accounts of adminis-
trators, Henry Howe's Historical
Collections of Ohio, Dickens' American
Notes (he didn't like the temperance hotels of Lebanon, when
he stayed at
the Golden Lamb, then named the Bradley
House), the Cincinnati Gazette,
and the Ohio State Journal.
Reference value is added by the
appendices, which list the furnishings
and their appraised value ($400) in the
estate of Henry Share; the bill of
sale of his goods and chattels; the
distinguished guests for whom rooms have
been named; and the taverns and tavern
keepers of Warren County.
There is an increasing demand for
historical sketches of old landmark
buildings and sites; and well done,
readable accounts, such as Hazel Spencer
Phillips has given us in The Golden
Lamb, will increase the demand and
help maintain the standards of
production. This publication reflects credit
on the Warren County Historical Society,
which was organized at the Golden
Lamb, and upon the Glendower Museum,
both of which evidently co-
operated in the project of this booklet.
Stark County Historical Society E. T. HEALD
BOOK REVIEWS 283
Method and Theory in American
Archaeology. By Gordon R. Willey and
Philip Phillips. (Chicago: University of
Chicago Press, 1957. ix~270p.;
figures, bibliography, and index.
$4.75.)
This is a meaty little volume, which
presents, in its largest section, an
organization of New World prehistory
into five "stages" of cultural develop-
ment called the "Lithic,"
"Archaic," "Formative," "Classic," and
"Post-
classic." In presenting this study
the authors have capitalized on a number
of developments in the study of American
archaeology. One of these develop-
ments is the large number of regional
chronologies which have been pro-
duced by many archaeologists from the
American Arctic to southern Chile,
along with the descriptive data
characterizing the changing cultural pattern.
Another development has been the
recognition and interpretation of the
obviously different levels of cultural
development within geographical areas,
or between areas. A third resource
available has been the recent publications
which translate these archaeological
data into cultural stages and social ac-
tivities. The co-authors have attempted
to align all of the New World data
into a "stage" framework which
has some validity as an interpretative device
in Nuclear America but is less
successfully employed throughout most of the
American continents.
The Lithic stage "is the stage of
adaptation by immigrant societies to the
late glacial and early postglacial
climatic and physiographic conditions in the
New World." It is thus the remains
found in the earliest chronological
period of man's occupancy of the New
World and is not a cultural definition
at all, although their stages are
supposed to be "a segment of a historical
sequence in a given area, characterized
by a dominating pattern of economic
existence" (definition from Krieger). Their Lithic stage lasts from about
20000 B.C. to about 5000 B.C., and
subsistence is by hunting and gathering,
depending upon local environmental
conditions.
The Archaic stage is also characterized
by a hunting and gathering
economy, and "stone implements and
utensils used in the preparation of
wild vegetable foods first appear in
this stage." Non-intensive utilization of
domesticated plants such as corn is also
placed in the Archaic stage. While
the Archaic stage may begin in some
areas before 5000 B.C., it lasts in
some specific cultures to the present.
Other interpreters of American archaeo-
logy might choose to place all hunting
and gathering societies into a single
"stage."
The Formative stage is defined by an
effective subsistence economy,
normally agricultural, which provides a
"well-established, sedentary village
life," and "with societies of
a certain minimal complexity and stability."
284
THE OHIO HISTORICAL QUARTERLY
Since this is an American stage, it is
connected by native American agri-
culture, pottery-making, weaving,
stone-carving, and a specialized ceremonial
architecture.
The Classic stage is defined as the
beginning of urban life in native
America, with developed political and
religious governments, high artistic
and intellectual achievement, widespread
commerce, specialized crafts of a
high order, and a clearly recognizable
class stratification.
The Postclassic stage is defined as
perhaps more urban than the Classic
stage. It is increasingly secular and
there is a decline in the aesthetic level
and religious architecture. It is marked
by increasing attention to fortifica-
tions and organized militaristic
activities. The Classic and Postclassic stages
are only found in Middle America and in
the Peruvian-Bolivian area.
Most of the readers of the Quarterly will
be interested in the manner in
which Willey and Phillips handle Ohio
Valley prehistory. The fluted blades
and perhaps some portion of the lithic
complex at the Parrish site in
Kentucky would be placed in their Lithic
stage. They allocate the sites now
called Archaic in the Ohio Valley to
their Archaic stage. They have classed
Adena in their Formative stage, although
its known characteristics do not
satisfy their definition. When Adena is
compared with Middle American
and Peruvian Formative cultures, the
contrast in development and complexity
is so great that it is difficult to
understand the authors' position in this
matter. The great majority of the Adena
sites would better fit their concept
of Archaic, while some of the larger and
late Adena sites are more compar-
able to the main Ohio Valley Hopewell
sites, which they also place in the
Formative stage. The latter stage also
includes the Middle Mississippi sites
in the lower Ohio, and presumably, Fort
Ancient. Willey and Phillips ques-
tion whether smaller Hopewellian sites
in Ohio and the Middle West would
belong in their Formative stage even
though they were Hopewell in their
culture content! The Late Woodland sites
in the Ohio Valley in my inter-
pretation of their classification would
represent reversion to the Archaic
stage, as well as a fair number of Fort
Ancient and Iroquoian sites.
This volume should have been titled,
"An Interpretive Method and
Theory in American Archaeology."
There are quite a number of archaeo-
logical methods and theories which are
not touched upon in its first section.
In the first part of the book an
organizational framework is presented which
can serve as a guide for prehistoric
studies. There is a selected but compre-
hensive bibliography. I trust the
authors did not see the invalid claims for
their publication which appear on the
flaps of the jacket.
Let it be said that the authors
recognized that their "historical-develop-
mental" stages as determined by
"culture-historical integration" are designed
BOOK REVIEWS 285
to present prehistoric American
achievement in general terms of a series of
cultural levels. The stages should not
be used as a research end or as a major
interpretive device in any particular
small geographical area. The five-stage
classification presented here is an
interesting example of how two men
would adjust American prehistory into
such a grouping.
University of Michigan JAMES B. GRIFFIN
Outpost on the Wabash, 1787-1791:
Letters of Brigadier General Josiah
Harmar and Major John Francis
Hamtramck and Other Letters and Docu-
ments Selected from the Harmar Papers in the William L. Clements
Library. Edited by Gayle Thornbrough. Indiana Historical
Society Publica-
tions, Vol. 19. (Indianapolis: Indiana Historical Society,
1957. 305p.;
illustration, map, and index. $2.50.)
In Outpost on the Wabash the
Indiana Historical Society adds another
important item to its already long and
distinguished list of publications. In
view of the high caliber and fine
scholarship of its predecessors, the current
volume leaves no stone unturned in its
presentation of the trials and troubles,
problems and pursuits of frontier
commander Major John Francis Ham-
tramck at Post Vincennes.
Outpost on the Wabash is composed primarily of the interchange of letters
between Hamtramck at Vincennes and the
commander of the federal forces
in the Northwest Territory, Josiah
Harmar, from June 15, 1787, to June 15,
1791. In this four-year period one is
given a first-hand glimpse of affairs in
the territory: troubles with Indians,
the bungling and dilatory efforts (or
lack of same) of Arthur St. Clair to
establish effective government, the per-
fidious actions of the contractors in
supplying provisions to the army, the
weakness of military authority, the
implications of foreign affairs for the
frontier, and numerous other details of
perhaps less significance to the broad
story being unfolded.
The well-written and well-conceived
introduction sets the stage for the
drama unfolded in the correspondence and
summarizes the themes of the
scenes as portrayed by the letters.
Perhaps it is here only that the reviewer
felt that more emphasis could have been
put on certain phases of develop-
ment, particularly British policies
toward the territory and development
thereof.
The editing of the correspondence is
complete almost to a fault. Here
the thoroughness of good scholarship is
predominantly evident. Explanations
are complete; identifications fall
within reasonable limits; and supplementary
286
THE OHIO HISTORICAL QUARTERLY
materials are profusely included in
notes. Perhaps bold type for letter captions
would have aided the reader in
distinguishing individual items, but this is a
small point. Likewise the addition of a
bibliography and a calendar of the
letters would have been a distinct aid
to the researcher using Outpost in con-
junction with other materials.
As one reads the scores of letters
included in this edition, he is constantly
amazed that the problems which dogged
the territory until the beginning of
the nineteenth century, perhaps even
through the War of 1812, were
evident at the initiation of the
territorial period. Vigorous action was seldom,
if ever, evident in the government or
the military arrangements of the
period covered. It was not until
"Mad" Anthony Wayne arrived on the
scene in the mid-nineties that any
effective measures were taken to bring
order out of the smoldering chaos in the
territory. In the final paragraph of
the introduction Miss Thornbrough notes:
"Hamtramck probably found it
easier to adapt himself to the
conditions of life in a frontier post than did
Harmar who had reveled in the society of
European capitals." As one reads
the correspondence in Outpost and
the remainder in the Indiana Society's
Harmar Collection, he wonders if Harmar
did any real adapting at all.
Great credit is due to Miss Thornbrough
and the Indiana Historical
Society for again scoring a point for
historical scholarship with the publica-
tion of Outpost on the Wabash.
Anthony Wayne Parkway Board RICHARD C. KNOPF
The American Heritage Book of Great
Historic Places. By the editors of
American Heritage, the Magazine of
History; narrative by Richard M.
Ketchum. (New York: American Heritage
Publishing Company with
Simon and Shuster, 1957. 376p.;
illustrations and index. $12.50.)
This handsome volume, according to the
dust jacket, is designed to be
"both a new kind of history and a
guide to the historic riches that are to be
seen in our own country." Certainly
it is a compilation of, and a guide to, the
more significant historic places in this
country, and the use of the events and
personalities associated with these
places to explain the shaping of the
American heritage is different from the
approach employed in other pic-
torial histories.
The book is dominated by hundreds of
superb modern photographs--154
of them in full color--of the surviving
physical remains of American history
supplemented by a large number of
contemporaneous paintings, prints, and
BOOK REVIEWS 287
drawings. In the selection of the
illustrations the editors have demonstrated
excellent judgment. The presentation of
such a collection alone is a major
contribution.
Although it is impossible, as Bruce
Catton points out in his brief intro-
duction, to catalog in one book all of
the historic places in America, the
editors have selected nearly 2,800 of
them after consultations with local
historians and members of congress.
These places have been grouped into
nine geographical sections, from New
England to the South and then
westward to the Pacific Northwest. The
informal commentary by Richard
M. Ketchum, one of the editors of the American
Heritage, is written in the
lively style that has been so popular
and successful in that magazine. Each
regional section is followed by a map
and a supplementary listing of lesser-
known places of interest, alphabetically
arranged by state.
Of the nine sections of the book, the
one concerning New England is the
best and the most comprehensive. Here
Mr. Ketchum's narrative is fresh
and filled with enthusiasm. As one
travels southward with the narrator,
however, this enthusiasm appears to dim
somewhat.
The supplementary list of the historic
sites in New England is also the
best in the book. To the southward,
especially, questions arise in the mind
of the reader about the selection of
sites. In New Jersey, for example, why
are Barnegat, Glassboro, Salem, and
Swedesboro omitted, if Allaire, Cald-
well, and Gloucester Point Park are
included? It should also be noted that
the Red Bank of the American Revolution
was located on the Delaware
River, not near the coast. Omissions and
errors such as these, lead this re-
viewer to suggest that it might have
been wiser for the editors to have con-
sulted more local historians and fewer
congressmen.
The maps locating the various historic sites are also inadequate if the
book is to serve as a guide. The vast
majority of people travel today by auto-
mobile, and guide maps should at least
locate sites in relationship to the
main arteries of travel. In this regard,
the maps issued by the automobile
club and oil companies are more useful.
The student of American history will
find no new information in this
volume. This is not its purpose. As a
handy compilation of the principal
historic sites in this country, however,
the volume will serve as a useful tool.
The student will appreciate the careful
selection of illustrations, and he will
hope that in the next edition more care
will be exercised in the preparation
of the maps and supplementary listings
of the historic places in our history.
Colonial Williamsburg EDWARD M. RILEY
288
THE OHIO HISTORICAL QUARTERLY
Magnificent Missourian: The Life of
Thomas Hart Benton. By Elbert B.
Smith. (Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott
Company, 1958. 351p.; index.
$6.00.)
Over fifty years ago three
historians--Theodore Roosevelt, William M.
Meigs, and Joseph M. Rogers--wrote
full-length studies of the life of
Thomas Hart Benton. Now, after a
half-century lapse, we have been treated
to two new biographies, William N.
Chambers Old Bullion Benton (1956),
and the volume under consideration. Both
books are more than adequate,
but further comparison is almost
inevitable. Smith's Magnificent Missourian
is much shorter and more colorfully
written. He avoids the minutiae of
Benton's political career, picking and
choosing so as to present a well-
rounded interpretation. Chambers' is
more detailed and scholarly, its style is
more sedate, and it contains an
excellent bibliography (which the Smith
book lacks). I would assign Smith for
undergraduate reading and purchase
Chambers for my own use.
There are several disturbing ingredients
contained in this volume. For
example, the author is not always
consistent. He describes Benton's opposi-
tion, in the early 1800's, to
preferential treatment of settlers on Indian lands
not yet acquired by the government.
"This devotion to legal right," says
Smith, "continued throughout
Benton's life" (p. 31). Yet, in 1830 (and
many times thereafter), Benton was
instrumental in having congress pass
preemption acts to benefit
"thousands of optimistic and law-ignoring
settlers throughout the west . . .
happily working Government lands not
yet on the market" (p. 114). Nor is
Smith's meaning clear when he dis-
cusses organization of the
Kansas-Nebraska region. On the same page that
he states, "No evidence existed to
indicate that the Southern people felt any
particular concern with the matter, and
a bill organizing the area without
mention of slavery would probably have
passed without significant opposi-
tion," he also writes, "Certain
Southerners . . . threatened Douglas with a
new sectional quarrel if the attempt was
made" (p. 295). Actually, several
bills to organize that territory earlier
than 1854 had been defeated by
southern votes.
The analysis of Andrew Jackson's war on
the Second Bank leaves much
to be desired. Smith states that
"in fighting back" against Jackson's order
prohibiting further deposits of
government funds in the bank, Biddle "justi-
fied almost every argument by Benton
against its recharter in the first place.
By suddenly curtailing loans, notes, and
credit, the bank produced overnight
a serious panic where business could not
operate without credit" (p. 148).
(Smith says, in a footnote, that
Schlesinger, Jr., "clearly exaggerates the
Northeastern radical influence on the
Jackson movement." Yet Smith's
BOOK REVIEWS 289
handling of the bank issue is similar to
the same slanted interpretation it
receives in The Age of Jackson. Smith's
secondary sources are Schlesinger,
Bowers, Swisher, and Catterall. He
neglects the work of Walter B. Smith and
Bray Hammond.) In the one example I have
cited, it is true that Biddle
acted to curtail bank credit; and he did
hope that financial distress might
force a recharter. But this credit
reduction approximated the lowering of
public and private deposits in the bank
during that period; in short, it was
a necessary move, financially sound and
conservative.
Smith's striving for color leads him on
occasion to make up words (like
"boilerful," on page 195).
Nevertheless, students will enjoy and understand
the views of Benton on the major issues
of the pre-Civil War period. Like
those of other great senators of that
era--Clay, Webster, and Calhoun--the
career of Thomas Hart Benton spanned and
mirrored American history "in
the days leading to its greatest
sorrow."
Montana State University MORTON BORDEN
Denison: The Story of an Ohio
College. By G. Wallace Chessman.
(Gran-
ville, Ohio: Denison University, 1957.
xiv~451p.; illustrations, guide to
the sources, and index. $4.00.)
Twenty-six years after the founding of
Granville, Ohio, in 1805, a
seminary, destined to become Denison
University, held its opening exercises
in the uncompleted Granville Baptist
Church. The sesquicentennial of the
town in 1955 was marked by the
publication of William T. Utter's engaging
Granville: The Story of an Ohio
Village. Now, in observance of the
125th
anniversary of the college, comes Mr.
Chessman's detailed and thorough-
going history of Denison University.
These companion books make up a
uniquely balanced record of town and
gown in midwestern America.
Mr. Utter's book traced the development
of a village whose principal busi-
ness has been the education of other
people's children. In Mr. Chessman's
volume that "principal
business" is followed from small beginnings through
difficulty, development, and many
changes. Now the people of Granville
must be enviably informed of their own
history.
Like many American colleges, Denison
sprang from a need for a trained
clergy. On a December day in 1831 a
ceremony in the drafty meetinghouse
inaugurated the Granville Literary and
Theological Institution, created by
the Baptist Education Society. It was
bravely launched, its founders wanting
to erect a true "Western"
seminary which would advance their denomination
throughout the Ohio and Mississippi
valleys.
Actually the college had humble
beginnings. Its opening enrollment was
290 THE OHIO HISTORICAL
QUARTERLY
thirty-seven, half of them under fifteen
years and two past thirty. These
earnest youths trudged through "a
measured mile of unmeasured mud" to a
bare college building on a farm outside
the village. Fire destroyed the first
edifice, and when it was rebuilt debt
hung over it in a darkening cloud.
After twenty years of financial struggle
in the seminary and denominational
controversy in Granville, the
institution's future was dim. Proposals to move
it to Lebanon and Cincinnati were under
consideration in 1853, when
"William S. Dennison" of
Zanesville saved it for Granville with a gift of
$10,000. A year later the newly named
Denison University (it was learned
that the benefactor spelled his name
with one "n") was moved to the hilltop
above the village, a setting which for a
hundred years has given grace and
distinction to the college.
To a modern reader there is a charm in
the record of homely beginnings
and persevering struggle that produced
our surviving institutions. Mr. Chess-
man effectively recreates the period of
poor and earnest students for whom
college was a life of labor, study, and
prayer. He pictures the early literary
societies reading their essays, debating
hard issues, and accumulating their
libraries. (It is pleasant to know that
slight, boyish Lyman C. Draper, who
later founded a great historical
collection, was the first secretary of the
Calliopean Society and sought the first
volumes for its shelves.) He shows the
arrival of Greek letter fraternities, at
first sub rosa, their gradual replacing of
the literary halls, and the changes they
brought to the college life.
This book looks at the development of a
college in all its aspects--
administrative, financial, curricular,
religious, social. It follows the struggle
for academic freedom and the lessening
of denominational control. It traces
the gradual secularizing of the
curriculum and the growth of a movement
toward general education. It recounts
successive endowment campaigns and
describes the growth of the idyllic
campus on the hill. But here Mr. Chess-
man is unduly restrained: the changing
seasons on their hilltop must have
haunted Denison students of every
generation.
Miami University WALTER HAVIGHURST
School and I: The Autobiography of an
Ohio Schoolmaster. By Frank P.
Whitney. (Yellow Springs, Ohio: Antioch
Press, 1957. 173p.; frontispiece
and index of education topics. $3.00.)
The former principal of Collinwood High
School in Cleveland has pro-
vided the reader with a basic
autobiographical sketch of his life, as well as a
keen insight into the educational
problems with which he became involved.
A graduate of Oberlin College, Mr.
Whitney has been active on the Ohio
BOOK REVIEWS 291
educational scene as teacher,
administrator, and supervisor for nearly a half
century.
The author traces his childhood in a
small Ohio community--Fairfield
Township in Huron County--from the time
of his birth in 1875 to the years
following his retirement. The reader
follows his progress through school and
college and into his first jobs in the
classroom.
Mr. Whitney's first job was in Wakeman
as assistant to the superin-
tendent. When the superintendent
resigned, the board of education elected
Whitney as his successor. He says: "Needless to say, I accepted
quite
promptly at what appeared to me at that
time as the truly munificent salary
of $70 per month for nine months. Even
before I received my diploma I had
a job, without making any application or
presenting any references. What
a wonderful feeling! Thus began a career
of forty-seven years as an Ohio
schoolmaster."
After two years at Wakeman the village
schoolteacher decided to apply for
teaching jobs in larger schools. His
answer came from Wells L. Griswold,
superintendent of the village schools of
Collinwood, then a suburb of Cleve-
land. "This call determined my
future. The next ten years I spent in Collin-
wood and the rest of my teaching life in
Cleveland, which annexed Collin-
wood at the end of the ten year
period."
But School and I is more than an
autobiography. While the reader par-
ticipates in the incidents in the life
of a schoolteacher, superintendent, and
principal, he also becomes aware of
basic philosophies and concepts.
Mr. Whitney's whole approach to
education is that of a practical under-
standing and application. Of special
interest is the chapter titled "The School
I'd Like to Have." Each point, such
as character development, school or-
ganization and administration, student
problems, academic instruction, extra-
curricular activities, adequate housing,
vocational training, and teaching staff,
is discussed in the light of necessary
developments for a modern-day school
system--with its feet planted firmly on
the ground.
It is significant that in his retirement
the author still felt that "one could
hardly fail to find in teaching and
school administration unending exhilira-
tion. Certainly life offers no greater
joy than to witness the miracle of growth,
above all, growth in human powers and
human personalities. This is the high
privilege of the teacher as of the
parent; sometimes to be sure his despair,
when growth is thwarted or stunted, but
always for him the ground for
whatever hope he may have for the future
and for the more abundant life."
The essence of Mr. Whitney's educational
philosophy is clearly stated.
School and I is an unpretentious story of a gentleman, a scholar, a
philos-
opher, and a school administrator with a
practical eye.
Ohio Department of Education E. E. HOLT
292
THE OHIO HISTORICAL QUARTERLY
Bibliography of Pennsylvania History.
Second edition of Writings on Penn-
sylvania History: A Bibliography. Compiled by Norman B. Wilkinson.
Edited by S. K. Stevens and Donald H.
Kent. (Harrisburg: Pennsylvania
Historical and Museum Commission, 1957.
xxx~826p.; index. $7.00.)
In 1946 the Pennsylvania Historical and
Museum Commission published
Writings on Pennsylvania History: A
Bibliography of Printed Secondary
Works. Although, as the title indicates, it was limited in
scope, it was, never-
theless, a much needed compilation. Not
only was it a handy reference and
research tool but it pointed out serious
gaps in writings on the history of the
state. And, happily, it became the
foundation upon which the new
edition is constructed.
What does the present work contain? It
adds the historical literature of
the 1943-52 decade to that of the
previous volume, as well as omissions from
the earlier edition. The scope of its
coverage includes, among other things,
printed source materials, graduate
theses and dissertations, textbooks on all
levels, and pamphlet materials.
The nearly ninety-two hundred entries
(as compared with over sixty-one
hundred in the first edition) are
grouped into four major categories: biblio-
graphical aids; bibliography of
Pennsylvania history; general and special
works which do not fit conveniently into
the chronological-topical outline
of the previous section; and folklore
tales, legends, poetry, and plays. Many
of the entries are supplemented with a
content-annotation. The table of
contents is a guide to the organization
of the volume and the more than one-
hundred-page detailed index is an
invaluable aid. Although the introduction
states that coverage "extends from
prehistoric times," the section on "natives"
(archaeology, customs and manners,
industries, religion, tribes, and chiefs)
is notably short and selective with only
about one hundred and fifty entries.
This situation is partly taken care of
by other existing bibliographies; but
these are by no means exhaustive. It
would seem, with the considerable
activity and interest in the subject,
that more would have been included in
the present work; or with some
justification, the topic could have been
omitted entirely.
Bibliographies and similar compilations,
such as calendars and indices,
are indispensable tools to historical
endeavor of any sort, especially to re-
search. Without them the task of the
historian would be much more diffi-
cult. With the publication of the
present work, and with such companion
pieces as the Guide to the Manuscript
Collections of The Historical Society of
Pennsylvania (2d edition, Philadelphia, 1949) and the cumulative and
analytical Index for the first
seventy-five volumes of the Pennsylvania Maga-
zine of History and Biography (Philadelphia, 1954), and others, Pennsylvania
BOOK REVIEWS 293
history has enviable coverage. Other
nearby states have good bibliographical
materials, for example, J. Winston
Coleman, Jr., A Bibliography of Kentucky
History (Lexington, 1949) and F. B. Streeter, Michigan
Bibliography (2
vols., Lansing, 1921), but not to the
extent and scope of Pennsylvania.
This Bibliography of Pennsylvania
History has considerable relevance and
use for the study of the history of Ohio
and the Old Northwest, not only
because of Pennsylvania's antecedent position
geographically as well as
chronologically in American history but
because a political boundary between
the two did not restrict the movement of
settlers, armies, or Indians, nor did
it circumscribe other ingredients of
historical development.
It is with considerable reluctance, but
this reviewer feels constrained to
comment that it is most unfortunate that
this work is so poorly bound. The
initial binding was bad; and the
reviewer's copy of a subsequent binding is
not improved very much. Even with
careful handling it still has broken.
Such a valuable reference tool that will
have considerable use needs better
binding, even if it means a higher price
for the book.
Miami University DWIGHT L. SMITH
Created Equal? The Complete
Lincoln-Douglas Debates of 1858. Edited
and
with an introduction by Paul M. Angle.
(Chicago: University of Chicago
Press, 1958. xxxiii~422p.;
illustrations, appendix, and index. $7.50.)
Readers of this journal may be
interested to know that the famous
Lincoln-Douglas debates were first
printed in book form by the firm of
Follett, Foster, and Company in Columbus
in 1860. The original edition,
which became an important campaign
document, was based on a scrapbook
compiled by Lincoln from newspaper
accounts soon after the debates took
place. The present edition, issued on
the one hundredth anniversary of the
debates, is based on the text originally
published in Columbus and includes
not only the full text of the seven
formal debates but five preliminary
speeches, three by Lincoln and two by
Douglas, which were a part of the
campaign. Included also are an appendix
giving a chronological list of all
the speeches made by the two candidates
in the campaign of 1858 and an
introduction by the editor, Paul M.
Angle.
Mr. Angle maintains that the debates are
important, not only because of
their effect on the political careers of
the participants but also because they
were concerned with national issues that
are still alive. Although the dis-
cussion at times wandered off into local
issues or personal squabbles, it was
primarily concerned with the questions
of slavery in the territories, the status
of the Negro, and the power of the
states to regulate that status. Citing the
294
THE OHIO HISTORICAL QUARTERLY
events that followed the supreme court
decision of 1954 desegregating the
public schools, the editor says,
"The status of the Negro and the rights of
the states to regulate that status, are
questions as live today and as danger-
ously charged with emotion as they were
when Lincoln and Douglas dis-
cussed them a hundred years ago."
That the questions of state rights and
civil rights are live questions, no
one will deny. But do the
Lincoln-Douglas debates shed important light on
present-day problems? Do they furnish us
safe guidelines, reliable general
principles to point the way through
present difficulties? This reviewer doubts
it. He is more inclined to see irony and
paradox in any comparison of the
situation prevailing now and that
existing a hundred years ago. Take, for
example, the situations regarding
supreme court decisions which a large
part of the country found unpalatable. A
large part of the Lincoln-Douglas
debates was concerned with what could or
should be done about the Dred
Scott decision, which the court rendered
in 1857. The court declared that
Negroes were not, and could not be,
citizens of the United States, and that
congress did not have the power to make
any laws depriving slaveholders of
their slave property in the territories.
The court furthermore declared the
Missouri Compromise (which had already
been repealed by act of congress)
unconstitutional. Theoretically at
least, this decision deprived the congress,
or the people of the territory itself,
of the right to exclude slavery.
Throughout most of the northern states
there was a great outcry against this
decision, and the court was condemned in
most extreme terms. Lincoln was
not extreme, but he frankly disagreed
with the decision and hoped to see it
reversed. He took the position that the
court was not the only branch of the
federal system with the capacity to
govern, and he cited Jefferson, Jackson,
and others to sustain his position.
Those who, in the present situation, preach
obedience to the law as the supreme
court sees it must go, not to Lincoln,
but to Douglas for comfort. "I will
not stop to inquire whether I agree or
disagree with all the opinions expressed
by Judge Taney or any other
judge," said Douglas. "It is
enough for me to know the decision has been
made .... Where is the remedy when you
refuse obedience to the con-
stituted authorities?" About the
only lesson to be drawn is that both liberals
and conservatives have preached
reverence for the court in exact propor-
tion to whether the court speaks in
accordance with their wishes and desires.
On the question of the status of the
Negro is there some great insight to
be drawn from the debates? On this
question there were differences between
Lincoln and Douglas, but they were of
degree, not of kind. Both believed,
or at least said they believed, the
Negro was an inferior race. Nevertheless,
there is about Douglas' statements a
certain harshness and coldness and
BOOK REVIEWS 295
about Lincoln's a certain sympathy and
compassion. Douglas (a New
Englander by birth) was unequivocally
for white supremacy and frankly
considered Negroes and Indians (and
apparently all colored peoples) in-
ferior and unfit to be citizens or
voters. He professed a perfect indifference
to slavery: white men should rule and
should vote slavery up or down in
states or territories as they saw fit.
Lincoln (a southerner by birth) con-
sidered the Negro inferior but was
unwilling for the white man to add to
his disabilities. There is downright
contradiction in what Lincoln said about
the status of the Negro; he trimmed his
sails. But when he was in the
northern part of the state at least, he
pronounced slavery a blot, a moral
evil, that should be placed in a
position of ultimate extinction.
As to the rights of the states to
regulate the status of the Negro, there was
no difference, even of degree, between
the candidates. Douglas questioned
the wisdom of states' making Negroes
voters but he did not question their
right to do so. Lincoln also stated that
he was against making citizens of
Negroes, but he would leave the matter
up to the states.
It is one of the ironies of the
situation that although both men were con-
servatives and both believed honestly in
state rights, they both made charges
that the other was a radical bent on
destroying local self-government. Seizing
upon Lincoln's statement that a house
divided against itself can not stand,
Douglas tried to make it appear that
Lincoln was a radical abolitionist, ready
to plunge the nation into a horrible
civil war to free the slaves. It was no
use for Lincoln to point out that his
house divided speech was a prophecy,
not a program, that he would merely limit
the further extension of slavery
in the territories, and that he did not
advocate the freeing of slaves in the
states where slavery existed. On the
offensive, Lincoln charged that Douglas
was part of a conspiracy not only to extend slavery to the territories
but to
nationalize and extend it to the free
states. It was no use for Douglas to
point out that he had consistently
fought for the principle of popular
sovereignty and that he would not
interfere with the local institutions of any
state. In other words, both men
exaggerated and, for political advantage,
made charges they knew were extreme.
It would be possible to extract from
these speeches certain ringing phrases
and lofty sentiments which would seem to
apply to today's issues. Actually,
however, both Lincoln's and Douglas'
views were much too circumscribed by
the scientific and social thought of
their day to have much applicability to
contemporary problems. One hundred years
ago, modern psychology, cultural
anthropology, and sociology were unheard
of. Furthermore, the politics of
that day, to say nothing of
international relations, are not what they are
today. This is not to say that the study
of the debates is useless. On the
296 THE OHIO
HISTORICAL QUARTERLY
contrary, such study and comparison is
useful precisely because it brings out
the tremendous difference in the
contexts of the problems then and now.
Furthermore, in spite of a certain
amount of exaggeration and abuse, the
Lincoln-Douglas debates are a credit to
both men because they explored from
almost every conceivable angle the most
important political issues of the day
in a local election. Both men had given
careful thought and deep study
(always of course within the confines of
knowledge of the day) to matters
they discussed. Both were skilled
dialecticians. They so defined the issues
that the voters, who came to hear them
in droves, could make an informed
decision. Can as much be said for
senatorial elections today?
Ohio State University HARRY L. COLES
The French in North America: A
Bibliographical Guide to French Archives,
Reproductions, and Research Missions.
By Henry Putney Beers. (Baton
Rouge: Louisiana State University Press,
1957. xi~413p.; appendices,
bibliography, and index. $12.50.)
This book seems rather a history than a
guide. A guide is usually a handy,
workaday reference manual consulted
briefly but often; but this is a history
of the reproduction of French archives
relating to the French in North
America. It is not historiography,
either, but an account of the transcribing,
calendaring, cataloging, publishing, and
filming of the sources. The title
French in North America therefore means just those aspects likely to appear
in French archives: the French regime
here before 1763, and Franco-
American diplomacy after 1775. It does
not mean the ethnic pockets that
that regime left in Louisiana or the
Midwest or deposited indirectly in New
England. It has little to do with
colonizations like Gallipolis.
Why a history of mining French (or any)
archives? Three reasons come
to mind. First, the book is the pedigree
of many a copy of French records.
The provenance of transcripts is the
measure of their respectability and
authority. Yet this purpose alone would
scarcely justify a large book, since,
as Mr. Beers tells us, the usefulness of
the transcripts is lessened by their
having been made selectively for
particular purposes.
Another purpose, broader and more
important, is to encourage further
research in the French archives, and to
point out little-used records. Mr.
Beers suggests several areas that might
be opened or reopened by resort to
these archives. The propagation of the
faith is one example; American
biographies are another. Joel Barlow and
Aaron Burr are among those
mentioned.
BOOK REVIEWS 297
The third apparent object of this
history of past efforts is to show lessons
applicable to all the growing number of
projects for filming and publishing
large masses of papers. The scholars who
plan, and the administrators who
evaluate, these expensive projects may
find this book pertinent even if they
know no French. Let us hope that the
title does not make them mutter,
"Somebody else's field," and
pass it by. Two of the basic lessons seem to be:
(1) states should stop wasting money in
competitive or duplicate projects;
and (2) no one should start grandiose
publication plans without any idea
where the money is to come from. These
lessons are obvious when stated,
but some historical societies have been
blind to one or both of them.
In an appendix at the end of the book is
a chronological list of those who
have visited the French archives,
beginning with Jared Sparks in 1828 and
ending with the Jamestown celebration
last year. The list includes Lewis
Cass, George Bancroft, Francis Parkman,
Henry Adams, Frederick Jackson
Turner, Reuben Gold Thwaites, Claude Van
Tyne, Samuel Eliot Morison,
James T. Adams, Samuel Flagg Bemis,
Randolph Adams, Louis Gottschalk,
Theodore Calvin Pease, Grace Lee Nute,
and many others worthy of men-
tion. It is something of a summary of
the book. It is also a testimony to the
importance of the materials, to draw
such people to them.
Miami University JOHN WEATHERFORD
American Industry and the European
Immigrant, 1860-1885. By Charlotte
Erickson. (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard
University Press, 1957. x~269p.;
appendices, notes, and index. $4.75.)
In this volume Charlotte Erickson (Mrs.
G. L. Watt) of the London
School of Economic and Political
Science, presents a challenging new inter-
pretation of the relation of American
industry to the recruiting and dis-
tribution of immigrant labor in the
generation from 1860 to 1885. The time
span involved is essentially from the
passage by congress in July 1864 of
"The Act to Encourage
Immigration" (the contract labor law), repealed in
1868, to the enactment of the Foran act
of 1885, which forbade the
importation of contract labor. In a
limited way the story is carried beyond
1885 in an evaluation of the various amendments
to the Foran act that
rather ineffectively sought to secure
satisfactory enforcement.
Source materials, involving widely
scattered records in the United States,
Great Britain, and the Scandinavian
countries, include (among much other
data), annual reports of corporations;
labor, trade, and daily newspapers;
records of the old federal bureau of
immigration; letters of United States
298
THE OHIO HISTORICAL QUARTERLY
consuls abroad and of European consuls
in America; and trade union
records.
The conclusion is reached that the act
of 1864 was intended to encourage
the immigration of skilled industrial
workers, chiefly from Great Britain.
Only occasionally, however, did American
industrialists seek to attain this
end and then not very successfully, and
contract labor proved to be a rarity
in the United States. Unskilled laborers
were readily available in most
instances, as they came in great numbers
from the farms and villages of
Europe. Agents for western states, for
railroad and land companies, and for
steamship companies, and private
commission agents were effective recruiters
of such labor.
Of various labor placement bureaus in
American cities, some were operated
privately for economic gain and some
were conducted by state, religious, or
philanthropic organizations. Private
labor agencies were often effective in
providing industrialists with immigrant
labor to break strikes or weaken the
unions.
The research presented in this study
indicates that the Foran act resulted
from the efforts of a highly specialized
group, window-glass fabricators,
whose skills were not then subject to
mechanization and whose work could
be duplicated only by the importation of
skilled British and Belgian crafts-
men on labor contracts. To gain
widespread support for such legislation,
appeal was made successfully to the
Knights of Labor to sponsor the
measure, the argument being made of the
need for restricting unskilled con-
tract laborers, especially from southern
and eastern Europe. Actually, the law
had practically no effect on the flow of
unskilled immigrants.
The study is especially important for
Ohioans, because the act of 1885 was
sponsored by Martin Foran, an active
trade unionist of Cleveland, who
served in congress from 1883 to 1889.
The glass industry in Ohio was
rapidly expanding from 1870 to 1890,
hence the efforts of the glass workers
to maintain their preferred status are
of considerable interest. Included also
is significant material showing the way
in which coal operators and iron
manufacturers in Ohio used immigrant
labor for strike-breaking purposes.
But, apart from the local interest
involved, the monograph is certainly a
careful analysis of an important aspect
of American economic history.
Ohio State University FRANCIS P. WEISENBURGER
Book Reviews
The Jacksonian Persuasion: Politics
and Belief. By Marvin Meyers. (Stan-
ford, Calif.: Stanford University Press,
1957. vii~234p.; appendices,
bibliography, and index. $5.00.)
This slim volume is the latest in the
recent series of attempts to discern
the elusive meaning behind that
deceptive textbook phrase, "Jacksonian
democracy." Professor Meyers'
monograph will not win a Pulitzer prize, be
chosen as a book-club selection, or reappear
in paper-bound dress as a lay-
man's treat. It will, for years to come,
be considered required reading
among historians seeking an
understanding of the 1830's.
Meyers deliberately eschews more usual
terms to write of the Jacksonian
"persuasion": the
"attitudes, beliefs, [and] projected actions" comprising
the "half-formulated moral
perspective" which he sees as the common bond
among that diverse group we know as the
Jacksonians. He finds his key to
their "persuasion" in
"the tension between Old Republican values and
nineteenth-century experience," a
tension which produced the Jacksonian
struggle "to recall agrarian
republican innocence to a society drawn fatally
to the main chance and the long chance .
. . to reconcile again the simple
yeoman virtues with the free pursuit of
economic interest, just as the two
were splitting hopelessly apart."
Obviously, such language is not the
historian's common coin. Meyers'
book is not easy reading. Analytical
rather than narrative, it is occasionally
confusing, perhaps at times even
obscure. He is probing new dimensions in
the relationship of society and
politics, and can hardly be criticized for resort
to unfamiliar phrasings. As a result,
however, his work is likely to prove
valuable more to those already
conversant with the issues in controversy
than to students seeking their
introduction to the Jackson period.
He develops his theme in ten topical
essays, scrutinizing the political
rhetoric of the day in an attempt to
uncover its contemporary appeal, and
probing the social climate in which this
rhetoric found response. Two
chapters examine Jackson and Van Buren
as key figures in leadership. Two
more derive interpretations of the Jacksonians'
world from close analysis of
Tocqueville's Democracy in America and
the novels of James Fenimore
Cooper. A chapter on "economic
processes" makes effective use of recent