Ohio History Journal

  • 1
  •  
  • 2
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  • 4
  •  
  • 5
  •  
  • 6
  •  
  • 7
  •  
  • 8
  •  
  • 9
  •  
  • 10
  •  
  • 11
  •  
  • 12
  •  
  • 13
  •  
  • 14
  •  
  • 15
  •  
  • 16
  •  
  • 17
  •  
  • 18
  •  
  • 19
  •  
  • 20
  •  
  • 21
  •  
  • 22
  •  
  • 23
  •  
  • 24
  •  
  • 25
  •  

Book Reviews

Book Reviews

 

 

 

PR Politics in Cincinnati: Thirty-Two Years of City Government Through

Proportional Representation. By Ralph A. Straetz. (New York: New York

University Press, 1958. xvii+312p.; bibliography and appendix. $5.00.)

From an early day the political history of Cincinnati has been a study in

contrasts. The home of such notable national figures as Edward McLean,

Joseph B. Foraker, William  Howard Taft, Nicholas Longworth, Judson

Harmon, and Robert A. Taft, it also numbers among its sons such divergent

local political figures as Henry Hunt, Herbert Bigelow, Murray Seasongood,

Charles Taft, and last but not least George Cox and Rud Hynicka. With

actors such as these in "starring roles," the political struggles that have

taken place in Cincinnati frequently have had an influence, for good or for

evil, that has extended far beyond the borders of the city. It is not surprising

then that Cincinnati politics, which is often unedifying but very seldom

dull, has long held a strong fascination for the student of the American

political process. During the first quarter of the century, when Cincinnati

was listed by Lord Bryce as one of the ten most poorly governed of the

larger American cities, an impressive number of political commentators, in-

cluding Lincoln Steffens, wrote at length on the low estate of the city. In

the second quarter of the century, particularly after major charter reforms

had been effected in 1924, an equally extensive body of writings appeared,

which has been largely devoted to the achievements of the "Cincinnati Ex-

periment" and to the operation of a new form of municipal government

based upon a small council, a city manager, and a system of proportional

representation (PR).

PR, it may be noted, is that system of voting (incorporated in both the

Model State Constitution and the Model City Charter of the National Muni-

cipal League) which most nearly provides for representation in a legislative

body on the basis of the actual voting strength of the various parties and

interest groups involved. The Cincinnati system of PR was used to select

the nine members of the city council (who in turn appointed the mayor and

city manager), and as the system operated, any minority group that could

muster ten percent of the city's vote usually found representation in the city

council. On September 30, 1957, after thirty-two years of existence, this

system, which has been called "a bulwark of the continuing reform move-