Ohio History Journal

  • 1
  •  
  • 2
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  • 4
  •  
  • 5
  •  
  • 6
  •  
  • 7
  •  
  • 8
  •  
  • 9
  •  
  • 10
  •  
  • 11
  •  
  • 12
  •  
  • 13
  •  
  • 14
  •  
  • 15
  •  
  • 16
  •  
  • 17
  •  
  • 18
  •  
  • 19
  •  
  • 20
  •  
  • 21
  •  
  • 22
  •  
  • 23
  •  
  • 24
  •  
  • 25
  •  
  • 26
  •  
  • 27
  •  

Book Reviews

Book Reviews

 

 

 

American Minds: A History of Ideas. By Stow Persons. (New York:

Henry Holt and Company, 1958. xii??467p.; suggestions for further

reading and index. $7.50.)

Here is a book with which all who are interested in American social

and intellectual history should be acquainted. It is designed partly as a

text and partly as an interpretive essay, a duality which since Parring-

ton has become almost standard practice (witness the work of Curti,

Gabriel, and Schneider). As the most recent effort "to provide an in-

troduction to the history of American thought" (p. vii), it offers an

original synthesis which departs in important ways from the structure

and material focus of its famous predecessors. Previous scholarly labors

in the vineyard of evolutionary and religious thinking eminently qualify

Professor Persons for his task.

The Persons' strategy in dealing with the growth of American thought

is "to describe the principal focal concentrations of ideas, or 'minds,'

that have determined the profile of American intellectual life during its

historical development. There have been five of these 'social minds,' and

the five parts of the book describe them as they appeared in chrono-

logical succession. . . . No effort is made to explain the formation or

dissolution of these systems of ideas or to trace the transitions between

them" (p. vii). The first two minds (Puritan and Enlightenment) and

almost a third of his pages center upon Colonial America. Here pro-

fessor Persons leans heavily upon recent scholarship in the field. Though

as impartial as one could reasonably expect, his sympathies are clearly

on the side of the Puritans. He ascribes to Thomas Hooker the real

authorship of the theory of mixed government in America (p. 30). He

sees democracy arising from majority Puritanism far more than from

dissenter sectarians like Roger Williams and Anne Hutchinson, for

whom he has no great taste (the Quakers come off best among colonial

sects). The fall of Puritanism he attributes to its defensive pose and

its inability to take missionary initiative against the smaller Baptist and

Quaker gadfly groups.