Ohio History Journal

  • 1
  •  
  • 2
  •  
  • 3
  •  
  • 4
  •  
  • 5
  •  
  • 6
  •  
  • 7
  •  
  • 8
  •  
  • 9
  •  
  • 10
  •  
  • 11
  •  
  • 12
  •  
  • 13
  •  
  • 14
  •  
  • 15
  •  
  • 16
  •  
  • 17
  •  
  • 18
  •  
  • 19
  •  
  • 20
  •  
  • 21
  •  
  • 22
  •  
  • 23
  •  
  • 24
  •  
  • 25
  •  
  • 26
  •  
  • 27
  •  
  • 28
  •  
  • 29
  •  
  • 30
  •  

Book Reviews

Book Reviews

 

 

 

 

 

 

A Bibliography of Ohio Archeology. By James L. Murphy. (Ann Arbor: Uni-

versity Microfilms International, 1977. xi + 488 p.; index. $23.75.)

 

This is the second comprehensive bibliography of Ohio archaeology. The

earlier compilation by Richard G. Morgan and James H. Rodabaugh was pub-

lished by the Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Society in 1947 and

contained 1351 entries. This larger volume has 3138 entries and reflects both

the striking growth of publications in the intervening years up to 1974 as well

as Murphy's additions of earlier references not listed by Morgan and Roda-

baugh. In addition, there is a complete bibliography of articles in the Ohio

Archaeologist irrespective of whether the article was on Ohio, another state or

country.

The value of the bibliography is enhanced by the annotations following many

of the references and the index which lists the reference numbers for articles

from the Abbott to the Zimmerman sites. There are remarkably few errors.

These include Schroger instead of Schorger for entry 2524; Silvergreg for Sil-

verberg for entry 2587; and Soaper for Soper in entry 2675.

One of the best examples of Hopewell acquisition and distribution of exotic

material is that of meteoric iron. The Morgan and Rodabaugh bibliography has

three entries in the index and Murphy has twenty. This reflects Murphy's list-

ing of some publications which should have been in the earlier bibliography as

much as it does references since 1947. Similar results would probably follow

other such comparisons. The index is an invaluable guide to materials from

sites, counties, prehistoric cultural units, materials and artifact types.

Murphy has amply accomplished his goal to update and supplement Morgan

and Rodabaugh's earlier work. However, one might question the inclusion of all

articles in the Ohio Archaeologist, for that journal has items on Latin America

and even Australia, but these listings can be accepted because they fall within

one of his stated goals. One suggestion provided by a colleague is that more

M.A. and Ph.D. theses on Ohio archaeology might well have been included.

One of the more estoeric references is No. 67 which "Notes Benjamin Frank-

lin's theory that Marietta earthworks were built by De Soto for pig pens".

This volume should be acquired by all Ohio libraries and those libraries that

include North America archaeology as one of their subject areas, by profes-

sional and lay archaeologists, and by students of eastern United States pre-

history. While the cost may seem somewhat high for the individual, possession

of this bibliography will save many hours of bibliographic research and should

serve to make many future papers on Ohio archaeology more comprehensive

than they normally are. This bibliography is certainly a deed well done.

 

Museum of Anthropology                                 James B. Griffin

University of Michigan