Ohio History Journal




JUDGE TOURGEE AND RECONSTRUCTION

JUDGE TOURGEE AND RECONSTRUCTION

 

By RUSSEL B. NYE

 

Albion Winegar Tourgee, Ohioan, novelist, political thinker,

soldier, editor, jurist, and diplomat, was a man whose comments

upon the political and social questions of the late nineteenth cen-

tury form an interesting chapter in the development of American

thought. Born in Williamsfield, Ohio, in 1838, of Huguenot,

German, and Yankee stock, he spent a normal boyhood amid the

farms and villages of northern Ohio.1 After study at Kingsville

Academy, Ohio, he entered the University of Rochester in 1859,

staying until 1861, when the outbreak of the Civil War led him

to join the Federal Army. The loss of an eye and a spine injury

invalided him home to Ashtabula, Ohio, after First Bull Run. He

studied law until 1862, when he again entered the army as first

lieutenant in Company G of the 105th Ohio Volunteers,2 where

he served with his regiment through some heavy fighting in Ken-

tucky and Tennessee, until captured by the enemy at Murfrees-

boro in 1863. After four months in Libby and other southern

prisons, he was exchanged, returned home to be married in Colum-

bus, Ohio, and soon after rejoined his regiment to fight at Tulla-

homa, Chickamauga, and Chattanooga. After withdrawing from

the army in the early months of 1864, he was admitted to the

bar in Painesville, Ohio, joining the law firm of Sherman and

Farmer, and shortly after removing to Ashtabula to practise for

himself. As the War closed, Tourgee saw an opportunity for

advancement in the new South which he felt bound to arise from

1 The best sources of fact and interpretation concerning Albion W. Tourgee's

life are Roy F. Dibble's Albion W. Tourgee (New York, 1921), and his own semi-

autobiographical novel, Figs and Thistles, A Romance of the Western Reserve (New

York, 1879), although the latter is thought by some to be a disguised life of James A.

Garfield, whom Tourgee admired. According to Dibble, the novel is, however, at least

partly autobiography.

2 The story of the 105th, Tourgee later told in The Story of A Thousand (Buf-

falo, 1896).

(101)



102 OHIO ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL QUARTERLY

102     OHIO ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL QUARTERLY

 

the ashes of the old, and in 1865, with his savings of five thousand

dollars, he went to Greensboro, North Carolina, determined to find

a place in that new order.3

The fourteen years Tourgee spent in the South, during the

period of Reconstruction, were the most important in his life, for

his experiences formed the foundation for his literary and political

work of those and later years. Business and politics he entered

almost at once. A nursery firm was his first commercial venture,

and upon its failure, he became a real estate agent in 1866. A

year later he engaged in an unsuccessful publishing venture, edit-

ing the short-lived Greensboro (North Carolina) Union Register.

The Loyalist Convention of 1866, engineered by Edwin M. Stanton

and the Radical Republicans to offset the rival "arm-in-arm" con-

vention of the Johnson Republicans, found Tourgee in Phila-

delphia as a North Carolina delegate, denouncing the provisional

reconstruction government of Andrew Johnson, and telling of

antinegro barbarities in his adopted state under its rule.4

Tourgee's political affiliation, then, during this period, was with

the Radical Republican group, and probably as a result his career

in politics began to show a success not evident in his business

affairs, since his journal failed in 1868. In that year, however,

Tourgee was elected judge of the Superior Court, Seventh Dis-

trict, of North Carolina, and served as a delegate to the state

constitutional convention. At the convention he came out boldly

for repudiation of the state's war debt, in agreement with the

Radical plans of reconstruction embodied in the Fourteenth

Amendment.5  The convention also appointed him         as head of a

commission concerned with codification and revision of state laws,

and he was instrumental in putting into effect a code similar to

Ohio's.6 His connections with the radical wing of the Republi-

3 See the early chapters of A Fool's Errand (New York, 1879), the autobio-

graphical novel based on his southern experiences.

4 C. G. Bowers, The Tragic Era (Boston, 1929), 124-5. Jonathan Worth, North

Carolina's governor, became Tourgee's chief political enemy after this convention. See

J. G. deR. Hamilton, ed., The Correspondence of Jonathan Worth (Raleigh, N. C.),

1909.

5 See the discussion in C. R. Fish, The Development of American Nationality.

Rev. ed. (New York, 1919), 410-1. Tourgee at the state convention advocated equal

civil and political rights for all men. repeal of the property qualification for suffrage

and office-holding, popular election of all state officers, penal reform, a uniform taxa-

tion system, and a public school system, all in general agreement with Radical Repub-

lican reconstruction policies. See A Fool's Errand, 141.

6 Dibble, Tourgee, 39ff., for further discussion.



TOURGEE AND RECONSTRUCTION: NYE 103

TOURGEE AND RECONSTRUCTION: NYE                   103

 

can Party, and his position as judge, gave Tourgee a great deal

of political power, especially as a dispenser of Federal patronage,

and he earned the dislike of numerous southerners. Fear of re-

prisal by the rapidly growing Ku Klux Klan led him at one time

to contemplate departure from the state to avoid personal injury,

but he stayed until 1879, when the declining power of his party,

and financial reverses, suffered because of the panic of 1873,

caused his removal from North Carolina. Political and literary

work took up his time, and after frequent changes of residence,

to Denver, New York, and Philadelphia, he was appointed consul

at Bordeaux, in 1897, retaining the post until his death in 1905.7

There are several aspects of Tourgee's life and work worthy

of attention, but perhaps the most important is that of his ideas

concerning the problems of the reconstruction period in the South.

Reconstruction is the theme of his major literary productions, and

is the motivating force behind the expression of most of his social

and political thought. Of his numerous works, 'Toinette (New

York, 1874), A Fool's Errand (New York, 1879), Bricks without

Straw   (New York, 1880), Eighty-nine (New York, 1888), and

Pactolus Prime (New York, 1890), are most directly expressive

of his ideas. The novelettes John Eax and Mamelon (New York,

1882), and the political tract, An Appeal to Caesar (New York,

1884), are also sources of information.8 Since Tourgee, as Union

soldier and Republican politician, was a typical product of the

northern school of thought, and since, as southern jurist and busi-

ness man he was familiar, as were few others, with the problems

of the postwar South, his answers to the questions raised by

reconstruction take on historical validity.

The South after Appomattox presented a dismal picture, its

economic and social systems disjointed by war and emancipation,

its old institutions forever dead. Obviously, the South must be

 

7 The consular post was probably the result of his assistance in the successful

McKinley Presidential campaign.

8 For a bibliography, see Dibble, Tourgee, 149-53. 'Toinette was published in the

1881 edition under the title, A Royal Gentleman, and The Invisible Empire, bound

with A Fool's Errand in the 1880 (New York) edition, is primarily a collection of

documentary evidence supporting the statements in the earlier novel made on the

Ku Klux and negro issues. Figs and Thistles, while important for autobiographical

information, does not fall within the scope of this paper, being a "payment of debt"

to his native Ohio in its nostalgic remembrances of childhood.



104 OHIO ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL QUARTERLY

104    OHIO ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL QUARTERLY

 

rebuilt, and a new South planned for and created, but how? The

answers to the question are divided by most authorities into three,

Lincoln's plan of reconstruction, Johnson's plan, and the Con-

gressional or Radical Republican system.9 The methods of re-

adjusting the Southern States to the Union, although never fully

put into practise because of his assassination, favored by Lincoln,

are fairly clear in his wartime treatments of the loyal Virginia

counties, of the Louisiana and Arkansas governments, in the

Sherman-Johnston agreement, and in his Proclamation of Amnesty

and Reconstruction of 1863.10 Fundamentally, Abraham Lincoln

was intent upon receiving the South back into the Union as quickly

and easily as possible; disfranchisement of the rebellious south-

erner in wholesale fashion, and similar enfranchisement of the

emancipated slave, seem never to have been integral parts of his

plan, and his policies were in no way intended to destroy com-

pletely, with the exception of slavery, basic southern political,

civil, and social institutions. The procedure of Johnson, his suc-

cessor, indicated slightly different aims. Johnson, no aristocrat,

found his main interests to lie with the middle class southern

yeomanry, and perhaps contemplated rebuilding the South upon

that foundation.11 As a strict constructionist of the Constitu-

tion, he contended that state governments alone had control over

white and negro suffrage, thereby leaving the provisional state

governments to solve the enfranchisement problem, although he

hoped that limited negro suffrage would be granted. His exclu-

sion from the voting privilege of holders of twenty thousand dol-

lars or more of property, intended to strengthen the political power

of the middle class at the expense of the upper economic group,

was the main point upon which he differed from Lincoln's plan.

The third method of reconstruction, that of the Republican group

in Congress, differed sharply from both. "Our safety," declared

 

9 For good summaries of the reconstruction period, see W. B. Hesseltine, His-

tory of the South (New York, 1936), and C. R. Fish, American Nationality, 407-53.

Broad treatments, from various viewpoints, are Bowers, The Tragic Era; G. F. Mil-

ton, The Age of Hate (New York, 1930), W. A. Dunning, Reconstruction, Political

and Economic (New York, 1907), and W. L. Fleming, The Sequel of Appomattox

(New Haven, 1919).

10 See Hesseltine, History of the South, 581-7, and for fuller treatment, C. H.

McCarthy, Lincoln's Plan of Reconstruction (New York, 1901).

11 See Hesseltine, History of the South, 587-95, or any other of the numerous biog-

raphies of Johnson.



TOURGEE AND RECONSTRUCTION: NYE 105

TOURGEE AND RECONSTRUCTION: NYE                     105

 

one of them, "requires us to disfranchise the rebels and enfran-

chise the colored citizens in the revolted states." Negro suffrage,

disfranchisement of the southern white man, repudiation of the

rebel debt in each state, division of the conquered area into dis-

tricts with military governors, civil rights for the colored man,

the abolition of slavery by constitutional amendment--these were

the major points of Congressional reconstruction policy,12 differ-

ing in aim and method from those of Lincoln and Johnson. The

Radical Republicans based their plans upon the "state suicide"

theory of Charles Sumner, and the "conquered province" theory

of Thaddeus Stevens, both of whom viewed the postwar South

as a tabula rasa upon which the principles of a new northern

civilization were to be written.

Fundamentally, all approaches to the problem of reconstruc-

tion focused upon three sets of issues, social, political, and eco-

nomic. Tourgee, recently removed from Ohio into the area to

be rebuilt, occupied himself for the greater part of his life in

thinking out solutions to the problems these issues presented.

Tourgee's first important literary work, 'Toinette (1874),

concerned itself with the study of relationship between Negro and

white in the South, before and after the Civil War.13 As his

preface explains, he found the root of southern troubles to lie in

the caste system of the aristocrat; the pride of class characteristic

of the slaveholder constituted the chief evil of the institution of

slavery, not cruelty to the black man, and while the Civil War

removed slavery, it had not destroyed the class consciousness of

the aristocratic class.14 The story covers the period 1858-1867,

and concerns the love of a young southern lawyer for his octo-

roon slave 'Toinette, to whom he gives freedom after she has

borne his child. Wounded in the war, he is nursed to health by

12 Hesseltine, History of the South, 597-613; Fish, American Nationality.

13 Dibble, Tourgee, 48, places the actual composition of the book some six years

before publication, in 1868-1869, when the Congressional Reconstruction Acts were in

full force. There is thus good evidence for the statement that 'Toinette and A Fool's

Errand are among the first, if not the first, of the literary treatments of reconstruction

problems. Constance Fenimore Woolson's Rodman the Keeper (New York), for ex-

ample, did not appear until 1880.

14 The Fords, Howard, and Hulbert edition of 'Toinette (New York, 1874).

The bitter experiences of Tourgee and his wife in southern society, recounted es-

pecially well in A Fool's Errand, probably reinforced this dislike of the planter class

which had rejected him socially, despite his sincere wish to know and help them.



106 OHIO ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL QUARTERLY

106    OHIO ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL QUARTERLY

 

'Toinette, who refuses, on the grounds of her new-found freedom

and equality, to renew their former relationship. Her suggestion

of marriage he refuses, and the two part ways to live unhappily.

Tourgee's point is, of course, that the southerner still regards

'Toinette as chattel, and although slavery no longer technically

exists, she is nevertheless in the eyes of the southern ruling class,

no better off than before. The caste system, the innate pride of

southern aristocracy, has not been done away with, and no plan

can ignore the fact if it is to face squarely the social issues in-

volved in reconstruction.

A Fool's Errand (1879) is a much more detailed study of

the postwar South, the doctrinal charge of the book being so

heavy that it becomes a tract rather than a literary project.15 Com-

fort Servosse, who is obviously Tourgee himself, journeys south

to help rebuild the shattered country, and the story is the record

of his growing disillusionment with the methods of reconstruc-

tion which he encounters. Like Tourgee, Servosse attempts to

show the southerner and the Negro the way to peaceful life to-

gether; he tries, as a convention delegate and politician, to assist

in redefining the aims of the state, is attacked by the Ku Klux

Klan, and, misunderstood and hated, is embittered by the failure

of both North and South to comprehend fully the issues involved.

Tourgee's perception of the problems is a clear one, and while he

was nominally a Radical Republican, he did not wholly accept

their Reconstruction Acts in practise. On the one hand, he was

willing to accept the "state suicide" and "conquered province"

theories of Stevens and Sumner, and like them, suggested that

the South be divided into territories, regardless of former state

lines, and upon reestablishment of commerce and society, that they

be readmitted as new states, in the same fashion as western terri-

tories. This plan to him "neither shirked nor temporized. It

accepted the past, and sought to guarantee the future."16 But on

 

15 Published anonymously, as by "One of the Fools." With Steele Mackaye,

Tourgee attempted unsuccessfully to dramatize the novel in 188l.

16 The Fords, Howard, and Hulbert edition of A Fool's Errand (New York,

1879), 115. He said (p. 213), "Rebellion destroyed and thereby annihilated the State.

. . . There is no state, in the sense we use it, but only a skeleton, a lifeless body."

Interesting replies to the book are W. L. Royal, A Reply to "A Fool's Errand"

(New York, 1881), and J. G. Ingraham, Not A Fool's Errand (New York, 1880).



TOURGEE AND RECONSTRUCTION: NYE 107

TOURGEE AND RECONSTRUCTION: NYE                   107

 

the other hand, Tourgee did not believe in immediate and complete

enfranchisement of the former slave, as the Radicals wished, for

"the slave was not made fit for unrestrained political power by

the simple fact of freedom."17 Neither did the Radical plan take

into account the southern pride of caste and race prejudice; in

order to rebuild the South, the northerner must perforce work

with the Negro, thereby placing himself, in the opinion of the

white South, upon the Negroes' social level, and as a result nulli-

fying any success he might have. With the pride and prejudice

of the South still operative, northern leaders working with the

Negro in an attempt to reconstruct the section were either "self-

seekers, martyrs, or fools," doomed to failure. He said:

It seems impossible that the wise men of the day should have been so

blind as not to see that they were doing the utmost possible injury to the

colored race, the country, and themselves, by propounding a plan of re-

organization which depended for its success . . . upon this class, in con-

nection with a few of the dominant race who, from whatever motives, might

be willing to put themselves on the same level with them in the estimation

of their white neighbors.18

The roots of the problem, stated before in 'Toinette, were

not perceived by the "wise men," and therefore all attempts at

reconstruction must fail until caste and prejudice were stamped

out. Neither did Tourgee agree with the practise of denying the

vote to the rebel white man. He pointed out accurately that the

Congressional planners had wrongly supposed that "if this class

were deprived of actual political position, they would thereby be

shorn of political influence"; furthermore, the practise led to

"segregation," and a line of demarcation, which widened the

breach between native southerner, Negro, and Republican north-

erner, had been drawn.

Upon the one side were found only those who constituted what was

termed respectable people. . . . On the other side were the pariahs of the

land, "niggers," the newly enfranchised African voters; "scalawags," the

native whites who were willing to accept the reconstruction measures; and

17 A Fool's Errand, 116. He reiterated the idea in Pactolus Prime saying, "Lib-

erty is a growth, an evolution--not an instantaneous fact," and in Zouri's Christmas,

a novel printed with John Eax, he stated that the Negro's true freedom came, "not

from proclamation or constitutional amendment, but from self-control, self-denial, and

self-direction."

18 A Fool's Errand, 119.



108 OHIO ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL QUARTERLY

108    OHIO ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL QUARTERLY

 

"carpetbaggers," all men of Northern birth, resident in the South, who

should elect to speak or act in favor of such reconstruction.19

On the issue of negro suffrage, Tourgee, through the mouth

of his hero Servosse, agreed more closely with the Lincoln and

Johnson plans than with the Radical Republican. He warns the

South, "if you of your own volition will enfranchise a part of

them, marked by some definite classification--of intellect, property,

or what not--and the others as they reach that development, it

will suffice at this time. . . . Refuse, and all will be enfranchised

without regard to your wishes and fears."20 It was clear to Tourgee

that the mistake of the Republican politicians arose from two

factors: first, the failure to recognize the importance of southern

pride and prejudice, with a resultant loss of cooperation, and sec-

ond, their handling of the enfranchisement problem, which alien-

ated the white population and gave "the power of the reorganized,

subordinate republics, into the hands of a race unskilled in public

affairs, poor to a degree hardly to be matched in the civilized

world, and so ignorant that not five out of a hundred of its voters

could read their own ballots. . . ." These were the errors of

reconstruction, due both to northern misunderstanding, and to the

fact that politics played a part; the political nature of Congres-

sional reconstruction did not escape Tourgee.21 "It should be

remembered that pressure for reconstruction came from the North

--not from the people of the North, but from its politicians. It

was reduced to practice, not because society here was ripe for its

operation, but to secure political victory and party ascendancy."

At least, the novel takes the stand that reconstruction upon such

grounds was a failure, in the opinion of southerner and northern

reconstructionist alike. Tourgee, living in the South, was sym-

pathetic to the southern viewpoint, misplaced and wrong at times

as he felt it to be. To him the South must of necessity be rebuilt

19 Ibid., 124-5.

20 Ibid., 56. This is substantially the same advice as that given to the southern

state constitutional conventions by Johnson; see Hesseltine, History of the South,

590-5. Tourgee did not completely disagree with Johnson's reconstruction, but his

main objection was rather that it attempted to put into practise principles for which

the South was unready. See A Fool's Errand, 115.

21 Ibid., 119. Tourgee was no advocate of negro social equality. While consul

at Bordeaux, he wrote President Theodore Roosevelt, expressing distaste for the invi-

tation proffered Booker T. Washington in 1901. See J. B. Bishop, Theodore Roose-

velt and His Time (New York, 1920), I, 165.



TOURGEE AND RECONSTRUCTION: NYE 109

TOURGEE AND RECONSTRUCTION: NYE               109

 

by the North, by "northern capital, northern energy, and northern

men," and "the only way to effect it is by the influence of northern

immigration." But the methods employed by those politicians he

ironically termed "the wise men," made ineffective the attempts

of men such as Servosse and Tourgee, and forced the southerner,

with some justice, to resist such attempts. While the Ku Klux

Klan was "a new and terrible revelation" of a power which "might

be used so as to effectually destroy the liberty of the newly

enfranchised citizens," yet "it was a magnificent sentiment that

underlay it all, an unfaltering determination, an invincible de-

fiance to all that had the seeming of compulsion and tyranny."22

Evil as it was, the Klan was the answer of a people pushed

beyond endurance by unwise reconstruction measures, and "all this

was natural, and should have been foreseen and acted upon by

the Wise Men whose task it was to reform the shattered nation."

Somewhat bitterly, Servosse concludes that northern reconstruc-

tion failed to attain its purpose through lack of comprehension

of the real problems, and, as a result, those who sincerely at-

tempted to assist in the rebuilding of the South were shunned as

"carpetbaggers" by North and South alike. It was "a fool's er-

rand," this attempt to "superimpose the civilization, the idea of

the North, upon the South at a moment's warning."23

It is clear, then, that Tourgee, while he agreed in theory with

the Radical Republicans, accepting some of their major policies,

did not agree with the fashion in which those theories were put

into practise. Political ax-grinding, plus failure to understand

key issues, had made reconstruction of the Congressional type a

failure. What, then, was the remedy he proposed, and from

whence ought it to come? In the final chapters of the book, he

gave the answer. First of all, solution of the problem must come

from the North, for "the sick man can not cure himself. The

South will never purge itself of the evils which affect it." The

answer, Tourgee felt, lay in education, education of the Negro

22 A Fool's Errand, 171, 227.

23 Ibid., 841. Tourgee's definition of the carpetbagger, as conceived in the

northern mind, was "a man without means, character, or occupation, an adventurer,

a camp-follower, a bummer," and to the southerner, he was "an incarnation of northern

hate, envy, spleen, greed, hypocrisy, and all uncleanliness."



110 OHIO ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL QUARTERLY

110    OHIO ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL QUARTERLY

 

and the white man in the ways of society and government calcu-

lated to make the two races friends, to make the two sections of

the Nation one, and to bring the South from its mistaken ideas

of prejudice and pride of class up to a level upon which recon-

struction could take place.

The course lies before us, broad and plain as the king's highway: the

remedy for darkness is light; for ignorance, knowledge; for wrong, right-

eousness. . . . Let the nation educate the voter because the nation cannot

afford that he should be ignorant. . . . Poor Whites, Ku Klux Klan, and

Bulldozers are all alike the harvest of ignorance. The nation cannot afford

to grow such a crop.24

This idea was to become the lodestar of Tourgee's life.

Bricks without Straw (1880), the second and least auto-

biographical of Tourgee's novels of reconstruction, attacked the

same issues in the same way as did the earlier books. The hero,

Hesden Le Mayne, a southern Whig, is converted to a northern

point of view through marriage to a Yankee school teacher, and

through his own realization of the weaknesses of southern civili-

zation. The injustice and blindness of the twin political measures

of negro enfranchisement and rebel disfranchisement are treated

as before.25 To Le Mayne, the aim of reconstruction should be

to build up in the South a self-governing system of townships,

of small democratic units on the pattern of the New England

town meeting. However, before this can successfully be accom-

plished, the South and the North must be made one in thought,

spirit, and purpose, and "the solution, lying just at hand," is

education. Le Mayne points out that an illiterate South is politi-

cally dangerous, that since forty-five per cent. of the South is

uneducated, it needs only the addition of an intelligent and un-

scrupulous six per cent. to rule the land.26 He, like Comfort

Servosse, feels that "the only remedy is to educate the people

until they shall be wise enough to know what ought to be done,

and brave and strong enough to do it." More specifically, how-

ever, than does A Fool's Errand, the novel outlines the method

 

24 Ibid., 346-7. Chapters LXVI-LXVIII are keen and intelligent summaries

of the problem of North and South.

25 The Fords, Howard, and Hulbert edition of Bricks without Straw (New

York, 1880), 355ff. See also his analysis of the Klan, ibid., 350-61.

26 Ibid., 514.



TOURGEE AND RECONSTRUCTION: NYE 111

TOURGEE AND RECONSTRUCTION: NYE                      111

 

to be followed. The Federal Government should establish and

maintain schools in the South, subsidies to be granted directly

proportionate to the illiteracy rates in each community.27 Besides

healing the ugly wounds left by both war and reconstruction,

such a measure, planned on a liberal scale, would be a vindication of the

manhood of the North; an assertion of its sense of right as well as the

determination to develop at the South the same intelligence, the same free-

dom of thought and action, the same equality of individual right, that have

made the North prosperous and free and strong, while the lack of them has

made the South poor and ignorant and weak.28

The thesis of An Appeal to Caesar (1884) is the same, the

book being not a novel, but an exposition of the ways and means

of instituting this educational system, and written to influence

the Republican Party in its policies toward the South.29 In the

preface to the tract, Tourgee stated that "the roots of the upas

tree" of rebellion, southern pride of caste and southern race

prejudice, still remained despite war and reconstruction. Begin-

ning in 1790, he traced the history of the South's problems through

the 1870's, and offered as a remedy the educational plans intro-

duced earlier in the novels.30

Eighty-nine (1888), a prognostication of the year to come,

repeats the southern material of the earlier books, and is inter-

esting for its view of the Ku Klux Klan. As in A Fool's Errand,

Tourgee did not wholly condemn the organization's purposes,

although he did resent its extra-legal and thoroughly dangerous

means of accomplishing its ends. His hero, Royal Owen, a

Georgian, founds an "Order of the Southern Cross" to combat

by peaceful and legal means the domination of his state by carpet-

baggers, taking a sympathetic but sensible view of reconstruction

problems.31

 

27 Ibid., Chapters LXI, LXII.

28 Ibid., 518-9.

29 Tourgee addressed the House Committee on Education in 1890, attacking the

Blair Bill, and suggesting instead the plan outlined here and in Bricks without Straw.

See Dibble, Tourgee, 110. The Blair Bill was also attacked in Pactolus Prime.

30 The Fords, Howard, and Hulbert edition of An Appeal to Caesar (New York,

1884). See especially the chapters, "Wisdom Becometh a King," "Is Education a

Specific?" "Who Shall Apply the Remedy?" and "The Method of Application" (p.

260-349).

31 Tourgee censures Grover Cleveland's failure to put into operation an adequate

southern educational system, and also attacks the monopolistic trends of the Standard

Oil Company, which he disguises as the "Rock Oil Company," antedating similar

attacks by Henry D. Lloyd in Wealth against Commonwealth (New York, 1894), and

Ida M. Tarbell in McClure's (New York, 1902).



112 OHIO ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL QUARTERLY

112    OHIO ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL QUARTERLY

 

Pactolus Prime (1890) was, like 'Toinette, a study of the

race problem, but built around a less convincing plot. Pactolus

is an octoroon who passes the color line to be successful in white

society, but who, through medical treatment for an injury, con-

tracts a skin ailment which turns him black. For his daughter's

sake, he conceals the relationship, and works as a bootblack in

Washington.     The central character, though painfully idealized,

is well drawn, and powerfully presented; bitterly he comes to the

conclusion that "color caste has become a part of Christianity,"

and that the only hope of the Negro for social and civil equality

lies in concealment of his racial origin if possible.32 The novel-

ettes, John Eax and Mainelon, published and bound together with

Zouri's Christmas in 1882, added little to what Tourgee had

already stated, being local color stories "of the reconstruction era

in the South, without the shadow that hung over the land."33 The

first-named work concerns a sentimental love story of an aristo-

crat and a girl of lower birth, being a treatment of southern

aristocracy less unsympathetic than 'Toinette and Bricks without

Straw. With Mamelon, which is the story of the saving of a

southern estate through the commercialization of a corundum

deposit found on it, it signifies the method by which the South

is to find renascence, that is, through its acceptance of northern

ideals. As Tourgee put it, "The New South was springing into

life about us--the spirit of the North and the manhood of the

South in its matchless elements."

From these sources, then, can be made a summary of Tour-

gee's ideas on the issues involved in the reconstruction period in

the South. In the question of the place of the Negro in society,

he was no equalitarian, but he was a champion of negro rights,

and an enemy of blind race prejudice.34 As for "carpetbagger"

politicians, he disliked the self-seeking northerner as much as any,

but was hurt by the failure of North and South alike to dis-

 

32 The Cassel and Company edition of Pactolus Prime (New York, 1890).

33 The Fords. Howard, and Hulbert edition of John Eax and Mameion (New

York, 1882), preface.

34 His departure from the army was in part caused by an argument with an

officer over the treatment of a Negro. He favored intelligent Negroes over white

applicants in appointments to office, and his dislike of race prejudice is evident in

all of his books. See Dibble, Tourgee, 30, 35, 43 etc.



TOURGEE AND RECONSTRUCTION: NYE 113

TOURGEE AND RECONSTRUCTION: NYE                  113

 

tinguish between politicians with false and sincere motives. From

this, perhaps, arose his hatred of the planter class, as well as

from his more objective evaluations of southern civilization. Po-

litically, despite his nominal party affiliation, he was, in his dis-

like of the aristocracy, his distrust of blanket enfranchisement of

the Negro, and his opposition to disfranchisement of the rebel,

much closer to the reconstruction policies of Johnson than those

of Stevens and Sumner, although agreeing with them in the theory

that the South was a conquered province to be rebuilt upon a sub-

stantially northern pattern. Economic questions Tourgee tended

to neglect, but in broad terms he seemed to feel that northern

capital and industry would combine with southern manhood and

resources to produce a new commercial South.35 Finally, his ideas

are noteworthy for their temperance and sensibility; writing in an

age marred by hatred, prejudice, and misunderstanding, he dis-

played an intelligent grasp of issues, men, and meanings.

In regard to literary artistry, Tourgee's novels leave some-

thing to be desired. For one thing, the propaganda in most cases

overshadows the plot, and is so evident as to make the books

tracts rather than works of art. Like most Victorians, Tourgee

attempted to combine artistic excellence and doctrinal inculcation

in equal portions. No realist, he yet at times did not avoid in

the interests of art touches of realism,36 although he stated quite

clearly his creed as follows: "The province of true art is to por-

tray the meaner phases of nature only as a foil for the nobler

and grander passions . . ."37 While his novels dealing with the

tragedies of mixed blood have a certain effectiveness, they suffer

by comparison with G. W. Cable's powerful Madam Delphine

(New York, 1881), as his war scenes do not measure up to those

of J. W. DeForest's Miss Ravenel's Conversion (New York,

1867). But Tourgee did not lack art, for the wild night ride

of Lily Servosse in A Fool's Errand is the equal of Cable's simi-

 

35 Tourgee's ideas, it is noticeable, are closer to those of Henry W. Grady than

to those of the agrarian Sidney Lanier.

36 For example, his description of the Ku Klux Klan, A Fool's Errand, 164ff.,

and its activities.

37 Quoted by Dibble. Tourgee, 188. Tourgee's favorite novelist was his con-

temporary E. P. Roe; he disliked the realism of William D. Howells, Thomas Hardy,

and the Russians.



114 OHIO ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL QUARTERLY

114    OHIO ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL QUARTERLY

 

lar description in Dr. Sevier (New York, 1882), and the swiftly

moving story of the attack of the Klan on the negro hut in the

same novel is a skillful piece of writing. The obvious fault of

Tourgee's books lies in the fact that he had but one theme to

discuss, and that he worked the same vein over more than once,

losing sight of the narrative in his attempt to teach and convince.

Despite the classification of his novels as literary propaganda,

Tourgee deserves credit for the clarity and intelligence with which

he approached the vital problems of his time, those of reconstruc-

tion, thus pointing the way for later treatment of the issues by

others.38

 

38 Followers of Tourgee in the novel of reconstruction include Constance Feni-

more Woolson, Thomas Nelson Page, George W. Cable, John Esten Cooke, Joel

Chandler Harris, Grace Elizabeth King, Augusta Evans Wilson, Harris Dickson,

Thomas Dixon, Stark Young, Ellen Glasgow, Margaret Mitchell, Laura Krey, and

others.