Ohio History Journal




OHIO'S GERMAN-LANGUAGE PRESS AND THE WAR

OHIO'S GERMAN-LANGUAGE PRESS AND THE WAR.*

 

 

BY CARL WITTKE.

Instructor in American History. Ohio State University.

In April 1917, when the war cloud settled over America,

most of the German-language publications in this country found

themselves in an extremely embarrassing position. To the very

last, they had opposed America's entry into the war. To them,

it seemed that Germany's cause had been grossly misrepresented

by an Anglicised press, and the German contention that the

Fatherland was waging a purely defensive war against envious

neighbors had been so skillfully presented, that, to the sym-

pathetic soul of the German-American, it seemed extremely

plausible. The editorial tone of the greater part of the German

press in this country, in spite of occasional criticisms of the "ar-

rogant, dull and blundering" Junker class that directed Ger-

many's foreign policy, remained consistently pro-German. The

glorious victories of German arms, on land and sea, were cele-

brated on the first page. Then the war came to America. A

change of front became necessary as a matter of self-preserva-

tion. Without it, complete suppression, or prosecutions for dis-

loyalty could hardly have been avoided. The first few months

after the declaration of war-the transition period-are by

all odds the most important and the most interesting in the recent

history of Ohio's German-language newspapers. It is during

these months that the editors performed the mental gymnastics

that have finally landed them in their present position. This

transition period was a period of bewildered readjustment, of

conflict of emotions in the hearts of many German-Americans,

and of the shifting in the editorial point of view of their papers.

The writer has found it impossible to make anything like a thor-

* This article is based on material collected by the Historical Com-

mission of Ohio.

(82)



Ohio's German-Language Press and the War

Ohio's German-Language Press and the War.           83

ough examination of the files for the neutrality and transition

periods in time for this paper. The present study covers only

the past twelve months, and therefore some of the conclusions

offered must be regarded as tentative and preliminary.     One

statement can be made without fear of contradition, namely,

the editors of the German dailies of Ohio have demonstrated

that they are past masters in the strategy of conducting retreats.

Position after position has been abandoned, until now, all the

papers with the exception of the German Socialist weekly, have

become intensely loyal, not to say, blatantly patriotic, in their

public professions of devotion to their country's cause. One

cannot help wondering how this complete metamorphosis was

accomplished in so short a time, and the reader longs for some

miraculous power that would enable him to peer into the inner-

most chambers of the editors' minds, and find out how the change

came about, and how sincere and complete it has been. But

practically, of course, it makes little difference for it is only the

printed article that reaches the reader, and so helps to mould

public opinion.1

No doubt some of the publishers of German newspapers

honestly came to the conclusion that the loyal support of the

government's war policy, after war had once been declared, was

the solemn duty of every American citizen, and if the conflict-

ing emotions that still surged through their hearts when the

choice between the old and the new Fatherland became impera-

tive, did not allow them to become very active supporters of

the war, they simply refrained from all comment and criticism.

1See an excellent article on "The Strategic Retreat of the German

Language Press", by Clyde William Park, in the North American Re-

view, May, 1918, pp. 706-720. The writer quotes from the Cleveland

Wachter und Anzeiger, the Cincinnati Volksblatt, and the Cincinnati

Abend-Presse. He concludes his discussion of this transition period as

follows,-"In all this tangle of unsympathetic comment, amusing in its

mixed logic and tragic in its conflicting emotions, there is probably less

of deliberate propaganda than of bewildered readjustment-a reluctant

shifting of the editorial point of view to meet an extremely embarrassing

situation." After having defended and idolized Germany for so long,

"a reasonable period of mourning for their dead illusions" was perhaps

but natural.



84 Ohio Arch

84        Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.

It is gratifying to find in a paper like the Columbus Express und

Westbote the statement made immediately after the declaration

of war, that "We have from this time on but one duty to per-

form, and that, an unswerving, unfaltering loyalty to the coun-

try and the flag of our adoption, whatever her course or wherever

she may lead." 2

After October, 1917, it became almost a physical impossi-

bility for any foreign language paper to circulate if its news

and editorial tone was not completely loyal. By act of Congress,

it was provided that no printed matter respecting the war, could

be published in any foreign language paper unless a true trans-

lation had first been submitted to the postmaster. Whenever the

government was satisfied that the paper was loyal, a permit could

be issued, allowing publication without filing translations. The

act practically forced every paper that desired to continue pub-

lication, to support the government and the war. By October,

1918, every important German newspaper in Ohio, with the ex-

ception of the Cleveland Wachter und Anzeiger, had been

granted such a permit. The Wachter und Anzeiger has had

many difficulties, and they can perhaps be explained in part, by

the fact that two former editors have been arrested as alien

enemies, the present editor was arrested on a charge of "gar-

bling" an Associated Press dispatch, and the stock of one of

the members of the company has been recently seized by the

Custodian of Alien Enemies' Property.

There was some criticism of the law requiring translations.

In an editorial of October 15, 1917, the Wachter und Anzeiger

promises to obey it, and asks its readers to appreciate the diffi--

culties of a German-American newspaper in these troubled times.

In a later issue, the editor remarks that many of the readers

must wonder why he prints all war dispatches without comment,

and then explains that he is "wide awake", conscious of the pit-

falls along the way, and extremely cautious because every such

article would have to be submitted in translation to the post-

master.3  The Wachter und Anzeiger had more difficulty than

any other German paper in Ohio in readjusting its editorial

2Quoted in The Columbus Dispatch, August 18, 1918.

3 Wachter und Anzeiger, November 3, 1917.



Ohio's German-Language Press and the War

Ohio's German-Language Press and the War.        85

 

policy to war conditions. In spite of protestations of loyalty,

one cannot help feeling that the conversion of this paper was

exceedingly slow and difficult, so slow that some still doubt the

sincerity of the new point of view.  November 1, 1917, the

Wachter und Anzeiger gave a conspicuous place to a quotation

from Roosevelt's "The Naval War of 1812", to the effect that the

disregard of the rights of neutrals is often simply a matter of ex-

pediency, and the editor did not let the opportunity slip to show

"the champion of Belgian neutrality in quite a different light". It

is difficult to see how there could have been any reason for pub-

lishing such an article at this time, unless it was to justify or ex-

cuse the German invasion of Belgium. Alien enemies, and all

others, are urged to keep silent on war questions, especially over

their beer. "Where conscience and duty speak", the editor adds,

"the heart must be silent".4  In March, the Wachter und

Anzeiger gave vent to an entirely uncalled for criticism of Am-

bassador Gerard's book, "Face to Face with Kaiserism", and

pronounced it a superficial study, showing lack of judgment and

containing certain, rather numerous, misstatements of fact.5

Equally uncalled for was an article that labored hard to prove

that Prussia was not an absolute monarchy, but a constitutional

monarchy since 1850.6 The same paper was late in publishing

Prince Lichnowsky's damaging revelations, and then announced

that it would also publish von Jagow's reply, so that all readers

might draw their own conclussions.7 The Wachter und Anzeiger

refused to take active part in the propaganda of the Friends of

German Democracy, an organization composed largely of Amer-

icans of German blood, and having for its purpose the democrat-

ization of Germany, on the ground that the agitation was con-

trary to President Wilson's statement that the United States

does not presume to suggest to Germany any alteration or

modification of her institutions.8  The German successes in

Russia must have warmed the heart of the editor, for he made

4Wachter und Anzeiger, November 26, 1917; see also May 6, 1918.

5Ibid., March 9, 1918.

6Ibid., December 14, 1917.

7Ibid., May 11. 1918.

8 Wachter und Anzeiger, May 2, 1917.



86 Ohio Arch

86        Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.

the blunder of announcing the German victories in the bold

headlines-"German Fleet Before Reval", "The Persecuted

People of Esthonia Do Not Call in Vain For Help." To speak

charitably, such a headline fails to grasp the American view-

point entirely. The citations show how long it was before the

transition period came to an end. No editor would make such

blunders to-day.

During the past year, an agitation against all things German,

has swept the state. In many cases, it has been led by extremists,

whose methods at times bordered on the hysterical. German

music, no matter how long ago it was composed, German litera-

ture, German churches, German Singing Societies, almost every-

thing that could be labelled with the hated German name, has,

at one time or other, been under the ban and the subject of bit-

ter attacks.  Cases of mob violence have been altogether too

frequent.9 The attitude of the German language press toward

all these attacks can be summed up in the statement that a man

can be 100% American and yet speak German, sing German

songs, worship his God in the German tongue, and read his old

friend, the German newspaper.10 Every German newspaper

justified the teaching of German in the public schools, and quoted

United States Commissioner of Education, Claxton in support

of this position.11  The Gross Daytoner Zeitung argues that the

children in any case do not read Treitschke or Bernhardi, but

only the German classics which breathe the spirit of republican-

ism.12 Naturally enough, the papers made the most of their op-

portunity to ridicule the extremists who changed Sauerkraut to

"Liberty Cabbage", and soothed their consciences by insisting

See the cases reported in Toledo Express, June 8, 1918; Gross

Daytoner Zeitung, April 2, 1918; Stern des Westlichen Ohio, April 4,

1918; Wachter und Anzeiger, April 3, 15, 16, 1918.

10 See for example, Cincinnati Volksblatt, May 8, 1918.

11 Following is a very incomplete list of towns where the teaching

of German has been dropped either entirely, or in the grades: Lancaster,

Defiance, Columbus, Cincinnati, Youngstown, Cleveland, Mansfield, Elyria,

Marysville, Wooster, Newark, Bowling Green, Delphos, Sandusky, Find-

lay, Sebring, Waynesfield, Bellevue, Port Clinton, Napoleon, Milford

Center, Irwin, Toledo, Springfield, Lakewood, Dayton, Norwalk.

12Gross Daytoner Zeitung, April 17, 1918.



Ohio's German-Language Press and the War

Ohio's German-Language Press and the War.          87

 

that German fried potatoes must be excluded from hotel

menus,13 but most of the editorials betray a real fear for the

future of the American "Deutschtum". The Gross Daytoner

Zeitung predicts a steady decline in the membership of German

societies and churches, and a gradual extermination of all foreign

language papers.14  The Wachter und Anzeiger prints editorials

on the Reorganization of "Das Deutschtum" in America, and

"The Critical Hour for German-Americans".15     Most of these

articles are simply vigorous rejoinders to the attacks of the

"Nativists" and "Knownothings", in which American casualty

lists and rolls of honor, full of German-sounding names, are

hurled in the teeth of the agitators to prove the loyalty of the

Americans of German extraction.16  But a few of the papers go

farther and venture to suggest that the German-Americans them-

selves might be somewhat at fault or at least might do a num-

ber of things to improve their standing in the eyes of their

fellow  Americans.   In an editorial of June 8, 1918, the

Wachter used Anzeiger advises dropping the term      German-

American and urges the German-born to mingle more freely

with the mass of Americans, so that they may learn to appreciate

them and their point of view. The Cincinnati Volksblatt be-

lieves that the German-Americans as a class have suffered much

from  the character of their leaders. !17  The Gross Daytoner

Zeitung shares this opinion, and on April 20, 1918, reprints an

article from the St. Louis Anzeiger, which maintains that it was

the few in authority who brought the now defunct German-

American Alliance into disrepute. The rank and file of the

membership it believes were innocent and absolutely loyal, but

control of the Alliance had, in late years, fallen into the hands

13 See Columbus Express und Westbote, June 4, 1918; April 26, 1918;

Gross Daytoner Zeitung, May 11 and May 21, 1918; Cincinnati Abend-

Presse, July 22, 1918. It has been discovered that the Pretzel is of

Italian origin, and that Limburger cheese really was introduced to suf-

fering humanity by a Belgian.

14Gross Daytoner Zeitung, July 20, 1918.

15 Wachter und Anzeiger, October 8, 1917; and June 19, 1918.

16 See Wachter und Anzeiger, May 18, 1918, October 25, 1917; and

Cincinnati Volksblatt, March 30 and April 1, 1918.

Cincinnati Volksblatt, May 17, 1918.



88 Ohio Arch

88        Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.

of a few who had recently come to America, and who were filled

with Pan-German dreams. The Dayton paper demands a thor-

ough Congressional investigation of the activities of the Alliance,

so that it may be definitely ascertained whether the millions of

loyal German-Americans who innocently joined the organization,

were hoodwinked by leaders in the service of Germany.18  An

attempt was made in Ohio to revive the Alliance under the new

name of "American Citizens' League", but judging from news-

paper comment, the great mass of German-Americans are refus-

ing to become interested.19

Unpleasant as it must have been, the German press could

not ignore the numerous arrests in Ohio of Germans, and those

of German extraction, for treasonable acts and disloyal utter-

ances, and a number of the editors tried to account for these ar-

rests and the pro-German activities. The Cincinnati Volksblatt

points out that those arrested are in many cases alien enemies

who have failed to obey all the minute regulations of the De-

partment of Justice in regard to their conduct, or members of

the I. W. W., Socialists, Anarchists and Pacifists. These oppose

the war, it is maintained, not as Germans, but as Socialists and

pacifists.20  The Toledo Express shows that it is the German

Socialist press which has given most of the trouble, and that

99% of the German-American press is loyal, no matter what it

might have been during the period of neutrality.21 Time and

again earnest appeals are directed by the newspapers to the great

majority of loyal German-Americans to expose the traitor lurk-

ing in their midst and bringing suspicion upon all of German

blood by his pro-German activities.22

The charge of the Toledo Express that the German So-

cialists are giving trouble because of their anti-war position, ap-

 

18Gross Daytoner Zeitung, April 22, 1918.

19 See Cincinnati Freie Presse, June 8, 1918; Cincinnati Volksblatt,

June 13, 1918; Toledo Presse, May 1, 1918.

20 Cincinnati Volksblatt, April 13, and July 11, and May 31, 1918;

Cincinnati Freie Presse, July 2, 1918.

21 Toledo Express, April 27, 1918.

22 Cincinnati Volksblatt, May 27, 1918; Gross Daytoner Zeitung,

March 29 and April 5, 1918.



Ohio's German-Language Press and the War

Ohio's German-Language Press and the War.           89

plies to the Echo, the German Socialist weekly published in

Cleveland. That paper still adheres to the St. Louis manifesto,

believes that "There can never be a good war or a bad peace",23

and that it is impossible to get political democracy until the new

social and industrial order has been attained. In spite of its anti-

war attitude, the Echo betrays no love for Germany, and its is-

sues are full of attacks on the German Socialists who have be-

trayed their party and the International, and who have been

foolish enough to help the Junkers and the Hohenzollerns win

a military victory which can never be a victory for the German

people.24

As far as public support of the war is concerned, Ohio's

German papers leave very little to be desired.    The greatest

publicity has been given to Liberty Loan drives, by large adver-

tisements which spread over entire pages, by editorials, and by

means of the plate service furnished by the government itself.

This is especially true of the last three loans.25  The Cleveland

daily made a special effort to get German-Americans to subscribe

to the third loan. One motive was undoubtedly to silence the

opponents of the paper by giving this public display of its loyalty.

Almost 2,000 bonds, amounting to over $250,000, were sold at

the newspaper office itself, and the total subscriptions of Cleve-

land's German-Americans exceeded a half million dollars.26

Vigorous support has been given by all the papers to the work

of the Red Cross and the Y. M. C. A., and to the War Chest

drives in the various cities.27 The regulations of the fuel and

food administrations are heartily endorsed, and a special appeal

23Echo, June 15, 1918.

24 See Echo, June 1, June 22, July 6, and May 25, 1918.

See for examples, Akron Germania, Sept. 28, 1918; Wachter und

Anzeiger, Sept. 27; Cincinnati Abend-Presse, Sept. 28; Cincinnati Freie

Presse, July 3; Cincinnati Volksblatt, June 28; Siebenburgisch-Ameri-

kanisches Volksblatt, Sept. 6; Columbus Express und Westbote, April 12

and May 6; Toledo Presse, April 17; Gross Daytoner Zeitung, April 6;

Stern des Westlichen Ohio (New Bremen), March 28, 1918.

26 Wachter und Anzeiger, April 5 and May 11, 1918.

27See for examples, Gross Daytoner Zeitung, April 3; Wachter und

Anzeiger, Feb. 11 and May 20; Toledo Express, May 18; Sandusky

Demokrat, May 17; Cincinnati Volksblatt, May 18, 1918.



90 Ohio Arch

90        Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.

is frequently made to the thrifty German housewife to live up

to her reputation and show the way to her American sisters in

the matter of conserving our food supply. There are also occa-

sional editorials appealing to the laborer to maintain industrial

peace, because strikes at this time would reduce the country's

fighting strength.28  Editorials in support of our merchant

marine and the shipbuilding program, are quite common.29

When the July offensive of the Allies began, there was no dis-

position to belittle its importance, and full credit and unstinted

praise was given, in headline and editorial, to the American boys

who played such an important role in these and all subsequent

operations.30

A much safer test of the loyalty and sincerity of the Ger-

man-language press than its support of liberty loans and Red

Cross campaigns affords, can be made, I think, by examining its

discussions of the fundamental causes and aims of the war.

What have the editors to say about responsibility for the war?

What of German war practices, and the internal conditions of

the German Empire? And finally, have they caught the Amer-

ican spirit, and do they understand and sympathize with the

high aims that America has set for herself in this war?

For a few months after we entered the war, some of the

editors published the war news as they received it, and refrained

from making any comments whatsoever. They must have felt

their embarrassing position very keenly, and it required time to

adjust themselves to the new conditions. Probably some were

skeptical of America's position and doubted the sincerity of

President Wilson's rather idealistic utterances.  But as one

reads the files of the various papers in Ohio, one cannot help

discovering, as the months go by, encouraging signs of a real

understanding of, and sympathy with, America's war aims.

 

28 Toledo Express, May 4; Cincinnati Freie Presse, September 14,

1918.

Columbus Express und Westbote, May 4; Wachter und Anzeiger,

Feb. 18, and May 4, 1918.

30See Cincinnati Abend-Presse, July 19; Cincinnati Volksblatt, July

19; Wachter und Anzeiger, July 19 and September 13, 1918; Columbus

Express und Westbote, July 19, 1918.



Ohio's German-Language Press and the War

Ohio's German-Language Press and the War.         91

Many a citizen of German blood has been disillusioned by

the terms of the Russian Peace, and the Lichnowsky Revelations,

and the same seems to be true of the editors of the German

newspapers. Editorials on the causes of the war become more

frequent as we approach the present day, and also more bitter

toward the existing German government.     President Wilson

made this change in editorial policy much easier when, at

the very beginning, he made a distinction between the Ger-

man people and their autocratic rulers. Naturally, that dis-

tinction was seized upon by the German-language press.

The Express und Westbote of April 16, 1918, carries an

editorial full of praise for the President.  He is described

as the spokesman of all free peoples, who desire peace, but

who must have a just peace. The editor contends that peace

can only be discussed with the real representatives of the

German people, and never with the military autocracy that

has just revealed its hand in the Russian and Roumanian peace

treaties. American liberties are at stake, and the fight must go

on until the German military autocracy, but not the German peo-

ple, is destroyed.31 The Russian peace made a profound im-

pression, and the Brest-Litovsk negotiations are condemned in

unmistakable language.32  The Lichnowsky Revelations, as well

as those of Dr. Muehlon, were printed in full in almost every

German paper in Ohio. The Columbus Express and Westbote

sent the German translation of "How the War Came to America"

to all its readers. Several of the papers printed complete lists

of the publications of the Committee on Public Information,

with directions to the readers in regard to how they might be

obtained.33 The plate service of the Friends of German Democ-

racy is used by many of the papers, and these articles very often

deal with the fundamental issues of the war. A Columbus paper

describes the German people as a people led astray by its selfish

rulers, and now threatening to destroy the liberty and peace of

31Columbus Express und Westbote, April 16, 1918.

32 See Gross Daytoner Zeitung, May 27, May 29, June 4, 1918.

33 Wachter und Anzeiger, May 27; Cincinnati Volksblatt, April 9,

1918.



92 Ohio Arch

92         Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.

 

the world forever.34    The Express und Westbote specifically

charges the German autocracy with plunging the world into war,

seeking world domination, disregarding all international law, and

being guilty of the most wanton destruction of property in its

conduct of the war.35    Of all such statements, the public confes-

sion of the editor of the Gross Daytoner Zeitung rings truest.

On May 31, 1918, he writes:

"It is not an easy matter for a German to change his mind. If he

does, there must be weighty reasons. What has happened lately, has

opened the eyes of Germans the world over....... They believed that

Germany......was compelled to fight a defensive war. But events have

brought to light the greed, tyranny, and lust for conquest of the ruling

class of Germany. The disregard of American rights, and the treatment

of the Russians has enabled every right-minded German to see the

situation in the proper light, and has brought him the conviction that

the Germany of the military party is not the Germany that has been

living on in his memory. The beauties of German literature and song

have been forced to yield to the dark powers that rule Germany to-day.

The scales have fallen from our eyes...... No one can dictate to our

conscience. We are speaking only for ourselves and for our readers

who wish to follow us........ when we declare that we have not the

least sympathy with the German government as it is constituted to-day,

and that we have devoted all we have to the cause of the United States.

All our interests are here, our homes and our children. All our hopes

are in America."36

The internal conditions of the German Empire are rather

common topics for discussion in the editorial columns.        One

paper assails the German Crown Prince as the leader of the Pan-

Germans, a would-be master of strategy, and a sufferer from a

violent case of megalomania.37     Articles on how    the German

people are being deceived, and attacks on the Junkers, and espe-

cially their opposition to Prussian electoral reform, appear fre-

quently.38  The work of our secret service in the last few months

has called out several articles on German intrigues and propa-

34 Der Ohio Sonntagsgast, April 21, 1918.

35Columbus Express und Westbote, April 30, 1918

36 See a similar article in, Columbus Express und Westbote, May

29, 1918.

37 Gross Daytoner Zeitung, September 4, 1918.

38 Gross Daytoner Zeitung, March 1, March 21, May 7, May 18, June

18, July 23; Cincinnati Volksblatt, May 17, 1918; Gross Daytoner Zeitung,

Sept. 28, 1918.



Ohio's German-Language Press and the War

Ohio's German-Language Press and the War.         93

ganda in the United States. The Gross Daytoner Zeitung de-

nounces these activities as shameful and absurd, and adds, "Poor

German people .... how you have been misrepresented by

adventurers who have made the German name hated and de-

spised the world over".39  George Sylvester Viereck, the editor

of the Fatherland, and later of Viereck's Weekly, a publication

that was a recognized organ of German propaganda, has few

friends among the German newspaper men of Ohio. They call

him a dishonest adventurer, "an American citizen who sold his

honor and his independence for the German ambassador's

gold".40

The one outstanding difference between the German and

English newspaper that appears in Ohio to-day, is the almost

complete absence of all discussion of German war practices in

the former. The Gross Daytoner Zeitung has carried one attack

on Germany's practice of killing innocent and defenseless women

and children by air raids on undefended towns,41 and a few com-

ments can be found on the failure of U-boat warfare,42 but that

is all. Speeches of soldiers and travelers, back from Europe,

and dealing with German war practices may be reported as news,

but they are printed without comment.43

In spite of the German newspapers' public professions of

loyalty, the past year has been for them a year of persecution and

financial loss. The German language press seems to be losing

ground continually, and it is inconceivable how it can ever be re-

gained unless the end of the war should bring a heavy German im-

migration. Paper after paper has suspended publication, either

for all time, or for the period of the war.44 The company which

39 Gross Daytoner Zeitung, July 26 and June 19, 1918; See also

Toledo Express, Sept. 19, 1918.

40 Cincinnati Freie Presse, July 30; Cincinnati Abend-Presse, July 27;

Gross Daytoner Zeitung, July 30, 1918.

41July 5, 1918.

42 Gross Daytoner Zeitung, June 5; Cincinnati Freie Presse, june

4, 1918.

43 See Wachter und Anzeiger, March 10, May 16, July 16, 1918.

44The following is an incomplete list,-Hamilton "Deutsch-Ameri-

kaner"; Lorain Post, Canton, Ohio Volkszeitung, Youngstown Rund-

schau, Steubenville Germania, Cleveland Volksfreund und Arbeiterzeitung,

Columbus Express und Westbote, Westbote and Ohio Sonntagsgast.



94 Ohio Arch

94        Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.

published the Columbus Express und Westbote bought the circu-

lation lists of eleven newspapers during the past year, and then

at last decided to cease publishing its own papers.    The

president of the company is a major in the United States

Army, and has been on duty in France. The publishers saw

the handwriting on the wall, and claim that they suspended

while business was still profitable.  The suspension is for

all time, and the reasons alleged are of a patriotic nature. Says

the editor in his farewell,-" . . . . The trend of the times,

a thousand times reinforced by the war, demands the suspension

of all foreign language publications, especially the German."45

Very few of the German papers still published in Ohio carry

enough advertising to make the business profitable. There have

been, and there still are, movements under way to boycott any

firm that advertises in the German press. The Cleveland Wach-

ter und Anzeiger, once a great advertising medium, now con-

tains little more than a few want ads, and its circulation list,

exclusive of sales at news stands, is down to 3,740.46 Its papers

have been burned by Boy Scouts, petitions have been sent to

Washington demanding its suppression,47 and riotous crowds

have interfered with the distribution of the paper by congregat-

ing around its agencies.48  German editors occasionally receive

anonymous and threatening letters.49  It has been increasingly

difficult to get boys to carry "the Dutch paper", and packages

of newspapers, shipped to neighboring towns, have been known

to disappear from the train or interurban in a most mysterious

fashion. The Toledo Express, a paper forty-seven years old,

has shrunk from a daily to a semi-weekly, and then to a weekly,

because of the financial losses incurred during the last year. The

publishers have declared that only an early peace can save the

paper. A number of the papers have reduced the size of their

issues. Interestingly enough, some of the papers are publishing

articles in English. Is this the beginning of a gradual change

45Der Ohio Sonntagsgast, August 18, 1918.

46 Wachter und Anzeiger, October 1, 1918.

47Ibid., June 1 and March 23, 1918.

48Ibid., June 2, 1918.

49See Gross Daytoner Zeitung, April 20, 1918.



Ohio's German-Language Press and the War

Ohio's German-Language Press and the War.         95

 

from  a German to an English paper?       The Wachter und

Anzeiger contains at least one article in English every day. The

Akron Germania publishes a war review, sometimes as much as

a full page, in English, and the Minster Post sometimes appears

half English and half German.50

Most of the papers are trying to hold their circulation, and

the few advertisers they are still able to get,-and are hoping

for an early peace to bring back the before-the-war prosperity.

They are answering their persecutors by pointing out that "A

war against the German press in this country is a war against the

government." 51 They publish with pride and evident delight

the letters from Secretary McAdoo, George Creel, and other

high officials, thanking them for their loyal and hearty support

of Liberty Loans and War Savings Stamp Campaigns. They

maintain that the German paper is still a necessity in this coun-

try, and ask, with considerable effect, how would it have been

possible to administer the draft law, and the detailed regulations

for the registration and conduct of alien enemies, among those

who know but one tongue, if it had not been for the German-

language press? As far as the government itself is concerned, its

present policy, whatever its ultimate policy may be, is to

recognize the foreign language newspapers as existing institu-

tions, and to get the greatest possible good out of them.52

50 See for example, Minster Post, Sept. 6, 1918; and Akron Germania,

Sept. 4, 1918. Also Siebenburgisch-Amerikanischer Bote (Youngstown),

Sept. 6, 1918.

51 Cincinnati Volksblatt, July 11, 1918.

52 See a letter from the Council of National Defense to all State

Councils, reprinted in Cincinnati Abend-Presse, July 15, 1918.