Mound Builders' Fort within Toledo's
Limits. 381
MOUND BUILDERS' FORT WITHIN TOLEDO'S
LIMITS.
BY S. S. KNABENSHUE, TOLEDO, OHIO.
It will probably surprise most of the
readers of the Quar-
terly to be told that there once existed
an ancient defensive earth-
work on the banks of the Maumee, within
the present city limits.
The writer was unaware of the fact until
some time ago, when he
found a reference to it in a somewhat
rare book-the first volume
of the Smithsonian Contributions to
Knowledge, printed in 1848.
It is a copy of "Ancient Monuments
of the Mississippi Valley,"
by Squier and Davis. In the chapter
devoted to works of de-
fence, is a section on such ancient
forts in Northern Ohio, writ-
ten by Hon Charles Whittlesey, of
Cleveland, whose archaeolog-
ical researches were both extensive and
accurate. The follow-
ing is Mr. Whittlesey's account of the
Toledo work:
"This work is situated on the right
bank of the Maumee
river, two miles above Toledo, in Wood
county, Ohio." (It is
now in Lucas county, and within the city
limits. The writer does
not know whether Mr. Whittlesey was in
error in placing the
work in Wood county, or whether the
county line has been changed
since his account was written.) The
water of the river is here
deep and still, and of the lake level;
the bluff is about 35 feet
high. Since the work was built, the
current has undermined a
portion, and parts of the embankments
are to be seen on the slips
a, a. The country for miles in all
directions is flat and wet,
though heavily timbered, as is the space
in and around this enclo-
sure. The walls, measuring from the
bottoms of the ditches,
are from three to four feet high. They
are not of uniform
dimensions throughout their extent; and
as there is no ditch on
the southwest side, while there is a
double wall and ditch else-
where, it is presumable that the work
was abandoned before it
was finished."
The site of this ancient work is on the
East Side, a little
above the end of Fassett street bridge,
and directly back of the
C., H. & D. elevator. The greater
part is an unfenced common,
382 Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
directly north of the present residence of Mrs. Charles A. Crane, to whom the site belongs. There is not a vestige of the old em- bankment remaining. After the ground was cleared of trees, it was cultivated, and the plow soon reduced the works to an uniform level. The only reminder of the work is the name of Fort street- a short thoroughfare running east from the Ohio Central tracks to Crescent street. If extended through westward to the river, it would cut the center of the site. When it was laid out, the |
|
work was still in existence. and the name given in conse- quence. Mr. Elias Fassett, who lives in the next house south of the Crane residence, has a vivid remembrance of the old mound builders' fort as it appeared more than a half century ago. He says the northern end reached the river only a few yards south of the end of Fassett street bridge, and the embankment on the southwestern side, where there was no ditch, crossed the present street just at the corner of the Crane front fence. When |
the Fassett family settled where he now lives, the site of the fort was covered with huge sugar maple trees. This grove of maples extended some distance north of the three acres covered by the works, and embraced about 200 trees. These were the only sugar trees in that vicinity. This would point to the site having been cleared of the primitive forest by the people who built the fort; for it is a well known fact that where an area is denuded of its original forest growth, and afterward allowed to reforest itself, the new growth is always of a different species. It would ap- pear that the soil becomes exhausted of the materials for that |
Mound Builders' Fort within Toledo's
Limits. 383
particular kind of tree, and others
spring up for which it con-
tains appropriate nourishment.
Directly where the river road now runs,
in front of the Fas-
set residence-or Miami street, to give
it the official name-there
was originally an elevation, probably an
artificial mound, of the
same date as the fort. A small oak tree,
on the edge of the bluff,
marks its position. This mound was of
nearly pure sand, and it
was used to level up the lot. In digging
it down a half dozen
human skeletons were unearthed, all in
perfect preservation, but
all buried face downward-a most unusual
thing. These were
probably the remains of Indians of a
later date, and not of the
race that erected the work itself. The
mound builders usually
burned their dead; and the writer, in
exploring their burial
mounds in Southern Ohio, has frequently
found later Indian inter-
ments in these ancient mounds. They are
easily distinguished,
for the mound builders deposited their
burned remains of their
dead on the ground, and then raised a
mound over them, the
relics being always found at the natural
level, and in the center
of the mound; while the Indian
interments were made anywhere
on the elevation that suited the fancy
of the burial party.
Mr. Whittlesey, in the chapter referred
to above, describes
eight ancient works, of which the Toledo
one is the most west-
erly, and all in Northern Ohio. Of them
he says:
"Nothing can be more plain that
that most of the remains
in Northern Ohio are military works.
They have not yet been
found any remnants of the timber in the
walls; yet it is very safe
to presume that pallisades were planted
on them, and that wooden
posts and gates were erected at the passages
left in the embank-
ments and ditches.
"All the positions are contiguous
to water; and none of them
have higher land in their vicinity, from
which they might in an
degree be commanded. Of the works
bordering on the shore of
Lake Erie, through the state of Ohio,
there the none but may
have been intended for defence; although
in some of them the
design is not perfectly manifest. They
form a line from Con-
neaut to Toledo, at a distance of from
three to five miles from the
lake; and all stand upon or near the
principal rivers." * * * *
384 Ohio Arch. and Hist. Society Publications.
"The most natural inference with
respect to the northern
cordon of works is, that they formed a
well-occupied line, con-
structed either to protect the advance
of a nation landing from the
lake and moving southward for conquest;
or, a line of resistance
for people inhabiting these shores and
pressed upon by their
southern neighbors. The scarcity of
mounds, the absence of
pyramids of earth, which are so common
on the Ohio, the want
of rectangular or any other regular
works, at the north-all
these differences tend to the conclusion
that the northern part
of Ohio was occupied by a distinct
people."
According to Mr. Whittlesey, this work
on the Maumee is
the most westerly of the defensive
cordon of these ancient forts.
The absence of mounds, of which he
speaks, points to a short
occupation, or to a very small
population; for the isolated mounds
were tumuli, or burial mounds. The
writer knows of but three
in this vicinity. Two are on the road to
Maumee, a short distance
this side of the Halfway House-one in a
pear orchard, some
fifty yards west of the road, and and
the other in the woods a few
hundred yards south. The third is in
Ottawa Park, marked by
a clump of trees, on the crest of the
hill west of the lower bridge.
The writer would like to be informed of
the location of any others
in this vicinity.