Ohio History Journal




378 Ohio Arch

378        Ohio Arch. and His. Society Publications.

 

 

ST. CLAIR'S DEFEAT.

 

AS TOLD BY AN EYE-WITNESS--FROM ORIGINAL MSS.

 

BY FRAZER E. WILSON, GREENVILLE, O.

It is refreshing to read an original account of any important

battle, especially when the field of action is near at hand. Of the

600 survivors of St. Clair's unfortunate army probably quite a

number wrote narratives which have been lost or destroyed in

the wreck of time. The General's own report and the descrip-

tion of Benjamin Van Cleve have been published a number of

times and we take pleasure in printing another from the pen of

a Mr. Thos. Irwin, deceased, of Butler County, Ohio, who was a

wagoner in the army. Mr. Irwin has a number of descendants in

Darke county; among whom are David P. Irwin and Mr. William

Swartz, of Greenville. The manuscript is in the possession of the

latter gentleman, who kindly loaned it to the writer for copy and

publication. It reads as follows:

"The following is an account from the memory of the movements

of General Arthur St. Clair's army from Fort Hamilton to where said

army was defeated on the 4th of November, in the year 1791:

"The army marched from Fort Hamilton about the last of Sep-

tember or first of October, on a straight line by the compass, to where

Fort Jefferson was built; encamped and lay there over two weeks, until

the fort was built and finished. Left there in October, marched to

Greenville creek, encamped and lay there one week. Marched from there

on the 1st of November and was attacked and defeated on the morning

of the 4th by the Indians. It was the opinion of the general and his

officers that the Indians would not attack an army where there was so

many canon with them. There was three six pounders and three smaller

ones. On the day before the battle, about four miles on this side,

there was a general halt. Something got wrong. The weather was

cold. During our stay us wagoners in front kindled up a large fire.

The general and a number of the officers collected round it to warm

themselves. They chatted on several subjects. One was whereabouts we

were. The general opinion was that we had passed over the dividing

ridge between the waters of the Miamis and St. Mary's-was then on

the waters of St. Mary's. Colonel Serjant had been in front, came up

while they were chatting, informed them that the advance guard had

chased four or five Indians from a fire out of a thicket and got part



St

St. Clair's Defeat.                    379

 

of a venison at the fire. The chat turned upon the movements of the

Indians, as they had been more seen that day than on any day previous.

The gen'l observed that he did not think the Indians was watching the

movements of the army with a view to attack them. The officers present

concured with him in that opinion. We marched from there about 2

mile, halted to encamp. An express came up from the front gard,

stated that they had got to a fine, running stream and good place to

encamp at. We started and got there about sunset. I expect it was

near eight o'clock before the troops got fixed for lodging and cooking

their scanty mess of provision. There was several guns shot that night

by the sentries. Our orders was to have our horses up early on the

4th. We had to pass through the sentries. They informed us that the

Indian had been round part of the camp nearly all night. We got

part of the horses and part was stole by the Indians. The Kentucky

malitia, perhaps three hundred, was encamped 40 rod in advance on

the opposite side of the creek. The army was encamped in a hollow

square on this side of creek. The three six-pounders on the left on the

bank of said creek. The two lines was about 50 or 60 yards apart so

as the rear could come to the creek for water. A small ravine put into

the creek a short distance on the left from where the six-pounders was.

About sunrise on the 4th one gun was discharged some distance in front

of the Kentucky militia. In two minutes after there was upwards of 50

discharged, a yell raised and charges made on the militia. They re-

treated into the main camp, the indians in pursuit. When the Indians

came within perhaps 60 yards of said creek they wheeled to the right and

left with a view to surround the army which they done in a very short

time. After they got round I think within one hour and a half they

had killed and wounded every officer and soldier belonging to the

artilery. After 'the artilery was silenced I think the battle continued

another hour and half. During that time there was several charges

made but I think neither of them advanced more than 40 steps until

they returned. A retreat was ordered to be beat which was done by

a drummer but not understood. George Adams, who afterwards lived

and died in Darke county and was on that campaign I think as a spie.

St. Clair placed great confidence in him for former services. He was with

the gen'l. A short time before the army retreated he came to that part

of the lone, near where the trace was, give three sharp yells and said-

"Boys let us make for the trace."-He took the lead, a charge was made.

I was within five or six feet of him. The Indians give way a few guns

was shot from both sides. When we had got perhaps about thirty rood

Adams ordered them to halt and form a line. They were then on the

trace and could not be stopped. The race continued perhaps 4 or 5 mile

when they slackened their pace and arrived at Fort Jefferson a short

time after sunset. The first regiment was there-had been sent after

deserters and to gard provisions. I expect on the day of the battle there



380 Ohio Arch

380        Ohio Arch. and His. Society Publications

 

was no provision on the way within 50 miles and then not much. The

wagoners had no guns while we lay at Jefferson and Greenville. I bor-

rowed a rifle to hunt with, could get none; time of battle got a musket,

bayonet, cartouch box with about 20 cartridges. Throwed the box away

and carried the cartridges in a large side pocket. The troops on that

campaign ought to have been trilled 8 or 10 months and learned them

how to handle a gun. I think a number never had handled a gun or

shot one. There was two excellent companies of artilary men command-

ed by Capt'ns Bradford and Ford. If they would have had a good breast-

work to shelter thmselves all the Indians that was there could not have

fazed them. That battle always reminded me of on of those thunder

storms that comes up quick and rapidly. The following is the names

of part of the officers that I had a knowledge of that was killed in that

battle on the 4th of November, 1791: General Butler, 1-Col. Gibson, 2

-Major Furguson of artilery, 3-Cap. Hart, 4-Cap't'n Kirkwood, 5-

Cap't'n Smith, 6-Cap't'n Darke, 7- Cap't'n Sarwinger, 8-Lieut Spear,

9-Lieut Lukens, 10-Ensign McMichel, 11-Cap't'n Bradford of Ar-

tilery, 12-Provisions was excedingly scarce. Nearly all the time we lay

at Greenville creek and on until the army was defeated the army was on

half rations and the beef part was not very good. Six spies was sent

from Greenville creek 2 days before the army marched from there-

went about a northeast course-heard nothing of the battle on the 4th-

met with an Indian who informed them the army was defeated. They

returned to Jefferson. There was four of the spies Chockta Indians-

they killed the one they met. Capt'n Ganoe who was afterwards gen'l in

Hamilton County was the surveyor.

THOMAS IRWIN, of B. C. Ohio.

There was six wagoners with the artillery and one cook. Two wagon-

ers and the cook was killed. Cap't'n Ford with the small pieces always

encampted on rear line right in rear of the large ones. The officers on

that campaign was as good as any that ever carried a gun.  T. I.

(Spelling and grammatical construction according to MSS.- Punc-

tuation altered to facilitate reading.)

This account corresponds in its main points with that of

Gen. St. Clair, but being written from memory several years after

the battle, it is inaccurate in a few minor points of time, etc.,

and, on account of brevity, necessarily gives but an incomplete

and imperfect picture of the affair. It remains, however, an ex-

tremely valuable witness to the truth as given in the generally

accepted accounts and should be carefully and reverently pre-

served for future reference.