Ohio History Journal

170                                               OHIO HISTORY

work of this remarkable man, who achieved the distinction of having done

some of the most notable post-colonial and Greek Revival work in northern

Ohio, and then of going on to create a body of equally notable Victorian

eclectic work.

Simeon Porter was the son of the famous master builder Lemuel Porter.

The elder Porter migrated to Ohio from Waterbury, Connecticut, in 1818

and settled in the town of Tallmadge.1 Having been born in 1807, Simeon

was eleven years old at the time. Lemuel Porter was past forty, and had

been trained as a woodworker and joiner in New England. His abilities

were soon in demand in Ohio, and in 1821 he was employed to superintend

the joiner work of the historic Congregational Church in Tallmadge. This

church has been frequently described elsewhere, and there seems to be

general agreement that it is the finest of early Ohio churches. Completed

in 1825, it is nearly identical in general appearance, proportion, and

details with churches which the well-known architect David Hoadley was

building at the same time back in Connecticut.²

In 1824 Lemuel Porter was appointed to a committee on location for

a Western Reserve collegiate institution.³ The town of Hudson, ten miles

north of Tallmadge, was selected, and in 1826 Lemuel Porter was given

the contract for the work on the first building of the new Western

Reserve College. This building, later known as Middle College, was com-

pleted in July 1827. Middle College was a simple rectangular brick block

56 feet by 37 feet, recalling similar New England buildings of the late

eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Its chief architectural feature

was the cupola, an open cylindrical belfry with arches and pilasters, sup-

porting a hemispherical dome.⁴ This feature appeared again in his son

Simeon's work, even as late as 1861.

In March 1829 Lemuel Porter was given the contract for two new

buildings for the college, the "chapel" and the "houses for the professors."5

The "chapel" was actually the building known as South College, for

the present chapel was not built until 1835. Porter moved to Hudson with

his family in order to superintend the college work, but he died suddenly

in September 1829. The trustees had such confidence in the ability of

Simeon, now twenty-two years old, that he was appointed to fulfill his

father's contract. Accordingly, the South College building was completed

in 1830. South College was a four-story multipurpose building measuring

64 feet by 37 feet. The chapel and theology rooms occupied the first floor,

the preparatory and collegiate departments the second, and dormitory

suites the third and fourth floors. The lower story was constructed of

sandstone and the other three stories of brick. The building was marked

with little of architectural note. Although of four stories instead of three,

it closely resembled Middle College, having the same stepped gables

and paired chimneys.

Also in 1830, Simeon Porter erected the second of the two buildings

which had been contracted for the year before. This was the double

residence built for the accommodation of two professors. Later it became

SIMEON PORTER                                                  171

known as the President's House. Since Middle and South Colleges have

both been demolished, the President's House is the oldest building now

remaining on the campus, and in the opinion of many, the most architec-

turally gracious of all. A handsome brick house, its ornamental details

are in the manner of the post-colonial Adamesque style of New England,

which suggest that probably it was designed by Lemuel Porter before his

death. The most important feature of the design is the pair of identical

central doorways. The delicate proportions and placing of the sidelights,

elliptical fanlights, and the half columns on either side of the doorways,

give the entrance, and the house, a distinction equal to that of any

New England counterpart, and make it a fitting posthumous tribute to

the life work of Lemuel Porter of Connecticut.

The independent career of Simeon Porter, then, actually began in

1830. His younger brother Orrin, also a builder, was now his partner.

The two brothers worked together on contracting, which included masonry,

carpentry, and painting.⁶ In August 1834 the erection of the next college

building was authorized by the trustees. A resolution of their meeting

reads: "Resolved that Messrs. Pierce, Pitkin, and Bradstreet be a com-

mittee to draw a plan for the contemplated Chapel."⁷ It seems certain

that this committee, according to the general practice of the day, deter-

mined the general plan of the building, and left the design and details to

the master builder. Colonel S. C. Porter was the contractor.⁸ On January

1, 1835, bids for the timber were solicited, and by November 1 the brick

walls were completed. The Chapel was dedicated on August 23, 1836,

its total cost having been $6,231.52. Like South College a multipurpose

building, the Chapel had a library and two recitation rooms on the

first floor, the auditorium with two recitation rooms on either side on

the second floor, and the horseshoe-shaped gallery of the auditorium

occupying the third floor. As originally built, the Chapel was 40 feet by

60 feet. The bell tower had three square diminishing stages with balus-

trades. The uppermost tower stage was removed in 1871, altering the

proportions of the building, and in 1940 the building was extended 22

feet at the rear, still further changing its original appearance.

For a long time there was a tradition that the design of the Chapel

was copied from some New England church, perhaps the chapel at Yale.

This tradition, apparently refuted for years, was confirmed only recently

with the publication of the description and pictures of the first chapel

at Yale, built in 1762-63 and razed toward the end of the nineteenth

century.⁹ It was a three-story building with the chapel and the gallery

in the lower two floors, and the library on the upper one. President

Pierce's committee simply turned the Yale building upside down! In

design, however, the Yale chapel was a typical colonial meetinghouse,

with an attached bell tower at the front. Simeon Porter's design for the

Western Reserve Chapel, on the other hand, was Greek.

It is important to emphasize that the Porters were not yet architects

in the modern sense at all. They had no formal architectural training.

172                                               OHIO HISTORY

Lemuel Porter, as has been mentioned, came from the New England

woodworking tradition, and was a builder and contractor by experience.

The Western Reserve buildings are essentially the building of master

craftsmen, and whatever architectural merit they have is due to the

use of details supplied by the builders' handbooks which were so widely

circulated. The comment of I. T. Frary on this point is interesting:

The clumsy attempts at classic pilasters, columns, mouldings, and

cornices often produced curious effects that would scarcely pass

muster in a school of architecture or a Beaux-Arts competition. They

were crude, the details often painfully misunderstood, yet in them

we recognize a sincerity that wins our admiration. Those pioneer

builders were creating a vernacular in architecture possessing vital-

ity and spontaneity that is often missing in highly sophisticated

creations.10

It is also important to ask the extent to which Simeon Porter was

acquainted with the Greek Revival. The Greek Revival in the East was

beginning and reached maturity simultaneously with the migration to

the West. The earliest settlers, the generation of Lemuel Porter, used

the handbooks of the post-colonial style, the "Adamesque," which were

rapidly going out of fashion in the East. By 1830, when Simeon Porter's

independent building career began, the inhabitants of Ohio were cer-

tainly familiar with the Greek Revival. In Asher Benjamin's manuals

of the 1830's, the Greek style had won out completely. A copy of Benjamin's

Practice of Architecture, printed in 1835, may be found in the Hudson

Historical Society, where it is hopefully believed that it belonged to

Simeon Porter. The preface to this work, written in 1833, suggests rea-

sons for the appeal of the Greek Revival:

The text is taken from the Grecian system, which is now universally

adopted by the first professors of the art, both in Europe and America;

and whose economical plan, and plain massive features, are peculiarly

adapted to the republican habits of this country.11

In addition, the classic style would certainly have appealed to the trustees

of Western Reserve College as a fitting embodiment of the scholarly cul-

ture which they were intent upon establishing at "the Yale of the West."

The Chapel is the first of the college buildings to use Greek detail,

and could possibly be called the only fully developed Greek Revival build-

ing on the campus. Daniel Giffen has made a careful study of many of

the decorative details -- pilasters, moldings, windows, and doorways--

in the Chapel, North College, the Observatory, and the Athenaeum.¹² Com-

paring these with plates in Benjamin's The Practical House Carpenter

of 1830, he concludes that this book was almost certainly a source of

Simeon Porter's details. Instead of the typical Greek columned portico,

the Chapel facade has three-story brick pilasters, doubled at the corners,

174                                               OHIO HISTORY

had foundations, sills, and lintels of dressed sandstone, and walls of brick.

The telescope was supported by two monolithic piers of sandstone set six

feet into the ground and independent of the building structure.

In February of 1840 the last of Porter's Western Reserve College

buildings was authorized. It was to be a natural science building, and

has always been called the Athenaeum. Uncertainty as to its location

delayed construction for over a year. Meanwhile, in 1841, Nathan Seymour,

professor of Greek at the college, built himself a house. Helen Kitzmiller,

in a brief paper on the house, says that "Simeon Porter built Seymour

House, literally under the very eye of the professor.^"14 The house is an

imposing rectangular brick structure, one of the most pleasing in the

village, and its doorway has perhaps the most handsomely proportioned

Doric portico in Hudson. As Frary says, "It is quite obvious that a man

of his attainments would have the portal of his house designed as nearly

as possible in conformity with the ideals of the Greeks, whose culture

was his life study."15

During the winter of 1841-42, the walls and roof of the Athenaeum were

completed. In August 1842 the finishing of the first and second floor

interiors was contracted, and these floors, containing four large lecture

rooms apiece, were occupied in February 1843. The third floor, finished

later, contained a natural history museum. This three-story brick building

was the largest of the college buildings. The front was dominated by a

tower which combined features of the Chapel tower and the Middle

College belfry, having a square base surmounted by a cupola. The side

elevations showed the three-story pilasters and the blind arcades of the

Chapel design. However, the tower was removed in the 1860's, and a

drastic alteration in 1917-18 converted the Athenaeum to a dormitory of

four stories, so there is little left of its original appearance. The comple-

tion of the Athenaeum made a total of seven college buildings erected

by the Porter family, father and sons, between 1826 and 1843, and those

still standing remain their most imposing monument in Hudson.

By now Simeon Porter's reputation had brought him a contract to

build in Brecksville, fourteen miles south of Cleveland. There he built

the Brecksville Congregational Church in 1844.16 This church is one of

the purest Greek Revival designs known to have been done by Simeon

Porter. The front is divided into three bays by double pilasters at the

corners and fluted half-round Doric columns flanking the entrance. The

tower is a curious combination of an octagonal base with a circular open

belfry and a conical spire. It is difficult to tell whether the uppermost

section is part of Porter's original design, for the present one is a

recent restoration, but it does recall vaguely the open belfry and spire

of Lemuel Porter's Tallmadge church.

There remains one more public building from this early Hudson period

of Simeon Porter's career to be mentioned, and it will always be a

curiosity. The Christ Church Episcopal of Hudson is the only example

of Porter's work known for certain to have been done in the pointed

SIMEON PORTER                                                  175

Gothic Revival style. By 1846, the date of its erection, the Greek Revival

was on the wane. It was rapidly being replaced by the various medieval

styles, of which the Gothic was to become a favorite for church edifices.

The Episcopal Church, a wooden frame building, was authorized in Jan-

uary 1846, its cornerstone laid in April, and the sanctuary opened for

divine service and consecrated in September. A historical sketch of 1876

states that "the plan of the church was furnished by Bp McIlvaine, but

was greatly modified by Mr. Porter, and produced a church beautiful

in style and proportions."¹⁷ Perhaps this explains Porter's momentary

dabbling in the Gothic fashion. Did Bishop McIlvaine "furnish" the

Gothic design, or did Porter's modifications make it Gothic? The fact

that all of Porter's experience so far was in the classic styles strongly

suggests the former alternative, but we shall probably never know for

sure. The 1846 building of Hudson Christ Church Episcopal exists no

longer, having been destroyed by fire and replaced by the present classically

styled building in 1930.

Sometime in 1848 Simeon Porter moved from the town of Hudson to

the growing city of Cleveland. Before leaving the earlier part of his

career, however, it is necessary to enter the realm of conjecture briefly.

The buildings already described are those for which there is positive

documentation, but they leave much of the time between 1830 and 1848

unaccounted for. Frederick C. Waite, the son of an apprentice and painter

under Porter, and later a professor at Western Reserve University, makes

the following statement about Simeon and Orrin Porter: "These two

brothers . . . built not only the college buildings but all the best residences

in town before the Civil War."18 Unfortunately he does not identify the

specific buildings. Mrs. Henry Farwell, a niece of Simeon, states in her

biographical sketch of the Porter family that Simeon "had all the work

he could do and employed apprentices and journeymen in his mechanical

operations" in Hudson and its vicinity.19 Furthermore, there were appar-

ently no other men living in Hudson between 1830 and 1850 capable of

the necessary joinery and masonry contracting that was done. Since the

town records of Hudson were destroyed by fire in 1892, we are forced

to rely on clues such as these. If we take them seriously, what begins to

emerge is the picture of an entire village, one of the most characteristic

(and best preserved) villages of the New England type in the Western

Reserve, for which the two brothers, Simeon and Orrin Porter, were

almost totally responsible.

In view of the fact that such contracts as are known were made with

Simeon, and in the light of his later career as partner of one of the

most noted architects of Cleveland, it seems reasonable to assume that

Simeon was the senior partner and designer, and the younger brother

Orrin was his assistant in the contracting and building. Needless to say,

there are varying degrees of probability for the attribution of certain

buildings to the Porters. It is beyond the scope of this article to do more

than mention some of the buildings in which the evidence of the design,

176                                                OHIO HISTORY

or ownership (as in the case of the college), or enlightened opinion, sug-

gests attribution of the work to the Porters.

The old dining hall of the college, or Nutting House (1831-32), seems

the most nearly certain, inasmuch as Porter was the college architect.

The house is deservedly famous for its doorway and "sunburst" fanlight.

The house which now houses the Hudson Historical Society (1835)

carries an unauthenticated tradition that it was done by workmen of the

Porters during the times when they were not occupied on the college

buildings. There are any number of other houses where a family or verbal

tradition connects their origin with Simeon Porter. Some of these are

country houses in brick or stone within a five-mile radius of Hudson. The

Brewster Store, built in 1839 and now the First National Bank, and another

store built by E. B. Ellsworth on virtually the same pattern, were worked

on by a carpenter of Porter's.²⁰ If they were indeed designed by Simeon

Porter, they afford interesting early examples of commercial buildings

added to his domestic, educational, and religious work.

The famous Congregational churches at Twinsburg (1848) and Streets-

boro (1851), each only five miles from Hudson, are so similar to the

Brecksville church that it is difficult to suppose that they were not done

by Porter. No less an authority than I. T. Frary, probably the most noted

historian of Ohio's early architecture, had this opinion: "[The churches]

at Twinsburg, Brecksville, Streetsboro and Gates Mills, all [are] located

so closely together and [show] such similarity of effect, especially the

first three, that it seems quite probable the same builder may have been

responsible for them all."²¹ Furthermore, there is a possibility that a

traveling minister was responsible for the religious guidance of the

three churches, preaching a Sunday a month at each of them.²²

One more Hudson building must be left until later. This is the Brewster

house, The Elms, a turreted Gothic sandstone pile, totally different from

the neighboring Greek Revival work. But this house must be seen in

the light of later developments. For Simeon Porter was about to embark

on the second phase of his career, which would be as notable in its way

as the Hudson phase. His early training as journeyman and master builder

were to stand him in good stead, so that the growing mid-century trend

toward eclecticism was always tempered in him with soundness of pro-

portion and construction.

When Porter arrived in Cleveland, its population of 17,000 was almost

thirty times that of 1820, when the Porters were newly arrived in

Ohio. Cleveland at mid-century was fully aware of its destiny as the

great Metropolis of the Lakes. It was already a center of shipping, com-

merce, manufacturing, and railroad transportation. The next decade saw

enormous changes in the architectural character of the city, and playing

the foremost role in these changes was the firm in which Simeon Porter

became a partner. Porter first listed himself in the city directory as

"architectural draftsman and building engineer."²³ Although he did not

yet call himself "architect," the decade of the fifties saw the emergence

SIMEON PORTER                                                  177

in the Midwest of the profession of architecture in the modern sense,

and the transformation of Simeon Porter from master builder into

architect.

In 1848 Porter joined the workshop of the master builder Perley Abbey

for a brief time, but there is no record of work done by them. Sometime

in 1849 or 1850 he joined Charles W. Heard as master builder.²⁴ Charles

W. Heard, one year older than Simeon Porter, had worked in Cleveland

since 1833. He was the co-worker and son-in-law of Jonathan Goldsmith,

whose Greek Revival work in and around Painesville is well known.

Goldsmith and Heard had been responsible for some of the best houses

on Euclid Avenue, which was rapidly becoming the most important

residential street in Cleveland. Heard took over Goldsmith's practice

upon his death in 1847. In 1849 Heard built a house for Henry B. Payne

on Euclid and Perry (East 21st) Streets, in the Gothic style.²5 Its details

showed Heard's acquaintance with the books of Andrew Jackson Downing,

one of the chief promulgators of the Gothic Revival. Heard's most im-

portant non-residential building in the Gothic style was St. Paul's

Episcopal Church, located on Euclid and Sheriff (East 4th).26 It was com-

pleted in 1851 after having been under construction since 1848 and having

suffered destruction by fire during that time. The brick structure was a

fairly typical design of the early Gothic Revival, with a lofty spire,

buttresses, and pinnacles.

Thus Simeon Porter came into an office where the Gothic Revival had

supplanted the earlier classical styles. This fact makes it possible to

understand how the design of the Brewster house in Hudson may have

come about. Mr. Brewster built his home next door to the store at the

north end of the Hudson green sometime between 1850 and 1853. It must

have seemed quite anomalous among the late colonial and Greek Revival

buildings as the large squarish sandstone front rose into the air, presenting

the villagers with a projecting two-story portico framed by twin octagonal

towers with ogival turrets. A large pointed arch framed the upper porch,

a shallow Tudor arch the lower one. This design bears strong resemblances

to that of the Old Library at Yale by Henry Austin (1846). It may be

traced further to an Ithiel Town and A. J. Davis project of 1838 for a

University of Michigan building, and beyond that to illustrations of King's

College Chapel at Cambridge which were known from architectural books.

In The Elms this design for a large public building has been greatly

reduced for a private dwelling. Now Simeon Porter was in Heard's office

with access to some of the latest architectural books, he was aware of

the Gothic Revival, and he was now an "architectural draftsman." It is

also certain that he maintained contact with Hudson friends and relatives.

If The Elms was the work of Porter, it was probably his first design done

with the point of view of an "architect" as opposed to that of the master

builder.

It is now obvious, as Edmund Chapman has pointed out, that "judging

by the number of important buildings attributed to this firm in the records,

180                                                OHIO HISTORY

its asymmetrical towers. Churches done in the Romanesque style displayed

sometimes the asymmetric pair of the Smithsonian, or a single tower

axially placed. The style gained great popularity in the late 1840's and

1850's, and spread rapidly and widely throughout the United States.

Heard and Porter's Second Presbyterian Church was built in 1851-52,

and opened for services on September 26, 1852. Its general form was

not unlike that of Heard's earlier St. Paul's, a simple rectangular block

with five windowed bays. The chief difference was that the central entrance

tower was octagonal instead of square. The reminiscences of S. J. Kelly

describe the Romanesque detail of the church:

Its high stone tower at the center, half imbedded in the church, was

topped by battlements. Above the tower an octagonal continuation

housed a clock beneath a tall shuttered belfry, each corner forming

a miniature tower with castle-like tops. Far above these rose a slender

spire, 185 feet high. . . . Three arched entrances were at the tower's

base, reached by three radiating flights of steps. . . . Along the roof's

edge at its sides and front ran foot-high battlements. The entire front

was of brown sandstone. . . . Completed and furnished, the structure

cost $70,000 to the credit of the society; Heard & Porter, who designed

it, and Heard & Warner, who supervised its erection.30

Inside, the sanctuary, or "main audience room,"³¹ was the largest in

the city, 98 feet by 63 feet, and 39 feet high, and had a gallery on three

sides. The principal floor could seat 850. In the basement there were three

meeting rooms, separated by folding doors, which could be opened into

one room seating 1,000 people. This in itself was rather remarkable. The

use of folding partitions apparently developed in the late 1840's. Their

use in this Cleveland church was among the first, and gives further

evidence of the advanced nature of Heard and Porter's work. This edifice

of the Second Presbyterian Church served until 1876, when it was

destroyed by fire.

Discussions had begun as early as December 1851 on the "expediency"

of tearing down the old structure of the First Presbyterian Church on

the square.³² Once the decision had been made to rebuild the "Old Stone

Church" on the same location, plans were prepared by Heard and Porter,

and the site was cleared. On September 9, 1853, the cornerstone laying

took place.³³ By February the chapel (30 feet by 70 feet) in the new church

was so nearly completed that the first services were held in it. The church

was finally dedicated on August 12, 1855, having cost $60,000. The spire

on the east tower was carried up after this date, and finally reached a

height of 228 feet.

In designing the Old Stone Church, it seems almost as if Heard and

Porter were ringing the changes on the Romanesque style described

above. Instead of the single central tower of Second Presbyterian, Old

Stone carried two asymmetric towers. Whether this scheme can be traced

184                                               OHIO HISTORY

high school. On the interior the Central High School boasted one of the

earliest uses of cast-iron structural columns in place of masonry walls.

Architects have always agreed that the form of a building should be

appropriate to the purpose it serves. To the nineteenth century mind

this appropriateness was more likely to be found in symbolic associations,

and a school building might very logically be medieval. On the other hand,

the nineteenth century builder was an eminently practical man. The new

invention of cast iron, made available in structural architectural pieces,

could not be ignored. Men like Heard and Porter can not be blamed either

for using style as symbolism or for not being a generation ahead of their

time and suddenly seeing the possibilities of the all-metal frame. Rather

they must be credited with inventiveness (or adaptability) in using the

cast-iron column as a space and material-saving device, even within the

framework of stylistic symbolism. But this is the point where we can

see the beginning of the breakdown of the unity of design and structure

which was to afflict the rest of the nineteenth century. Good brick side

walls, a Romanesque facade for style and show, interior iron columns

for space and strength--these are typical of the nineteenth century

approach to design.

The residence which Heard and Porter built for H. B. Hurlbut was one

of several whose plans were seen by a reporter visiting their office in

October 1855.38 They included houses for C. Hickox and a Mr. Mason,

and were in the $11,000 to $16,000 price range. The Hurlbut House is an

excellent example of the firm's work in the popular type of so-called

Italianate villa. The Italian, or Tuscan, villa style was a revival which

had arrived in America in the 1830's and was extremely popular in the

years before the Civil War. The chief examples of Richard Upjohn, John

Notman, Henry Austin, and Calvert Vaux were irregular in plan and

outline.³⁹ But the Hurlbut House is of the second type of Italian villa, a

large simple cube with a lookout on the flat roof. It has been suggested that

the "cupola" or "observatory" was an economical substitute for the more

picturesque tower. The villa also displayed wide projecting bracketed

eaves. On the Hurlbut House the eaves were embellished with large

Greek floral ornaments, as was the cupola and the entrance portico. The

proposed house was to be in "mastic," evidently a kind of cement for

facing the walls. Apart from the brackets and the anthemions, the design

was almost austere in its simplicity, having only the few doors and

windows to break the plane surface.

"Cleveland's residences are the finest, its business architecture the

shabbiest in the United States." Thus editorialized the Leader in 1869.40

Certainly the majority of the commercial and mercantile establishments

thrown up in a boom town were purely utilitarian, but some of them were

architect-designed. During the summer months of 1855 three wholesale

houses sprang up on Water Street (West 9th). On the corner of Superior

was Payne and Perry's block (not to be confused with the million dollar

Perry-Payne Building which was erected near the same site in 1889),

designed by Heard and Porter. A Cleveland landmark for many years,

SIMEON PORTER                                                  185

the store was a four-story building 48 1/2 feet high, plus a basement, with

a frontage of 138 feet and a depth of 100 feet. The store was described

as being "constructed of face brick above the first story, which is supported

by iron columns."⁴1 Probably there were structural iron columns on

the interior throughout the five floors. In the Central High School and

the Perry store then, Heard and Porter must have been among the first

in the Midwest to use iron columns as structural supports in place of

masonry walls--this was only six years after the iron building of James

Bogardus in New York. They built several such commercial buildings. In

1859 they designed a business block for I. S. Converse, at the corner of

Merwin and James. The Converse Block was a three-story building with

a 66 foot frontage on Merwin and a depth of 100 feet.⁴²

Toward the end of 1855 the first plans were drawn for the new Cus-

toms House, Federal Court rooms, and Post Office building. On January

31, 1856, it was announced that the building would be begun in early

spring and finished by December.⁴³ However, a series of delays, including

a disagreement concerning its location, and a long winter in 1857-58,

made this predicted date two years premature, and the building was

not opened until December 29, 1858.⁴⁴ The Heard and Porter design for

the Post Office constituted the central block of the larger building which

was torn down in 1902. Their section, 110 feet long and 60 feet wide,

was in the more classic, or Italian Renaissance, phase of the round-arched

styles. The Heard and Porter building was a three-story block with rusti-

cated stone masonry on the first story. The colonnade and the massive

wings seen in later photographs were added after 1876. The whole design

had a monumental simplicity undoubtedly considered more suitable for

public buildings and closely related to "government style" buildings

everywhere.

Just across the square from the rising federal building, fire broke out

in the Old Stone Church on March 7, 1857. The flames spread to the

228 foot steeple, and "like a flaming torch, it swayed and crashed across

Ontario Street.^"45 The main church walls, being of stone lined with brick,

still stood, and rebuilding was begun immediately. The whole was made

as fire-resistant as possible, and the restored building was dedicated on

January 17, 1858. After the second fire of 1884, the present interior was

restored by Charles Schweinfurth, and the new steeple was later declared

unsafe and taken down. A century after it was built, the Old Stone Church

was the oldest building still standing in the center of Cleveland, and

although much modified was still substantially the original design of

Heard and Porter.

The year 1859 marked the completion of two institutional buildings

which afford an interesting comparison in their general plan. In the fall

of 1859 the new Lake Erie Female Seminary (Lake Erie College) in

Painesville was completed. Charles Heard had been called back to the

city of his famous father-in-law, Jonathan Goldsmith, to supervise its

construction.46 The Lake Erie College building, now known as College Hall,

is the largest existing building from the Heard and Porter partnership.

186                                                 OHIO HISTORY

Measuring 180 feet by 60 feet, the red brick structure rises four stories

above a basement. A central tower in turn rises above the main block,

which connects two wings. Connecting the tower to the wings, and forming

porches in front of the main block, are two charming wooden arcades

topped by balustrades. College Hall contained the living rooms for the

instructors and students, the classrooms, library, gymnasium, dining hall,

and social hall.

In March 1859 it was announced at a meeting of the Cleveland Orphan

Asylum that a contract had been made with Messrs. Heard and Porter

"for the speedy completion of the asylum building."⁴⁷ The building had

been occupied since 1855. An old photograph shows a three-story building

with a central tower and block connected to two side wings. There was

a dome-shaped cupola above. The wings were connected by a balustraded

and arcaded portico. These similarities between the two buildings suggest

that this arrangement was considered appropriate for the institutional

type of building which included the provision of dormitory space among

its various functions.

But the end of the Heard and Porter partnership was soon in sight.

In February 1859 the Leader announced that "an unpretending structure

has recently sprung up in the midst of that populous portion of the city

[St. Clair below Erie], which must please the eye of every citizen, and

especially of the Christian."⁴⁸ The Cottage Chapel was a small house of

worship dedicated to the Sabbath school. No picture or complete descrip-

tion has been found. But the interesting fact is that the chapel was planned

by Porter alone, and his builder was G. H. Kidney. This was the first

indication that Charles Heard and Simeon Porter were going their separate

ways, and by the next year the firm of Heard and Porter was no longer

in existence.

Heard and Porter were listed separately in the city directory of 1859-60.

The reason for the separation is unknown. Before looking at the final

phase of Simeon Porter's career, it should be pointed out that Charles

Heard's later career was quite different from Porter's. Little building

was done during the Civil War. After the war Heard maintained his

reputation as one of Cleveland's foremost architects, and he worked in

the latest style, the French Renaissance revival. The most important of

his buildings were Case Hall, the music hall and cultural center begun

in 1859 and finally completed in 1867, the Case Block, a giant five-story

mansarded structure which was leased for use as the city hall upon its

completion in 1875, and the Euclid Avenue Opera House (1875). Also in

1875 Heard was chosen as the architect of the building to represent

Ohio at the 1876 Centennial Exposition in Philadelphia. The Ohio House

is the only state building from the exposition still standing on its original

site in Fairmount Park. In the centennial year, Charles W. Heard died,

on August 29, 1876.

Simeon Porter, on the other hand, continued to do some work for the

Cleveland public schools, but his most important buildings after 1860

were done outside of Cleveland. The Civil War was a time of testing for

SIMEON PORTER                                                 187

the builder as well as for the Union. Just before the opening of the

conflict, Simeon Porter, perhaps to dramatize his independence as an

architect, took his first (and only) advertisement in the city directory of

1861. It simply said: "S. C. Porter, ARCHITECT, No. 7 Perkins' Building,

Cleveland, Ohio." On the same day that Fort Sumter was bombarded by

the Confederates, the Leader carried a small story to the effect that the

carpentry work was finished on the new West Side High School, designed

by S. C. Porter.49 The building on State and Clinton Streets was occupied

in the fall, and was described as being a two-story brick building with a

nine-foot basement of stone. Its dimensions were50 feet by 96 feet, and

the total height was 51 feet. An old photograph shows that the West Side

High School was a smaller (but still "elegant")50 version of the 1856

Central High School, and hence another reference to the King's College

type. An important difference, however, was the addition of four battle-

mented corner towers to the Romanesque theme.

When construction in Cleveland nearly reached a standstill, fortunately

two or three jobs came to Porter from outside Cleveland. One of these

was his brother Orrin's house in Hudson. It is not known for certain

where the complete responsibility lies for its plan, but in all probability

Orrin and Simeon worked on it together, taking advantage of Simeon's

experience in Cleveland. The Porter House seems to be an amalgamation

of elements from both the early Hudson era and the later Cleveland one.

The house has the square, symmetrical simplicity of houses of the Hurlbut

type. The bracketed eaves certainly show the knowledge of the Italianate

style of the fifties. But in spite of its obviously Civil War character, the

Porter House lives very harmoniously with its neighbors from the earlier

Western Reserve period. The cornice return is a reminder of the earlier

classical houses, and the most recognizable Romanesque element is the

pair of round-arched second-story windows together with a circular attic

window, translated of course from masonry into wood.

In December 1861 the president of Mount Union College near Alliance,

some sixty miles southeast of Cleveland, procured the services of Simeon

Porter to build its College Hall. On December 27 the building specifications

and contract were signed by the architect and the building committee

of the college. The cornerstone laying ceremony was held on July 4, 1862.

After several delays due to the unavailability of labor during the war,

College Hall was completed and dedicated on December 1, 1864.51 By a

remarkable circumstance the manuscript specifications by Porter are still

in existence, and give unusual insight into the building practices of the

day.52 The specifications contain twenty-one paragraphs which give specific

details on all parts of the building. On the other hand, such general terms

as "suitable," "the most thorough and approved workman-ship," and "in

the strongest and best manner" appear over and over again in the specifi-

cations. These are obviously the specifications of an architect who fully

intended to oversee the construction himself, and did not need to spell

out what they meant. The basic construction of College Hall (later named

Chapman Hall) was unvaried from his standard practice since the earliest

188                                               OHIO HISTORY

buildings at Hudson, that is, a wooden frame with outer walls of brick,

and foundations and trim of sandstone. Although he originally specified the

use of cast-iron columns in the first and second stories of Chapman Hall,

it was only in a supplement to the specifications, dated some three weeks

later, that they were also specified in the interior foundations. This sug-

gests that even after the modern usages practiced with Heard, Porter

wrote the original specifications from years of habit in the carpenter-mason

tradition.

What Porter seems to have done with Chapman Hall was to take the

basic block of the Cleveland Central and West High Schools, and add

a few touches of Hudson reminiscence on top. This is not to suggest that

the final result is frivolous. It is eclectic, it is bold, it perhaps shows a

certain lack of discrimination, but the result has much dignity. The

main mass of the building is basically that of the Romanesque high

schools, including the corner towers of the West Side school. Its overall

length (120 feet by 64 feet) is somewhat greater. The additions which

recall the classic details of the Hudson period are the cupolas on either

end of the building. The south cupola is octagonal and supports a dome

which served as an astronomical observatory. On the north there is a

square clock tower with shuttered openings. As a combination of elements

from several periods of Porter's past, Chapman Hall almost seems to

be a conscious stylistic summary of his career.

While Porter was supervising the erection of the Mount Union College

building, Professor Ira O. Chapman (for whom Chapman Hall was later

named) built a house for himself in Mount Union village. This was in

1863. The last owner of the house before it was demolished in the 1950's

reported that it was built "by the same man who built Chapman Hall."⁵³

A photograph of 1880 shows a brick house which was almost certainly

not merely contractor-built. It seems likely that the Chapman House was

one of the last examples of Simeon Porter's domestic work. The general

form of this house is related to the Hurlbut and Orrin Porter Italianate

type. It is basically a simple cube with wide bracketed eaves. Instead of

the crowning observatory, there is simply a railed platform on the roof.

An unusual note is the third floor dormer which takes the form of a

curved pediment inserted into the main cornice. These details show the

continuing freedom with which the early Victorian architect was able

to rearrange details on a basically standard plan.

Porter also had another building under way in Hudson now, the new

brick edifice of the First Congregational Church. The cornerstone of the

church was laid on July 21, 1863, and the building dedicated on March 1,

1865.54 The First Congregational Church is also Romanesque, with a

single, symmetrically placed tower, buttresses, arcaded corbeling, and

round-arched windows. The entrance door is an interesting translation

into wood of the slender columns, foliated capitals, and zigzag molding

of the Old Stone Church. The basic form of the church, however, probably

gives the best possible indication of what Heard's Gothic St. Paul's looked

like. Still standing in 1863, that church must have provided the pattern

SIMEON PORTER                                                  189

for Porter. The Hudson Congregational Church is essentially a late

example of the early Gothic Revival, with Romanesque details.

During these war years Porter maintained his residence in Cleveland.

He had been living at the same address on Huron Street since first settling

there. In 1865 and 1866 Porter had a new young draftsman and junior

partner, Charles T. Roesling. During these two years they did two buildings

which may be compared, the Brownell Street School in Cleveland, completed

in September 1865,⁵5 and another building for Mount Union College,

finished in August 1866. Both buildings were simple rectangular blocks

of three stories with a series of rooms along a central corridor. The school

had ten windows on a side, with slightly projecting end blocks grouping

them into a two-six-two division. At Mount Union the new building was

a boarding hall (later called Miller Hall). Here there were likewise ten

windows on a side, but they were divided into vertical ranks by three-story

pilasters and corbeling, like Chapman Hall and the Western Reserve

buildings.

As Miller Hall was nearing completion, Porter, as college architect,

was appointed a member of a committee to prepare a history of Mount

Union College. It contained Porter's own description of the boarding hall:

Its dimensions are 134 1/2 feet long, by 46 1/2 feet wide, having three

ten feet stories above its basement story, which contain sixty good

rooms that measure each 12 by 15 feet, and having proper arrange-

ments in each room for light, heating, ventilation and furniture, with

roofs of slate, and the interior neatly and thoroughly finished, and

plastered with hard-finish, and skillfully constructed throughout, with

reference to health, convenience, permanence, and architectural taste.⁵⁶

The interior of Miller Hall was rebuilt with fire-resistant construction

early in this century, but the outer walls are those of 1866. Later the

building was marred by a new entrance on the south side, placed directly

beneath a brick pier and ignoring completely the structural logic of that

form.

Miller Hall is the last building by Simeon Porter of which there is a

positive record. Mrs. Farwell states that "his very active life in overseeing

the buildings he was erecting in various parts of the country undermined

his health and the last years of his life [he] was an invalid and slowly

declined until his death."⁵⁷ By 1870 he no longer listed a business address

in the directory. The next year he died in Cleveland, on May 6, 1871, and

was buried in the new Lakeview Cemetery. It was a singular circumstance

that Orrin Porter died in Hudson about the same hour in the morning

of the same day.

Simeon Porter was a New England pioneer of the Western Reserve, a

master builder of integrity, and a fairly typical Victorian architect. He

was not an original genius. His sources were clear. As an apprentice to

his father and as a master builder, he learned a solid trade in carpentry

and masonry. As a designer he undoubtedly relied heavily on the wide-

190                                                OHIO HISTORY

spread pattern books of the day. But while using them for decorative

details, he does not seem to have copied buildings intact from any source.

This freedom was characteristic of the early Victorian architect. It was

not until the late nineteenth and twentieth centuries that designers copied

buildings whole. The mid-century eclectic was an unscholarly one who

assembled details from various sources with boldness and zest, but always

with freedom and originality. As a builder, Porter was always conscious

of high standards, to which we can ascribe the fact that so many of his

buildings are standing and in use today. But once he set upon the path

of designing, he does not seem to have returned to the actual building

trades himself. He did indeed superintend construction, seeing that ma-

terials were sound and specifications followed, but this was part of the

job of the architect.

Simeon Porter could probably be said to have worked chiefly in three

styles. His early post-colonial work before 1835 was of course the heritage

of his father, simply continued until he became aware of any other

possibility. His Greek Revival work in Hudson is typical of the provincial

simplification with which that style was treated all over the Midwest.

His arrival in Cleveland just as the Romanesque style was taking hold

seems to have set his preference for the rest of his building career.

The work of Heard and Porter was among the most advanced in the

Midwest. Their use of the Romanesque, of cast-iron columns as soon as

they were available, and of folding partitions, was among the earliest.

Perhaps more important, Heard and Porter helped to change the face

of Cleveland. The dozen-odd buildings that are known must be assumed

to be only a portion of their actual work. If one considers as a sample

one or two masterpieces of Romanesque church architecture, a half dozen

schools and residences, several important public buildings, and commer-

cial stores in which the new structural system was eagerly tried, this is

an impressive record, and the other jobs coming to such an important firm

can be readily imagined. The work that Porter did alone in the last decade

of his life completed his development as a Victorian architect, and might

be seen, in one sense, as a recapitulation of the various stylistic elements

of his earlier career.

Simeon Porter developed from a master craftsman into a Victorian

architect as the Western Reserve was developing from a pioneer, agrarian

society into a mercantile, industrial one. It has frequently been observed

that the evolution of architecture not only parallels but even embodies

the growth and development of a region, and for this reason alone the

career of Simeon Porter is an invaluable chapter in the story of the

Western Reserve of Ohio.

THE AUTHOR: Eric Johannesen is the

chairman of the art department at Mount

Union College.