Ohio History Journal




206 OHIO ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL QUARTERLY

206     OHIO ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL QUARTERLY

 

it is a job well done. It is really only in its beginning. The op-

portunity for service to the State of Ohio has been multiplied

many times beyond that we ever hoped for in years gone by.

As I remarked at the opening of the meeting this is a sort of

birthday for the director. He is today joining the quarter cen-

tury group in service. In lieu of the report of the director I am

going to ask him to say something about the Society and the staff,

feelings he may have about his hopes for the future. Imme-

diately following Dr. Shetrone's address I will ask a committee

to retire for a moment to make nominations for three members of

the Board of Trustees to succeed Dr. Rightmire, Mr. Clark of

Cleveland, and Commander Hayes, whose terms expire this year.

I will appoint Mr. Carlisle, Mrs. Dryer and Curator Thomas.

The director needs no introduction, and for this tough citizen who

grows better with age, we wish another twenty-five years of very

active service in behalf of the Society. If the Nominating Com-

mittee will now slip out, we will ask the director for his report.

 

THE SOCIETY--A QUARTER CENTURY OF PROGRESS

By H. C. SHETRONE

After the disastrous flood of 1913 had subsided and the debris was

partly cleared away, this speaker found himself lodged on the threshold

of the Ohio State Archaeological and Historical Museum, as assistant to

the then curator. Which is but a round-about way of saying that just

now he is observing the twenty-fifth anniversary of his connection with

this organization.

Presumably a quarter-century of service entitles the servitor to lay

aside inhibitions and modesty and to make free use of the personal pro-

noun "I". With your permission, then, I shall attempt a brief evaluation

of the twenty-five-year period corresponding to my incumbency, with per-

haps a word of comment as to the future of the Society.

Without doubt, time is an important factor in human activities, since

conditions obtaining in any given time-period definitely influence the careers

both of individuals and organizations. The period under consideration--1913

to 1938--in many respects has been the most remarkable quarter-century

on record. It has witnessed the greatest era of peace and prosperity that

humans have known; the most widespread and destructive war in history;

the most poignant period of depression that society has had to endure; and,

finally a social revolution which finds us now living in a new social, in-

dustrial and economic world.   Had conditions remained favorable the

Society by now might be well on the way toward realizing its ideals. Since

they have not so remained, we may inquire as to just how the changes have

been met.

This twenty-five-year period, in so far as the present discussion is

concerned, separates into two distinct sub-periods; the first fifteen years

were a time of prosperity and the last ten years a time of depression.



PROCEEDINGS 207

PROCEEDINGS                           207

 

Coincidentally, these correspond precisely to the administrations of Director

Mills and your speaker, respectively.

By way of reminiscence and as a standard for comparison, the status

of the Society in 1913 was somewhat as follows: Dr. George Frederick

Wright, president; Emilius O. Randall, secretary; Edwin F. Wood, treasurer,

and Dr. William C. Mills, curator. Among the trustees were such illustrious

personages as Dr. W. O. Thompson, Gov. James E. Campbell, Hon. Myron

T. Herrick, Col. Webb C. Hayes, Mr. George F. Bareis, and Hon. Daniel

J. Ryan. Incidentally, none of the then seventeen trustees, and only two

of the members present at the 1913 Annual Meeting (Mrs. Howard Jones

and Mr. J. S. Roof) survive today. The Society occupied modest quarters

in Page Hall. Curator Mills, assisted by Starling L. Eaton, our present

efficient superintendent of maintenance, and a part-time stenographer, com-

prised the staff. Twenty-one volumes of the Publications had made their

appearance.  Several seasons of archaeological explorations had yielded

gratifying results. A number of private archaeological collections and a

corresponding amount of historical material had been secured. The begin-

nings of our present great Library were accommodated on shelves at the

rear of the office room. The Society held title to Serpent Mound, Fort

Ancient, and two or three lesser properties.

But these modest possessions and accomplishments were by no means

a true index to the status of the organization. Officers, trustees and mem-

bers, taking advantage of the nascent era of prosperity, were alert and

active.  A  period of expansion was at hand.   Public approval of the

Society's activities was finding expression in State recognition and increased

appropriations. The Museum and Library building even then was in process

of erection, and all concerned looked to the time when the Society would

occupy a home of its own and assume place as the official repository for

Ohio's historical and archaeological treasures.  The pioneering had been

done.

It was at this time and as a part of this broader program that your

speaker came into the picture. These first ten years or more were years

of action, without watching the clock, and oftener than not without vaca-

ions; years of intensive training in archaeological and museum methods,

under an exacting but just disciplinarian, for which I always have felt

grateful and appreciative.

The succeeding fifteen years under the energetic administration of

Dr. Mills were years of progress, placing the institution at their close

in pretty much its present form. There were accomplished the addition of

the North Wing; construction of the South Wing, which Dr. Mills was

not to see completed; acquisition of Campus Martius, Hayes Memorial,

Mound City and Ft. Laurens; exploration of the Tremper Mound, the

Feurt site, the Hopewell Group and the Seip Mound, with publication of

results; accumulation of historical materials; growth of the Library under

Secretary Galbreath; and establishment of a Department of Natural History,

Prof. James S. Hine, curator.

The decade and a half witnessed the passing of a number of the men

who had made this growth possible. Dr. Wright passed to his reward in

1919 and was succeeded as president by Gov. James E. Campbell: in the

following year the secretaryship, left vacant by the death of Mr. Randall,

was assumed by Charles B. Galbreath. Governor Campbell was called to

his fathers in 1925, and was succeeded by Mr. Arthur C. Johnson. Finally,

to close this remarkable era, Director Mills was called to a higher estate

on January 17, 1928, leaving for his successor a standard of conduct and

achievement difficult to attain.



208 OHIO ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL QUARTERLY

208     OHIO ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL QUARTERLY

 

Without further detail, we turn to the recent decade--1928-1938, and

to the incumbency of the present director.   Never had any individual

entered a new field of work under more auspicious circumstances. The

South Wing was nearing completion. Appropriations for the biennium

were adequate, with no inkling that they might not so continue.

As successor to Director Mills, I had no revolutionary program in

mind; rather, a continuation of the program which he had devised, with

such modifications as developments might indicate. Among the more im-

portant items which I had set for myself, were these: A program for

membership, bequests and endowments; a broader service to the remoter

districts of the State; a means for supplying growing demands on the part

of the Columbus Public Schools; closer cooperation with Ohio State Uni-

versity; more effective use and interpretation of archaeological and his-

torical materials within the Museum, and a wider recognition of the Society

and its Museum.

Partly owing to a set of unfortunate circumstances but mainly be-

cause of the depression, which came as a bolt from the blue, efforts in

the interest of membership, grants, bequests and endowments were nothing

short of a failure. I had been conscious for some years of the generosity

of citizens of wealth in aiding educational institutions, and believed it to

be logical and possible for our institution to share in this. But we had

begun too late; that source of financial support disappeared from sight,

temporarily only, let us hope.

Greater success attended our efforts to serve outlying districts of

the State. Despite curtailed appropriations subsequent to 1928, we have

been able to prepare and furnish free of cost to the outlying schools portable

loan collections in archaeology, history and natural history. This modest

service has done much to take the museum to the people, and the demand

for the collections is limited only by our inability to finance additional

sets. This initial effort to serve equally the citizens of the state should

lead eventually to realization of our ultimate aim--branch museums in the

several counties to act as clearing-houses for the parent institution.

For some years past the Columbus Public Schools, because of their

proximity to the Museum and Library, have evinced a desire to make

specific use of the collections and facilities. The temptation to discriminate

in their favor was averted by inviting them to place trained teachers in the

Museum, in order that they might help themselves. This suggestion was

accepted and has been effective for several years, thus affording the local

schools the equivalent of municipal museum service without unduly taxing

our personnel and funds. The suggestion is offered that the Columbus

Public Schools might make even greater use of the Museum and Library

facilities, and that they might conceivably contribute financially to the

supplying of a more detailed service.

A most satisfactory and mutually advantageous working relationship

with Ohio State University has been effected, as evidenced by the fact

that the president of the university is one of our most interested and

active trustees. The addition to the university faculty recently of a highly

competent anthropologist, who regards the Museum's archaeological col-

lections as an invaluable source of study and instructional material, assures

an even greater degree of cooperation, and justifies the prediction that

in the not distant future the two institutions will be recognized as outstand-

ing in the field of anthropology and archaeology.

While the result of years of exploration had disclosed the material

culture of the Ohio aborigines, at least from the technical point of view,



PROCEEDINGS 209

PROCEEDINGS                           209

 

there remained the need of clarifying these concepts for the average lay

individual. Relics alone, displayed in cases, were not enough. As a be-

ginning, we devised two displays--the "Story of Stone" and the "Story

of Flint," illustrating the sequential use of these basic materials. While

the scientist readily pictured the physical aborigine from his skeletal

remains, the general public continued to wonder as to what manner of

man he may have been. To gratify this interest, and with funds furnished

by our late lamented trustee, Gen. Edward Orton, the figure of a male

Moundbuilder, accurately reproduced through scientific methods and with

an actual mound skeleton as its base, now graces the Museum's Hall of

Ohio Prehistory. A little later, on the assumption that "it is not good

for man to live alone," our ever-generous President Johnson financed

"The Basket Maker," as a mate to the "Prehistoric Sculptor." Historical

material is being treated in a similar manner. Through the able efforts of

Dr. Harlow Lindley, the then curator of history, a Hall of Ohio History

was installed. To illustrate adequately the use of relics of pioneer days,

an actual log cabin was brought into the Museum and completely equipped

with actual furnishings of the period of 1850. This is supplemented by

period rooms from early Ohio homes.

At this point I desire to comment on a phase of the Society's activities

which in later years has assumed undreamed-of proportions. From the

first the preservation of outstanding archaeological and historic sites has

been recognized as a proper function of the Society. Prior to 1932 the

Society assumed sponsorship of such areas as the need for so doing arose,

and in an orderly manner. Since then, however, a combination of circum-

stances has resulted in inordinate growth of the park movement, as a

result of which the Society now holds a total of forty State Parks or,

more properly, State Memorials. Since park procedure is something of

an innovation without adequate precedent for its control, those concerned

therewith virtually have had to proceed along the lines of trial and error.

With the coming of federal relief activities, to which park development

is particularly suited, demand on the part of communities adjacent to exist-

ing parks for relief projects has been frequent and persistent. Further,

the general public has become definitely park-minded, one might say

competitively so--to the point where legislators, yielding to pressure from

their constituencies, have secured appropriations for purchase of areas ill-

suited for park purposes. On the whole, a situation was precipitated wherein

the Society could not exercise full control, and it is doubtful if any or-

ganization could have dealt with the complex without some attendant com-

plications. The situation as regards State Memorials is now fully under

control, and will so remain. There can be no question that the future will

justify the Society's sponsorship of archaeological and historical areas, in

which it is the pioneer in the State, and that the recent untoward features

will be looked upon as inevitable details, insignificant in comparison with

the importance of the development itself.

As to wider recognition of the Society: Through the years of its

existence the organization rightly has concentrated on the state of Ohio;

in other words, we have been intentionally provincial. This attitude, or

policy, latterly has given an impression of aloofness and self-sufficiency in

outside quarters. Feeling that the time had come when the Society might

take its place in the broader museum picture, the director sought ways and

means of effecting this. Publication of The Mound Builders helped; affiil-

iation with the various scientific organizations and associations, in most

of which we have held office, were further aids. Bringing of the American



210 OHIO ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL QUARTERLY

210     OHIO ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL QUARTERLY

 

Anthropological Association to Columbus convinced its members that

Ohio has something worth considering. The finishing touch, however, came

with the establishment, through funds provided by Trustee H. Preston

Wolfe and President Johnson, of the Lithic Laboratory for the Eastern

United States. This innovation, while primarily serving our own institu-

tion, accords a service to other museums in the area. It has been widely

publicized and has met with a surprisingly enthusiastic reception. Highest

recognition of the Museum as a whole came just recently, with the naming

of the director to the Council of the American Association of Museums,

an honor which, of course, is shared by those functions of the institution

directly in charge of Dr. Lindley.

This brief review does not admit of details. There are countless

things which we should like to say, but which we must leave unsaid. We

shall, however, make mention of some of those who have contributed so

largely to the success of the organization.  Among the individuals and

organizations which have supplied funds may be mentioned the Columbus

Dispatch, which came to our rescue substantially when important explora-

tion work otherwise would have had to cease; President Johnson and

Trustee Wolfe, Mr. Frank C. Long, Mr. Charles F. Kettering, Dr. W. K.

Moorehead, and others. Numerous members and friends have presented

specimens and collections, without which the Society would be far less

developed than at present.

Loss by death during this ten-year period, while not great in numbers,

includes several of the Society's most ardent supporters. The list includes

Claude Meeker, Myron T. Herrick, George F. Bareis, Edward Orton,

William  O. Thompson and Webb C. Hayes, trustees; James S. Hine,

curator of natural history; Edwin F. Wood, treasurer; Charles B. Gal-

breath, secretary. Our only consolation in their loss is that their successors

in every instance are men best qualified to continue their work--Edward S.

Thomas, for Prof. Hine; Oscar F. Miller, for Treasurer Wood; and Dr.

Harlow Lindley for Mr. Galbreath.

With the appointment of the present director, Dr. E. F. Greenman was

elected to succeed him as archaeologist; Dr. Greenman resigned in 1936, and

his place was filled by our present curator of archaeology, Dr. Richard G.

Morgan.

The much-needed and long-delayed Department of History was

established in 1929, with Dr. Harlow Lindley as curator: when Dr. Lind-

ley succeeded to the secretaryship, Dr. William D. Overman became

head of the Department of History; Dr. Overman, now on leave of

absence, is being ably represented by Dr. John O. Marsh.

On March 1 of this year, Mr. H. R. McPherson resigned as curator

of State Memorials, and was succeeded by Mr. Erwin C. Zepp, erstwhile

assistant curator in the division.

What of the future? Frankly, in this time of unsettlement and un-

certainty, museumists are somewhat at a loss as to just how museums should

Steer their courses. They are marking time. At the convention of the

American Association of Museums, to be held in Philadelphia in mid-May,

the matter will be discussed. As chairman of the History Section, I have

scheduled a symposium on the subject: "History Museums; Present and

Prospective Programs."

The program of our own institution is based on recognized good

museum practice and is modeled to fit our particular situation. Under it,

we have traveled a goodly distance. I have no doubt that continuance along

the same lines, with such modifications as conditions may require, will



PROCEEDINGS 211

PROCEEDINGS                          211

 

carry us still further and assure us comparable achievement. We shall

continue, I believe, to avoid overstepping the limitations within which we

are authorized and equipped to act; we shall make no attempt to be all

things to all men. The task which you have set the members of your

Museum and Library staff is, as I interpret it, just this: to discover, secure,

preserve, interpret, publish and make available for study purposes mate-

rials relating to Ohio history and prehistory. In this direction lies success;

to yield to suggestions not infrequently made by some of our well-meaning

friends and attempt more would be to duplicate what already is being done

elsewhere, and to weaken our cause correspondingly.

May I offer this brief paper as an accounting of my twenty-five years'

stewardship? For my failures, I accept the responsibility; for the success

that I have enjoyed, I have to thank the officers and trustees of this

Society for the confidence and support accorded me, and the members of

my staff, who have borne the burden of the battle.

Although not given at the meeting the Directors' Annual Re-

port with a List of Accessions appended is inserted here as a

matter of record.

 

REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR FOR THE YEAR ENDING

MARCH 31, 1938

The past year has been a notable one for the director. A trip to

Europe, during June and July of 1938 afforded an opportunity to study

methods of the so-called flint knappers at Brandon, England, and experi-

ments in flint-chipping techniques by several individuals in Paris.  The

trip was made preparatory to establishing the Lithic Laboratory for the

Eastern United States, within the Ohio State Museum, which was effected

on January 1, 1938. The Laboratory, with Mr. H. H. Ellis as Technical

Associate, has made excellent progress in assembling a bibliography on

flint-working methods and in carrying out initial experiments looking to

a solution of the aboriginal flint chipping arts.

The director, with the curators of the several departments, attended

the Convention of the American Association of Museums at New Orleans

in May, 1938, and read a paper on "State Museums." He was elected

chairman of the History Section of the American Association of Museums

and, later, a member of the Association's Council.

The several departments of the Museum cooperated in devising and

installing the display in the Ohio Building during the second year of the

Great Lakes Exposition. This display was one of the more outstanding

at the exposition and attracted a great deal of favorable comment. In

recognition of the service, the display cases, furniture and furnishings of

the Ohio Building were turned over to the Museum at the close of the

exposition.

The director and several members of the staff attended the Michigan-

Indiana-Ohio Museums Conference at Cleveland in November, and as presi-

dent of the organization, the director took an active part in the program.

The Department of Archaeology, Richard G. Morgan, curator, con-

ducted explorations at Fairport Harbor, near Painesville, and secured nu-

merous valuable specimens illustrative of the material culture of the oc-

cupants of the site, which proved to be of Erie origin. The curator of

the Department gave freely of his time in connection with the newly in-